Sorry, Left-Wingers, But Governors CAN Turn away "Refugees"

Federal government DOES NOT HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL POWER to FORCE immigrants on states

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 says that Congress has the power

"To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States"

In 1980, Congress, exercised that power to do so with the Refugee Act of 1980. So the Federal Government does have the power to accept refugees, and the states cannot invoke the 10th Amendment to deny these refugees, as the constitution clearly delegates that power to Congress, not the states.

Read it carefully. The Congress can set the guidelines for accepting a refugee - it cannot enforce any law upon the states. Law enforcement is left to the governors of the states.

Once a refugee is accepted, they become a legal permanent resident of the United States.

What is it that you believe Governors can do to them via "law enforcement"?
 
Vigilante is absolutely correct. Obama knows this. That is why he is now decided to house them on military bases within the states. Federal property. The problem is, if a refugee steps one foot off the military reservation, the police of that state can immediately arrest the refugee and dispose of him in the manner approved by the state. They could return the refugee to the FEMA authorities there at the base, have him returned to his homeland, or whatever.

Obama has already overstepped his authority in Louisiana. He may have to be slapped down again by another federal judge.

There is literally not a single thing true about this post.

Certainly is. The Constitution bears it out. Obama has no authority
 
Nearly every single point in the OP can be refuted by a single link.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-94/pdf/STATUTE-94-Pg102.pdf

And How are you going to make Governors of 30 states so far that REFUSE to accept them ...accept them... Federal troops against State and LOCAL police? The people have already TURNED AWAY ILLEGAL CHILDREN that this muslim president tried to force on communities... The PEOPLE have the ULTIMATE SAY, and so far THE PEOPLE do NOT WANT THEM.... Shall we have a Civil War caused by a muslim president?

No action is required for Governors to "accept" refugees.

If you want to start a civil war about it, you're welcome to try. I wouldn't expect it to work out well for you.

Well, of course a subversive would think that... But we do have a RECENT HISTORY, of THE PEOPLE turning away UNWANTED INVADERS!

upload_2015-11-17_18-28-2.jpeg
 
Nearly every single point in the OP can be refuted by a single link.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-94/pdf/STATUTE-94-Pg102.pdf

And How are you going to make Governors of 30 states so far that REFUSE to accept them ...accept them... Federal troops against State and LOCAL police? The people have already TURNED AWAY ILLEGAL CHILDREN that this muslim president tried to force on communities... The PEOPLE have the ULTIMATE SAY, and so far THE PEOPLE do NOT WANT THEM.... Shall we have a Civil War caused by a muslim president?

No action is required for Governors to "accept" refugees.

If you want to start a civil war about it, you're welcome to try. I wouldn't expect it to work out well for you.

Well, of course a subversive would think that... But we do have a RECENT HISTORY, of THE PEOPLE turning away UNWANTED INVADERS!

View attachment 55018

:lol:

You mean when a bunch of angry white people assaulted a bus full of American children on a field trip?
 
Federal government DOES NOT HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL POWER to FORCE immigrants on states

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 says that Congress has the power

"To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States"

In 1980, Congress, exercised that power to do so with the Refugee Act of 1980. So the Federal Government does have the power to accept refugees, and the states cannot invoke the 10th Amendment to deny these refugees, as the constitution clearly delegates that power to Congress, not the states.

Read it carefully. The Congress can set the guidelines for accepting a refugee - it cannot enforce any law upon the states. Law enforcement is left to the governors of the states.

Yeah, that's what the Confederates thought.
 
Federal government DOES NOT HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL POWER to FORCE immigrants on states

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 says that Congress has the power

"To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States"

In 1980, Congress, exercised that power to do so with the Refugee Act of 1980. So the Federal Government does have the power to accept refugees, and the states cannot invoke the 10th Amendment to deny these refugees, as the constitution clearly delegates that power to Congress, not the states.

Read it carefully. The Congress can set the guidelines for accepting a refugee - it cannot enforce any law upon the states. Law enforcement is left to the governors of the states.

Once a refugee is accepted, they become a legal permanent resident of the United States.

What is it that you believe Governors can do to them via "law enforcement"?

Simple, only the governors can enforce the laws of their respective states. Congress enforces no laws. Congress makes policies upon which refugees can be accepted, that is all.
 
Federal government DOES NOT HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL POWER to FORCE immigrants on states

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 says that Congress has the power

"To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States"

In 1980, Congress, exercised that power to do so with the Refugee Act of 1980. So the Federal Government does have the power to accept refugees, and the states cannot invoke the 10th Amendment to deny these refugees, as the constitution clearly delegates that power to Congress, not the states.

Read it carefully. The Congress can set the guidelines for accepting a refugee - it cannot enforce any law upon the states. Law enforcement is left to the governors of the states.

Oddly enough, you just made a case for the right of municipalities to be sanctuary cities. lol
 
Federal government DOES NOT HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL POWER to FORCE immigrants on states

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 says that Congress has the power

"To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States"

In 1980, Congress, exercised that power to do so with the Refugee Act of 1980. So the Federal Government does have the power to accept refugees, and the states cannot invoke the 10th Amendment to deny these refugees, as the constitution clearly delegates that power to Congress, not the states.

Read it carefully. The Congress can set the guidelines for accepting a refugee - it cannot enforce any law upon the states. Law enforcement is left to the governors of the states.

Once a refugee is accepted, they become a legal permanent resident of the United States.

What is it that you believe Governors can do to them via "law enforcement"?

Simple, only the governors can enforce the laws of their respective states. Congress enforces no laws. Congress makes policies upon which refugees can be accepted, that is all.

You said that already. I'm asking for specifics. What is it that you see happening?
 
Federal government DOES NOT HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL POWER to FORCE immigrants on states

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 says that Congress has the power

"To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States"

In 1980, Congress, exercised that power to do so with the Refugee Act of 1980. So the Federal Government does have the power to accept refugees, and the states cannot invoke the 10th Amendment to deny these refugees, as the constitution clearly delegates that power to Congress, not the states.

Read it carefully. The Congress can set the guidelines for accepting a refugee - it cannot enforce any law upon the states. Law enforcement is left to the governors of the states.

Yeah, that's what the Confederates thought.

You unable to read and comprehend? It's not all that difficult.
 
Nearly every single point in the OP can be refuted by a single link.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-94/pdf/STATUTE-94-Pg102.pdf

And How are you going to make Governors of 30 states so far that REFUSE to accept them ...accept them... Federal troops against State and LOCAL police? The people have already TURNED AWAY ILLEGAL CHILDREN that this muslim president tried to force on communities... The PEOPLE have the ULTIMATE SAY, and so far THE PEOPLE do NOT WANT THEM.... Shall we have a Civil War caused by a muslim president?

No action is required for Governors to "accept" refugees.

If you want to start a civil war about it, you're welcome to try. I wouldn't expect it to work out well for you.

Well, of course a subversive would think that... But we do have a RECENT HISTORY, of THE PEOPLE turning away UNWANTED INVADERS!

View attachment 55018

:lol:

You mean when a bunch of angry white people assaulted a bus full of American children on a field trip?

America children, FROM LATIN AMERICA.... From that picture...

The national controversy over a surge of Central American immigrants illegally crossing the U.S. border established a new battleground this week in a Southern California small town where angry crowds thwarted detained migrants from entering their community.
 
Federal government DOES NOT HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL POWER to FORCE immigrants on states

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 says that Congress has the power

"To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States"

In 1980, Congress, exercised that power to do so with the Refugee Act of 1980. So the Federal Government does have the power to accept refugees, and the states cannot invoke the 10th Amendment to deny these refugees, as the constitution clearly delegates that power to Congress, not the states.

Read it carefully. The Congress can set the guidelines for accepting a refugee - it cannot enforce any law upon the states. Law enforcement is left to the governors of the states.

Once a refugee is accepted, they become a legal permanent resident of the United States.

What is it that you believe Governors can do to them via "law enforcement"?

Simple, only the governors can enforce the laws of their respective states. Congress enforces no laws. Congress makes policies upon which refugees can be accepted, that is all.

You've never heard of the Department of Justice? whoa. Amazing.
 
Federal government DOES NOT HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL POWER to FORCE immigrants on states

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 says that Congress has the power

"To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States"

In 1980, Congress, exercised that power to do so with the Refugee Act of 1980. So the Federal Government does have the power to accept refugees, and the states cannot invoke the 10th Amendment to deny these refugees, as the constitution clearly delegates that power to Congress, not the states.

Read it carefully. The Congress can set the guidelines for accepting a refugee - it cannot enforce any law upon the states. Law enforcement is left to the governors of the states.

Once a refugee is accepted, they become a legal permanent resident of the United States.

What is it that you believe Governors can do to them via "law enforcement"?

Simple, only the governors can enforce the laws of their respective states. Congress enforces no laws. Congress makes policies upon which refugees can be accepted, that is all.

You said that already. I'm asking for specifics. What is it that you see happening?

I already said. When a refugee steps off the military base, state police arrests him.
 
Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 says that Congress has the power

"To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States"

In 1980, Congress, exercised that power to do so with the Refugee Act of 1980. So the Federal Government does have the power to accept refugees, and the states cannot invoke the 10th Amendment to deny these refugees, as the constitution clearly delegates that power to Congress, not the states.

Read it carefully. The Congress can set the guidelines for accepting a refugee - it cannot enforce any law upon the states. Law enforcement is left to the governors of the states.

Once a refugee is accepted, they become a legal permanent resident of the United States.

What is it that you believe Governors can do to them via "law enforcement"?

Simple, only the governors can enforce the laws of their respective states. Congress enforces no laws. Congress makes policies upon which refugees can be accepted, that is all.

You said that already. I'm asking for specifics. What is it that you see happening?

I already said. When a refugee steps off the military base, state police arrests him.

For what?
 
Federal government DOES NOT HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL POWER to FORCE immigrants on states

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 says that Congress has the power

"To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States"

In 1980, Congress, exercised that power to do so with the Refugee Act of 1980. So the Federal Government does have the power to accept refugees, and the states cannot invoke the 10th Amendment to deny these refugees, as the constitution clearly delegates that power to Congress, not the states.

Read it carefully. The Congress can set the guidelines for accepting a refugee - it cannot enforce any law upon the states. Law enforcement is left to the governors of the states.

Yeah, that's what the Confederates thought.

You unable to read and comprehend? It's not all that difficult.

Kim Davis found out what federal law enforcement is, her state laws notwithstanding.
 
Maybe not. but the PEOPLE can get out and protest like they did before they shipped in a whole load of them from other places like Honduras, etc. Remember that one? how many are WE THE PEOPLE expected to take in and have TO PAY FOR THEM too? this is the SECOND time under Obama we are going through this. NOW WHY IS THAT?

this was from the first batch of people the we ended up taking in under Obama.


ok Pelosi was added in the picture but these were the people being warehoused from before.


AND they wonder why the American people are freaking FED UP with people being dumped on them and they have to PAY FOR. This is from the FIRST wave from other countries.

Now they want us to take in people from the Muslin countries. WHERE does it stop folks?
 
Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 says that Congress has the power

"To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States"

In 1980, Congress, exercised that power to do so with the Refugee Act of 1980. So the Federal Government does have the power to accept refugees, and the states cannot invoke the 10th Amendment to deny these refugees, as the constitution clearly delegates that power to Congress, not the states.

Read it carefully. The Congress can set the guidelines for accepting a refugee - it cannot enforce any law upon the states. Law enforcement is left to the governors of the states.

Once a refugee is accepted, they become a legal permanent resident of the United States.

What is it that you believe Governors can do to them via "law enforcement"?

Simple, only the governors can enforce the laws of their respective states. Congress enforces no laws. Congress makes policies upon which refugees can be accepted, that is all.

You said that already. I'm asking for specifics. What is it that you see happening?

I already said. When a refugee steps off the military base, state police arrests him.

On what charge?
 
Federal government DOES NOT HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL POWER to FORCE immigrants on states

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 says that Congress has the power

"To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States"

In 1980, Congress, exercised that power to do so with the Refugee Act of 1980. So the Federal Government does have the power to accept refugees, and the states cannot invoke the 10th Amendment to deny these refugees, as the constitution clearly delegates that power to Congress, not the states.

Read it carefully. The Congress can set the guidelines for accepting a refugee - it cannot enforce any law upon the states. Law enforcement is left to the governors of the states.

Once a refugee is accepted, they become a legal permanent resident of the United States.

What is it that you believe Governors can do to them via "law enforcement"?

Simple, only the governors can enforce the laws of their respective states. Congress enforces no laws. Congress makes policies upon which refugees can be accepted, that is all.

You've never heard of the Department of Justice? whoa. Amazing.

The Department of Justice falls under President Obama. He has zero authority under the Constitution on this matter.
 
Read it carefully. The Congress can set the guidelines for accepting a refugee - it cannot enforce any law upon the states. Law enforcement is left to the governors of the states.

Once a refugee is accepted, they become a legal permanent resident of the United States.

What is it that you believe Governors can do to them via "law enforcement"?

Simple, only the governors can enforce the laws of their respective states. Congress enforces no laws. Congress makes policies upon which refugees can be accepted, that is all.

You said that already. I'm asking for specifics. What is it that you see happening?

I already said. When a refugee steps off the military base, state police arrests him.

On what charge?

Whatever charge they dream up. The refugee is not a citizen.
 
Once a refugee is accepted, they become a legal permanent resident of the United States.

What is it that you believe Governors can do to them via "law enforcement"?

Simple, only the governors can enforce the laws of their respective states. Congress enforces no laws. Congress makes policies upon which refugees can be accepted, that is all.

You said that already. I'm asking for specifics. What is it that you see happening?

I already said. When a refugee steps off the military base, state police arrests him.

On what charge?

Whatever charge they dream up. The refugee is not a citizen.

Are you unaware that the Bill of Rights applies to refugees, as does the rest of our criminal justice system?
 
Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 says that Congress has the power

"To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States"

In 1980, Congress, exercised that power to do so with the Refugee Act of 1980. So the Federal Government does have the power to accept refugees, and the states cannot invoke the 10th Amendment to deny these refugees, as the constitution clearly delegates that power to Congress, not the states.

Read it carefully. The Congress can set the guidelines for accepting a refugee - it cannot enforce any law upon the states. Law enforcement is left to the governors of the states.

Once a refugee is accepted, they become a legal permanent resident of the United States.

What is it that you believe Governors can do to them via "law enforcement"?

Simple, only the governors can enforce the laws of their respective states. Congress enforces no laws. Congress makes policies upon which refugees can be accepted, that is all.

You've never heard of the Department of Justice? whoa. Amazing.

The Department of Justice falls under President Obama. He has zero authority under the Constitution on this matter.

You are so stupid it hurts.

Read the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution. States cannot make laws that violate the Constitution. Which means that they cannot make laws that violate the civil rights of a legal non-citizen resident of the United States.
 

Forum List

Back
Top