Spicer Says Hitler Didn't "Use Chemical Weapons"

[NYcarbineer]

So if Assad is worse than Hitler, that must mean that we DEFINITELY need to get into another major war in the ME,

correct?

 

[Correll]

So if Assad is worse than Hitler, that must mean that we DEFINITELY need to get into another major war in the ME,

correct?

Nothing in the statement that "even Hitler didn't use chemical weapons" translates to, we "must" get into a major war.

Try to be less dishonest, if you can.

 

[NYcarbineer]

So if Assad is worse than Hitler, that must mean that we DEFINITELY need to get into another major war in the ME,

correct?

Nothing in the statement that "even Hitler didn't use chemical weapons" translates to, we "must" get into a major war.

Try to be less dishonest, if you can.

I have history on my side. Saddam got compared to Hitler repeatedly, by those pushing the Iraq war.

 

[Correll]

So if Assad is worse than Hitler, that must mean that we DEFINITELY need to get into another major war in the ME,

correct?

Nothing in the statement that "even Hitler didn't use chemical weapons" translates to, we "must" get into a major war.

Try to be less dishonest, if you can.

I have history on my side. Saddam got compared to Hitler repeatedly, by those pushing the Iraq war.

Which means what exactly in your goofy mind?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Hitler was a decorated war hero from WWI. I have more respect for him for winning his Iron Cross than I have for some of these pussified snowflakes that need safe spaces.

That is fucking sick!! Here is more stupidity that ill bet you can relate to..

http://addictinginfo.org/2017/04/12...is-time-it-wasnt-sean-spicer/snt-sean-spicer/

Hitler had more bravery than most current Democrats and Snowflake liberals and their safe spaces.

Holy fucking shit!! Seriously? !!

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

So if Assad is worse than Hitler, that must mean that we DEFINITELY need to get into another major war in the ME,

correct?

Nothing in the statement that "even Hitler didn't use chemical weapons" translates to, we "must" get into a major war.

Try to be less dishonest, if you can.

No. It translates into Spicer is a moron.

 

[Faun]

Hitler was a decorated war hero from WWI. I have more respect for him for winning his Iron Cross than I have for some of these pussified snowflakes that need safe spaces.

That is fucking sick!! Here is more stupidity that ill bet you can relate to..

http://addictinginfo.org/2017/04/12...is-time-it-wasnt-sean-spicer/snt-sean-spicer/

Hitler had more bravery than most current Democrats and Snowflake liberals and their safe spaces.

Kewl, so now we can add Hitler with Putin among your heroes.

 

[Faun]

Weapon.




View attachment 121630 Not weapon.


Liberals are lying pieces of shit.

As if the forum needed more evidence that you struggle with the English language.

weapon

something (as a club, knife, or gun) used to injure, defeat, or destroy​

Both images you posted were used as weapons.

Words have meaning, even if you don't understand them.

 

[Correll]

So if Assad is worse than Hitler, that must mean that we DEFINITELY need to get into another major war in the ME,

correct?

Nothing in the statement that "even Hitler didn't use chemical weapons" translates to, we "must" get into a major war.

Try to be less dishonest, if you can.

No. It translates into Spicer is a moron.

Nope, it translates to liberals are lying scum.

 

[Correll]

Weapon.




View attachment 121630 Not weapon.


Liberals are lying pieces of shit.

As if the forum needed more evidence that you struggle with the English language.

weapon

something (as a club, knife, or gun) used to injure, defeat, or destroy​

Both images you posted were used as weapons.

Words have meaning, even if you don't understand them.

So, would you call THIS a weapon?

Or an execution device?


Dumb ass lib.

 

[Faun]

Weapon.




View attachment 121630 Not weapon.


Liberals are lying pieces of shit.

As if the forum needed more evidence that you struggle with the English language.

weapon

something (as a club, knife, or gun) used to injure, defeat, or destroy​

Both images you posted were used as weapons.

Words have meaning, even if you don't understand them.

So, would you call THIS a weapon?

Or an execution device?


Dumb ass lib.

Either could apply, depending on context. If it's not used, it's neither, it's just an ugly chair. Of course, according to your idiocy, if I were to strap you into one of those and flipped the switch, according to you, I would have killed you without using a weapon.

Again, words have meaning, even though they're well beyond your limited comprehension.

Hit a nail with a hammer and it's a tool.

Hit someone over the head with that same hammer and it's a weapon.

Savvy?

 

[Correll]

Weapon.




View attachment 121630 Not weapon.


Liberals are lying pieces of shit.

As if the forum needed more evidence that you struggle with the English language.

weapon

something (as a club, knife, or gun) used to injure, defeat, or destroy​

Both images you posted were used as weapons.

Words have meaning, even if you don't understand them.

So, would you call THIS a weapon?

Or an execution device?


Dumb ass lib.

Either could apply, depending on context. If it's not used, it's neither, it's just an ugly chair. Of course, according to your idiocy, if I were to strap you into one of those and flipped the switch, according to you, I would have killed you without a weapon.

Again, words have meaning, even though they're well beyond your limited comprehension.

Hit a nail with a hammer and it's a tool.

Hit someone over the head with that same hammer and it's a weapon.

Savvy?

Kill someone with an execution device and you've executed them, you didn't kill them in battle.

Iron is a chemical. DOes that make this a chemical weapon?

 

[ricechickie]

Weapon.




View attachment 121630 Not weapon.


Liberals are lying pieces of shit.

As if the forum needed more evidence that you struggle with the English language.

weapon

something (as a club, knife, or gun) used to injure, defeat, or destroy​

Both images you posted were used as weapons.

Words have meaning, even if you don't understand them.

So, would you call THIS a weapon?

Or an execution device?


Dumb ass lib.

Either could apply, depending on context. If it's not used, it's neither, it's just an ugly chair. Of course, according to your idiocy, if I were to strap you into one of those and flipped the switch, according to you, I would have killed you without a weapon.

Again, words have meaning, even though they're well beyond your limited comprehension.

Hit a nail with a hammer and it's a tool.

Hit someone over the head with that same hammer and it's a weapon.

Savvy?

Kill someone with an execution device and you've executed them, you didn't kill them in battle.

Iron is a chemical. DOes that make this a chemical weapon?

Hmmm. Iron is an element. Are all elements "chemicals"?

 

[Faun]

Weapon.




View attachment 121630 Not weapon.


Liberals are lying pieces of shit.

As if the forum needed more evidence that you struggle with the English language.

weapon

something (as a club, knife, or gun) used to injure, defeat, or destroy​

Both images you posted were used as weapons.

Words have meaning, even if you don't understand them.

So, would you call THIS a weapon?

Or an execution device?


Dumb ass lib.

Either could apply, depending on context. If it's not used, it's neither, it's just an ugly chair. Of course, according to your idiocy, if I were to strap you into one of those and flipped the switch, according to you, I would have killed you without a weapon.

Again, words have meaning, even though they're well beyond your limited comprehension.

Hit a nail with a hammer and it's a tool.

Hit someone over the head with that same hammer and it's a weapon.

Savvy?

Kill someone with an execution device and you've executed them, you didn't kill them in battle.

Iron is a chemical. DOes that make this a chemical weapon?

So what if it's used in battle or not? Use it to kill someone and it's still a weapon.

You really should learn English if you're going to post here.

Oh, and if one were to hit someone over the head with that chunk of iron, then yes, it's a weapon.

This really isn't that difficult. If you weren't a sniveling conservative, you'd get it.

 

[Faun]

Here's yet another example of how rightarded Correll is.... Here are several of his posts where he employed the word, "weapon"...

And Bill is an excellent weapon to do so with.

Her strongest weapon would have been the Woman Card.

The Political Correctness is hypersensitivity used as a weapon to destroy, bully, intimidate, suppress and marginalize the enemies of the Left.

[emphasis added]​

according to this raging imbecile...

Bill Clinton is a "weapon"....

Play the "woman card" is a "weapon"...

And even political correctness is a "weapon"...

But posionous gas used to kill millions of people is not a "weapon"

 

[Correll]

Here's yet another example of how rightarded Correll is.... Here are several of his posts where he employed the word, "weapon"...

And Bill is an excellent weapon to do so with.

Her strongest weapon would have been the Woman Card.

The Political Correctness is hypersensitivity used as a weapon to destroy, bully, intimidate, suppress and marginalize the enemies of the Left.

[emphasis added]​

according to this raging imbecile...

Bill Clinton is a "weapon"....

Play the "woman card" is a "weapon"...

And even political correctness is a "weapon"...

But posionous gas used to kill millions of people is not a "weapon"

And if some lefty had said that Bill Clinton was NOT a weapon, I would have NOT had a hissy fit about word usage.

 

[Correll]

Weapon.




View attachment 121630 Not weapon.


Liberals are lying pieces of shit.

As if the forum needed more evidence that you struggle with the English language.

weapon

something (as a club, knife, or gun) used to injure, defeat, or destroy​

Both images you posted were used as weapons.

Words have meaning, even if you don't understand them.

So, would you call THIS a weapon?

Or an execution device?


Dumb ass lib.

Either could apply, depending on context. If it's not used, it's neither, it's just an ugly chair. Of course, according to your idiocy, if I were to strap you into one of those and flipped the switch, according to you, I would have killed you without a weapon.

Again, words have meaning, even though they're well beyond your limited comprehension.

Hit a nail with a hammer and it's a tool.

Hit someone over the head with that same hammer and it's a weapon.

Savvy?

Kill someone with an execution device and you've executed them, you didn't kill them in battle.

Iron is a chemical. DOes that make this a chemical weapon?

Hmmm. Iron is an element. Are all elements "chemicals"?

Depending on context, technically, yes.

Of course, only an asshole would get bent out of shape if someone said that it was NOT a chemical weapon.

An asshole with a dishonest agenda.

 

[Correll]

Weapon.




View attachment 121630 Not weapon.


Liberals are lying pieces of shit.

As if the forum needed more evidence that you struggle with the English language.

weapon

something (as a club, knife, or gun) used to injure, defeat, or destroy​

Both images you posted were used as weapons.

Words have meaning, even if you don't understand them.

So, would you call THIS a weapon?

Or an execution device?


Dumb ass lib.

Either could apply, depending on context. If it's not used, it's neither, it's just an ugly chair. Of course, according to your idiocy, if I were to strap you into one of those and flipped the switch, according to you, I would have killed you without a weapon.

Again, words have meaning, even though they're well beyond your limited comprehension.

Hit a nail with a hammer and it's a tool.

Hit someone over the head with that same hammer and it's a weapon.

Savvy?

Kill someone with an execution device and you've executed them, you didn't kill them in battle.

Iron is a chemical. DOes that make this a chemical weapon?

So what if it's used in battle or not? Use it to kill someone and it's still a weapon.

You really should learn English if you're going to post here.

Oh, and if one were to hit someone over the head with that chunk of iron, then yes, it's a weapon.

This really isn't that difficult. If you weren't a sniveling conservative, you'd get it.

I asked you if it was a CHEMICAL WEAPON.

Based on technically exacting definitions, taken out of normal context, and an asshole could make the argument that it is.

 

[Faun]

Here's yet another example of how rightarded Correll is.... Here are several of his posts where he employed the word, "weapon"...

And Bill is an excellent weapon to do so with.

Her strongest weapon would have been the Woman Card.

The Political Correctness is hypersensitivity used as a weapon to destroy, bully, intimidate, suppress and marginalize the enemies of the Left.

[emphasis added]​

according to this raging imbecile...

Bill Clinton is a "weapon"....

Play the "woman card" is a "weapon"...

And even political correctness is a "weapon"...

But posionous gas used to kill millions of people is not a "weapon"

And if some lefty had said that Bill Clinton was NOT a weapon, I would have NOT had a hissy fit about word usage.

LOLOL

What you refer to as a "hissy fit" is, in reality, "education."

You're just too oblivious to know it.

You're welcome.

 

[SYTFE]

Hitler was a decorated war hero from WWI. I have more respect for him for winning his Iron Cross than I have for some of these pussified snowflakes that need safe spaces.

Kindly go sit on a landmine. Thanks.