Sodomite Suppression Act of California

[Katzndogz]

The initiative is to keep pornography away from children so we know the left is going to be against it.

 

[g5000]

The initiative is to keep pornography away from children so we know the left is going to be against it.

What special brain surgery did you have that translates "any person who willingly touches another person of the same gender for purposes of sexual gratification be put to death by bullets to the head" as an initiative to keep porn away from children?

 

[Moonglow]

The initiative is to keep pornography away from children so we know the left is going to be against it.

Hardly so, that is not a truth...

 

[g5000]

MEASURE: Any person who willingly touches another person of the same gender for purposes of sexual gratification be put to death by bullets to the head.

RETARD: Well, that might be what is SAYS, but what it REALLY is is an attempt to outlaw blowing up nursery schools, so we know the Left will be against it.

 

[g5000]

Christ, the straw man fallacies are getting more and more bizarre every day.

 

[g5000]

From the proposed Act: "No person shall distribute, perform, or transmit sodomistic propaganda directly or indirectly by any means to any person under the age of majority."

This is an attempt to prevent kids from being taught that homosexuality is not evil.

 

[g5000]

Also from the proposed Act, right after that last part I quoted in my last post: "Every offender shall be fined...

 

[Katzndogz]

The initiative is to keep pornography away from children so we know the left is going to be against it.

What special brain surgery did you have that translates "any person who willingly touches another person of the same gender for purposes of sexual gratification be put to death by bullets to the head" as an initiative to keep porn away from children?

You didn't read it.

 

[g5000]

The initiative is to keep pornography away from children so we know the left is going to be against it.

What special brain surgery did you have that translates "any person who willingly touches another person of the same gender for purposes of sexual gratification be put to death by bullets to the head" as an initiative to keep porn away from children?

You didn't read it.

I sure did.

Your straw man fallacy has one fatal flaw.

Along with death by bullets for being gay, it is aimed at the prevention of "creating an interest in or an acceptance of human sexual relations other than between a man and a woman." Meaning, don't teach kids that being gay is okay.

Second-your straw man fallacy has TWO fatal flaws-the "left" is not in favor of giving kids porn.

Third-your straw man fallacy has THREE fatal flaws-teaching kids that being gay is okay is not porn.

Fourth-your straw man fallacy has FOUR fatal flaws-the "left" will oppose this for the death-by-bullets-to-the-head provision more than anything else.

So your bogus attempt to pre-empt opposition to this bill as meaning "They want kids to have porn!" is as transparent as vodka.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Wow...

And I'm an 'extremist' for noting that the perverse reasoning that causes sexual abnormality, is not Normal.

But, at the end of the day, THAT is the fate of the homosexual cult.

They have spent most of humanity IN THE CLOSET... for a reason. The chaos and calamity that they're presently causing, will inevitably lead ... ONCE AGAIN, to the catastrophe that will just as inevitably get THE above noted 'bill'... pushed into 'just another Tuesday'. Which of course, is the means by which humanity slams the obligatory closet door... SHUT!

Some of us are patiently waiting for you to tell us what harm homosexuals do to society that heterosexuals don't do,...

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Still waiting.

I'll help you. Tell us what harm to society two men or two women do if they legally marry in a jurisdiction where such a marriage is legal.

PLEASE be clear, concise, and specific.

Let's review:

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Perhaps we should go over it once more just to be sure its been adequately published:

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Once more? Good idea...

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Still not sure? Let's not take a chance...

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Questions?

Yes. Where's your FIRST example of how same sex marriage harms society?

OH! Good question...

Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman. Therefore society is harmed where two men are said to be suitable for something which is by definition, unsuited for them. Because it is deceit, being advanced as truth... which is axiomatically harmful, because it DECEIVES... which is to say it intentionally misinforms, misguides, defrauds and as such robs the individual and by extension, the culture... of truth, thus is a delusion which can only result in chaos, calamity and catastrophe... which is the product common to evil.


Which brings us to once again needing to review:

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Perhaps we should go over it once more just to be sure its been adequately published:

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Once more? Good idea...

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Still not sure? Let's not take a chance...

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

 

[bodecea]

Still waiting ...

Let's review:

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Perhaps we should go over it once more just to be sure its been adequately published:

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Once more? Good idea...

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Still not sure? Let's not take a chance...

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Questions?

What deceit? The kind of deceit that came from hiding in the Closet and marrying someone of the opposite gender without love in order to hide some more? That kind of deceit?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Some of us are patiently waiting for you to tell us what harm homosexuals do to society that heterosexuals don't do,...

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Still waiting.

I'll help you. Tell us what harm to society two men or two women do if they legally marry in a jurisdiction where such a marriage is legal.

PLEASE be clear, concise, and specific.

Let's review:

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Perhaps we should go over it once more just to be sure its been adequately published:

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Once more? Good idea...

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Still not sure? Let's not take a chance...

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Questions?

Yes. Where's your FIRST example of how same sex marriage harms society?

OH! Good question...

Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman. Therefore society is harmed where two men are said to be suitable for something which is by definition, unsuited for them. Because it is deceit, being advanced as truth... which is axiomatically harmful, because it DECEIVES... which is to say it intentionally misinforms, misguides, defrauds and as such robs the individual and by extension, the culture... of truth, thus is a delusion which can only result in chaos, calamity and catastrophe... which is the product common to evil.

]

You have to answer the question without your baseless subjective immaterial bias injected into the answer.

So again. What is your first example of how same sex marriage harms society?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Still waiting ...

Let's review:

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Perhaps we should go over it once more just to be sure its been adequately published:

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Once more? Good idea...

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Still not sure? Let's not take a chance...

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Questions?

What deceit? The kind of deceit that came from hiding in the Closet and marrying someone of the opposite gender without love in order to hide some more? That kind of deceit?

Let me translate his answer: 'I think same sex marriage harms society because I don't like it.'

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Define non sequitur...

Q: What harm to society two men or two women do if they legally marry in a jurisdiction where such a marriage is legal?

A: Treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful!

The Reader should now see the presentation of mental disorder.

You are literally witnessing an adult imply doubt in the premise that deceit, advanced as truth is axiomatically harmful.

LOL! THAT is a classic demonstration of what "Mental Disorder", "Deviant / Perverse Reasoning" actually represents.

Now not everyone suffering mental disorder presents sexual deviancy, but all sexual deviancy is manifested BY Mental Disorder; its important that you understand that... .

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

You're asking, what does: "Deceit, fraudulently advanced as a means to influence the ignorant", look like?

Good question... it looks like THIS:

Let me translate his answer: 'I think same sex marriage harms society because I don't like it.'

Do you see how it works? It advances something which, by DEFINITION: CANNOT EXIST: as being real... . In reality, that which cannot exist, does not exist... meaning that it is not real.

Now how can we know that 'same sex marriage' does not exist?

We know this because: Marriage > is < the joining of one man and one woman.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Define non sequitur...

Q: What harm to society two men or two women do if they legally marry in a jurisdiction where such a marriage is legal?

A: Treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful!

The Reader should now see the presentation of mental disorder.

You are literally witnessing an adult imply doubt in the premise that deceit, advanced as truth is axiomatically harmful.

LOL! THAT is a classic demonstration of what "Mental Disorder", "Deviant / Perverse Reasoning" actually represents.

Now not everyone suffering mental disorder presents sexual deviancy, but all sexual deviancy is manifested BY Mental Disorder; its important that you understand that... .

There is nothing deceitful in same sex relationships. Persons of the same sex fall in love all the time. They share a sincere desire to commit to each other in a marital relationship all the time. They reject your prejudicial view that they are deceiving themselves all the time.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Still waiting ...

Let's review:

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Perhaps we should go over it once more just to be sure its been adequately published:

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Once more? Good idea...

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Still not sure? Let's not take a chance...

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Questions?

What deceit? The kind of deceit that came from hiding in the Closet and marrying someone of the opposite gender without love in order to hide some more? That kind of deceit?

Let me translate his answer: 'I think same sex marriage harms society because I don't like it.'

Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman.

There is no such limited definition of marriage. Marriage under the law can be defined as anything the People say it is.

 

[bodecea]

The initiative is to keep pornography away from children so we know the left is going to be against it.

Hardly so, that is not a truth...

Katzndogz doesn't know how to tell the truth.

 

[bodecea]

Still waiting ...

Let's review:

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Perhaps we should go over it once more just to be sure its been adequately published:

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Once more? Good idea...

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Still not sure? Let's not take a chance...

LOL! No you're not. What you're pretending is that you haven't been told ad nauseum that treating deceit as truth, is axiomatically harmful... .

BUT! In fairness... you only do so because you've no means to do anything else.

Questions?

What deceit? The kind of deceit that came from hiding in the Closet and marrying someone of the opposite gender without love in order to hide some more? That kind of deceit?

Let me translate his answer: 'I think same sex marriage harms society because I don't like it.'

Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman.

For you...but not for everyone.

 

[Political Junky]

Penal Code section 39 a) The abominable crime against nature known as buggery, called also sodomy, is a monstrous evil that Almighty God, giver of freedom and liberty, commands us to suppress on pain of our utter destruction even as he overthrew Sodom and Gomorrha.

...the People of California wisely command, in the fear of God, that any person who willingly touches another person of the same gender for purposes of sexual gratification be put to death by bullets to the head or by any other convenient method.

https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/initiatives/pdfs/15-0008 (Sodomy).pdf

Filed by a bona fide lawyer of Sodom California.

It will be interesting to see how many signatures this American Taliban whackjob guy gets on his ballot initiative.

The American Taliban at work.