OnePercenter
Gold Member
- Apr 10, 2013
- 23,667
- 1,880
- 265
I was just going to post this so I guess that's not needed now.
Like others have mentioned I didn't see anything about how they would plan to store the energy to be used at night when they become energy consuming devices as opposed to producers.
But what I like is that this came from two people using their own funding to produce and test the panels. Apparently they got a grant from the Highway Administration for two prototypes, I don't like that. Don't hand them a half billion dollars like Solyndra by any means. I would prefer some bigger company install them in their parking lots and let's see how that goes.
Let's have Walmart or any other volunteer install them in the parking lot of a store and see how they perform. Let's see if the extra costs of installation prove to be worth it. Let's see if they can actually take a store completely off grid for a day. If a company like that evaluates the system as a net gain and not a loss then the product will sell itself. We won't need any government funding and in the end once it proves to be a benefit then the public roads will also benefit the tax payers with a better product.
Private sector testing will make or break this idea. Keep the government out of it.
More words of wisdom from the guy who believes that Ford didn't take bailout monies.
Solyndra, as well as every solar panel manufacturer was whipped out by China subsidizing their companies.
I know you aren't very sharp but you did remember Solyndra was given a half billion dollars in subsidies and failed right?
Solyndra, as well as every solar panel manufacturer was whipped out by China subsidizing their companies. ie; The Chinese sold panels on the market for less than manufacturing costs.