So Herr Mueller will investigate a 150k about a guy who gave millions to the clintons

[tyroneweaver]

BREAKING: Mueller Investigating $150K Donation To Trump From Man Who Gave Clintons Millions

2 teir justice system continues

 

[The Original Tree]

He needs fired. If Mueller's Investigation had some balance like he was Investigating Skirpal, Steele, Fusion GPS, COIE Lawfirm and Clinton's role in procuring and disseminating Russian Propagand through our Government, I'd feel like he was running an Honest and Impartial Investigation, but he is not.

It's almost like he is trying to get fired he has violated so many Constitutional Protections during his Investigation.

And again, people need to wake up and realize the connection between Steele & Skirpal who was The Russian Agent working with Steele on the Fusion GPS Dossier, and why Skirpal and his Daughter were poisoned with a Nerve Agent shortly after it was revealed Strozk met with Steele and Skirpal in the UK.

They also need to look in to The Pakistani Hackers relationship with Seth Rich, and the fact both Seth Rich and Kim.com both have made Public Statements that they got their data from Seth Rich, and not any Foreign State Actors or anyone associated with Russia.

Both Assange and Kim.com said they are willing to testify to this fact. Mueller is not interested in facts though.

Mueller won't look in to anything actually dealing with Russia, like The Fusion GPS, or verifying where Podesta's Emails came from, or Fusion GPS, Clinton, The DNC and COIE Lawfirm.

Fire him and Rosenstein Yesterday.

Spy vs. Spy: Skirpal, Strozk & Steele

 

[tyroneweaver]

if mueller can make it look sinister that's all he cares about

 

[DrLove]

So now we're going to compare the money given to the now defunct Trump Foundation to the Clinton Foundation?

Don't go there - The Clinton Foundation has A ratings -

Clinton Foundation | Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch
Charity Navigator - Rating for The Clinton Foundation

As we all should know by now, Trump Foundation was a self-dealing scam used to bribe state AGs into not investigating him (see Pam Bondi), pay off lawsuits, and buy sports memorabilia and ginormous portraits of himself.

 

[CHAZBUKOWSKI]

BREAKING: Mueller Investigating $150K Donation To Trump From Man Who Gave Clintons Millions

2 teir justice system continues

Obama, Clinton, Fake news!!! Holy shit! You and your fellow fucktards are a pathetic and predictable lot

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

BREAKING: Mueller Investigating $150K Donation To Trump From Man Who Gave Clintons Millions

2 teir justice system continues

If it was an improper donation, both could and should be prosecuted. Was his donation to Hillary improper? Does anyone have the balls to find out?

 

[tyroneweaver]

So now we're going to compare the money given to the now defunct Trump Foundation to the Clinton Foundation?

Don't go there - The Clinton Foundation has A ratings -

Clinton Foundation | Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch
Charity Navigator - Rating for The Clinton Foundation

As we all know by now, Trump Foundation was a self-dealing scam used to bribe state AGs into not investigating him (see Pam Bondi), pay off lawsuits, and buy sports memorabilia and ginormous portraits of himself.

So now we're going to compare the money given to the now defunct Trump Foundation to the Clinton Foundation?

Don't go there - The Clinton Foundation has A ratings -

Clinton Foundation | Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch
Charity Navigator - Rating for The Clinton Foundation

As we all should know by now, Trump Foundation was a self-dealing scam used to bribe state AGs into not investigating him (see Pam Bondi), pay off lawsuits, and buy sports memorabilia and ginormous portraits of himself.

ya dems good gop bad
same ole BS.

 

[Valerie]

9-13.000 - Obtaining Evidence | USAM | Department of Justice

U.S. Attorneys » Resources » U.S. Attorneys' Manual » Title 9: Criminal

9-13.420 - Searches of Premises of Subject Attorneys
NOTE: For purposes of this policy only, "subject" includes an attorney who is a "suspect, subject or target," or an attorney who is related by blood or marriage to a suspect, or who is believed to be in possession of contraband or the fruits or instrumentalities of a crime. This policy also applies to searches of business organizations where such searches involve materials in the possession of individuals serving in the capacity of legal advisor to the organization. Search warrants for "documentary materials" held by an attorney who is a "disinterested third party" (that is, any attorney who is not a subject) are governed by 28 C.F.R. 59.4 and USAM 9-19.221 et seq. See also 42 U.S.C. Section 2000aa-11(a)(3).

There are occasions when effective law enforcement may require the issuance of a search warrant for the premises of an attorney who is a subject of an investigation, and who also is or may be engaged in the practice of law on behalf of clients. Because of the potential effects of this type of search on legitimate attorney-client relationships and because of the possibility that, during such a search, the government may encounter material protected by a legitimate claim of privilege, it is important that close control be exercised over this type of search. Therefore, the following guidelines should be followed with respect to such searches:

1. Alternatives to Search Warrants. In order to avoid impinging on valid attorney-client relationships, prosecutors are expected to take the least intrusive approach consistent with vigorous and effective law enforcement when evidence is sought from an attorney actively engaged in the practice of law. Consideration should be given to obtaining information from other sources or through the use of a subpoena, unless such efforts could compromise the criminal investigation or prosecution, or could result in the obstruction or destruction of evidence, or would otherwise be ineffective. NOTE: Prior approval must be obtained from the Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division to issue a subpoena to an attorney relating to the representation of a client. See USAM 9-13.410.
2. Authorization by United States Attorney or Assistant Attorney General. No application for such a search warrant may be made to a court without the express approval of the United States Attorney or pertinent Assistant Attorney General. Ordinarily, authorization of an application for such a search warrant is appropriate when there is a strong need for the information or material and less intrusive means have been considered and rejected.
3. Prior Consultation. In addition to obtaining approval from the United States Attorney or the pertinent Assistant Attorney General, and before seeking judicial authorization for the search warrant, the federal prosecutor must consult with the Criminal Division. NOTE: Attorneys are encouraged to consult with the Criminal Division as early as possible regarding a possible search of an attorney's office. Telephone No. (202) 305-4023; Fax No. (202) 305-0562.
   To facilitate the consultation, the prosecutor should submit the attached form (see Criminal Resource Manual at 265) containing relevant information about the proposed search along with a draft copy of the proposed search warrant, affidavit in support thereof, and any special instructions to the searching agents regarding search procedures and procedures to be followed to ensure that the prosecution team is not "tainted" by any privileged material inadvertently seized during the search. This information should be submitted to the Criminal Division through the Office of Enforcement Operations. This procedure does not preclude any United States Attorney or Assistant Attorney General from discussing the matter personally with the Assistant Attorney General of the Criminal Division.
   
   If exigent circumstances prevent such prior consultation, the Criminal Division should be notified of the search as promptly as possible. In all cases, the Criminal Division should be provided as promptly as possible with a copy of the judicially authorized search warrant, search warrant affidavit, and any special instructions to the searching agents.
   
   The Criminal Division is committed to ensuring that consultation regarding attorney search warrant requests will not delay investigations. Timely processing will be assisted if the Criminal Division is provided as much information about the search as early as possible. The Criminal Division should also be informed of any deadlines.
   
   
4. Safeguarding Procedures and Contents of the Affidavit. Procedures should be designed to ensure that privileged materials are not improperly viewed, seized or retained during the course of the search. While the procedures to be followed should be tailored to the facts of each case and the requirements and judicial preferences and precedents of each district, in all cases a prosecutor must employ adequate precautions to ensure that the materials are reviewed for privilege claims and that any privileged documents are returned to the attorney from whom they were seized.
5. Conducting the Search. The search warrant should be drawn as specifically as possible, consistent with the requirements of the investigation, to minimize the need to search and review privileged material to which no exception applies.
   While every effort should be made to avoid viewing privileged material, the search may require limited review of arguably privileged material to ascertain whether the material is covered by the warrant. Therefore, to protect the attorney-client privilege and to ensure that the investigation is not compromised by exposure to privileged material relating to the investigation or to defense strategy, a "privilege team" should be designated, consisting of agents and lawyers not involved in the underlying investigation.
   
   Instructions should be given and thoroughly discussed with the privilege team prior to the search. The instructions should set forth procedures designed to minimize the intrusion into privileged material, and should ensure that the privilege team does not disclose any information to the investigation/prosecution team unless and until so instructed by the attorney in charge of the privilege team. Privilege team lawyers should be available either on or off-site, to advise the agents during the course of the search, but should not participate in the search itself.
   
   The affidavit in support of the search warrant may attach any written instructions or, at a minimum, should generally state the government's intention to employ procedures designed to ensure that attorney-client privileges are not violated.
   
   If it is anticipated that computers will be searched or seized, prosecutors are expected to follow the procedures set forth in the current edition of Searching and Seizing Computers, published by CCIPS.
   
   
6. Review Procedures. The following review procedures should be discussed prior to approval of any warrant, consistent with the practice in your district, the circumstances of the investigation and the volume of materials seized.
   • Who will conduct the review, i.e., a privilege team, a judicial officer, or a special master.
   • Whether all documents will be submitted to a judicial officer or special master or only those which a privilege team has determined to be arguably privileged or arguably subject to an exception to the privilege.
   • Whether copies of all seized materials will be provided to the subject attorney (or a legal representative) in order that: a) disruption of the law firm's operation is minimized; and b) the subject is afforded an opportunity to participate in the process of submitting disputed documents to the court by raising specific claims of privilege. To the extent possible, providing copies of seized records is encouraged, where such disclosure will not impede or obstruct the investigation.
   • Whether appropriate arrangements have been made for storage and handling of electronic evidence and procedures developed for searching computer data (i.e., procedures which recognize the universal nature of computer seizure and are designed to avoid review of materials implicating the privilege of innocent clients).

These guidelines are set forth solely for the purpose of internal Department of Justice guidance. They are not intended to, do not, and may not be relied upon to create any rights, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by any party in any matter, civil or criminal, nor do they place any limitations on otherwise lawful investigative or litigative prerogatives of the Department of Justice.

See the Criminal Resource Manual at 265, for an attorney office search warrant form.

[updated October 2012] [cited in Criminal Resource Manual 265]

 

[RodISHI]

BREAKING: Mueller Investigating $150K Donation To Trump From Man Who Gave Clintons Millions

2 teir justice system continues

I was thinking when that name came up it had stronger ties to the Clinton parade than Trump. I don't hold much hope out though because the tread seems to be run time limits out on bigger politically connected crooks rather than to actually do some about them.

 

[The Original Tree]

So let's get this straight.

Mueller again, IGNORES anything to do with The Clintons, and instead tries to focus in on this DONATION, and also LEAKS that he is looking at it?
Freaking most Leaking Investigation Ever. Which tells me it is Nothing But a Propaganda Campaign and Witch Hunt, paid for The Dems, ordered by The Democrats.

But never mind what you read below.... Never happened, right Herr, Mueller?

"The New York Times reported in 2016 that Pinchuk "has directed between $10 million and $25 million to the [Clinton] foundation," and that he also "lent his private plane to the Clintons and traveled to Los Angeles in 2011 to attend Mr. Clinton’s star-studded 65th birthday celebration."

The Times report also notes that Schoen, who was a former political consultant for Bill Clinton, arranged approximately a dozen meetings with Hillary Clinton's State Department on behalf of or with Pinchuk between September 2011 and November 2012 to discuss political problems in Ukraine.

A January 2017 report from Politico alleged that Ukrainian government officials worked to boost Hillary Clinton and hurt then-candidate Donald Trump by "helping to force Manafort’s resignation and advancing the narrative that Trump’s campaign was deeply connected to Ukraine’s foe to the east, Russia."

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Interesting!

Wikileaks: Clinton Foundation's 'Pay-To-Play' With Ukraine Oligarch To Show Support For Coup

 

[MrShangles]

The trumpanzees are running scared....scared...scared.

You'd think they'd welcome anything that could exonerate their orange god.

Yes Trumpsters are scared of a witch hunt, you can find something criminal on anyone even you, if you dig deep enough


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[mudwhistle]

BREAKING: Mueller Investigating $150K Donation To Trump From Man Who Gave Clintons Millions

2 teir justice system continues

Yeah, but that's different.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

BREAKING: Mueller Investigating $150K Donation To Trump From Man Who Gave Clintons Millions

2 teir justice system continues

delusional ignoramus trolls continue!

my my.
A personal attack. Typical.

funny, you have no problem personally attacking highly esteemed federal agents.

if the shoe fits, wear it... do you need a tissue, snowflake?

How bout you follow the forum rules ya twat. Where was the on topic content in that post?

 

[The Original Tree]

Let's go over this one more time for the Mentally and Intellectually Challenged!

BREAKING: Mueller Investigating $150K Donation To Trump From Man Who Gave Clintons Millions

A January 2017 report from Politico alleged that Ukrainian government officials worked to boost Hillary Clinton and hurt then-candidate Donald Trump by "helping to force Manafort’s resignation and advancing the narrative that Trump’s campaign was deeply connected to Ukraine’s foe to the east, Russia."

And looking at that Above Snip of this article, let me REMIND EVERYONE AGAIN, who secretly met with UKRANIAN AGENTS in THE UKRANIAN EMBASSY to begin Plotting a SMEAR CAMPAIGN against DONALD TRUMP?

The Clinton Campaign!

Did the Clinton Campaign Really Collude With Ukraine?

Did Ukraine try to interfere in the 2016 election on Clinton's behalf?

Rep. Adam Schiff: Democrats Meeting Ukrainians "Different Degree Of Involvement" Than Trump-Russia

Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire

 

[The Original Tree]

MORE LIES.. Read between The Lines Kiddies. We know for a Fact The Clinton Campaign met with Ukrainian Agents in The Ukraine Embassy to kick off their smear campaign against The President.

THE BACK STORY: HOW THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN SOLICITED FOREIGN AGENTS AND GOVERNMENTS TO HELP THEM IN THE 2016 ELECTION:

Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents (Portions of The Fusion GPS Dossier) implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.

“It was clear that they were supporting Hillary Clinton’s candidacy,” Artemenko said. “They did everything from organizing meetings with the Clinton team, to publicly supporting her, to criticizing Trump.

RUSSIAN STOOGES IN THE UKRAINE:

Ukraine’s minister of internal affairs, Arsen Avakov, even joined in, trashing Trump on Twitter in July as a “clown” and asserting that Trump is “an even bigger danger to the US than terrorism.”

So did Leshchenko, who daily made accusations against the Trump Campaign after meeting with Clinton Campaign Officials.

At the time, Leshchenko suggested that his motivation was partly to undermine Trump.

“For me, it was important to show not only the corruption aspect, but that he is [a] pro-Russian candidate who can break the geopolitical balance in the world,” Leshchenko told the Financial Times about two weeks after his news conference. The newspaper noted that Trump’s candidacy had spurred “Kiev’s wider political leadership to do something they would never have attempted before: intervene, however indirectly, in a U.S. election,” and the story quoted Leshchenko asserting that the majority of Ukraine’s politicians are “on Hillary Clinton’s side.”

THE CONDUIT FOR UKRAINIAN PROPAGANDA FROM RUSSIAN LOYALISTS: May I have a CHULUPA? :

A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials (THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN & UKRAINIAN AGENTS) in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

The Ukrainian antipathy for Trump’s team — and alignment with Clinton’s — can be traced back to late 2013. That’s when the country’s president, Viktor Yanukovych, whom Manafort had been advising, abruptly backed out of a European Union pact linked to anti-corruption reforms. Instead, Yanukovych entered into a multibillion-dollar bailout agreement with Russia, sparking protests across Ukraine and prompting Yanukovych to flee the country to Russia under Putin’s protection.

In the ensuing crisis, Russian troops moved into the Ukrainian territory of Crimea, and Manafort dropped off the radar.

Manafort’s work for Yanukovych caught the attention of a veteran Democratic operative named Alexandra Chalupa, who had worked in the White House Office of Public Liaison during the Clinton administration. Chalupa went on to work as a staffer, then as a consultant, for Democratic National Committee. The DNC paid her $412,000 from 2004 to June 2016, according to Federal Election Commission records, though she also was paid by other clients during that time, (FUSION GPS & COIE Lawfirm) including Democratic campaigns and the DNC’s arm for engaging expatriate Democrats around the world.

A daughter of Ukrainian immigrants who maintains strong ties to the Ukrainian-American diaspora and the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine, Chalupa, a lawyer by training, in 2014 was doing pro bono work for another client (Steele's Orbis Intelligence Firm) interested in the Ukrainian crisis and began researching Manafort’s role in Yanukovych’s rise, as well as his ties to the pro-Russian oligarchs who funded Yanukovych’s political party.

A former DNC staffer described their exchange initially with Chalupa as an “informal conversation,” saying “‘briefing’ makes it sound way too formal,” and adding, “We were not directing or driving her work on this.” Yet, the former DNC staffer and the operative familiar with the situation agreed that with the DNC’s encouragement, Chalupa asked embassy staff to try to arrange an interview in which Poroshenko might discuss Manafort’s ties to Yanukovych.

While the embassy declined that request, officials there became “helpful” in Chalupa’s efforts, she said, explaining that she traded information and leads with them. “If I asked a question, they would provide guidance, or if there was someone I needed to follow up with.” But she stressed, “There were no documents given, nothing like that.”

RUSSIAN LOYALISTS IN THE UKRAINIAN EMBASSY:

But Andrii Telizhenko, who worked as a political officer in the Ukrainian Embassy under Shulyar, said she instructed him to help Chalupa research connections between Trump, Manafort and Russia. “Oksana said that if I had any information, or knew other people who did, then I should contact Chalupa,” recalled Telizhenko, who is now a political consultant in Kiev. “They were coordinating an investigation with the Hillary team on Paul Manafort with Alexandra Chalupa,” he said, adding “Oksana was keeping it all quiet,” but “the embassy worked very closely with” Chalupa.

In fact, sources familiar with the effort say that Shulyar specifically called Telizhenko into a meeting with Chalupa to provide an update on an American media outlet’s ongoing investigation into Manafort.

Telizhenko recalled that Chalupa told him and Shulyar that, “If we can get enough information on Paul [Manafort] or Trump’s involvement with Russia, she can get a hearing in Congress by September.”

Chalupa confirmed that, a week after Manafort’s hiring was announced, she discussed the possibility of a congressional investigation with a foreign policy legislative assistant in the office of Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio), who co-chairs the Congressional Ukrainian Caucus. But, Chalupa said, “It didn’t go anywhere.”

Asked about the effort, the Kaptur legislative assistant called it a “touchy subject” in an internal email to colleagues that was accidentally forwarded to Politico.

Kaptur’s office later emailed an official statement explaining that the lawmaker is backing a bill to create an independent commission to investigate “possible outside interference in our elections.” The office added “at this time, the evidence related to this matter points to Russia, but Congresswoman Kaptur is concerned with any evidence of foreign entities interfering in our elections.”

A DNC official (WASSERMAN SCHULTZ OF PAKISTANI HACKER FAME) stressed that Chalupa was a consultant paid to do outreach for the party’s political department, not a researcher. She undertook her investigations into Trump, Manafort and Russia on her own, and the party did not incorporate her findings in its dossiers on the subjects, the official said, stressing that the DNC had been building robust research books on Trump and his ties to Russia long before Chalupa began sounding alarms.

Clinton’s campaign seized on the Manafort Ukraine Russia Narrative to advance Democrats’ argument that Trump’s campaign was closely linked to Russia. The ledger represented “more troubling connections between Donald Trump’s team and pro-Kremlin elements in Ukraine,” Robby Mook, Clinton’s campaign manager, said in a statement. He demanded that Trump “disclose campaign chair Paul Manafort’s and all other campaign employees’ and advisers’ ties to Russian or pro-Kremlin entities, including whether any of Trump’s employees or advisers are currently representing and or being paid by them.”


THE ALLEGED LEDGERS:

A former Ukrainian investigative journalist and current parliamentarian named Serhiy Leshchenko, who was elected in 2014 as part of Poroshenko’s party, held a news conference to highlight the ledgers, and to urge Ukrainian and American law enforcement to aggressively investigate Manafort.

Manafort denied receiving any off-books cash from Yanukovych’s Party of Regions, and said that he had never been contacted about the ledger by Ukrainian or American investigators, later telling POLITICO “I was just caught in the crossfire.”

THE ACCUSATION:

According to a series of memos reportedly compiled for Trump’s opponents by a former British intelligence agent (Christopher Steele assisted by Skirpal), Yanukovych, in a secret meeting with Putin on the day after the Times published its report, admitted that he had authorized “substantial kickback payments to Manafort.” But according to the report, which was published Tuesday by BuzzFeed but remains unverified. Yanukovych assured Putin “that there was no documentary trail left behind which could provide clear evidence of this” — an alleged statement that seemed to implicitly question the authenticity of the ledger.

THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE LEDGER:

Valentyn Nalyvaichenko, a Ukrainian former diplomat who served as the country’s head of security under Poroshenko but is now affiliated with a leading opponent of Poroshenko, said it was fishy that “only one part of the black ledger appeared.” He asked, “Where is the handwriting analysis?” and said it was “crazy” to announce an investigation based on the ledgers.

Some Poroshenko critics have gone further, suggesting that the bureau is backing away from investigating because the ledgers might have been doctored or even forged.

The scrutiny around the ledgers — combined with that from other stories about his Ukraine work — proved too much for Manafort, and he stepped down from the Trump campaign less than a week after the Times story.


TREE:

Clinton, with The Help of Obama, a British and Russian Spy, and Ukrainian Agents set the whole thing up all along.

Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire

 

[Auld Phart]

MOD NOTE

Assorted posts deleted because of personal attacks, lack of content, trolling.

This is Zone 2.

some of you either don't know the rules, or you are ignoring them.

This would be a good time to change your ways.

 

[bendog]

BREAKING: Mueller Investigating $150K Donation To Trump From Man Who Gave Clintons Millions

2 teir justice system continues

I'm sure glad I didn't vote for Crooked Hillary

 

[Siete]

heres how it works for everyone of you dumbshits -

Trump is under investigation

Clinton isnt under investigation.

now use all of your powers to try and figure that out.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

MOD NOTE

Assorted posts deleted because of personal attacks, lack of content, trolling.

This is Zone 2.

some of you either don't know the rules, or you are ignoring them.

This would be a good time to change your ways.

I will keep that in mind. Until my next bender of course. Preemptive apologies