Something Weird Is Going on in Fulton County, Where Trump Is Expected to Be Indicted

This is your problem.

Taking legal steps to try to overturn the apparent result of an election is not illegal.
....what was it you were saying about "USMBlawyers (eyeroll)"?

Go get yourself some popcorn, read the indictment and watch prosecutors school you on how it was illegal.
 
Last edited:
You don't know wtf you are talking about. Unless you can show a specific act, done for specific agreed to personal gain, you have nothing.

Turkey was DIRECTLY paying Trump. Trump himself stated that he has a conflict of interest there. And sure enough Turkey got plenty of Trump favorable foreign policy that reversed America's prior stance and screwed our long time Kurdish allies. Trump foreign policy advisor straight up admitted that Trump's finances were steering his foreign policy.

This is WAAAAAY more damning than anything you fools have so on Joe and yet Trump never faced prosecution for this because AGAIN, there has to be specific quod pro quo established, not just speculation that someone got paid and favorable policy was provided, so therefore one was for the other.

I do not believe your accusations pertaining to President Trump.

Document please.
 
I do not believe your accusations pertaining to President Trump.

Document please.

You don't belive that Trump has refused to put his bussiness in a blind trust?

You don't belive that he was making money in all kinds of countries?

You don't belive that his foreign policy powers had a direct conflict of interest with all these personal financial intanglements?

You don't belive all those countries knew damn well that they can potentialy influence American foreign policy through Trump's personal bussiness?

What don't you belive exactly?

maxresdefault.jpg


John Bolton derided President Donald Trump’s daughter and son-in-law during a private speech last week and suggested his former boss’ approach to U.S. policy on Turkey is motivated by personal or financial interests




 
Last edited:
I know what they talked about because Joe showed up soon with a billion dollars for Ukraine if they fire the prosecutor. Joe bragged about it after he was out of office.

Shokin refused to prosecute corruption. Ukraine was trying to clean up it's reputation so they could attract foreign investment. It was US foreign policy backed by the EU and the IMF.
 
“Justice should be blind, but Biden has weaponized government against his leading political opponent to interfere in the 2024 election. Now a radical DA in Georgia is following Biden’s lead by attacking President Trump and using it to fundraise her political career. Americans see through this desperate sham,” posted House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), referring to Ms. Willis, a Democrat.

“This is another rogue Far Left radical District Attorney weaponizing their office to target Joe Biden’s top political opponent President Trump. President Trump had every legal right to challenge the results of the election,” said House Republican Conference Chairwoman Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), referring to Ms. Willis.

Ms. Stefanik labeled the indictment as “blatant election interference by the far-left.”

“Today’s indictment is just the latest political attack in the Democrats’ WITCH HUNT against President Trump. He did nothing wrong!” posted Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, on X, formerly Twitter.

“President Biden and the Democrats are ABUSING the justice system and have weaponized it against Donald Trump,” posted Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on X. “They are trying to take the power away from the voters.”

“President Trump did nothing wrong!” posted Rep. Troy Nehls (R-Texas) on X.

“Fani Willis is giving Stacey Abrams a run for her money with this shameless quest for fame and fortune. Willis, just like Alvin Bragg, is a left-wing Democrat with an axe to grind weaponizing the justice system against President Trump in an effort to interfere with the 2024 presidential election,” posted Rep. Mike Collins (R-Ga.) on X.
I hope you Trumpies don't hurt any jurists.

 
Shokin refused to prosecute corruption. Ukraine was trying to clean up it's reputation so they could attract foreign investment. It was US foreign policy backed by the EU and the IMF.
Polly want a cracker?
 
Shokin refused to prosecute corruption. Ukraine was trying to clean up it's reputation so they could attract foreign investment. It was US foreign policy backed by the EU and the IMF.

They weren't trying with Shokin. He was their then-President's long time buddy and it took Biden's ultimatum for Ukranian Congress to finally get rid of his corrupt ass.
 
You don't belive that Trump has refused to put his bussiness in a blind trust?

You don't belive that he was making money in all kinds of countries?

You don't belive that his foreign policy powers had a direct conflict of interest with all these personal financial intanglements?

You don't belive all those countries knew damn well that they can potentialy influence American foreign policy through Trump's personal bussiness?

What don't you belive exactly?

maxresdefault.jpg


John Bolton derided President Donald Trump’s daughter and son-in-law during a private speech last week and suggested his former boss’ approach to U.S. policy on Turkey is motivated by personal or financial interests





Your assertion was that President Trump committed crimes.
Did you forget?
 
Your assertion was that President Trump committed crimes.
Did you forget?

You need to read better. My "assertion" was about what it takes to establish a crime.

Even though Trump's financial intaglements look bad,
even though he and his family got paid huge money,
even though there were eye raising policies and acts towards those payers,
even though his foreign policy advisors were describing his personal interests steering his policies.

even with all that it's not a criminal case make and you don't even have a small fraction of that on Joe.
 
Last edited:
You need to read better. My "assertion" was about what it takes to establish a crime.

Even though Trump's financial intaglements look bad,
even though he and his family got paid huge money,
even though there were eye raising policies and acts towards those payers,
even though his foreign policy advisors were describing his personal interests steering his policies.

even with all that it's not a criminal case make and you don't even have a small fraction of that on Joe.

We do.
 

Forum List

Back
Top