Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's a fake quote. He didn't say that. He said the fake news is the enemy of the people, and that is 100% correct.Of course, you can't name anything "totalitarian" that Trump has done.As we look at what Trump is doing, we see a republican march towards totalitarianism. Over the course of the past 40 years republicans have done everything you put on democrats.ROFL! What "totalitarian" measures have Republicans supported?You republicans are marching us towards totalitarianism and you're too stupid to see it.
Censorship? Nope, that's democrats.
Wiping your ass on the Constitution? Nope, that's democrats.
Beating people up for speaking their minds? Nope, that's democrats.
All you Trump haters do nothing but spew hot gas out your ass.
"The press is the enemy of the people." Investigating people because they investigated him. Just 2 things of many.
Vietnam, Korea and WW II were run by both parties? Really?Wars ran by both parties.Wars run by Democrats, dumbass.Wars do that, create larger government, cost money and has casyaktues,classic dumbass leftwing argument. Prior to WW I, government was tiny. Since then, it has grown by leaps and bounds.America has probably had socialism even before the Constitution was ratified and has continued to add programs.
Two lies in two sentences.Of course it does. A government that controls the economy is necessarily huge. And a capitalist economy is the product of small government.classic dumbass leftwing argument. Prior to WW I, government was tiny. Since then, it has grown by leaps and bounds.America has probably had socialism even before the Constitution was ratified and has continued to add programs.
The size of government has nothing to do with the system that government uses to operate..
Only socialist idiots make claims like that.
Your dumb ass doesn't know what socialism is. And our government has always controlled commerce. That's a constitutional requirement of congress.
We require zero socialism, dumbass.You finally came to the point.Oh, stow the shell games. Are democrats for socialism, or not? Shit or get off the pot. This waffling gets old. You wine when people call your positions socialist, but then go on and on about how socialism is not so bad after all. Make up your fucking mind.
Pure idiocy.
We are a capitalist nation that has socialist programs and policies to mitigate the excesses of capitalism.
Do Democrats want more socialism, or less? Or do they want to keep it just the same?
And claiming that Sweden (which is more socialist than we ever will be) is NOT socialist is just stupidity in an attempt to prop up a failed argument
I don't really care what Sweden is.
The question has never been "Are we socialist?" but rather "How much socialism do we require?"
THAT is the beginning of an honest conversation
We require zero socialism, dumbass.You finally came to the point.Oh, stow the shell games. Are democrats for socialism, or not? Shit or get off the pot. This waffling gets old. You wine when people call your positions socialist, but then go on and on about how socialism is not so bad after all. Make up your fucking mind.
Pure idiocy.
We are a capitalist nation that has socialist programs and policies to mitigate the excesses of capitalism.
Do Democrats want more socialism, or less? Or do they want to keep it just the same?
And claiming that Sweden (which is more socialist than we ever will be) is NOT socialist is just stupidity in an attempt to prop up a failed argument
I don't really care what Sweden is.
The question has never been "Are we socialist?" but rather "How much socialism do we require?"
THAT is the beginning of an honest conversation
We require zero socialism, dumbass.You finally came to the point.Oh, stow the shell games. Are democrats for socialism, or not? Shit or get off the pot. This waffling gets old. You wine when people call your positions socialist, but then go on and on about how socialism is not so bad after all. Make up your fucking mind.
Pure idiocy.
We are a capitalist nation that has socialist programs and policies to mitigate the excesses of capitalism.
Do Democrats want more socialism, or less? Or do they want to keep it just the same?
And claiming that Sweden (which is more socialist than we ever will be) is NOT socialist is just stupidity in an attempt to prop up a failed argument
I don't really care what Sweden is.
The question has never been "Are we socialist?" but rather "How much socialism do we require?"
THAT is the beginning of an honest conversation
Really now. You are using socialism when you post in there over the Internet. You are using socialism when you drive to get your groceries. You are using socialism when you turn on your lights. You are using socialism when you fire up your furnace in the winter.....it's a very long socialist list, cupcake.
The US is a mixture of Capitalism and Socialism and always has been. All the way from the Whiskey Tax to today. It's now whether we need socialism or not, but how much. Capitalism, at the level of the United States could not exist without the social programs to make it work.
You just won an award, cupcake.
View attachment 278933
* crickets *So, are Democrats in favor of more socialism? Are any of them brave enough to answer?
Sure they canCons cant even explain what democrat socialism is .
Except now it is not a smear.![]()
Republicans Have Been Smearing Democrats As Socialists Since Way Before You Were Born
From FDR to Barack Obama to Bernie Sanders, conservatives are reading from the same playbook.
Republicans believe they have hit on a bold, brand new line of attack that is sure to doom Democrats heading into the 2020 elections. President Donald Trump made it a central point of his State of the Union. Rep. Tom Emmer (R-Minn.), head of the National Republican Congressional Committee, promises to bring this fresh hit in his party’s effort to regain control of the House.
The big plan is to ― wait for it ― attack Democrats as socialists.
“Socialism is the greatest vulnerability by far that the House Democrats have,” Emmer told the New York Times.
As any American who has developed to the stage of object permanence can tell you, this isn’t a new plan. It is, in fact, the oldest trick in the book.
Every single political actor since the late 19th century advocating for some form progressive social change ― whether it be economic reform, challenging America’s racial caste system or advocating for women’s rights or LGBT rights ― has been tarred as a socialist or a communist bent on destroying the American Free Enterprise System.
Contemporary political conservatism has been focused on blocking social change that challenges existing hierarchies of class, race and sex since its founding in response to the French Revolution. Socialism emerged as the biggest threat to class hierarchies in due time and conservatives have called everything they don’t like socialism ever since.
More: Republicans Have Been Smearing Democrats As Socialists Since Way Before You Were Born
Once again, it's the same ole socialism bogeyman. Hopefully most voters are smart enough to see through this GOP bogeyman. Socialism is a major part of our society - and has been for a long time. It makes our lives much better - each and every day. Socialism comes in various forms - it isn't one size fits all.
75 Ways Socialism Has Improved America
Yes. That's why they suck.A good case could be made that the military is socialistic. How about public schools or the police force?
We should all be thankful for Democratic Socialism!
We require zero socialism, dumbass.You finally came to the point.Pure idiocy.
We are a capitalist nation that has socialist programs and policies to mitigate the excesses of capitalism.
Do Democrats want more socialism, or less? Or do they want to keep it just the same?
And claiming that Sweden (which is more socialist than we ever will be) is NOT socialist is just stupidity in an attempt to prop up a failed argument
I don't really care what Sweden is.
The question has never been "Are we socialist?" but rather "How much socialism do we require?"
THAT is the beginning of an honest conversation
Really now. You are using socialism when you post in there over the Internet. You are using socialism when you drive to get your groceries. You are using socialism when you turn on your lights. You are using socialism when you fire up your furnace in the winter.....it's a very long socialist list, cupcake.
That's 99% bullshit, dumbass. The internet was almost entirely created by private corporations. Yeah, the roads are built by the government, but that doesn't mean they have to be. My electricity is supplied by a private corporations, moron. The same goes for the gas in my furnace. You obviously don't know the slightest thing about our economy.
The US is a mixture of Capitalism and Socialism and always has been. All the way from the Whiskey Tax to today. It's now whether we need socialism or not, but how much. Capitalism, at the level of the United States could not exist without the social programs to make it work.
You just won an award, cupcake.
View attachment 278933
At the time of the Whiskey Rebellion, the government was less than 5% of the economy. Now it's 50%. There has been no noticeable improvement.
We don't need any socialism. Government fucks up everything it touches, including the military.
So, are you arguing for more socialism?There are at jeast sixty types of socialism and one of those types leads to communism.the rest do not.
Anyone remember the fear episodes the Republicans used with Social Security?
Sure they canCons cant even explain what democrat socialism is .
It's socialism
We should all be thankful for Democratic Socialism!
Actually no;A good case could be made that the military is socialistic. How about public schools or the police force?