South Carolina Sees Earliest Snow Fall in 100 Years

sst_anom_new.gif


Given the 2- 4Deg C Drop in Northern hemisphere oceans over the last few weeks the cooling is headed in hard and fast. The major drop will kill any chance of El Nino even occurring. It is now officially dead. Here comes the snow and ice... hope your ready. We no longer have Buffering heat in the northern hemisphere...
 
Actually snow in SC setting a record proves GW. Or maybe you're behind the times. GW morphed to Climate Change which morphed into Climate Disruption. SO, if it is cold in one area that only means it is hotter in some other area or so says the GW/CC/CD side.

They will tell you that as you heat one side the other side will get colder. Not only do we have GW/CC/CD we also have a reinvention of thermodynamics.


Ummm......nope. It proves dick.

Who cares if the hot and cold are always moving around? Kinda akes the whole "global" thing appear gay, does it not. We've already established that nobody cares about the science. And anyway.......reality is 95% perception. If its snowing on Nov 1st in SC, nobody's saying to themselves, "Shit.....we better do something about this global warming stuff fast!!":2up:
Well......maybe in the world of the AGW k00ks, but nobody else.
 
It's not snowing in the deep ocean
True.

However, the cold surface temps will now allow faster cooling of the land mass. I fully expect to see rapid ice growth in the arctic and a fridgide mid western states. By Jan 1 I expect a 100% freeze of t he great lakes.

While it may not be snowing in the deep ocean, the surface of much of it could very well freeze over above 80 Lat.
 
AM2SI20141031IC0.png


Record Ice growth in the arctic already noted and its only Nov 1 2014. Looks like things are going to be significantly colder as the Polar Low is massive and stable.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #27
Actually snow in SC setting a record proves GW. Or maybe you're behind the times. GW morphed to Climate Change which morphed into Climate Disruption. SO, if it is cold in one area that only means it is hotter in some other area or so says the GW/CC/CD side.

They will tell you that as you heat one side the other side will get colder. Not only do we have GW/CC/CD we also have a reinvention of thermodynamics.

LOL! Of course. When it's hotter than normal it's man made global warming! When it's colder than normal it's mad made global warming!
 
Actually snow in SC setting a record proves GW. Or maybe you're behind the times. GW morphed to Climate Change which morphed into Climate Disruption. SO, if it is cold in one area that only means it is hotter in some other area or so says the GW/CC/CD side.

They will tell you that as you heat one side the other side will get colder. Not only do we have GW/CC/CD we also have a reinvention of thermodynamics.

LOL! Of course. When it's hotter than normal it's man made global warming! When it's colder than normal it's mad made global warming!

They're dumber than normal because of carbon dioxide.
 
Gee, it's (hot/cold/snowing/flooding, etc.) is an observation.

Then you form a theory.

Then you test to fail your theory

That's how science works.

Now the AGWCult goes Gee, it's hot/cold/snowing/flooding, etc., therefore ManMade Global Warming you FUCKING DENIER!!! DIE DIE YOU FUCKING DENIERS!!! AGW AKBARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
 
BTW, from the OP's article:

To add to the bizarre nature of the event, this means that the area saw its first snowfall before its first freeze, since temperatures did not go below freezing. Ground temperatures were also well above freezing, which should have made it hard for the snow to stick to the ground.

But it did.

Odder still, we're just a week removed from tying an all-time daily high temperature, when it hit 87 degrees in Columbia last Sunday.
**************************************************************************

This was far more anomalous a precipitation event. Temperature-wise, this was completely typical weather for the region and the time of year. if you were looking for something to challenge global warming, this ain't it.
 
87% of the earth has BELOW NORMAL TEMPS and some how its magically the hottest eve'a.... Snow and ice are already taking their toll on the great lakes with lake temps already 12 degrees F below normal it wont take much cooling to being the freeze. The warmist morons just cant get things straight.. Siberia is a full 9 deg F below normal and already has over 2 feet of snow a full two months early. But hey... they got one small area of warmth..


Proves global warming, the warming is driving the cold to places it never went before.
 
BTW, from the OP's article:

To add to the bizarre nature of the event, this means that the area saw its first snowfall before its first freeze, since temperatures did not go below freezing. Ground temperatures were also well above freezing, which should have made it hard for the snow to stick to the ground.

But it did.

Odder still, we're just a week removed from tying an all-time daily high temperature, when it hit 87 degrees in Columbia last Sunday.
**************************************************************************

This was far more anomalous a precipitation event. Temperature-wise, this was completely typical weather for the region and the time of year. if you were looking for something to challenge global warming, this ain't it.
Whatever is presently on the Weather Channel is called an OBSERVATION. It's not EVIDENCE.

Sent from smartphone using my wits and Taptalk
 
87% of the earth has BELOW NORMAL TEMPS and some how its magically the hottest eve'a.... Snow and ice are already taking their toll on the great lakes with lake temps already 12 degrees F below normal it wont take much cooling to being the freeze. The warmist morons just cant get things straight.. Siberia is a full 9 deg F below normal and already has over 2 feet of snow a full two months early. But hey... they got one small area of warmth..


Proves global warming, the warming is driving the cold to places it never went before.
LOLz

Oh wait you're serious?

That's sad, pathetic.

Sent from smartphone using my wits and Taptalk
 
Whatever is presently on the Weather Channel is called an OBSERVATION. It's not EVIDENCE.

I believe you're responding in the wrong thread.

For what its worth, observations ARE evidence. In fact, virtually all evidence consists of observations.

What were you thinking constituted evidence?
 
Heres what the AGW mental cases don't get........

They get and have historically gotten all their attention when their prediction shit happens to be correct.......it creates a perception. Perceptions have now come back to blast them in the nut sacks here in 2014. Here it is November 2nd on my calendar in New York........feels like 20 degrees. Feels like January 2nd. Only a mental case would think that is going to create a perception of, "SHIT.......the global warming crap is killing us!!!"

These mental cases keep talking about the scientific evidence. When your dick is limp, its limp no matter how hard you tell the chick its a museum piece woody. That's how it works.
 
Whatever is presently on the Weather Channel is called an OBSERVATION. It's not EVIDENCE.

I believe you're responding in the wrong thread.

For what its worth, observations ARE evidence. In fact, virtually all evidence consists of observations.

What were you thinking constituted evidence?

OK so you admit the AGWCult has no science, no evidence, you merely point at Weather Channel and shriek "ManMade Global Warming!!"

It's what we knew all along
 

Forum List

Back
Top