Colin norris
Platinum Member
- Apr 25, 2021
- 10,427
- 4,109
Because medical information is private.
Yeah sure it is. If he refused to show me proof, I would sack him.
Then he can have all the privacy he wants. Beat that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because medical information is private.
Sure you can. I’ve had to provide my vaccination status for every job I’ve had in healthcare.There is because you cannot demand proof of it
I never said the world is coming to an end.Been there, done that.
Stick your head outside of there sometime and you'll see the world isn't coming to an end.
You’re an idiot.Civil rights
As we have said it can be a condition if being hired but you cannot be fired for refusing.Why can't I demand proof?
You want to work here, show proof or go somewhere else and infect people.
How's that sound comrade?
You might like to have a no whites hiring policy and they both would not work equally wellYeah sure it is. If he refused to show me proof, I would sack him.
Then he can have all the privacy he wants. Beat that.
Nobody has vaccination proofs from 50+ years agoSure you can. I’ve had to provide my vaccination status for every job I’ve had in healthcare.
As we have said it can be a condition if being hired but you cannot be fired for refusing.
You might like to have a no whites hiring policy and they both would not work equally well
No I’m very clear. You cannot fire an otherwise stellar employee because he won’t ingest an experimental vaccine and you cannot require the proof of such or be fired.If he was working for me, I can do what I like with him. You're having a little trouble understanding this.
One minute you're defending the rights of the worker who is probably a Democrat while simultaneously trying to justify him not getting jabbed.
You sound confused.
Go ahead.Yeah sure it is. If he refused to show me proof, I would sack him.
Then he can have all the privacy he wants. Beat that.
I’m going with dispensing of the fallacy that an employer can fire an otherwise stellar employee because he won’t get vaccinated nor if the employee refuses to provide a vaccination card.Who mentioned colour?
Where are you going with this?
I know what you said.I never said the world is coming to an end.
I just said this is far worse than any influenza.
No I’m very clear. You cannot fire an otherwise stellar employee because he won’t ingest an experimental vaccine and you cannot require the proof of such or be fired.
Can you make him get a limb amputated, then?If he was working for me, I can do what I like with him. You're having a little trouble understanding this.
One minute you're defending the rights of the worker who is probably a Democrat while simultaneously trying to justify him not getting jabbed.
You sound confused.
Go ahead.
I'm pretty sure you'll get sued. And even if you win, you lose money.
It's not experimental, it's proven to be saving lives. I can't ask for his ID and other items.
That's irrelevant. I can and will sack if I chose and there's nothing anyone can do about it.
You can bleat your bias on this forever but if it's my business and don't want him destroying it, he's like last week's pay. He's gone.
Know the difference between “destroying unions” vs. “reigning in Unions”. Left unchecked, unions try to save jobs by mandating multiple trucks carrying individual products on the same route. Contrast the more sensible option of multiple products on the same truck or fewer trucks on the same route.Kind of ironic that the rightwing has worked for decades to destroy unions. And now that they need one . . .