Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Republicans plan is let the fukers die. We all know that. It’s no secret nor a mystery.
More than likely you have money!Funny I have lived in GOP led states my entire life and never had a problem getting healthcare or medicine.The Republicans plan is let the fukers die. We all know that. It’s no secret nor a mystery.
LOL hell no. I and my wife are college students full time,I get disability for a back injury damn near 10 years ago. At best she was making 13$ an hour,we still got medicaid for us and the kids and it was fast as can be simply because we had choices of who to use etc. 100% government controlled healthcare is a horrible idea. I agree there should be SOMETHING done but complete government control is not the answer.More than likely you have money!Funny I have lived in GOP led states my entire life and never had a problem getting healthcare or medicine.The Republicans plan is let the fukers die. We all know that. It’s no secret nor a mystery.
How does Spain's GDP compare to the US?Surgery waiting times in Spain: 93 days, slightly down from 2017
Wow! I waited less than a month from when my insurance approved my back surgery until I got it.
LOL hell no. I and my wife are college students full time,I get disability for a back injury damn near 10 years ago. At best she was making 13$ an hour,we still got medicaid for us and the kids and it was fast as can be simply because we had choices of who to use etc. 100% government controlled healthcare is a horrible idea. I agree there should be SOMETHING done but complete government control is not the answer.
How long does it take to pay for surgery?Surgery waiting times in Spain: 93 days, slightly down from 2017
Wow! I waited less than a month from when my insurance approved my back surgery until I got it.
Yep! Seen my father and sister in law go through that crap.Want to fix a segment of healthcare and save a boatload of money...fix workers comp care. Everything is done backwards to maximize the haul to the providers.
Well here in a deep red state I have an appt with an ENT in 70 days, yep 70 and there are 10 docs in the practice. Cataract surgery is normally a 2 to 3 month wait. In fact the only doctor I could get into see if I called him tomorrow morning is my family doctor all other specialists is 2 to 3 month wait. Back and cataract surgery is elective surgeries and should have to wait 2, 3 or 4 months. This has been this way long before obamacare.
Must be nice to be on government health care which by the way is what Medicaid is. Man, a guy who with his family live off the government tit sure does hate it when someone else does. Go figure you are a republican.
High costs you say?....How about the high cost of Medicare, costing in excess of TEN TIMES what it was projected to?How does Spain's GDP compare to the US?Surgery waiting times in Spain: 93 days, slightly down from 2017
Wow! I waited less than a month from when my insurance approved my back surgery until I got it.
In-Depth Analysis by Team of UMass Amherst Economists Shows Viability of Medicare For All
“The most fundamental goals of Medicare for All are to significantly improve health care outcomes for everyone living in the United States while also establishing effective cost controls throughout the health care system.
"'These two purposes are both achievable,' says lead author Robert Pollin, Distinguished Professor in economics at UMass Amherst and co-director of PERI. 'As of 2017, the U.S. was spending about $3.24 trillion on personal health care—about 17 percent of total GDP.'
"'Meanwhile, 9 percent of U.S. residents have no insurance and 26 percent are underinsured—they are unable to access needed care because of prohibitively high costs.'
"'Other high-income countries spend an average of about 40 percent less per person and produce better health outcomes. Medicare for All could reduce total health care spending in the U.S. by nearly 10 percent, to $2.93 trillion, while creating stable access to good care for all U.S. residents.'"
The Republicans plan is let the fukers die. We all know that. It’s no secret nor a mystery.
Surgery waiting times in Spain: 93 days, slightly down from 2017
Wow! I waited less than a month from when my insurance approved my back surgery until I got it.
How long does it take to pay for surgery?Surgery waiting times in Spain: 93 days, slightly down from 2017
Wow! I waited less than a month from when my insurance approved my back surgery until I got it.
Zero
The Republicans plan is let the fukers die. We all know that. It’s no secret nor a mystery.
That’s exactly how it should be. It’s the natural order - those who cannot fend for themselves and don’t have someone else to protect them, are the first to become prey.
How much of those high costs are due to private, for-profit health care insurers?High costs you say?....How about the high cost of Medicare, costing in excess of TEN TIMES what it was projected to?How does Spain's GDP compare to the US?Surgery waiting times in Spain: 93 days, slightly down from 2017
Wow! I waited less than a month from when my insurance approved my back surgery until I got it.
In-Depth Analysis by Team of UMass Amherst Economists Shows Viability of Medicare For All
“The most fundamental goals of Medicare for All are to significantly improve health care outcomes for everyone living in the United States while also establishing effective cost controls throughout the health care system.
"'These two purposes are both achievable,' says lead author Robert Pollin, Distinguished Professor in economics at UMass Amherst and co-director of PERI. 'As of 2017, the U.S. was spending about $3.24 trillion on personal health care—about 17 percent of total GDP.'
"'Meanwhile, 9 percent of U.S. residents have no insurance and 26 percent are underinsured—they are unable to access needed care because of prohibitively high costs.'
"'Other high-income countries spend an average of about 40 percent less per person and produce better health outcomes. Medicare for All could reduce total health care spending in the U.S. by nearly 10 percent, to $2.93 trillion, while creating stable access to good care for all U.S. residents.'"
If the figures you just posted are off by just half of that miss, you have less than no argument.
Excuses are like assholes.How much of those high costs are due to private, for-profit health care insurers?High costs you say?....How about the high cost of Medicare, costing in excess of TEN TIMES what it was projected to?How does Spain's GDP compare to the US?Surgery waiting times in Spain: 93 days, slightly down from 2017
Wow! I waited less than a month from when my insurance approved my back surgery until I got it.
In-Depth Analysis by Team of UMass Amherst Economists Shows Viability of Medicare For All
“The most fundamental goals of Medicare for All are to significantly improve health care outcomes for everyone living in the United States while also establishing effective cost controls throughout the health care system.
"'These two purposes are both achievable,' says lead author Robert Pollin, Distinguished Professor in economics at UMass Amherst and co-director of PERI. 'As of 2017, the U.S. was spending about $3.24 trillion on personal health care—about 17 percent of total GDP.'
"'Meanwhile, 9 percent of U.S. residents have no insurance and 26 percent are underinsured—they are unable to access needed care because of prohibitively high costs.'
"'Other high-income countries spend an average of about 40 percent less per person and produce better health outcomes. Medicare for All could reduce total health care spending in the U.S. by nearly 10 percent, to $2.93 trillion, while creating stable access to good care for all U.S. residents.'"
If the figures you just posted are off by just half of that miss, you have less than no argument.
"As Obamacare twists in political winds, top insurers made $6 billion (not that there is anything wrong with that)"
As Obamacare twists in political winds, top insurers profits surge nearly 30 percent
"Combined, the nation's top six health insurers reported $6 billion in adjusted profits for the second quarter.
"That's up more about 29 percent from the same quarter a year ago — far outpacing the overall S&P 500 health care sector's growth of 8.5 percent for the quarter, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S data."
