'Socialism': The GOP's Forever Bogeyman

Left Tard Cock
Suckers Are the Totalitarianists.

Trump Is trying To restore our Freedoms
Not Attack Them Like Scum Sucking Leftists
Do!
As we look at what Trump is doing, we see a republican march towards totalitarianism. Over the course of the past 40 years republicans have done everything you put on democrats.

Ignorance.





Indeed you are. Next.
.

I am still not as ignorant as you.





Facts in evidence say otherwise. When every argument you have revolves around a single trope, you have defined your singular ignorance.

Claims of racism for problems merely show you HAVE no point.

Fact supported claims I have made that you can't refute say otherwise.
 
Republicans Have Been Smearing Democrats As Socialists Since Way Before You Were Born

And as long as assholes such as you exhist in America, we will continue smearing you and denying your ilk any solace. Got it butthole? Do a search on YouTube for Socialim and do something about abating your extreme and profound ignorance, goofy. At the very least, socialism is a crutch for the weak willed and simple minded jerks of the world. Like you.
 
Cons cant even explain what democrat socialism is .

Oh, stow the shell games. Are democrats for socialism, or not? Shit or get off the pot. This waffling gets old. You wine when people call your positions socialist, but then go on and on about how socialism is not so bad after all. Make up your fucking mind.
 
Oh, stow the shell games. Are democrats for socialism, or not? Shit or get off the pot. This waffling gets old. You wine when people call your positions socialist, but then go on and on about how socialism is not so bad after all. Make up your fucking mind.

Pure idiocy.

We are a capitalist nation that has socialist programs and policies to mitigate the excesses of capitalism.

And claiming that Sweden (which is more socialist than we ever will be) is NOT socialist is just stupidity in an attempt to prop up a failed argument
 
Oh, stow the shell games. Are democrats for socialism, or not? Shit or get off the pot. This waffling gets old. You wine when people call your positions socialist, but then go on and on about how socialism is not so bad after all. Make up your fucking mind.

Pure idiocy.

We are a capitalist nation that has socialist programs and policies to mitigate the excesses of capitalism.

And claiming that Sweden (which is more socialist than we ever will be) is NOT socialist is just stupidity in an attempt to prop up a failed argument

Sweden is a country of 10mil not 300mil. Sweden does not give citizenship to people for simply being born there. Sweden is homogeneous and has become quite unstable since the arrival of Islamists.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/billmuehlenberg.com/2017/12/03/islam-immigration-death-sweden/amp/
 
Oh, stow the shell games. Are democrats for socialism, or not? Shit or get off the pot. This waffling gets old. You wine when people call your positions socialist, but then go on and on about how socialism is not so bad after all. Make up your fucking mind.

Pure idiocy.

We are a capitalist nation that has socialist programs and policies to mitigate the excesses of capitalism.

Do Democrats want more socialism, or less? Or do they want to keep it just the same?

And claiming that Sweden (which is more socialist than we ever will be) is NOT socialist is just stupidity in an attempt to prop up a failed argument

I don't really care what Sweden is.
 
Sweden is a country of 10mil not 300mil. Sweden does not give citizenship to people for simply being born there. Sweden is homogeneous and has become quite unstable since the arrival of Islamists.

None of that changes the fact that Sweden is far more socialist than we are...that they are NOT communist...and that they are a successful prosperous country.

Thanks for playing (and losing)
 
Oh, stow the shell games. Are democrats for socialism, or not? Shit or get off the pot. This waffling gets old. You wine when people call your positions socialist, but then go on and on about how socialism is not so bad after all. Make up your fucking mind.

Pure idiocy.

We are a capitalist nation that has socialist programs and policies to mitigate the excesses of capitalism.

Do Democrats want more socialism, or less? Or do they want to keep it just the same?

And claiming that Sweden (which is more socialist than we ever will be) is NOT socialist is just stupidity in an attempt to prop up a failed argument

I don't really care what Sweden is.
You finally came to the point.

The question has never been "Are we socialist?" but rather "How much socialism do we require?"

THAT is the beginning of an honest conversation
 
Oh, stow the shell games. Are democrats for socialism, or not? Shit or get off the pot. This waffling gets old. You wine when people call your positions socialist, but then go on and on about how socialism is not so bad after all. Make up your fucking mind.

Pure idiocy.

We are a capitalist nation that has socialist programs and policies to mitigate the excesses of capitalism.

Do Democrats want more socialism, or less? Or do they want to keep it just the same?

And claiming that Sweden (which is more socialist than we ever will be) is NOT socialist is just stupidity in an attempt to prop up a failed argument

I don't really care what Sweden is.
You finally came to the point.

The question has never been "Are we socialist?" but rather "How much socialism do we require?"

THAT is the beginning of an honest conversation

Can you honestly answer the question? Will Democrats answer the question? Or will they keep playing all the shell games?
 
Last edited:
Oh, stow the shell games. Are democrats for socialism, or not? Shit or get off the pot. This waffling gets old. You wine when people call your positions socialist, but then go on and on about how socialism is not so bad after all. Make up your fucking mind.

Pure idiocy.

We are a capitalist nation that has socialist programs and policies to mitigate the excesses of capitalism.

Do Democrats want more socialism, or less? Or do they want to keep it just the same?

And claiming that Sweden (which is more socialist than we ever will be) is NOT socialist is just stupidity in an attempt to prop up a failed argument

I don't really care what Sweden is.
You finally came to the point.

The question has never been "Are we socialist?" but rather "How much socialism do we require?"

THAT is the beginning of an honest conversation

Can you answer the question? Will Democrats answer the question? Or will they keep playing all the shell games?

See, in my experience, despite all the foot-shuffling and excuse making, Democrats want more socialism for the US. Which makes them advocates for socialism, ie socialists.
 
See, in my experience, despite all the foot-shuffling and excuse making, Democrats want more socialism for the US. Which makes them advocates for socialism, ie socialists.

Again...we are ALL socialists stupid. You just admitted it..

The only conversation is how socialist should we be

And you are not being honest about either your opposition or what you claim Dems want
 
See, in my experience, despite all the foot-shuffling and excuse making, Democrats want more socialism for the US. Which makes them advocates for socialism, ie socialists.

Again...we are ALL socialists stupid. You just admitted it..

The only conversation is how socialist should we be

And you are not being honest about either your opposition or what you claim Dems want
Who does all the money in the USA belong to?
 
See, in my experience, despite all the foot-shuffling and excuse making, Democrats want more socialism for the US. Which makes them advocates for socialism, ie socialists.

Again...we are ALL socialists stupid. You just admitted it..

The only conversation is how socialist should we be

And you are not being honest about either your opposition or what you claim Dems want

Dance faster! Whatever you do, don't answer the question. Don't own up to your actual values and goals. Who'd vote for you then?
 
5c73041b3b000085046b80b3.jpeg


Republicans Have Been Smearing Democrats As Socialists Since Way Before You Were Born

From FDR to Barack Obama to Bernie Sanders, conservatives are reading from the same playbook.

Republicans believe they have hit on a bold, brand new line of attack that is sure to doom Democrats heading into the 2020 elections. President Donald Trump made it a central point of his State of the Union. Rep. Tom Emmer (R-Minn.), head of the National Republican Congressional Committee, promises to bring this fresh hit in his party’s effort to regain control of the House.

The big plan is to ― wait for it ― attack Democrats as socialists.

“Socialism is the greatest vulnerability by far that the House Democrats have,” Emmer told the New York Times.

As any American who has developed to the stage of object permanence can tell you, this isn’t a new plan. It is, in fact, the oldest trick in the book.

Every single political actor since the late 19th century advocating for some form progressive social change ― whether it be economic reform, challenging America’s racial caste system or advocating for women’s rights or LGBT rights ― has been tarred as a socialist or a communist bent on destroying the American Free Enterprise System.

Contemporary political conservatism has been focused on blocking social change that challenges existing hierarchies of class, race and sex since its founding in response to the French Revolution. Socialism emerged as the biggest threat to class hierarchies in due time and conservatives have called everything they don’t like socialism ever since.

More: Republicans Have Been Smearing Democrats As Socialists Since Way Before You Were Born

Once again, it's the same ole socialism bogeyman. Hopefully most voters are smart enough to see through this GOP bogeyman. Socialism is a major part of our society - and has been for a long time. It makes our lives much better - each and every day. Socialism comes in various forms - it isn't one size fits all.

75 Ways Socialism Has Improved America

The article is total bullshit.

Police are not the product of socialism.

John Jay said it in the Federalist Papers (I doubt you have a fucking clue as to what they are)...

Nothing is more certain than the indispensable necessity of government, and it is equally undeniable, that whenever and however it is instituted, the people must cede to it some of their natural rights in order to vest it with requisite powers.

Which simply means people have government.

That does not make public programs socialism.
the thing you miss in that little explanation is that people dictate what they want, not the politician dictating what we need. So your premise is wrong. I will agree that law must be protected and that the security of the citizens is the governments first role.

Now with that, how does open borders fall under that umbrella?

how does the new green deal fall under that umbrella?

How does healthcare fall under that umbrella?

The reaction to this post I will receive from lefties will be bubkas. They are for total government control. Free people have free minds, don't forget it. Someone telling you to believe or support or anything they're telling you, they are taking your freedom.

"Open borders" isnt a real thing, dupe.
the right wing prefers, "democratic socialist control of the borders" not "open market operations" like Good capitalists.
 
Sweden is a country of 10mil not 300mil. Sweden does not give citizenship to people for simply being born there. Sweden is homogeneous and has become quite unstable since the arrival of Islamists.

None of that changes the fact that Sweden is far more socialist than we are...that they are NOT communist...and that they are a successful prosperous country.

Thanks for playing (and losing)

You don’t get to be the ref and scorekeeper, Herr Lesh . Their GDP is ~$500bil. Out GDP is $19rn

Maybe they should be less socialist? Game, set, match.
 
5c73041b3b000085046b80b3.jpeg


Republicans Have Been Smearing Democrats As Socialists Since Way Before You Were Born

From FDR to Barack Obama to Bernie Sanders, conservatives are reading from the same playbook.

Republicans believe they have hit on a bold, brand new line of attack that is sure to doom Democrats heading into the 2020 elections. President Donald Trump made it a central point of his State of the Union. Rep. Tom Emmer (R-Minn.), head of the National Republican Congressional Committee, promises to bring this fresh hit in his party’s effort to regain control of the House.

The big plan is to ― wait for it ― attack Democrats as socialists.

“Socialism is the greatest vulnerability by far that the House Democrats have,” Emmer told the New York Times.

As any American who has developed to the stage of object permanence can tell you, this isn’t a new plan. It is, in fact, the oldest trick in the book.

Every single political actor since the late 19th century advocating for some form progressive social change ― whether it be economic reform, challenging America’s racial caste system or advocating for women’s rights or LGBT rights ― has been tarred as a socialist or a communist bent on destroying the American Free Enterprise System.

Contemporary political conservatism has been focused on blocking social change that challenges existing hierarchies of class, race and sex since its founding in response to the French Revolution. Socialism emerged as the biggest threat to class hierarchies in due time and conservatives have called everything they don’t like socialism ever since.

More: Republicans Have Been Smearing Democrats As Socialists Since Way Before You Were Born

Once again, it's the same ole socialism bogeyman. Hopefully most voters are smart enough to see through this GOP bogeyman. Socialism is a major part of our society - and has been for a long time. It makes our lives much better - each and every day. Socialism comes in various forms - it isn't one size fits all.

75 Ways Socialism Has Improved America

The article is total bullshit.

Police are not the product of socialism.

John Jay said it in the Federalist Papers (I doubt you have a fucking clue as to what they are)...

Nothing is more certain than the indispensable necessity of government, and it is equally undeniable, that whenever and however it is instituted, the people must cede to it some of their natural rights in order to vest it with requisite powers.

Which simply means people have government.

That does not make public programs socialism.
the thing you miss in that little explanation is that people dictate what they want, not the politician dictating what we need. So your premise is wrong. I will agree that law must be protected and that the security of the citizens is the governments first role.

Now with that, how does open borders fall under that umbrella?

how does the new green deal fall under that umbrella?

How does healthcare fall under that umbrella?

The reaction to this post I will receive from lefties will be bubkas. They are for total government control. Free people have free minds, don't forget it. Someone telling you to believe or support or anything they're telling you, they are taking your freedom.

"Open borders" isnt a real thing, dupe.
the right wing prefers, "democratic socialist control of the borders" not "open market operations" like Good capitalists.

Piss off, troll.
 
5c73041b3b000085046b80b3.jpeg


Republicans Have Been Smearing Democrats As Socialists Since Way Before You Were Born

From FDR to Barack Obama to Bernie Sanders, conservatives are reading from the same playbook.

Republicans believe they have hit on a bold, brand new line of attack that is sure to doom Democrats heading into the 2020 elections. President Donald Trump made it a central point of his State of the Union. Rep. Tom Emmer (R-Minn.), head of the National Republican Congressional Committee, promises to bring this fresh hit in his party’s effort to regain control of the House.

The big plan is to ― wait for it ― attack Democrats as socialists.

“Socialism is the greatest vulnerability by far that the House Democrats have,” Emmer told the New York Times.

As any American who has developed to the stage of object permanence can tell you, this isn’t a new plan. It is, in fact, the oldest trick in the book.

Every single political actor since the late 19th century advocating for some form progressive social change ― whether it be economic reform, challenging America’s racial caste system or advocating for women’s rights or LGBT rights ― has been tarred as a socialist or a communist bent on destroying the American Free Enterprise System.

Contemporary political conservatism has been focused on blocking social change that challenges existing hierarchies of class, race and sex since its founding in response to the French Revolution. Socialism emerged as the biggest threat to class hierarchies in due time and conservatives have called everything they don’t like socialism ever since.

More: Republicans Have Been Smearing Democrats As Socialists Since Way Before You Were Born

Once again, it's the same ole socialism bogeyman. Hopefully most voters are smart enough to see through this GOP bogeyman. Socialism is a major part of our society - and has been for a long time. It makes our lives much better - each and every day. Socialism comes in various forms - it isn't one size fits all.

75 Ways Socialism Has Improved America

The article is total bullshit.

Police are not the product of socialism.

John Jay said it in the Federalist Papers (I doubt you have a fucking clue as to what they are)...

Nothing is more certain than the indispensable necessity of government, and it is equally undeniable, that whenever and however it is instituted, the people must cede to it some of their natural rights in order to vest it with requisite powers.

Which simply means people have government.

That does not make public programs socialism.
the thing you miss in that little explanation is that people dictate what they want, not the politician dictating what we need. So your premise is wrong. I will agree that law must be protected and that the security of the citizens is the governments first role.

Now with that, how does open borders fall under that umbrella?

how does the new green deal fall under that umbrella?

How does healthcare fall under that umbrella?

The reaction to this post I will receive from lefties will be bubkas. They are for total government control. Free people have free minds, don't forget it. Someone telling you to believe or support or anything they're telling you, they are taking your freedom.

"Open borders" isnt a real thing, dupe.
the right wing prefers, "democratic socialist control of the borders" not "open market operations" like Good capitalists.

Piss off, troll.
don't be jealous.
 
See, in my experience, despite all the foot-shuffling and excuse making, Democrats want more socialism for the US. Which makes them advocates for socialism, ie socialists.

Again...we are ALL socialists stupid. You just admitted it..

The only conversation is how socialist should we be

And you are not being honest about either your opposition or what you claim Dems want
we should have zero socialism
the government shouldn't have to take care of anyone that should be done by family and friends and because that isn't done as much anymore shows how regressed as a society we have become

Back in the day when someone was in need, it was family and friends that stepped forward and provide
and family and friends that didn't were rightfully criticized by society for not doing so it was an expected norm to help out your own family member
 
Last edited:
See, in my experience, despite all the foot-shuffling and excuse making, Democrats want more socialism for the US. Which makes them advocates for socialism, ie socialists.

Again...we are ALL socialists stupid. You just admitted it..

The only conversation is how socialist should we be

And you are not being honest about either your opposition or what you claim Dems want
we should have zero socialism
the government shouldn't have to take care of anyone that should be done by family and friends and because that isn't done as much anymore shows how regressed as a society we have become

Back in the day when someone was in need, it was family and friends that stepped forward and provide
and family and friends that didn't were rightfully criticized by society for not doing so it was an expected norm to help out your own family member
Government is socialism.

Ten simple Commandments from a God is all we should need if we were, truly moral.

We know we must rely on ethics and politics.
 

Forum List

Back
Top