Inthemiddle
Rookie
- Oct 4, 2011
- 6,354
- 675
So you're argument is that since Mitt is apparently greedier than Buffet, and doesn't think he should pay more in taxes despite the evidence that tax cuts are what drove the deficits, that makes him morally superior somehow?
You conservatives shouldn't be so hard on Socialism. Hell you socialized the costs of 30 years your tax cuts for the rich, buy shoving the debt incurred as a result on the rest of us.
Seems to me, you conservatives like socialism just fine.
There is no "cost" to the taxpayer for tax cuts, dipshit. Only parasites look at tax cuts as a "cost."
Hey dipshit, if tax cuts contribute to deficits and increases in the public debt, then there is indeed a cost to taxpayers, in the form of interest paid on the debt. Actually, since our country already has so much debt, any tax cut will necessarily incur a cost to the tax payer, because at the very least it will delay the repayment of that debt, thus costing even more interest.