Admiral Rockwell Tory
Diamond Member
He is not. The US Marshalls are investigating.no clue, J Roberts is investagating the leak.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He is not. The US Marshalls are investigating.no clue, J Roberts is investagating the leak.
Ok, we'll be watching. I'm preparing a prize for you if you're correct!
He is not. The US Marshalls are investigating.
Afterall, she's the major far left activist on the Bench!
Ain't no puzzle.
He is not. The US Marshalls are investigating.
Didn't want the truth to come out. Not a good look.Seems there are different possibilities here.
One prevailing thought of course, is that it's a liberal clerk, who leaked it with the hope that once the justices see the massive outcry, one or more them might change their vote.
Another, is the idea that it's one of the conservative justices, who not wanting to see another situation like that occurred when Roberts got cold feet and changed his vote reaffirming Obamacare. By leaking the decision, it could put pressure on the conservative justices to stay the course and not be remembered like Roberts will always be remembered.
Amy Coney Barrett, hands down.Didn't want the truth to come out. Not a good look.
No. Nobody outside the cult gives a shit about that.This maybe a factor in in the leak if it came from the left side of the fence. of.https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/timing-intentional-roe-v-wade-leak-lefts-answer-2000-mules-documentary-release-today-proves-2020-election-stolen/
Seems there are different possibilities here.
One prevailing thought of course, is that it's a liberal clerk, who leaked it with the hope that once the justices see the massive outcry, one or more them might change their vote.
Another, is the idea that it's one of the conservative justices, who not wanting to see another situation like that occurred when Roberts got cold feet and changed his vote reaffirming Obamacare. By leaking the decision, it could put pressure on the conservative justices to stay the course and not be remembered like Roberts will always be remembered.
*Marshall of the CourtHe is not. The US Marshalls are investigating.
And now candidates have 6 months to campaign on it.I think your priority is messed up here.
The leaker isn't the problem.
The problem is the court is about to ignore 50 years of precedent to force women to have pregnancies they don't want.
Seems there are different possibilities here.
One prevailing thought of course, is that it's a liberal clerk, who leaked it with the hope that once the justices see the massive outcry, one or more them might change their vote.
Another, is the idea that it's one of the conservative justices, who not wanting to see another situation like that occurred when Roberts got cold feet and changed his vote reaffirming Obamacare. By leaking the decision, it could put pressure on the conservative justices to stay the course and not be remembered like Roberts will always be remembered.
The notion that a Justice would have leaked the document to coerce another Justice's vote is ludicrous. Which party tends to gain by the leak? Obviously democrats needed an issue for the mid-terms while the Country is falling apart under the Biden administration. The question is whether the investigators will do a thorough job if they suspect the leaker is a liberal democrat.
Chief suspect is Sotomayor clerk, Amit Jian, avowed communist. Now, the question, did Sotomayor have a part?
Is Roe Leaker Another Unscrupulous Indian Trying To Destroy The Country? | Blog Posts
Twitter and Gab are aflame with speculation, and...vdare.com
Do you imagine Politico would fess up?Wow, you are going with Racist site VDare?