Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So if I say I was abducted by Martians and probed anally, but no one saw anything, that means the FBI should investigate it?No one believes her story, dumbfuck. She isn't credible. Are there any witnesses to this event? She claims there were three other boys involved. Does she name them? No. There were plenty of other people in the house. Have any of them supported her story? No. Can you be locked into a bedroom when the latch is on the inside? No.The fact that even some women on here think it is no big deal that some drunk teenage boy tried to rape her, just goes to show why she didn't come out with this story back when it happened. She'd have been shunned by not only all the friends of Kavanaugh, but probably a large number of girls in her school that thought she was just trying to get attention or something.
So when things happen that there are no witnesses, nothing happened? Do we just say, "Fuck it!" and not investigate things unless there was witnesses? ... you're lack of intelligence continues to amaze. What makes Kavanaugh more credible than her? Oh yeah... you said because she saw a therapist. Do you have a clue how fucking stupid THAT statement is?
Kavanaugh accuser breaks silence over sexual misconduct allegations
The woman who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct has identified herself and is speaking publicly about her allegations against Kavanaugh for the first time, according to a Washington Post investigation published Sunday.
Christine Blasey Ford, now a 51-year-old professor at Palo Alto University in California, described an incident between the two in high school, alleging that Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed one summer in the 1980s and forced himself on her.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, Kavanaugh LIED to The US Senate
We all know who will OK Kavanaugh 'the LIAR' = Republicans
Was Kavanaugh 'under oath' when he lied to the US Senate?
This one sentence proves the gal is lying, a woman doesn't forget the date something like that happens, much less the freaking year. Just a commie professor trying to take one for the team.one summer in the 1980s
.
She didn't. You need to read more news than just one article. Not only for the purpose of becoming more knowledgeable on the subject... but so that you don't read just a biased source.
Dumbasses never realize when they are making fools of themselves, and they never learn.Lewdog thinks he's winning in the trolling department.
Lewdog thinks he's winning in the trolling department.
I did not know that. I believed Anita Hill and I felt really bad for her, the walloping she took from Republicans and men in general, for speaking up.Anita Hill was telling the truth but in those days, it was okay to behave as C. Thomas did. They were both adults, though, and he was her boss.At the least the filthy dishonest Democrats are not coming up with the "pubic hair on a Coke can" lie this time.
This time it is the "he tried to rape me in High School" lie.
I think part of the reason I am so hesitant on this accusation is that they were both kids and we grow up.
There were also THREE other women waiting to testify against Thomas, but Biden chickened out after Thomas made his "high-tech lynching" comment. The remaining THREE women were never called to testify. Hence, pervert Thomas was confirmed. Do Republicans really want another pervert on SCOTUS? We'll see...
This Kavanaugh thing seems really different to me. Maybe I'm wrong, but she seems to have had a big overreaction to the incident, as well as the fact that they were both kids. Who is the same person they were when they were 17? It just isn't apples and apples, as far as I'm concerned.
Attempted rape is attempted rape - even at 17. Kavanaugh can either confirm or deny the event. Either way, it should be thoroughly investigated - especially if he continues to deny it happened.
They will play this up to the vote.........demanding it be stopped.........it's a Hail Mary pass....and that's all.Dumbasses never realize when they are making fools of themselves, and they never learn.Lewdog thinks he's winning in the trolling department.
Kavanaugh accuser breaks silence over sexual misconduct allegations
The woman who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct has identified herself and is speaking publicly about her allegations against Kavanaugh for the first time, according to a Washington Post investigation published Sunday.
Christine Blasey Ford, now a 51-year-old professor at Palo Alto University in California, described an incident between the two in high school, alleging that Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed one summer in the 1980s and forced himself on her.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, Kavanaugh LIED to The US Senate
We all know who will OK Kavanaugh 'the LIAR' = Republicans
Was Kavanaugh 'under oath' when he lied to the US Senate?
This one sentence proves the gal is lying, a woman doesn't forget the date something like that happens, much less the freaking year. Just a commie professor trying to take one for the team.one summer in the 1980s
.
She didn't. You need to read more news than just one article. Not only for the purpose of becoming more knowledgeable on the subject... but so that you don't read just a biased source.
I quoted the fucking OP, if you want to dispute his link feel free to post a competing link.
.
This whole attempt to stop the vote is a joke..........it's not going to work......good luck.......you'll need it.Lewdog thinks he's winning in the trolling department.
It's not trolling. Bripat is making some of the most ridiculously stupid statements I have ever seen. I mean not even in the same zipcode as previous ones.
So if I say I was abducted by Martians and probed anally, but no one saw anything, that means the FBI should investigate it?No one believes her story, dumbfuck. She isn't credible. Are there any witnesses to this event? She claims there were three other boys involved. Does she name them? No. There were plenty of other people in the house. Have any of them supported her story? No. Can you be locked into a bedroom when the latch is on the inside? No.The fact that even some women on here think it is no big deal that some drunk teenage boy tried to rape her, just goes to show why she didn't come out with this story back when it happened. She'd have been shunned by not only all the friends of Kavanaugh, but probably a large number of girls in her school that thought she was just trying to get attention or something.
So when things happen that there are no witnesses, nothing happened? Do we just say, "Fuck it!" and not investigate things unless there was witnesses? ... you're lack of intelligence continues to amaze. What makes Kavanaugh more credible than her? Oh yeah... you said because she saw a therapist. Do you have a clue how fucking stupid THAT statement is?
30 years as a judge with an impeccable record makes Kavanaugh more credible.
A woman who can't escape from a room locked from the inside isn't exactly credible. At the very least, she's a clueless dumbass.
Kavanaugh accuser comes forward, details alleged sexual assault
Christine Blasey Ford, a professor at Palo Alto University, told the Post that she decided to come forward because she felt her "civic responsibility" began "outweighing [her] anguish and terror about retaliation." Ford does not remember all of the details of the alleged incident — such as the exact time or location — but says she took a lie detector test administered by a former FBI agent in August, which determined she was telling the truth when she said her account of that night was accurate.
OK Republicans; go ahead and get another Roy Mooreon 'your' side.
If Kavanaugh is confirmed we shall address him as 'Judge Rape'
So she went through a traumatic experience but can't tell when or where it happened? But she isn't come forward because she is afraid that a man who has zero history in violent behavior is going to retaliate?
why are you finding this at all credible?
this just goes to show what lengths democrats will go to kill their children
so, sexual assault is funny?
I stated an irrefutable fact, moron. It used to be that if you got to a certain point, like having all her cloths off, that if she said "no" at that point, it didn't constitute rape.Lewdog thinks he's winning in the trolling department.
It's not trolling. Bripat is making some of the most ridiculously stupid statements I have ever seen. I mean not even in the same zipcode as previous ones.
I can 't find her pic. Can you post a link?She’s fugly.
If he was ever attracted to her I don’t want him on the Supreme Court.
I stated an irrefutable fact, moron. It used to be that if you got to a certain point, like having all her cloths off, that if she said "no" at that point, it didn't constitute rape.Lewdog thinks he's winning in the trolling department.
It's not trolling. Bripat is making some of the most ridiculously stupid statements I have ever seen. I mean not even in the same zipcode as previous ones.
How old are you? You must be pretty young. The "no means no" meme didn't exist in those days. If you think current norms have always been in place, you are either extremely naive, a liar or a dumbfuck. I think you're all three.
Yeah, because Lewdog, the relentless detail cop, will hound you to your grave if you get one trivial detail wrong.Kavanaugh accuser breaks silence over sexual misconduct allegations
The woman who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct has identified herself and is speaking publicly about her allegations against Kavanaugh for the first time, according to a Washington Post investigation published Sunday.
Christine Blasey Ford, now a 51-year-old professor at Palo Alto University in California, described an incident between the two in high school, alleging that Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed one summer in the 1980s and forced himself on her.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, Kavanaugh LIED to The US Senate
We all know who will OK Kavanaugh 'the LIAR' = Republicans
Was Kavanaugh 'under oath' when he lied to the US Senate?
This one sentence proves the gal is lying, a woman doesn't forget the date something like that happens, much less the freaking year. Just a commie professor trying to take one for the team.one summer in the 1980s
.
She didn't. You need to read more news than just one article. Not only for the purpose of becoming more knowledgeable on the subject... but so that you don't read just a biased source.
I quoted the fucking OP, if you want to dispute his link feel free to post a competing link.
.
That's your problem... you shouldn't be putting words to your name if you aren't going to take a minute to do a little of your own research to check the source. It takes all of a minute or so.
Anita Hill was telling the truth but in those days, it was okay to behave as C. Thomas did. They were both adults, though, and he was her boss.
I think part of the reason I am so hesitant on this accusation is that they were both kids and we grow up.
There were also THREE other women waiting to testify against Thomas, but Biden chickened out after Thomas made his "high-tech lynching" comment. The remaining THREE women were never called to testify. Hence, pervert Thomas was confirmed. Do Republicans really want another pervert on SCOTUS? We'll see...
I'd think you'd source this claim.
It's easy to "source", sparky. I'm 72 and watched it live. Google it...
Not the way this works Shitting Bull. You made the claim so you can source it, right?
Okay...
About 9,770 results (0.16 seconds)
- Clarence Thomas High-Tech Lynching - YouTube
- 313k - similar pages
Mar 18, 2008 ...Clarence Thomas responds to sexual harassment accusations by Anita Hill in front of the Senate Judiciary committee.
- Flashback: Clarence Thomas responds to Anita Hill - YouTube
- 202k - similar pages
Apr 13, 2016 ...Flashback: Clarence Thomas responds to Anita Hill ... Clarence Thomas responded, calling his nomination hearing "a high-tech lynching." ...- Clarence Thomas - Wikiquote
Clarence Thomas - Wikiquote - 87k - similar pages
Clarence Thomas(born 23 June 1948) is an American judge and the ... And from my standpoint, as a black American, it is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks ...- ?A high-tech lynching for uppity blacks??-Clarence Thomas ...
“A high-tech lynching for uppity blacks…”-Clarence Thomas, October 11, 1991 » IAN C. FRIEDMAN – WORDS MATTER - 70k - similar pages
Nov 3, 2011 ... Just over twenty years ago, the most compelling episode of He Said, She Said in U.S. history gripped the nation. Taking place in the unlikely ...- How racism and sexism shaped the Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill ...
How Clarence Thomas used racism to deny he sexually harassed Anita Hill - 193k -similar pages
Apr 16, 2016 ... "A high-tech lynching for uppity blacks". President George H.W. Bush meets with Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas in October 1991.- Clarence Thomas
Clarence Thomas - 6k - similar pages
Thomas had chaired the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) from 1982 ... Clarence Thomas declares himself the victim of a high-tech lynching .- Clarence Thomas - Wikipedia
Clarence Thomas - Wikipedia - 448k - 19 hours ago - similar pages
Clarence Thomas (born June 23, 1948) is an American judge, lawyer, and government official ..... And from my standpoint, as a black American, it is a high- tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves, to do for ...
- Clarence Thomas Supreme Court nomination - Wikipedia
Clarence Thomas Supreme Court nomination - Wikipedia - 241k - 7 hours ago - similar pages
On July 1, 1991, President George H. W. Bush nominatedClarence Thomas for the Supreme .... And from my standpoint, as a black American, it is ahigh-tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves, to do for ...- American Rhetoric: Clarence Thomas - Statement to the Senate ...
American Rhetoric: Clarence Thomas - Statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee - 18k -similar pages
Oct 11, 1991 ... Complete text and audio and video of Clarence ThomasStatement to the ... it is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deign to ...- For Clarence Thomas, Lynching Is Personal. Only. - Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com / wp-dyn / content / article / 2007 / 10 / 12 / AR2007101201883.html - similar pages
Oct 14, 2007 ... As far as I'm concerned, it is ahigh-tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves." With his Supreme Court ...
I understand that you pretend not to know what social mores were like in the 1980s, dumbfuck.I stated an irrefutable fact, moron. It used to be that if you got to a certain point, like having all her cloths off, that if she said "no" at that point, it didn't constitute rape.Lewdog thinks he's winning in the trolling department.
It's not trolling. Bripat is making some of the most ridiculously stupid statements I have ever seen. I mean not even in the same zipcode as previous ones.
How old are you? You must be pretty young. The "no means no" meme didn't exist in those days. If you think current norms have always been in place, you are either extremely naive, a liar or a dumbfuck. I think you're all three.
You really don't understand what sexual assault is do you?
I did not know that. I believed Anita Hill and I felt really bad for her, the walloping she took from Republicans and men in general, for speaking up.Anita Hill was telling the truth but in those days, it was okay to behave as C. Thomas did. They were both adults, though, and he was her boss.At the least the filthy dishonest Democrats are not coming up with the "pubic hair on a Coke can" lie this time.
This time it is the "he tried to rape me in High School" lie.
I think part of the reason I am so hesitant on this accusation is that they were both kids and we grow up.
There were also THREE other women waiting to testify against Thomas, but Biden chickened out after Thomas made his "high-tech lynching" comment. The remaining THREE women were never called to testify. Hence, pervert Thomas was confirmed. Do Republicans really want another pervert on SCOTUS? We'll see...
This Kavanaugh thing seems really different to me. Maybe I'm wrong, but she seems to have had a big overreaction to the incident, as well as the fact that they were both kids. Who is the same person they were when they were 17? It just isn't apples and apples, as far as I'm concerned.
Attempted rape is attempted rape - even at 17. Kavanaugh can either confirm or deny the event. Either way, it should be thoroughly investigated - especially if he continues to deny it happened.
If he's a Republican, then it's rape. Otherwise it's just foreplay.I did not know that. I believed Anita Hill and I felt really bad for her, the walloping she took from Republicans and men in general, for speaking up.Anita Hill was telling the truth but in those days, it was okay to behave as C. Thomas did. They were both adults, though, and he was her boss.At the least the filthy dishonest Democrats are not coming up with the "pubic hair on a Coke can" lie this time.
This time it is the "he tried to rape me in High School" lie.
I think part of the reason I am so hesitant on this accusation is that they were both kids and we grow up.
There were also THREE other women waiting to testify against Thomas, but Biden chickened out after Thomas made his "high-tech lynching" comment. The remaining THREE women were never called to testify. Hence, pervert Thomas was confirmed. Do Republicans really want another pervert on SCOTUS? We'll see...
This Kavanaugh thing seems really different to me. Maybe I'm wrong, but she seems to have had a big overreaction to the incident, as well as the fact that they were both kids. Who is the same person they were when they were 17? It just isn't apples and apples, as far as I'm concerned.
Attempted rape is attempted rape - even at 17. Kavanaugh can either confirm or deny the event. Either way, it should be thoroughly investigated - especially if he continues to deny it happened.
let's say this incident did occur. A young man and a young woman are drunk and the boy makes a move to feel her up and undress her. What exactly makes this attempted rape rather than boy makes a move and girl doesn't welcome it so he stops?
