Six studies that show that everything the GOP believe are wrong...

[Luddly Neddite]

A lot of what the tea party believes is wrong. Not all but a lot!

good boy!!! but can you put into words why it is wrong? How will you learn if you are afraid to try?

[MENTION=34008]EdwardBaiamonte[/MENTION] I remember when you used to say some really dumb things about China. Hmmm - Have you met [MENTION=42952]GISMYS[/MENTION]? He's a lot like you - utterly ignorant and always insulting.

He hangs out in Religion ... I think you're a match made in heaven.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

I remember when you used to say some really dumb things about China.

dear, can you name one of those things or is pure bigotry your natural liberal inclination?

 

[Misty]

858 billion tax payer dollars to buy jobs but for how long? It's a temporary fix at best.

Plus the Feds are pouring over 80 billion a month into the stock market.

It can't be sustained. It's not a fix. It's a bubble that will burst.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

858 billion tax payer dollars to buy jobs but for how long? It's a temporary fix at best.

Plus the Feds are pouring over 80 billion a month into the stock market.

It can't be sustained. It's not a fix. It's a bubble that will burst.

well, stock PE ratios are not badly out of line so I don't see a reason to panic at this point. And lets not forget they are tapering and about to raise rates too.

 

[hazlnut]

Great thread!!

 

[AmericanFirst]

Only a backwards fool believes in tea party economics. Yeah, let's cut our
-Infrastructure.
-Science institutions
-and safety net

Straight to shit. Lets become more like Africa or Mexico!

Exactly what obamashitforbrins wants to do, turn us into a third world country, and he is doing a good job so far.

 

[AmericanFirst]

A lot of what the tea party believes is wrong. Not all but a lot!

good boy!!! but can you put into words why it is wrong? How will you learn if you are afraid to try?

[MENTION=34008]EdwardBaiamonte[/MENTION] I remember when you used to say some really dumb things about China. Hmmm - Have you met [MENTION=42952]GISMYS[/MENTION]? He's a lot like you - utterly ignorant and always insulting.

He hangs out in Religion ... I think you're a match made in heaven.

This from a retarded liberal who thinks obamashitforbrains is actually doing a good job. Do you know every other stupid libtard on here? You all have your heads up obamashitforbrains arse.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Only a backwards fool believes in tea party economics. Yeah, let's cut our
-Infrastructure.
-Science institutions
-and safety net

Straight to shit. Lets become more like Africa or Mexico!

Exactly what obamashitforbrins wants to do, turn us into a third world country, and he is doing a good job so far.

yes, imagine the pure liberal ignorance, if not insanity, in forcing our corporations and jobs offshore with the highest tax rates in the world at the same time China and India are forcing our corporations and jobs offshore with the lowest wages in the world.

 

[Crystalclear]

Only a backwards fool believes in tea party economics. Yeah, let's cut our
-Infrastructure.
-Science institutions
-and safety net

Straight to shit. Lets become more like Africa or Mexico!

And you think those 3 things you listed can't be handled on a state level instead of federal level?
That will do fine and the U.S will certainly not become a third world country.
It will only mean a more balanced budget and lower deficit, just think.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Only a backwards fool believes in tea party economics. Yeah, let's cut our
-Infrastructure.
-Science institutions
-and safety net

Straight to shit. Lets become more like Africa or Mexico!

sadly, when you're $17 trillion in debt with $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities you have to cut.

Does the liberal think the more you're in debt the more you should spend?

 

[LeftofLeft]

Six Studies That Show Everything Republicans Say About the Economy is Wrong | Politics News | Rolling Stone

If an Economics publication came out and said Milli Vanilli really sang their songs, you would believe it. Quote an economic publication when posting an economic analysis. If your article had teeth, an Economic publication would have picked it up.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Only a backwards fool believes in tea party economics. Yeah, let's cut our
-Infrastructure.
-Science institutions
-and safety net

Straight to shit. Lets become more like Africa or Mexico!

And you think those 3 things you listed can't be handled on a state level instead of federal level?
That will do fine and the U.S will certainly not become a third world country.
It will only mean a more balanced budget and lower deficit, just think.

No, actually they cannot be "handled on a state level".

Take a look at the states and post which ones are indeed handling it on a state level.

The whole point of being the UNITED States of America is pool our resources have the whole better than the smaller, poorer parts.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Six Studies That Show Everything Republicans Say About the Economy is Wrong | Politics News | Rolling Stone

If an Economics publication came out and said Milli Vanilli really sang their songs, you would believe it. Quote an economic publication when posting an economic analysis. If your article had teeth, an Economic publication would have picked it up.

Then post proof that the article is incorrect.

You can't because the article is spot on.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Then post proof that the article is incorrect.

You can't because the article is spot on.

dear, article said stimulus worked
when we know raising taxes to stimulate the economy destimulates the economy more than govt spending stimulates it. There is proof but of course it means nothing to a liberal illiterate left speechless.

 

[The Rabbi]

Six Studies That Show Everything Republicans Say About the Economy is Wrong | Politics News | Rolling Stone

If an Economics publication came out and said Milli Vanilli really sang their songs, you would believe it. Quote an economic publication when posting an economic analysis. If your article had teeth, an Economic publication would have picked it up.

Then post proof that the article is incorrect.

You can't because the article is spot on.

The article is stupid, like a lot of what RS puts out. Their recent issue contained an article showing the 5 most dangerous types of guns:
Handguns
Revolver
Rifles
Shotguns
Derringers.

I didnt make that up, either. They are idiots writing for idiots. Like you.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

If an Economics publication came out and said Milli Vanilli really sang their songs, you would believe it. Quote an economic publication when posting an economic analysis. If your article had teeth, an Economic publication would have picked it up.

Then post proof that the article is incorrect.

You can't because the article is spot on.

The article is stupid, like a lot of what RS puts out. Their recent issue contained an article showing the 5 most dangerous types of guns:
Handguns
Revolver
Rifles
Shotguns
Derringers.

I didnt make that up, either. They are idiots writing for idiots. Like you.

yes its an entertainment rag. "Shut Up and Sing" is the advice they should be given, rather than print articles about serious subjects they don't understand.

 

[Mustang]

Only a backwards fool believes in tea party economics. Yeah, let's cut our
-Infrastructure.
-Science institutions
-and safety net

Straight to shit. Lets become more like Africa or Mexico!

sadly, when you're $17 trillion in debt with $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities you have to cut.

Does the liberal think the more you're in debt the more you should spend?

Which political party had the idea to cut taxes and increase spending at the same time? And after it failed in the 1980s. twenty years later they trotted that idea out yet once again with even MORE disastrous results while also putting wars on the credit card. That's how you end up with a massive debt that made Reagan's deficits look like the good ol' days.

 

[The Rabbi]

Only a backwards fool believes in tea party economics. Yeah, let's cut our
-Infrastructure.
-Science institutions
-and safety net

Straight to shit. Lets become more like Africa or Mexico!

sadly, when you're $17 trillion in debt with $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities you have to cut.

Does the liberal think the more you're in debt the more you should spend?

Which political party had the idea to cut taxes and increase spending at the same time? And after it failed in the 1980s. twenty years later they trotted that idea out yet once again with even MORE disastrous results while also putting wars on the credit card. That's how you end up with a massive debt that made Reagan's deficits look like the good ol' days.

Obama's deficits are bigger than Reagan's entire budgets.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Only a backwards fool believes in tea party economics. Yeah, let's cut our
-Infrastructure.
-Science institutions
-and safety net

Straight to shit. Lets become more like Africa or Mexico!

sadly, when you're $17 trillion in debt with $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities you have to cut.

Does the liberal think the more you're in debt the more you should spend?

Which political party had the idea to cut taxes and increase spending at the same time? And after it failed in the 1980s. twenty years later they trotted that idea out yet once again with even MORE disastrous results while also putting wars on the credit card. That's how you end up with a massive debt that made Reagan's deficits look like the good ol' days.

the issue was whether you cut back when you are $17 trillion in debt with $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities. Do you?? Do you shut down a tiny part of govt as Republicans did or do you borrow as if there is no tomorrow for more crippling liberal welfare programs to buy votes!

 

[The Rabbi]

sadly, when you're $17 trillion in debt with $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities you have to cut.

Does the liberal think the more you're in debt the more you should spend?

Which political party had the idea to cut taxes and increase spending at the same time? And after it failed in the 1980s. twenty years later they trotted that idea out yet once again with even MORE disastrous results while also putting wars on the credit card. That's how you end up with a massive debt that made Reagan's deficits look like the good ol' days.

the issue was whether you cut back when you are $17 trillion in debt with $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities. Do you?? Do you shut down a tiny part of govt as Republicans did or do you borrow as if there is no tomorrow for more crippling liberal welfare programs to buy votes!

You deflect to events that happened 30 years ago. At least if you're a lib on this board.