Someone wants to use the 14th Amendment to fix the 2024 election for Dems.

[martybegan]

Well, it’s how our constitutional government has worked so far.

Is that the system you want to attack?

Save it, not attack it.

 

[Marener]

Save it, not attack it.

You can't save it by violating a fundamental concept of the constitution. That's bizarre thinking.

 

[martybegan]

You can't save it by violating a fundamental concept of the constitution. That's bizarre thinking.

LOL, that's the Dems thing, especially with the 2nd amendment.

 

[Faun]

This isn't a binary solution set situation, suits could be before, after, way after.

Of course they can. You say that now but your original position on this was that cases filed before the election would be dismissed for lack of standing.

 

[Faun]

There is evidence something screwy went on, just not enough to overcome the protectors of the system or the fellow travelers like you.

There is no such evidence.

 

[Marener]

LOL, that's the Dems thing, especially with the 2nd amendment.

But that’s what you’re saying. You think using the courts to change the outcome of an election because your opinion is that it was stolen (without a basis in fact) is saving the constitution.

That’s bizarre.

 

[martybegan]

Of course they can. You say that now but your original position on this was that cases filed before the election would be dismissed for lack of standing.

They were. And after. and then for "cause" but not really.

Is this really that difficult for you? Maybe the Hello Kitty Message Board is more your speed.

 

[martybegan]

There is no such evidence.

There is, just not enough to overcome the system.

Yet.

 

[martybegan]

But that’s what you’re saying. You think using the courts to change the outcome of an election because your opinion is that it was stolen (without a basis in fact) is saving the constitution.

That’s bizarre.

The Courts are mandated by the constitution, idiot.

 

[Moonglow]

This guy is basically calling for a Court mandated coup.

The Disqualification Clause is clear — let’s use it



Does he really think 1/2 the country would accept this lying down and let the Dems get super majorities in both houses?

This is a call for civil war, plain and simple.

Trump is a criminal and should be excluded from running for president.

 

[Marener]

The Courts are mandated by the constitution, idiot.

The courts base their opinions on fact. Doing otherwise would be counter to the constitution.

 

[martybegan]

Trump is a criminal and should be excluded from running for president.

Marion Barry's crack pipe begs to differ.

 

[martybegan]

The courts base their opinions on fact. Doing otherwise would be counter to the constitution.

A truly neutral court would, but progs have made many of the courts far from neutral.

Roe wasn't per the constitution, nor Plessey. Next on the list to die is Chevron deference.

 

[Marener]

A truly neutral court would, but progs have made many of the courts far from neutral.

Roe wasn't per the constitution, nor Plessey. Next on the list to die is Chevron deference.

This has nothing to do with Roe, or Plessey or Chevron.

You were asking the courts to violate fundamental aspects of our constitution because of your beliefs which are not based on facts. How does that protect the constitution?

 

[martybegan]

This has nothing to do with Roe, or Plessey or Chevron.

You were asking the courts to violate fundamental aspects of our constitution because of your beliefs which are not based on facts. How does that protect the constitution?

Yes it does. Bad courts make bad decisions, like the 3 above.

I am asking the courts to protect the Constitution as written, not desecrate it as seen fit, like progressives do.

 

[Marener]

Yes it does. Bad courts make bad decisions, like the 3 above.

I am asking the courts to protect the Constitution as written, not desecrate it as seen fit, like progressives do.

How would disenfranchising millions of Americans protect the constitution?

 

[Faun]

They were. And after. and then for "cause" but not really.

Is this really that difficult for you? Maybe the Hello Kitty Message Board is more your speed.

LOL

Hisses the idiot who said nobody is harmed before the election by laws being changed; therefore, any suits filed would be dismissed on lack of standing.

 

[Faun]

There is, just not enough to overcome the system.

Yet.

Prove there's evidence...

 

[martybegan]

How would disenfranchising millions of Americans protect the constitution?

How would allowing cheaters to cheat protect the Constitution?

 

[martybegan]

LOL

Hisses the idiot who said nobody is harmed before the election by laws being changed; therefore, any suits filed would be dismissed on lack of standing.

The courts were saying that, not me.

Try to keep up.