Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
it depends on the force used not the weapon.that’s not true. It depends on the weapon used.
So then I have to assume the testimony was true.Great question. Why do you think I should know that? Grosskreutz was illegally carrying a concealed weapon, he’s not charged! Bad prosecution or damaged DA, I suppose!
I've provided a source. It's not on me to make you read it...So, continue to lie....It's settled already that you lie so, nothing from here on out is a surprise...Why should I?
It should be easy enough to find a source that says Dough boy was specifically asked to be armed security at that business in other places
That he pointed a gun at Kyle before he was shot? ok....So then I have to assume the testimony was true.
I can find no other source that refutes my statement.I've provided a source. It's not on me to make you read it...So, continue to lie....It's settled already that you lie so, nothing from here on out is a surprise...
no that Dough Boy wasn't asked to "protect" anythingThat he pointed a gun at Kyle before he was shot? ok....
I gave you one liar....I can find no other source that refutes my statement.
He was, and that is in the testimony of Nicholas Smith....no that Dough Boy wasn't asked to "protect" anything
And yours is the only one on the internet ?I gave you one liar....
But not the actual owners of the business.He was, and that is in the testimony of Nicholas Smith....
California law allows use of force in self-defense or defense of others when you reasonably believe that you or they are in imminent danger of physical harm, and that force is necessary to stop the danger. However, you may only use the degree of force reasonably necessary under the circumstances.that’s not true. It depends on the weapon used.
Because ex-employees have no reason to lie.But not the actual owners of the business.
Why should I believe an ex employee over the owners themselves?
"Rittenhouse was among a number of armed men, and at least one woman, who attested they were asked to protect Car Source the night of Aug. 25, 2020."And yours is the only one on the internet ?
I should be able to find that info elsewhere if it was legit
kyle i think. that’s pretty standard across the country in regards to self defense.California law allows use of force in self-defense or defense of others when you reasonably believe that you or they are in imminent danger of physical harm, and that force is necessary to stop the danger. However, you may only use the degree of force reasonably necessary under the circumstances.
Impeached by witnesses testimony! Again, who knows why demofks can’t figure this out! Five individuals impeached the brothers lied.So then I have to assume the testimony was true.
California law? Did I miss something? I thought we were in a thread about an event that happened in Wisconsin. Is California now allowed to make laws for other states? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm????????????California law allows use of force in self-defense or defense of others when you reasonably believe that you or they are in imminent danger of physical harm, and that force is necessary to stop the danger. However, you may only use the degree of force reasonably necessary under the circumstances.
Go tell the Wisconsin DACalifornia law allows use of force in self-defense or defense of others when you reasonably believe that you or they are in imminent danger of physical harm, and that force is necessary to stop the danger. However, you may only use the degree of force reasonably necessary under the circumstances.
Not just an ex employee but at least four others....One of which is ex military...Nah, these owners lied on the stand....And you only believe them because you will not accept the truth...And want to continue to lie about it...But not the actual owners of the business.
Why should I believe an ex employee over the owners themselves?
The photo proves the lie.Not just an ex employee but at least four others....One of which is ex military...Nah, these owners lied on the stand....And you only believe them because you will not accept the truth...And want to continue to lie about it...
You do not know that for a fact. Think about it for a moment, you're saying that there are people who are so unhinged that they go into a murderous rage when they see a gun that isn't pointed at them or even aimed at anyone? And we let these people out by themselves after dark?If Kyle Rittenhouse was unarmed, no harm would've came to him.
It was the gun that made the people around him hostile.
