So, Kavanaugh LIED = Kavanaugh accuser breaks silence

[Lakhota]

Well, sparky, you can always Google it. However, I'll help you a little...

Three other women were willing to testify about being harassed by Thomas, too. But Biden chose not to allow one of them, Angela Wright, to testify publicly, instead releasing a transcript of a phone interview with her. Strange Justice, a 1994 book by reporters Jill Abramson and Jane Mayer, concluded the Judiciary Committee had failed to follow up leads on allegations against Thomas and had conducted only a cursory investigation. Whether such testimony would have been adequate to convict Thomas in a court of law is unclear, but perhaps also beside the point. It was as strong or stronger than the evidence that has toppled several members of Congress, including Senator Al Franken.

What About Clarence Thomas? - The Atlantic

"Whether such testimony would have been adequate to convict Thomas in a court of law is unclear,"

I love this shit. No wonder you idiots keep losing elections.

The point is they weren't allowed to publicly testify. What's your point?

If Biden and the Left thought that they could have stopped it they would have. They couldn't, they knew it and they let it go.

No, sparky, here's what turned Biden into chickenshit: "it is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks".

Clarence Thomas - Wikiquote

LOL, it wouldn't have mattered if Biden had the proof. Are you really that stupid?

Okay, sparky, you're nothing but a flaming troll. I'm now placing you on permanent ignore. Bye...

 

[Doc1]

"Whether such testimony would have been adequate to convict Thomas in a court of law is unclear,"

I love this shit. No wonder you idiots keep losing elections.

The point is they weren't allowed to publicly testify. What's your point?

If Biden and the Left thought that they could have stopped it they would have. They couldn't, they knew it and they let it go.

No, sparky, here's what turned Biden into chickenshit: "it is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks".

Clarence Thomas - Wikiquote

LOL, it wouldn't have mattered if Biden had the proof. Are you really that stupid?

Okay, sparky, you're nothing but a flaming troll. I'm now placing you on permanent ignore. Bye...

Seeya pussy.

 

[OKTexas]

Lewdog thinks he's winning in the trolling department.

It's not trolling. Bripat is making some of the most ridiculously stupid statements I have ever seen. I mean not even in the same zipcode as previous ones.

I stated an irrefutable fact, moron. It used to be that if you got to a certain point, like having all her cloths off, that if she said "no" at that point, it didn't constitute rape.

How old are you? You must be pretty young. The "no means no" meme didn't exist in those days. If you think current norms have always been in place, you are either extremely naive, a liar or a dumbfuck. I think you're all three.

You really don't understand what sexual assault is do you?

I understand that you pretend not to know what social mores were like in the 1980s, dumbfuck.

You don't know the differences between laws, and socially accepted attitudes. You also don't understand the difference between socially accepted attitudes and morality.

Just because some people thought it was ok to sexually assault a woman in the early 80's even if they said no, doesn't mean it was legal. And sadly, you don't understand how you are making the case as to why she didn't report it at the time.

And some people don't think a 30 year old allegation, made by an obviously politically motivated individual, is enough to override the presumption of innocence. Only really ignorant people or political hacks would even entertain this as currently relevant.

.

 

[Lewdog]

It's not trolling. Bripat is making some of the most ridiculously stupid statements I have ever seen. I mean not even in the same zipcode as previous ones.

I stated an irrefutable fact, moron. It used to be that if you got to a certain point, like having all her cloths off, that if she said "no" at that point, it didn't constitute rape.

How old are you? You must be pretty young. The "no means no" meme didn't exist in those days. If you think current norms have always been in place, you are either extremely naive, a liar or a dumbfuck. I think you're all three.

You really don't understand what sexual assault is do you?

I understand that you pretend not to know what social mores were like in the 1980s, dumbfuck.

You don't know the differences between laws, and socially accepted attitudes. You also don't understand the difference between socially accepted attitudes and morality.

Just because some people thought it was ok to sexually assault a woman in the early 80's even if they said no, doesn't mean it was legal. And sadly, you don't understand how you are making the case as to why she didn't report it at the time.

And some people don't think a 30 year old allegation, made by an obviously politically motivated individual, is enough to override the presumption of innocence. Only really ignorant people or political hacks would even entertain this as currently relevant.

.

How was it politically motivated when she reported it in 2012 long before Kavanaugh was nominated?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Kavanaugh accuser breaks silence over sexual misconduct allegations

The woman who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct has identified herself and is speaking publicly about her allegations against Kavanaugh for the first time, according to a Washington Post investigation published Sunday.

Christine Blasey Ford, now a 51-year-old professor at Palo Alto University in California, described an incident between the two in high school, alleging that Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed one summer in the 1980s and forced himself on her.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

So, Kavanaugh LIED to The US Senate

We all know who will OK Kavanaugh 'the LIAR' = Republicans

Was Kavanaugh 'under oath' when he lied to the US Senate?

He said, she said...

No PROOF from either side.


Don't give a fuck.

 

[Doc1]

I stated an irrefutable fact, moron. It used to be that if you got to a certain point, like having all her cloths off, that if she said "no" at that point, it didn't constitute rape.

How old are you? You must be pretty young. The "no means no" meme didn't exist in those days. If you think current norms have always been in place, you are either extremely naive, a liar or a dumbfuck. I think you're all three.

You really don't understand what sexual assault is do you?

I understand that you pretend not to know what social mores were like in the 1980s, dumbfuck.

You don't know the differences between laws, and socially accepted attitudes. You also don't understand the difference between socially accepted attitudes and morality.

Just because some people thought it was ok to sexually assault a woman in the early 80's even if they said no, doesn't mean it was legal. And sadly, you don't understand how you are making the case as to why she didn't report it at the time.

And some people don't think a 30 year old allegation, made by an obviously politically motivated individual, is enough to override the presumption of innocence. Only really ignorant people or political hacks would even entertain this as currently relevant.

.

How was it politically motivated when she reported it in 2012 long before Kavanaugh was nominated?

So her accusation is ok...mine isn't. Imagine that asshole. When it gets personal you assholes run and cry foul. Bring it.

 

[mudwhistle]

She looks credible to me...

Yeah....

 

[Doc1]

I stated an irrefutable fact, moron. It used to be that if you got to a certain point, like having all her cloths off, that if she said "no" at that point, it didn't constitute rape.

How old are you? You must be pretty young. The "no means no" meme didn't exist in those days. If you think current norms have always been in place, you are either extremely naive, a liar or a dumbfuck. I think you're all three.

You really don't understand what sexual assault is do you?

I understand that you pretend not to know what social mores were like in the 1980s, dumbfuck.

You don't know the differences between laws, and socially accepted attitudes. You also don't understand the difference between socially accepted attitudes and morality.

Just because some people thought it was ok to sexually assault a woman in the early 80's even if they said no, doesn't mean it was legal. And sadly, you don't understand how you are making the case as to why she didn't report it at the time.

And some people don't think a 30 year old allegation, made by an obviously politically motivated individual, is enough to override the presumption of innocence. Only really ignorant people or political hacks would even entertain this as currently relevant.

.

How was it politically motivated when she reported it in 2012 long before Kavanaugh was nominated?

RUN FOREST......

 

[Doc1]

For all those people that keep saying this bullshit about it being "teenagers" in "high school" in the "80's," Were you as lenient on the Central Park 5? Would you say they were just being young teenagers that made a mistake? Of course not... and they were PROVEN innocent by DNA evidence despite Trump calling for them to be put to death for the crime before, and even AFTER being proven innocent.

Did you pay any price for raping that girl in High School?

Yeah that crosses the line and is the kind of allegation that can get you sued. It's been reported to moderation here, and documented in case I need it for the future.

Did you?

 

[hadit]

Or, democrats threatened this women's children

No, that's Trump's modus operandi according to Stormy Daniels.
.
.
.

She didn't accuse Trump of threatening her children.

 

[hadit]

Ms. Ford is none too attractive, I think she just wants to break up Judge Kavanaugh's happy family.


This is, IMHO, about as disgraceful as you can get.

Looks like a continuation of the Me Too movement.

Do you approve of sexual assault?

Democrats don't care about sexual assault.

Republicans do not care about sexual assault; they voted for a man that bragged about, "grabbing pussy."

If the child of a Republican is raped the parents just look at each other & say, "Trump."

Wow, if you believe that, you're beyond help.

 

[rightwinger]

Kavanaugh accuser breaks silence over sexual misconduct allegations

The woman who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct has identified herself and is speaking publicly about her allegations against Kavanaugh for the first time, according to a Washington Post investigation published Sunday.

Christine Blasey Ford, now a 51-year-old professor at Palo Alto University in California, described an incident between the two in high school, alleging that Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed one summer in the 1980s and forced himself on her.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

So, Kavanaugh LIED to The US Senate

We all know who will OK Kavanaugh 'the LIAR' = Republicans

Was Kavanaugh 'under oath' when he lied to the US Senate?

I guess this broad is looking for Liberal Superstardom, like that enjoyed by Anita Hill?

Unfortunately for her, all that's left is the vote, she isn't going to get a chance to testify, as the vote is scheduled in just a few days and there is insufficient time.

When a witness LIES to a US Senate committee there is a serious problem.

If The Hill story is correct there will be plenty of time to expose the liar & there won't be any vote.

Got any proof of him lying?

It’s the same old bullshit Dems do every time. The old Clearance Thomas treatment.

Did you see that word I used, "If?"

According to the stories currently available, a one Mark Judge was present at the time of the claimed assault.
Ford & Judge should be allowed to testify before the Senate committee.

Hearings are over. Done deal. You lose. Move on.

It ain’t over till it’s over

 

[rightwinger]

I tend to believe 60 women who wrote letters saying how well he treated women than one moonbat shit crazy insane woman claiming he did something as a teen in high school.

Were they there?

 

[OKTexas]

A Porn Star would be more reliable than this loon-bitch Leftist-Sociology Researcher from a Left Wing California College.

Its why they hid her until the last minute.

Try again.

I knew that she would automatically be dismissed because she's from California....how very very very predictable trumpanzees are.

Yeah, we knew you commies would say that. LMAO

.

 

[Flash]

She looks credible to me...

Is that like these women looking credible?

 

[Flash]

 

[hadit]

Or, democrats threatened this women's children

That sounds more like something Republicans would do. After all they love the fetus but they don’t give a sh!t about the kids.

You really believe some stupid stuff.

 

[hadit]

Kavanaugh accuser breaks silence over sexual misconduct allegations

The woman who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct has identified herself and is speaking publicly about her allegations against Kavanaugh for the first time, according to a Washington Post investigation published Sunday.

Christine Blasey Ford, now a 51-year-old professor at Palo Alto University in California, described an incident between the two in high school, alleging that Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed one summer in the 1980s and forced himself on her.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

So, Kavanaugh LIED to The US Senate

We all know who will OK Kavanaugh 'the LIAR' = Republicans

Was Kavanaugh 'under oath' when he lied to the US Senate?

Kavanaugh and Republicans should welcome a thorough investigation to clear his name before voting on his confirmation - otherwise, he will be forever branded a pervert like Thomas.

He wasn't. That's only in your imagination.

 

[Polishprince]

You dumbass... he was HOLDING HER DOWN.

Actually, he wasn't. Judge Kavanaugh categorically denied this calumny against him.

For this broad to try and destroy Mr. Kavanaugh's marriage and family, is one of the most despicable things I've every seen.

 

[hadit]

FAUX NUWZ is NOW reporting:

California professor Christine Ford claims Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her: 'It derailed me'

The woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault came forward with her explosive allegations on Sunday, saying the supposed attack "derailed me substantially for four or five years" and claiming that the episode rendered her "unable to have healthy relationships with men."


Republicans, specifically Grassley, are blaming the messenger, Feinstein, but they are NOT blaming Kavanaugh, the wanna B rapist. That is JUST SAD.

That's because the messenger is doing nothing to help the accuser, as she sat on the accusation for a long time instead of getting it out so it could have been addressed in the hearings. Instead, she waited until the last possible moment to make it as difficult as possible to even ascertain the truth. It's a political hit job, SOP for democrats.