So Why Is Israel Allowed To Possess Chemical And Nuclear Weapons?...

[Correll]

Prove they have chemical weapons and nukes. No one has proven it yet.
(Oh just to make sure, unsubstantiated allegations and flights of fancy do not constitute proof).

Why hasn't Israel ratified weapons treaties like the Chemical Weapons Ban Treaty? It's one of the very few nations on earth that hasn't signed on to some of these treaties.

Because they are honest enough to NOT sign a Treaty they have no intentions of following.

And as they have not signed these treaties they are not bound by them.

The mindset of holding people responsible for violating agreements they have not agreed to is fairly bizarre.

That wasn't the question. The question was, why won't they ratify such treaties? Most of the civilized world has.

Because they are honest enough to NOT sign a Treaty they have no intentions of following.

That's my answer. What part of it are you not getting?

Do you want something more?

Why doesn't that concern you or the U.S. Government? Most nations in the world have ratified these Treaties. That includes nations like Syria and Iran.

Probably because as a Western style government with a mostly western style culture, they don't seem very scary to US.

I mean, their use for them are painfully obvious. And legitimate.

Deterring their hostile neighbors from trying to commit genocide on them.

 

[irosie91]

(1)
Truman Adviser Recalls May 14, 1948 US Decision to Recognize Israel

"Most people who knew the Middle East at first hand opposed the partition plan, adopted by the United Nations on November 29, 1947. Patently unfair, it awarded 56 percent of Palestine to its 650,000 Jewish inhabitants, and 44 percent to its 1,300,000 Muslim and Christian Arab inhabitants."

Nor, apparently, does Clifford, who never once expresses any regret about the 750,000 Palestinians pushed out of their country during the 1947 to 1949 fighting, and never allowed by Israel to return to their homes


John Judis’s Truman book is a landmark in anti-Zionism

But Truman folded on these impulses, Judis says, in part because he needed $100,000 from political donors Abe Feinberg and Ed Kaufmann – a huge sum in 1948–for a whistlestop campaign trip through the midwest when his campaign was broke and Thomas Dewey was threatening to make him a one-termer. Those Zionist donors got “unmatched access to the White House.” - See more at: John Judis’s Truman book is a landmark in anti-Zionism

Franklin Roosevelt expressed a similar secular pragmatism. In 1944, he chided the two leading Zionist lobbyists, Rabbis Wise and Abba Silver, that they were pushing a course that could lead to war. Roosevelt reflected angrily: “”To think of it, two men, two holy men, coming here to ask me to let millions of people be killed in a jihad.” - See more at: John Judis’s Truman book is a landmark in anti-Zionism

Yeah, it's to the point where you're immediately branded an 'Antisemite' if you dare to question Israel's behavior. But i'm an American Citizen, not an Israeli Citizen. I'm not subserviant to Israel...

"Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations - Entangling alliances with none - President Thomas Jefferson

Thomas Jefferson was wrong about lots of things----he tried to grow olive
trees at MONTICELLO

He wasn't wrong on 'Entangling Alliances. We can't just approve of all terrible behavior because we consider the perpetrators 'Close Allies.' Israel is wrong sometimes. It does a lot of awful things. And calling it out on it doesn't make one an 'Antisemite.'

I know of no one who ever claimed that Israel cannot be criticized-------Jews criticize Israel LOTS-----that's why they have dozens of political parties over there-----you anti Semitism has nothing to do with CRITICIZING negative action by Israel---
my impression is that you have been an anti-Semite all of your life----but I did not MEMORIZE your posts ------I will ask a question----How old were you when you knew that there is something really nasty about jews?

Well, now you're just makin stupid shit up. People who know me here know i often defend Israel. I just don't feel i'm obligated to defend and support all of its awful behavior. I'm an American Citizen, not an Israeli Citizen.

???? you have NO OBLIGATIONS to Israel at all-----in fact you need not defend
everything the USA does either--------your posts reveal the fact that you have
an UNBLALANCED desire to shit on Israel-------which is why it is logical to
conclude that you probably do not like jews

 

[Ringel05]

(1)
Truman Adviser Recalls May 14, 1948 US Decision to Recognize Israel

"Most people who knew the Middle East at first hand opposed the partition plan, adopted by the United Nations on November 29, 1947. Patently unfair, it awarded 56 percent of Palestine to its 650,000 Jewish inhabitants, and 44 percent to its 1,300,000 Muslim and Christian Arab inhabitants."

Nor, apparently, does Clifford, who never once expresses any regret about the 750,000 Palestinians pushed out of their country during the 1947 to 1949 fighting, and never allowed by Israel to return to their homes


John Judis’s Truman book is a landmark in anti-Zionism

But Truman folded on these impulses, Judis says, in part because he needed $100,000 from political donors Abe Feinberg and Ed Kaufmann – a huge sum in 1948–for a whistlestop campaign trip through the midwest when his campaign was broke and Thomas Dewey was threatening to make him a one-termer. Those Zionist donors got “unmatched access to the White House.” - See more at: John Judis’s Truman book is a landmark in anti-Zionism

Franklin Roosevelt expressed a similar secular pragmatism. In 1944, he chided the two leading Zionist lobbyists, Rabbis Wise and Abba Silver, that they were pushing a course that could lead to war. Roosevelt reflected angrily: “”To think of it, two men, two holy men, coming here to ask me to let millions of people be killed in a jihad.” - See more at: John Judis’s Truman book is a landmark in anti-Zionism

Yeah, it's to the point where you're immediately branded an 'Antisemite' if you dare to question Israel's behavior. But i'm an American Citizen, not an Israeli Citizen. I'm not subserviant to Israel...

"Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations - Entangling alliances with none - President Thomas Jefferson

Thomas Jefferson was wrong about lots of things----he tried to grow olive
trees at MONTICELLO

He wasn't wrong on 'Entangling Alliances. We can't just approve of all terrible behavior because we consider the perpetrators 'Close Allies.' Israel is wrong sometimes. It does a lot of awful things. And calling it out on it doesn't make one an 'Antisemite.'

I know of no one who ever claimed that Israel cannot be criticized-------Jews criticize Israel LOTS-----that's why they have dozens of political parties over there-----you anti Semitism has nothing to do with CRITICIZING negative action by Israel---
my impression is that you have been an anti-Semite all of your life----but I did not MEMORIZE your posts ------I will ask a question----How old were you when you knew that there is something really nasty about jews?

Well, now you're just makin stupid shit up. People who know me here know i often defend Israel. I just don't feel i'm obligated to defend and support all of its awful behavior. I'm an American Citizen, not an Israeli Citizen.

There's the crux of the problem, you, like others, view it as awful behavior, not everyone sees it the way you do. Such is life, deal with it.

 

[Ringel05]

In 1937 FDR REFUSED to recognize the Jewish State because to do so would force the US to PERMANENTLY defend and support the Jewish State.

But in 1949 Harry S Truman was in a tight race against Dewey ; he needed all the support he could get . David Ben Gurion gave him 2M $ and a promise that American Likudnicks would vote for him.

Presto, 1.5 Million Palestinian were declared foreigners in their own land.

And now the zionuts control our domestic politics and foreign policy.

.

I am intrigued-----someone asked FDR to recognize Israel in 1937 ? and FDR refused on the grounds that recognition would obligate the US to "DEFEND"?
gotta link?

Ben Gurion gave Truman 2 Million? and mentioned AMERICAN LIKUDNIKS?
Ben Gurion, himself was not LIKUD-----in fact there was no "LIKUD" back then---
Ben Gurion was head of the Israeli LABOR PARTY--------kinda a socialist thing
gotta link?

1.5 million Palestinians were declared "foreigners" in Israel--------there were not
1.5 million Palestinians in all of Israel in 1948. In fact ---in 1948 arabs living in any
part of Palestine were not called "Palestinians" In 1948 the ONLY people called
PALESTINIANS-----were jews

(1)
Truman Adviser Recalls May 14, 1948 US Decision to Recognize Israel

"Most people who knew the Middle East at first hand opposed the partition plan, adopted by the United Nations on November 29, 1947. Patently unfair, it awarded 56 percent of Palestine to its 650,000 Jewish inhabitants, and 44 percent to its 1,300,000 Muslim and Christian Arab inhabitants."

Nor, apparently, does Clifford, who never once expresses any regret about the 750,000 Palestinians pushed out of their country during the 1947 to 1949 fighting, and never allowed by Israel to return to their homes


John Judis’s Truman book is a landmark in anti-Zionism

But Truman folded on these impulses, Judis says, in part because he needed $100,000 from political donors Abe Feinberg and Ed Kaufmann – a huge sum in 1948–for a whistlestop campaign trip through the midwest when his campaign was broke and Thomas Dewey was threatening to make him a one-termer. Those Zionist donors got “unmatched access to the White House.” - See more at: John Judis’s Truman book is a landmark in anti-Zionism

Franklin Roosevelt expressed a similar secular pragmatism. In 1944, he chided the two leading Zionist lobbyists, Rabbis Wise and Abba Silver, that they were pushing a course that could lead to war. Roosevelt reflected angrily: “”To think of it, two men, two holy men, coming here to ask me to let millions of people be killed in a jihad.” - See more at: John Judis’s Truman book is a landmark in anti-Zionism

Yeah, it's to the point where you're immediately branded an 'Antisemite' if you dare to question Israel's behavior. But i'm an American Citizen, not an Israeli Citizen. I'm not subserviant to Israel...

"Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations - Entangling alliances with none - President Thomas Jefferson

Only to some. You may not be an anti-semite but you are an idiot who believes anything that comes down the pike supporting your paranoid delusions.

Huh??

Unless I'm seriously mistaken (and I'm not) you've espoused some belief in obvious conspiracy theories and when argued with claimed the other person was either an agent or dupe of the government. Doesn't lend itself to your credibility in any realm.

 

[pwjohn]

But yet they insist we go to war with Iran because they might get nukes. No wonder people hate fucking israel.

Ah, poor boy hates Israel, damn uppity Jews........

And you're an uppity buttfucking troll.

Whatever justification you can come up with eh?

You make it about me, I'm gonna make it all about you, dicklicker

Soooooo, personal perspective ain't about you.......? Okie, dokie Sparky......

You have something else to say, dicklicker ?

 

[Snouter]

irosie91, do you really think your trope and ad hominems rationalize support of the racial supremacist state that illegally obtained nukes? And there is that theory that JFK was taken out because he was not going to tolerate the theft of the nuke material the zionists stole from the USA.

 

[Ringel05]

Ah, poor boy hates Israel, damn uppity Jews........

And you're an uppity buttfucking troll.

Whatever justification you can come up with eh?

You make it about me, I'm gonna make it all about you, dicklicker

Soooooo, personal perspective ain't about you.......? Okie, dokie Sparky......

You have something else to say, dicklicker ?

Dicklicker? Is that the best you can do??!! I mean seriously, a 5 year old could do better.

 

[pwjohn]

I am intrigued-----someone asked FDR to recognize Israel in 1937 ? and FDR refused on the grounds that recognition would obligate the US to "DEFEND"?
gotta link?

Ben Gurion gave Truman 2 Million? and mentioned AMERICAN LIKUDNIKS?
Ben Gurion, himself was not LIKUD-----in fact there was no "LIKUD" back then---
Ben Gurion was head of the Israeli LABOR PARTY--------kinda a socialist thing
gotta link?

1.5 million Palestinians were declared "foreigners" in Israel--------there were not
1.5 million Palestinians in all of Israel in 1948. In fact ---in 1948 arabs living in any
part of Palestine were not called "Palestinians" In 1948 the ONLY people called
PALESTINIANS-----were jews

(1)
Truman Adviser Recalls May 14, 1948 US Decision to Recognize Israel

"Most people who knew the Middle East at first hand opposed the partition plan, adopted by the United Nations on November 29, 1947. Patently unfair, it awarded 56 percent of Palestine to its 650,000 Jewish inhabitants, and 44 percent to its 1,300,000 Muslim and Christian Arab inhabitants."

Nor, apparently, does Clifford, who never once expresses any regret about the 750,000 Palestinians pushed out of their country during the 1947 to 1949 fighting, and never allowed by Israel to return to their homes


John Judis’s Truman book is a landmark in anti-Zionism

But Truman folded on these impulses, Judis says, in part because he needed $100,000 from political donors Abe Feinberg and Ed Kaufmann – a huge sum in 1948–for a whistlestop campaign trip through the midwest when his campaign was broke and Thomas Dewey was threatening to make him a one-termer. Those Zionist donors got “unmatched access to the White House.” - See more at: John Judis’s Truman book is a landmark in anti-Zionism

Franklin Roosevelt expressed a similar secular pragmatism. In 1944, he chided the two leading Zionist lobbyists, Rabbis Wise and Abba Silver, that they were pushing a course that could lead to war. Roosevelt reflected angrily: “”To think of it, two men, two holy men, coming here to ask me to let millions of people be killed in a jihad.” - See more at: John Judis’s Truman book is a landmark in anti-Zionism

Yeah, it's to the point where you're immediately branded an 'Antisemite' if you dare to question Israel's behavior. But i'm an American Citizen, not an Israeli Citizen. I'm not subserviant to Israel...

"Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations - Entangling alliances with none - President Thomas Jefferson

Only to some. You may not be an anti-semite but you are an idiot who believes anything that comes down the pike supporting your paranoid delusions.

Huh??

Unless I'm seriously mistaken (and I'm not) you've espoused some belief in obvious conspiracy theories and when argued with claimed the other person was either an agent or dupe of the government. Doesn't lend itself to your credibility in any realm.

And you're an uppity buttfucking troll.

Whatever justification you can come up with eh?

You make it about me, I'm gonna make it all about you, dicklicker

Soooooo, personal perspective ain't about you.......? Okie, dokie Sparky......

You have something else to say, dicklicker ?

Dicklicker? Is that the best you can do??!! I mean seriously, a 5 year old could do better.

Your comments on this thread are a lot like you, in that they don;t amount to diddly squat, dicklicker

 

[Ringel05]

(1)
Truman Adviser Recalls May 14, 1948 US Decision to Recognize Israel

"Most people who knew the Middle East at first hand opposed the partition plan, adopted by the United Nations on November 29, 1947. Patently unfair, it awarded 56 percent of Palestine to its 650,000 Jewish inhabitants, and 44 percent to its 1,300,000 Muslim and Christian Arab inhabitants."

Nor, apparently, does Clifford, who never once expresses any regret about the 750,000 Palestinians pushed out of their country during the 1947 to 1949 fighting, and never allowed by Israel to return to their homes


John Judis’s Truman book is a landmark in anti-Zionism

But Truman folded on these impulses, Judis says, in part because he needed $100,000 from political donors Abe Feinberg and Ed Kaufmann – a huge sum in 1948–for a whistlestop campaign trip through the midwest when his campaign was broke and Thomas Dewey was threatening to make him a one-termer. Those Zionist donors got “unmatched access to the White House.” - See more at: John Judis’s Truman book is a landmark in anti-Zionism

Franklin Roosevelt expressed a similar secular pragmatism. In 1944, he chided the two leading Zionist lobbyists, Rabbis Wise and Abba Silver, that they were pushing a course that could lead to war. Roosevelt reflected angrily: “”To think of it, two men, two holy men, coming here to ask me to let millions of people be killed in a jihad.” - See more at: John Judis’s Truman book is a landmark in anti-Zionism

Yeah, it's to the point where you're immediately branded an 'Antisemite' if you dare to question Israel's behavior. But i'm an American Citizen, not an Israeli Citizen. I'm not subserviant to Israel...

"Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations - Entangling alliances with none - President Thomas Jefferson

Only to some. You may not be an anti-semite but you are an idiot who believes anything that comes down the pike supporting your paranoid delusions.

Huh??

Unless I'm seriously mistaken (and I'm not) you've espoused some belief in obvious conspiracy theories and when argued with claimed the other person was either an agent or dupe of the government. Doesn't lend itself to your credibility in any realm.

Whatever justification you can come up with eh?

You make it about me, I'm gonna make it all about you, dicklicker

Soooooo, personal perspective ain't about you.......? Okie, dokie Sparky......

You have something else to say, dicklicker ?

Dicklicker? Is that the best you can do??!! I mean seriously, a 5 year old could do better.

Your comments on this thread are a lot like you, in that they don;t amount to diddly squat, dicklicker

Project often?

 

[irosie91]

I am intrigued-----someone asked FDR to recognize Israel in 1937 ? and FDR refused on the grounds that recognition would obligate the US to "DEFEND"?
gotta link?

Ben Gurion gave Truman 2 Million? and mentioned AMERICAN LIKUDNIKS?
Ben Gurion, himself was not LIKUD-----in fact there was no "LIKUD" back then---
Ben Gurion was head of the Israeli LABOR PARTY--------kinda a socialist thing
gotta link?

1.5 million Palestinians were declared "foreigners" in Israel--------there were not
1.5 million Palestinians in all of Israel in 1948. In fact ---in 1948 arabs living in any
part of Palestine were not called "Palestinians" In 1948 the ONLY people called
PALESTINIANS-----were jews

(1)
Truman Adviser Recalls May 14, 1948 US Decision to Recognize Israel

"Most people who knew the Middle East at first hand opposed the partition plan, adopted by the United Nations on November 29, 1947. Patently unfair, it awarded 56 percent of Palestine to its 650,000 Jewish inhabitants, and 44 percent to its 1,300,000 Muslim and Christian Arab inhabitants."

Nor, apparently, does Clifford, who never once expresses any regret about the 750,000 Palestinians pushed out of their country during the 1947 to 1949 fighting, and never allowed by Israel to return to their homes


John Judis’s Truman book is a landmark in anti-Zionism

But Truman folded on these impulses, Judis says, in part because he needed $100,000 from political donors Abe Feinberg and Ed Kaufmann – a huge sum in 1948–for a whistlestop campaign trip through the midwest when his campaign was broke and Thomas Dewey was threatening to make him a one-termer. Those Zionist donors got “unmatched access to the White House.” - See more at: John Judis’s Truman book is a landmark in anti-Zionism

Franklin Roosevelt expressed a similar secular pragmatism. In 1944, he chided the two leading Zionist lobbyists, Rabbis Wise and Abba Silver, that they were pushing a course that could lead to war. Roosevelt reflected angrily: “”To think of it, two men, two holy men, coming here to ask me to let millions of people be killed in a jihad.” - See more at: John Judis’s Truman book is a landmark in anti-Zionism

Yeah, it's to the point where you're immediately branded an 'Antisemite' if you dare to question Israel's behavior. But i'm an American Citizen, not an Israeli Citizen. I'm not subserviant to Israel...

"Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations - Entangling alliances with none - President Thomas Jefferson

Only to some. You may not be an anti-semite but you are an idiot who believes anything that comes down the pike supporting your paranoid delusions.

Huh??

Unless I'm seriously mistaken (and I'm not) you've espoused some belief in obvious conspiracy theories and when argued with claimed the other person was either an agent or dupe of the government. Doesn't lend itself to your credibility in any realm.

MING!!!! the main character in my nightmares----when I was four years old
(ok ---now you know ---I am THAT old. )

 

[irosie91]

Didn't ming have a white arrow shaped decoration on the middle of his bald
skull?

 

[Ringel05]

(1)
Truman Adviser Recalls May 14, 1948 US Decision to Recognize Israel

"Most people who knew the Middle East at first hand opposed the partition plan, adopted by the United Nations on November 29, 1947. Patently unfair, it awarded 56 percent of Palestine to its 650,000 Jewish inhabitants, and 44 percent to its 1,300,000 Muslim and Christian Arab inhabitants."

Nor, apparently, does Clifford, who never once expresses any regret about the 750,000 Palestinians pushed out of their country during the 1947 to 1949 fighting, and never allowed by Israel to return to their homes


John Judis’s Truman book is a landmark in anti-Zionism

But Truman folded on these impulses, Judis says, in part because he needed $100,000 from political donors Abe Feinberg and Ed Kaufmann – a huge sum in 1948–for a whistlestop campaign trip through the midwest when his campaign was broke and Thomas Dewey was threatening to make him a one-termer. Those Zionist donors got “unmatched access to the White House.” - See more at: John Judis’s Truman book is a landmark in anti-Zionism

Franklin Roosevelt expressed a similar secular pragmatism. In 1944, he chided the two leading Zionist lobbyists, Rabbis Wise and Abba Silver, that they were pushing a course that could lead to war. Roosevelt reflected angrily: “”To think of it, two men, two holy men, coming here to ask me to let millions of people be killed in a jihad.” - See more at: John Judis’s Truman book is a landmark in anti-Zionism

Yeah, it's to the point where you're immediately branded an 'Antisemite' if you dare to question Israel's behavior. But i'm an American Citizen, not an Israeli Citizen. I'm not subserviant to Israel...

"Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations - Entangling alliances with none - President Thomas Jefferson

Only to some. You may not be an anti-semite but you are an idiot who believes anything that comes down the pike supporting your paranoid delusions.

Huh??

Unless I'm seriously mistaken (and I'm not) you've espoused some belief in obvious conspiracy theories and when argued with claimed the other person was either an agent or dupe of the government. Doesn't lend itself to your credibility in any realm.

MING!!!! the main character in my nightmares----when I was four years old
(ok ---now you know ---I am THAT old. )

Well, vote for him...... or else......

(He has a death ray).

 

[pwjohn]

Yeah, it's to the point where you're immediately branded an 'Antisemite' if you dare to question Israel's behavior. But i'm an American Citizen, not an Israeli Citizen. I'm not subserviant to Israel...

"Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations - Entangling alliances with none - President Thomas Jefferson

Only to some. You may not be an anti-semite but you are an idiot who believes anything that comes down the pike supporting your paranoid delusions.

Huh??

Unless I'm seriously mistaken (and I'm not) you've espoused some belief in obvious conspiracy theories and when argued with claimed the other person was either an agent or dupe of the government. Doesn't lend itself to your credibility in any realm.

You make it about me, I'm gonna make it all about you, dicklicker

Soooooo, personal perspective ain't about you.......? Okie, dokie Sparky......

You have something else to say, dicklicker ?

Dicklicker? Is that the best you can do??!! I mean seriously, a 5 year old could do better.

Your comments on this thread are a lot like you, in that they don;t amount to diddly squat, dicklicker

Project often?

Never, dicklicker.

 

[Ringel05]

Didn't ming have a white arrow shaped decoration on the middle of his bald
skull?

You might be thinking about his helmet but it's not white.

 

[Ringel05]

Only to some. You may not be an anti-semite but you are an idiot who believes anything that comes down the pike supporting your paranoid delusions.

Huh??

Unless I'm seriously mistaken (and I'm not) you've espoused some belief in obvious conspiracy theories and when argued with claimed the other person was either an agent or dupe of the government. Doesn't lend itself to your credibility in any realm.

Soooooo, personal perspective ain't about you.......? Okie, dokie Sparky......

You have something else to say, dicklicker ?

Dicklicker? Is that the best you can do??!! I mean seriously, a 5 year old could do better.

Your comments on this thread are a lot like you, in that they don;t amount to diddly squat, dicklicker

Project often?

Never, dicklicker.

Like taking candy from a baby......

 

[pwjohn]

Huh??

Unless I'm seriously mistaken (and I'm not) you've espoused some belief in obvious conspiracy theories and when argued with claimed the other person was either an agent or dupe of the government. Doesn't lend itself to your credibility in any realm.

You have something else to say, dicklicker ?

Dicklicker? Is that the best you can do??!! I mean seriously, a 5 year old could do better.

Your comments on this thread are a lot like you, in that they don;t amount to diddly squat, dicklicker

Project often?

Never, dicklicker.

Like taking candy from a baby......

Don't be silly, dicklicker. Your beliefs are as usual, leading you astray.

 

[Ringel05]

Unless I'm seriously mistaken (and I'm not) you've espoused some belief in obvious conspiracy theories and when argued with claimed the other person was either an agent or dupe of the government. Doesn't lend itself to your credibility in any realm.

Dicklicker? Is that the best you can do??!! I mean seriously, a 5 year old could do better.

Your comments on this thread are a lot like you, in that they don;t amount to diddly squat, dicklicker

Project often?

Never, dicklicker.

Like taking candy from a baby......

Don't be silly, dicklicker

I bet PW stands for pee wee and we ain't talking height.......

 

[irosie91]

irosie91, do you really think your trope and ad hominems rationalize support of the racial supremacist state that illegally obtained nukes? And there is that theory that JFK was taken out because he was not going to tolerate the theft of the nuke material the zionists stole from the USA.

Israel had nukes long before Kennedy was US president-------and no "theft"
was involved. --- what is it you IMAGINE would have to be stolen? I
cannot wait for your idiot response. URANINUM is a naturally occurring element.
In fact-------Israel was pulling HEAVY WATER our of the dead sea way back in the
early 60s for FUSION experiments------even I knew that ----way back then. I have
the impression that "FISSION" is a mystery to you

 

[pwjohn]

Your comments on this thread are a lot like you, in that they don;t amount to diddly squat, dicklicker

Project often?

Never, dicklicker.

Like taking candy from a baby......

Don't be silly, dicklicker

I bet PW stands for pee wee and we ain't talking height.......

Your beliefs hold no water, dicklicker.

 

[irosie91]

Didn't ming have a white arrow shaped decoration on the middle of his bald
skull?

You might be thinking about his helmet but it's not white.

I was a little distracted--------in love with FLASH