Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You claim the courts never heard evidence, that Trump couldn't take cases to court before the election. These are false claims.
And you ignore much more than that. You ignore the cases that were adjudicated. You ignore the incompetence of Trump. You ignore the attempts by Trump and his cronies to disenfranchise millions of people.
I am your enemy because I have opinions you don't like.
If you think the rules were changed illegally, you don't wait until after people voted to sue.
The battle you picked would disenfranchise millions of legitimate voters who did nothing wrong and overthrow the result of the election.
And all that without proving a single vote was fraudulent.
If you can't see how incredibly bad that it is, you are deplorable.
It’s always a fucking conspiracy with you. You just handle that the courts ruled against you because the courts don’t share your opinion.I said most of the courts denied on standing, and the ones that didn't still were in the hock.
Adjudicated doesn't mean shit when the courts don't want to take a position that would question the entire system.
I can handle opinions not my own, you are just a smarmy shit about it.
When it comes to the election procedures, you can sue before the election. Not after.You sue whenever you can. Before, after, and next time you make sure you set up a system to watch ballot drop places like hawks. If Republicans don't do that in swing States in 2024 it's their own damn fault.
They would benefit from the poison fruit. If one side cheats, sorry but you can't let that pass.
Yet.
Being called deplorable by a mouth breathing SJW moron like you is a badge of honor.
It’s always a fucking conspiracy with you. You just handle that the courts ruled against you because the courts don’t share your opinion.
You’re changing what you said because you were wrong and can’t admit it.
When it comes to the election procedures, you can sue before the election. Not after.
Any moron would be able to tell you that you can’t just change the rules after the election.
Trump and his cronies could have sued before the election but mostly didn’t. That’s their fault You don’t disenfranchise millions of voters because your side wasn’t competent.
Youre just making excuses because you can’t handle the idea that you’re wrong.Not always. Don't believe in 9/11 or moon landing ones. Don't believe in the JEWS ARE OUT TO GET US (like so many on the left do).
I do believe progressives like their Marxist ilk will do anything to win, and I do believe people in the system will protect the system no matter what.
Not changing at all.
You can’t sue whenever you want if you want to win. When you lose, as expected and as you should, it’s not a conspiracy. It’s incompetence.You can sue whenever the fuck you want, as the left has shown us time and time again. Lawfare.
Meaningless point is meaningless
"mostly". So cheaters should be rewarded then? Good to know for future reference.
Youre just making excuses because you can’t handle the idea that you’re wrong.
You can’t sue whenever you want if you want to win. When you lose, as expected and as you should, it’s not a conspiracy. It’s incompetence.
Changing election procedures isn’t cheating. Disenfranchising millions of voters after the election because they don’t vote for you is cheating.
It’s always a conspiracy. You obviously can’t handle the idea that you’re wrong, because you think the only way someone disagrees with you is because of some corrupt ulterior motive.I can handle it, can you?
Or the system is rigged to protect itself.
Changing election procedures without following the actual law in question is illegal, and the changes were made to make cheating easier.
A few minor wins doesn't change the fact the system protects itself.
Like the ACLU throwing Trump a bone over the gag order.
"Hey look, we're impartial!"
Babble.100%.
I'm good at name calling when it suits me and the target is worthy, mouth breather.
"Women can have penises, and I believe in science" <-Every leftard on this board
And you’re law degree is from where ?It doesn’t matter. The constitution is clear. If you are going to refer to that guy in New Mexico, his ruling was not lawful, the judge was wrong. It was a bench trial and the guy wasn’t charged with the relevant statute. The judge just decided on his own that the guy was guilty of insurrection, even though he didn’t participate in the violence or enter the capitol.
I’m sure you’ll find some leftist judge somewhere who will try to say trump is guilty of insurrection, but you’ll find as many on the right who will say he’s not.
Do you think we should go by what a judge decides on his own, or by what the constitution and the rule of law says?
It’s always a conspiracy. You obviously can’t handle the idea that you’re wrong, because you think the only way someone disagrees with you is because of some corrupt ulterior motive.
The system isn’t rigged. You just don’t get to have it your way every time.
If you think changing election procedures is illegal, then file a lawsuit and get them changed for the next election. But don’t use that as an excuse to disenfranchise people just because they didn’t vote for your candidate.
Your paranoia makes you look retarded. Now you're even shifting your own position because it already failed you.
Just sad.
More Babble.Coming from you that is sad and hilarious.
Sadlarious.
Bull-fucking-shit.
I know what the evidence was in the Conn case. But you know that one already and are just pretending to not know about it.
You sue whenever you can. Before, after, and next time you make sure you set up a system to watch ballot drop places like hawks. If Republicans don't do that in swing States in 2024 it's their own damn fault.
They would benefit from the poison fruit. If one side cheats, sorry but you can't let that pass.
Yet.
Being called deplorable by a mouth breathing SJW moron like you is a badge of honor.
I can handle it, can you?
Or the system is rigged to protect itself.
Changing election procedures without following the actual law in question is illegal, and the changes were made to make cheating easier.
No one believes they’re wrong, but they’re open to the possibility with having to resort to conspiracy theories. You are demonstrating intellectual fragility. It takes a strong individual to consider the possibility they’re wrong.Just like the Wuhan flu maybe coming from a lab?
I can handle it, I just don't believe that I am.
So you say.
They did, and got rejected on standing.
