- Banned
- #1
Funny how things come full circle. They both pay the same rate basically but since Buffet cries about it he gets a pass? Have I got this right? Can I rob my neighbor as long as I condemn it while I do it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
didn't buffet say he paid 20% in federal taxes, which was less than what his secretary had to pay in federal taxes as a percentage?Funny how things come full circle. They both pay the same rate basically but since Buffet cries about it he gets a pass? Have I got this right? Can I rob my neighbor as long as I condemn it while I do it?
Funny how things come full circle. They both pay the same rate basically but since Buffet cries about it he gets a pass? Have I got this right? Can I rob my neighbor as long as I condemn it while I do it?
Funny how things come full circle. They both pay the same rate basically but since Buffet cries about it he gets a pass? Have I got this right? Can I rob my neighbor as long as I condemn it while I do it?
So you're argument is that since Mitt is apparently greedier than Buffet, and doesn't think he should pay more in taxes despite the evidence that tax cuts are what drove the deficits, that makes him morally superior somehow?
You conservatives shouldn't be so hard on Socialism. Hell you socialized the costs of 30 years your tax cuts for the rich, buy shoving the debt incurred as a result on the rest of us.
Seems to me, you conservatives like socialism just fine.
Funny how things come full circle. They both pay the same rate basically but since Buffet cries about it he gets a pass? Have I got this right? Can I rob my neighbor as long as I condemn it while I do it?
Buffet gets a pass because he wants to raise Romney's taxes. Romney doesn't get a pass because he doesn't want to raise anyone's taxes.
See how that works?
WRONG bripat....there is most certainly "a cost" to tax cuts IF THE SPENDING IS NOT EQUALLY CUT......to go along with the tax cuts.....So you're argument is that since Mitt is apparently greedier than Buffet, and doesn't think he should pay more in taxes despite the evidence that tax cuts are what drove the deficits, that makes him morally superior somehow?
You conservatives shouldn't be so hard on Socialism. Hell you socialized the costs of 30 years your tax cuts for the rich, buy shoving the debt incurred as a result on the rest of us.
Seems to me, you conservatives like socialism just fine.
There is no "cost" to the taxpayer for tax cuts, dipshit. Only parasites look at tax cuts as a "cost."
didn't buffet say he paid 20% in federal taxes, which was less than what his secretary had to pay in federal taxes as a percentage?Funny how things come full circle. They both pay the same rate basically but since Buffet cries about it he gets a pass? Have I got this right? Can I rob my neighbor as long as I condemn it while I do it?
I thought Teresa Heinz Kerry got her federal taxes paid down to just 19% and I thought that was pretty damn low...
Now Mitt is saying his was only 15% in federal taxes....I for one, had no idea that those in the 36% tax bracket paid so little as a percentage in federal taxes....!!!
So you're argument is that since Mitt is apparently greedier than Buffet, and doesn't think he should pay more in taxes despite the evidence that tax cuts are what drove the deficits, that makes him morally superior somehow?
You conservatives shouldn't be so hard on Socialism. Hell you socialized the costs of 30 years your tax cuts for the rich, buy shoving the debt incurred as a result on the rest of us.
Seems to me, you conservatives like socialism just fine.
There is no "cost" to the taxpayer for tax cuts, dipshit. Only parasites look at tax cuts as a "cost."
Funny how things come full circle. They both pay the same rate basically but since Buffet cries about it he gets a pass? Have I got this right? Can I rob my neighbor as long as I condemn it while I do it?
So you're argument is that since Mitt is apparently greedier than Buffet, and doesn't think he should pay more in taxes despite the evidence that tax cuts are what drove the deficits, that makes him morally superior somehow?
You conservatives shouldn't be so hard on Socialism. Hell you socialized the costs of 30 years your tax cuts for the rich, buy shoving the debt incurred as a result on the rest of us.
Seems to me, you conservatives like socialism just fine.
Funny how things come full circle. They both pay the same rate basically but since Buffet cries about it he gets a pass? Have I got this right? Can I rob my neighbor as long as I condemn it while I do it?
So you're argument is that since Mitt is apparently greedier than Buffet, and doesn't think he should pay more in taxes despite the evidence that tax cuts are what drove the deficits, that makes him morally superior somehow?
You conservatives shouldn't be so hard on Socialism. Hell you socialized the costs of 30 years your tax cuts for the rich, buy shoving the debt incurred as a result on the rest of us.
Seems to me, you conservatives like socialism just fine.
WTF is the problem with people on here? I didn't say any of that shit. Maybe you should try reading the lines rather than in between them.
Funny how things come full circle. They both pay the same rate basically but since Buffet cries about it he gets a pass? Have I got this right? Can I rob my neighbor as long as I condemn it while I do it?
Funny how things come full circle. They both pay the same rate basically but since Buffet cries about it he gets a pass? Have I got this right? Can I rob my neighbor as long as I condemn it while I do it?
So you're argument is that since Mitt is apparently greedier than Buffet, and doesn't think he should pay more in taxes despite the evidence that tax cuts are what drove the deficits, that makes him morally superior somehow?
You conservatives shouldn't be so hard on Socialism. Hell you socialized the costs of 30 years your tax cuts for the rich, buy shoving the debt incurred as a result on the rest of us.
Seems to me, you conservatives like socialism just fine.
WTF is the problem with people on here? I didn't say any of that shit. Maybe you should try reading the lines rather than in between them.
Now Mitt is saying his was only 15% in federal taxes....I for one, had no idea that those in the 36% tax bracket paid so little as a percentage in federal taxes....!!!
So you're argument is that since Mitt is apparently greedier than Buffet, and doesn't think he should pay more in taxes despite the evidence that tax cuts are what drove the deficits, that makes him morally superior somehow?
You conservatives shouldn't be so hard on Socialism. Hell you socialized the costs of 30 years your tax cuts for the rich, buy shoving the debt incurred as a result on the rest of us.
Seems to me, you conservatives like socialism just fine.
WTF is the problem with people on here? I didn't say any of that shit. Maybe you should try reading the lines rather than in between them.
Since when is it "robbing your neighbor" to having them pay their fair share?
The rich paid over 90% top tax rate under that pinko commie Eisenhower, but now that the rich have seen their tax rate DROP by 2/3rds, suddenly asking that much of them is THEFT?
When you don't tax the rich and cut spending to match it, it drives up our NATIONAL DEBT, which is owed by ALL of us. THAT'S SOCIALIZING the COSTS of your tax cuts for the rich on the backs of EVERYONE ELSE. Don't deny the IRREFUTABLE consequences of your positions, just because you don't LIKE them. We've had enough of that already.
ummmmm yea....that is why buffet gets a pass....because he is willing to raise the taxes on his own bracket....for the sake of the country....at least that is how it is being played....Funny how things come full circle. They both pay the same rate basically but since Buffet cries about it he gets a pass? Have I got this right? Can I rob my neighbor as long as I condemn it while I do it?
ummmmm yea....that is why buffet gets a pass....because he is willing to raise the taxes on his own bracket....for the sake of the country....at least that is how it is being played....Funny how things come full circle. They both pay the same rate basically but since Buffet cries about it he gets a pass? Have I got this right? Can I rob my neighbor as long as I condemn it while I do it?
And truthfully, those with the kind of money as buffet, probably won't miss a lick of it and probably don't care about a few percentage points in extra taxes....
the problem imo is that those clearing 250k are in the same tax bracket as someone like buffet or Heinz Kerry, or Koch brothers, or Hilton or Gates, and they would be hit with the same tax hike as the billionaires if taxes were raised on that group.....