Some perspective on mass shootings. CARS kill 100 americans every DAY

Obvious the left doesn't care about saving lives since they not only accept without complaint the much bigger highway homicide problem, but also the million abortions every year in america.
People need cars, but not guns. And, we could get that number down greatly, if we had the will.

OK let me tell you what you need or don't need

I sure I could come up with a long list
 
Suicide is not a crime therefore the death is not a crime no one is hurt but the person pulling the trigger

Suicide is a choice, voluntary and is not a measure of violence or murder
It is intentionally inflicted. It is an intentional death by firearm. You can't get away from this, sp. Give it up.

Intentional suicide is not a crime

You people like to use the suicide stat because it pads your your numbers and makes the problem of gun violence look worse that it is but it's a red herring

The more relevant stats are murders by gun then accidental death by guns
Your objection has already been noted and overruled. Your comments are a red herring and will be ignored.
LIke you have any authority

Twit
:lol: as much "authority" as you, bub. :lol: Your argument is not relevant. Tough.
Of course it is you just want to ignore it because the padded numbers work in your favor
 
It is intentionally inflicted. It is an intentional death by firearm. You can't get away from this, sp. Give it up.

Intentional suicide is not a crime

You people like to use the suicide stat because it pads your your numbers and makes the problem of gun violence look worse that it is but it's a red herring

The more relevant stats are murders by gun then accidental death by guns
Your objection has already been noted and overruled. Your comments are a red herring and will be ignored.
LIke you have any authority

Twit
:lol: as much "authority" as you, bub. :lol: Your argument is not relevant. Tough.
Of course it is you just want to ignore it because the padded numbers work in your favor
Your comment exemplifies your failure: you don't comprehend the issue.
 
Intentional suicide is not a crime

You people like to use the suicide stat because it pads your your numbers and makes the problem of gun violence look worse that it is but it's a red herring

The more relevant stats are murders by gun then accidental death by guns
Your objection has already been noted and overruled. Your comments are a red herring and will be ignored.
LIke you have any authority

Twit
:lol: as much "authority" as you, bub. :lol: Your argument is not relevant. Tough.
Of course it is you just want to ignore it because the padded numbers work in your favor
Your comment exemplifies your failure: you don't comprehend the issue.
prove to me the suicide rate will go down with gun control

You can't because it won't people who want to kill themselves will with or without a gun
 
Your objection has already been noted and overruled. Your comments are a red herring and will be ignored.
LIke you have any authority

Twit
:lol: as much "authority" as you, bub. :lol: Your argument is not relevant. Tough.
Of course it is you just want to ignore it because the padded numbers work in your favor
Your comment exemplifies your failure: you don't comprehend the issue.
prove to me the suicide rate will go down with gun control

You can't because it won't people who want to kill themselves will with or without a gun
The suicide rate is not the issue, although you would like it to be, because you have nothing else.
 
Obvious the left doesn't care about saving lives since they not only accept without complaint the much bigger highway homicide problem, but also the million abortions every year in america.
Perhaps we should treat gun ownership as we do automobile ownership. Require state testing to obtain a license, require insurance, require age and vision restrictions for gun operation, require an annual license.

The fact is, cars were not specifically designed to kill people, guns are. While the state has mandated safety improvements to cars (seat belts, air bags, ABS braking systems, horns, lights and safety glass, gun manufacturers have designed guns to fire more rapidly with a sustained rate of fire.

Your inept comparison shows that you have not plumbed the intellectual depth of the conundrum the NRA left us with.
 
You are the one trying to deflect the conversation. Libs hate it when conservatives point out that car violence is a far bigger problem than gun violence. They hate it because they have no answer.

Car violence is down 2/3rds per capita since the 60's by placing safety before profits. Shouldn't that be the same in guns?
 
Cars kill 100 people a day and we do whatever we can to make them safer

Guns kill 100 people a day and we refuse to do anything
 
People need cars, but not guns. And, we could get that number down greatly, if we had the will.

I think we need both. Cars for transportation and guns to keep DC in check. And yes we could easily reduce the highway carnage and save money in the process. Nobody has the solution to gun killing.
 
While the state has mandated safety improvements to cars (seat belts, air bags, ABS braking systems, horns, lights and safety glass, gun manufacturers have designed guns to fire more rapidly with a sustained rate of fire.

.

HAHAHA. You can't be serious. The govt lets detroit sell cars that do 3 even 3 times the speed limit. They let the car makers install extremely distracting devices like internet access. And they let people use radar detectors. The govt ENCOURAGES people to drive like psychos. The media is even worse what with how they make movies and tv shows and commercials that glorify speeding and text-driving. THINK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Obvious the left doesn't care about saving lives since they not only accept without complaint the much bigger highway homicide problem, but also the million abortions every year in america.


WARNING - RETARDED NRA NUTTER TALKING POINT AHEAD.
 
us-motor-vehicle-deaths.png

That's an interesting graph and i wish you would give a link. I went to DOT and couldn't find it. BTW - it would be better to see a graph of deaths per mile instead of per person.

Notice the big drop around 1974. That's when we went to the 55 mph speed limit. We'd get a similar drop if we did it today but libs say no way.

Deaths have also gone way down because of the fewer driving under the influence..Back in the 1950's and 60's the cops would let the person go, call a cab..next night back out on the road drunk.
 
Deaths have also gone way down because of the fewer driving under the influence..Back in the 1950's and 60's the cops would let the person go, call a cab..next night back out on the road drunk.

The war on DWIs has helped a lot. But now DWI has been replaced by DWT - driving while texting. Amazing how stupid people are. Everyone concedes drunk driving is bad, but the fools think text driving is ok!!!
 
LIke you have any authority

Twit
:lol: as much "authority" as you, bub. :lol: Your argument is not relevant. Tough.
Of course it is you just want to ignore it because the padded numbers work in your favor
Your comment exemplifies your failure: you don't comprehend the issue.
prove to me the suicide rate will go down with gun control

You can't because it won't people who want to kill themselves will with or without a gun
The suicide rate is not the issue, although you would like it to be, because you have nothing else.
then why do you use it in your gun control arguments

There is a difference between gun deaths and gun crime but you don't seem to understand that
 

Forum List

Back
Top