Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump is claiming he can’t be subject to prosecution because of a stupid interpretation of the impeachment clause. He’s saying the president cant be prosecuted until he’s impeached (which is true), but fails to mention that he isn’t president.Then what do YOU think Trump's case is?
why not the drone pilot that was driving the drone?Then you believe that Obama should be in prison for murdering US civilians? How about for drone striking a wedding?
No evidence of the crime?!!! Are you retarded? Every drone strike is recorded and documented. No one is even denying Obama did it, not even Obama himself.Ridiculous, ignorant, hyperbolic nonsense.
No grand jury would indict President Obama for murder because there would be no evidence of a crime; Federal prosecutors can’t indict someone absent evidence just because they want to.
Trump was indicted because there was ample, compelling, objective, documented evidence of his crimes.
No one is above the law, including presidents.
Dude, every single president would come out of the office under numerous indictments. What do you suppose that would do to future presidents? Are they all going to be awesome after that? No!!! They will all be paralyzed with fear and bad guys around the world will greatly prosper as a result.
Given the Supreme Court is dominated by partisan conservative ideologues, it’s perfectly understandable to imagine the Court doing just that.I can’t imagine the court would accept Trump’s claim that nothing he does while president could ever be subject to criminal prosecution.
He was president at the time when they are saying he did sonething illegal.Trump is claiming he can’t be subject to prosecution because of a stupid interpretation of the impeachment clause. He’s saying the president cant be prosecuted until he’s impeached (which is true), but fails to mention that he isn’t president.
More baloney from the Mrs. Jones libtard sausage factory.....Ridiculous, ignorant, hyperbolic nonsense.
No grand jury would indict President Obama for murder because there would be no evidence of a crime; Federal prosecutors can’t indict someone absent evidence just because they want to.
Trump was indicted because there was ample, compelling, objective, documented evidence of his crimes.
No one is above the law, including presidents.
He didnt do that. Thats why he hasnt been charged with "incitement".Incite an attack on the US Capitol.
No the fuck isnt better. Thats an absurd and naive statement.seems better than having some god above the laws of their very own country sitting in the White House
So what?He was president at the time when they are saying he did sonething illegal.
Conservatives judge by actual law, no wonder you are whining so much Mrs. Jones.....Given the Supreme Court is dominated by partisan conservative ideologues, it’s perfectly understandable to imagine the Court doing just that.
One you can't understand. From time to time some cases test the law and standing of the Constitution through the interpretation of the Constitution.Tha fuck kind of answer is that?
He was under the orders of the Commander in Chief.why not the drone pilot that was driving the drone?
Not for President and Vice President.Absolutely not. You can dely electoral results under a court order. Any suggestion otherwise is pure horseshit.
Pay attention to the discussion before jumping in with random useless posts that dont apply to the conversation.One you can't understand. From time to time some cases test the law and standing of the Constitution through the interpretation of the Constitution.
When did they make war illegal?He was under the orders of the Commander in Chief.
Trump was making legal moves BEFORE the deadline was up. You are trying to criminal those legal moves.Not for President and Vice President.
The constitution gives a clear deadlines as does federal law for a president to be decided. Either by the EC or by Congress. A delay in the first, automatically triggers action in the other.
The president is commander in chief. Which means he has the power to command the military to take whatever actions he commands, short of violating the laws of war.No evidence of the crime?!!! Are you retarded? Every drone strike is recorded and documented. No one is even denying Obama did it, not even Obama himself.
I was in the military dipshit, so i know that the top of the US military chain of command is "The Commander in Chief"When did they make war illegal?
Youve got some bizarre beliefs about how government should work.
The unwarranted, wrongheaded defense of the insane notion that presidents are above the law is motivated solely by Trump being a Republican; this is yet another example of the right’s contempt for the rule of law.No evidence of the crime?!!! Are you retarded? Every drone strike is recorded and documented. No one is even denying Obama did it, not even Obama himself.
