So, Kavanaugh LIED = Kavanaugh accuser breaks silence

[Tilly]

At the least the filthy dishonest Democrats are not coming up with the "pubic hair on a Coke can" lie this time.

This time it is the "he tried to rape me in High School" lie.

Anita Hill was telling the truth but in those days, it was okay to behave as C. Thomas did. They were both adults, though, and he was her boss.

I think part of the reason I am so hesitant on this accusation is that they were both kids and we grow up.

There were also THREE other women waiting to testify against Thomas, but Biden chickened out after Thomas made his "high-tech lynching" comment. The remaining THREE women were never called to testify. Hence, pervert Thomas was confirmed. Do Republicans really want another pervert on SCOTUS? We'll see...

I did not know that. I believed Anita Hill and I felt really bad for her, the walloping she took from Republicans and men in general, for speaking up.
This Kavanaugh thing seems really different to me. Maybe I'm wrong, but she seems to have had a big overreaction to the incident, as well as the fact that they were both kids. Who is the same person they were when they were 17? It just isn't apples and apples, as far as I'm concerned.

Nobody even knows if it happened.

 

[airplanemechanic]

The fact that even some women on here think it is no big deal that some drunk teenage boy tried to rape her, just goes to show why she didn't come out with this story back when it happened. She'd have been shunned by not only all the friends of Kavanaugh, but probably a large number of girls in her school that thought she was just trying to get attention or something.

No one believes her story, dumbfuck. She isn't credible. Are there any witnesses to this event? She claims there were three other boys involved. Does she name them? No. There were plenty of other people in the house. Have any of them supported her story? No. Can you be locked into a bedroom when the latch is on the inside? No.

So when things happen that there are no witnesses, nothing happened? Do we just say, "Fuck it!" and not investigate things unless there was witnesses? ... you're lack of intelligence continues to amaze. What makes Kavanaugh more credible than her? Oh yeah... you said because she saw a therapist. Do you have a clue how fucking stupid THAT statement is?

Pretty much. Without evidence, innocent until proven guilty.

So I must ask you, when an accuser accuses YOU of sexual assault and has no proof whatsoever, do we just say "Fuck it, he's a pervert, he's guilty"? It's a whole different ball game when its your ass on the line.

 

[bripat9643]

She’s fugly.
If he was ever attracted to her I don’t want him on the Supreme Court.

I can 't find her pic. Can you post a link?

Christine Blasey Ford - AOL Image Search Results

AAAAAGGGHHHHHH!

 

[bripat9643]

I stated an irrefutable fact, moron. It used to be that if you got to a certain point, like having all her cloths off, that if she said "no" at that point, it didn't constitute rape.

How old are you? You must be pretty young. The "no means no" meme didn't exist in those days. If you think current norms have always been in place, you are either extremely naive, a liar or a dumbfuck. I think you're all three.

You really don't understand what sexual assault is do you?

I understand that you pretend not to know what social mores were like in the 1980s, dumbfuck.

You don't know the differences between laws, and socially accepted attitudes. You also don't understand the difference between socially accepted attitudes and morality.

Just because some people thought it was ok to sexually assault a woman in the early 80's even if they said no, doesn't mean it was legal. And sadly, you don't understand how you are making the case as to why she didn't report it at the time.

No one considered it to be rape, you lying asshole. I heard numerous such stories when I was in high school and college, and no one ever went to jail or prison as a result.

You're a lying piece of shit who will say whatever you think will advance your sleazy despicable agenda.

I never said it was rape... I've said sexual assault. Again you prove you don't know what sexual assault is.

Let me help you a bit. Rape is sexual assault, but not all sexual assault is rape. Does that blow your mind?

Let me help you a bit: this is 2018, not 1980. It's 40 years later. Mores have changed since then.

 

[Doc1]

"He touched my pee pee"

 

[Lewdog]

The fact that even some women on here think it is no big deal that some drunk teenage boy tried to rape her, just goes to show why she didn't come out with this story back when it happened. She'd have been shunned by not only all the friends of Kavanaugh, but probably a large number of girls in her school that thought she was just trying to get attention or something.

No one believes her story, dumbfuck. She isn't credible. Are there any witnesses to this event? She claims there were three other boys involved. Does she name them? No. There were plenty of other people in the house. Have any of them supported her story? No. Can you be locked into a bedroom when the latch is on the inside? No.

So when things happen that there are no witnesses, nothing happened? Do we just say, "Fuck it!" and not investigate things unless there was witnesses? ... you're lack of intelligence continues to amaze. What makes Kavanaugh more credible than her? Oh yeah... you said because she saw a therapist. Do you have a clue how fucking stupid THAT statement is?

Pretty much. Without evidence, innocent until proven guilty.

So I must ask you, when an accuser accuses YOU of sexual assault and has no proof whatsoever, do we just say "Fuck it, he's a pervert, he's guilty"? It's a whole different ball game when its your ass on the line.

Well since I never said that... then no. But it should be investigated... and this isn't a criminal case, it's for a person to serve on the Supreme Court.

 

[Lewdog]

You really don't understand what sexual assault is do you?

I understand that you pretend not to know what social mores were like in the 1980s, dumbfuck.

You don't know the differences between laws, and socially accepted attitudes. You also don't understand the difference between socially accepted attitudes and morality.

Just because some people thought it was ok to sexually assault a woman in the early 80's even if they said no, doesn't mean it was legal. And sadly, you don't understand how you are making the case as to why she didn't report it at the time.

No one considered it to be rape, you lying asshole. I heard numerous such stories when I was in high school and college, and no one ever went to jail or prison as a result.

You're a lying piece of shit who will say whatever you think will advance your sleazy despicable agenda.

I never said it was rape... I've said sexual assault. Again you prove you don't know what sexual assault is.

Let me help you a bit. Rape is sexual assault, but not all sexual assault is rape. Does that blow your mind?

Let me help you a bit: this is 2018, not 1980. It's 40 years later. Mores have changed since then.

And let me help you... it doesn't fucking matter. It was a law back then, it is still a law today... and even if someone is no longer criminally liable for it, when the accused is someone nominated for the Supreme Court, it needs to be taken seriously and investigated.

 

[Doc1]

The fact that even some women on here think it is no big deal that some drunk teenage boy tried to rape her, just goes to show why she didn't come out with this story back when it happened. She'd have been shunned by not only all the friends of Kavanaugh, but probably a large number of girls in her school that thought she was just trying to get attention or something.

No one believes her story, dumbfuck. She isn't credible. Are there any witnesses to this event? She claims there were three other boys involved. Does she name them? No. There were plenty of other people in the house. Have any of them supported her story? No. Can you be locked into a bedroom when the latch is on the inside? No.

So when things happen that there are no witnesses, nothing happened? Do we just say, "Fuck it!" and not investigate things unless there was witnesses? ... you're lack of intelligence continues to amaze. What makes Kavanaugh more credible than her? Oh yeah... you said because she saw a therapist. Do you have a clue how fucking stupid THAT statement is?

Pretty much. Without evidence, innocent until proven guilty.

So I must ask you, when an accuser accuses YOU of sexual assault and has no proof whatsoever, do we just say "Fuck it, he's a pervert, he's guilty"? It's a whole different ball game when its your ass on the line.

Well since I never said that... then no. But it should be investigated... and this isn't a criminal case, it's for a person to serve on the Supreme Court.

Sure and Mitt didn't pay taxes for ten years. Only you stupid lefty's are buying into any of this shit.

 

[Lewdog]

The fact that even some women on here think it is no big deal that some drunk teenage boy tried to rape her, just goes to show why she didn't come out with this story back when it happened. She'd have been shunned by not only all the friends of Kavanaugh, but probably a large number of girls in her school that thought she was just trying to get attention or something.

No one believes her story, dumbfuck. She isn't credible. Are there any witnesses to this event? She claims there were three other boys involved. Does she name them? No. There were plenty of other people in the house. Have any of them supported her story? No. Can you be locked into a bedroom when the latch is on the inside? No.

So when things happen that there are no witnesses, nothing happened? Do we just say, "Fuck it!" and not investigate things unless there was witnesses? ... you're lack of intelligence continues to amaze. What makes Kavanaugh more credible than her? Oh yeah... you said because she saw a therapist. Do you have a clue how fucking stupid THAT statement is?

Pretty much. Without evidence, innocent until proven guilty.

So I must ask you, when an accuser accuses YOU of sexual assault and has no proof whatsoever, do we just say "Fuck it, he's a pervert, he's guilty"? It's a whole different ball game when its your ass on the line.

Well since I never said that... then no. But it should be investigated... and this isn't a criminal case, it's for a person to serve on the Supreme Court.

Sure and Mitt didn't pay taxes for ten years. Only you stupid lefty's are buying into any of this shit.

What the fuck does Mitt Romney and taxes have to do with this? Wow what a fucking show from left field.

 

[Doc1]

No one believes her story, dumbfuck. She isn't credible. Are there any witnesses to this event? She claims there were three other boys involved. Does she name them? No. There were plenty of other people in the house. Have any of them supported her story? No. Can you be locked into a bedroom when the latch is on the inside? No.

So when things happen that there are no witnesses, nothing happened? Do we just say, "Fuck it!" and not investigate things unless there was witnesses? ... you're lack of intelligence continues to amaze. What makes Kavanaugh more credible than her? Oh yeah... you said because she saw a therapist. Do you have a clue how fucking stupid THAT statement is?

Pretty much. Without evidence, innocent until proven guilty.

So I must ask you, when an accuser accuses YOU of sexual assault and has no proof whatsoever, do we just say "Fuck it, he's a pervert, he's guilty"? It's a whole different ball game when its your ass on the line.

Well since I never said that... then no. But it should be investigated... and this isn't a criminal case, it's for a person to serve on the Supreme Court.

Sure and Mitt didn't pay taxes for ten years. Only you stupid lefty's are buying into any of this shit.

What the fuck does Mitt Romney and taxes have to do with this? Wow what a fucking show from left field.

Precisely my point kid.

 

[Lewdog]

So when things happen that there are no witnesses, nothing happened? Do we just say, "Fuck it!" and not investigate things unless there was witnesses? ... you're lack of intelligence continues to amaze. What makes Kavanaugh more credible than her? Oh yeah... you said because she saw a therapist. Do you have a clue how fucking stupid THAT statement is?

Pretty much. Without evidence, innocent until proven guilty.

So I must ask you, when an accuser accuses YOU of sexual assault and has no proof whatsoever, do we just say "Fuck it, he's a pervert, he's guilty"? It's a whole different ball game when its your ass on the line.

Well since I never said that... then no. But it should be investigated... and this isn't a criminal case, it's for a person to serve on the Supreme Court.

Sure and Mitt didn't pay taxes for ten years. Only you stupid lefty's are buying into any of this shit.

What the fuck does Mitt Romney and taxes have to do with this? Wow what a fucking show from left field.

Precisely my point kid.

No... you have no point, you made that quite clear.

 

[bodecea]

A Porn Star would be more reliable than this loon-bitch Leftist-Sociology Researcher from a Left Wing California College.

Its why they hid her until the last minute.

Try again.

I knew that she would automatically be dismissed because she's from California....how very very very predictable trumpanzees are.

 

[bodecea]

Love how the misogynists just can't help themselves.....

 

[Doc1]

Pretty much. Without evidence, innocent until proven guilty.

So I must ask you, when an accuser accuses YOU of sexual assault and has no proof whatsoever, do we just say "Fuck it, he's a pervert, he's guilty"? It's a whole different ball game when its your ass on the line.

Well since I never said that... then no. But it should be investigated... and this isn't a criminal case, it's for a person to serve on the Supreme Court.

Sure and Mitt didn't pay taxes for ten years. Only you stupid lefty's are buying into any of this shit.

What the fuck does Mitt Romney and taxes have to do with this? Wow what a fucking show from left field.

Precisely my point kid.

No... you have no point, you made that quite clear.

LOL, you just don't have the intellect to understand it kid. This stupid "allegation" came out of left field and that's where it will die. He will be seated and you'll be left to scream and cry.

 

[Lewdog]

Well since I never said that... then no. But it should be investigated... and this isn't a criminal case, it's for a person to serve on the Supreme Court.

Sure and Mitt didn't pay taxes for ten years. Only you stupid lefty's are buying into any of this shit.

What the fuck does Mitt Romney and taxes have to do with this? Wow what a fucking show from left field.

Precisely my point kid.

No... you have no point, you made that quite clear.

LOL, you just don't have the intellect to understand it kid. This stupid "allegation" came out of left field and that's where it will die. He will be seated and you'll be left to scream and cry.

I have plenty of intellect... enough to recognize how dumb it is for a Trump supporter to bring up Romney in this argument like you give 2 shits about him.

 

[Lakhota]

So, Kavanaugh has reportedly previously lied under oath - and now this. No wonder Mitch McConnell was concerned when Trump nominated him. Doesn't look good...

 

[Doc1]

Sure and Mitt didn't pay taxes for ten years. Only you stupid lefty's are buying into any of this shit.

What the fuck does Mitt Romney and taxes have to do with this? Wow what a fucking show from left field.

Precisely my point kid.

No... you have no point, you made that quite clear.

LOL, you just don't have the intellect to understand it kid. This stupid "allegation" came out of left field and that's where it will die. He will be seated and you'll be left to scream and cry.

I have plenty of intellect... enough to recognize how dumb it is for a Trump supporter to bring up Romney in this argument like you give 2 shits about him.

LOL, you're an idiot kid.

 

[BrokeLoser]

So, Kavanaugh has reportedly previously lied under oath - and now this. No wonder Mitch McConnell was concerned when Trump nominated him. Doesn't look good...

“And now this”
What’s “this”?
Some loony Liberal whore suddenly recalls her butt getting raped 35 years later?
Sounds like a super credible bitch.

 

[Lakhota]

She looks credible to me...

 

[BrokeLoser]

She looks credible to me...

Haha...what do credible people look like?