Spygate Indictments Coming!!! Look out, Corrupt Behaviors!!!

[TheGreatSatan]

Watching the Chinese Democrats take Hong Kong will mirror what the American Democrats will do in America.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Time will tell if this means Russian Bots or FBI Agents who broke the laws of the United States of America.

(1) Who wrote the "Steel Dossier"?
(2) Who paid for what and when? Was political revenge really a source of this?
(3) Why did Comey depart from internal controls that should prevent this from happening?
(4)Why did Mueller act confused when asked about his poorly written 2nd report?
(5) Credibility issues: Rachel Maddow, CNN News dropping viewers
(6) Why did the media call questioners "Tin foil hatters"
(7) Why were investigations predicated and why weren't they legal?
(8) Does process need to be reviewed, and does system need to be cleansed?
(9) Why did Brennan, Clapper, Rice, Strzok and a handful of others others leak to the media on government equipment?
(10) Was this charge against President trump an attempted coup?
(11) Will free and democratic Hong Kong become a vassal of Communist China?

​

All of this stuff could be 100% true, but no one will be held accountable, sadly.

.

It also could be 100% false and THAT is why no one will be held accountable, not sadly.

If you think there is no truth to this, I have a bridge to sell you. It may not be as diabolical as it is being presented, but it is far from false. Way too much smoke.

.

 

[AntonToo]

Hey idiot, why not simply answer the question?

You are correct that I'm going to let righties handle stupid lefty predictions, but that doesn't mean your predictions are not stupid, and it doesn't excuse righties from being unable to commit to ANY actual testable position.

You shoot the shit, but seems god forbid you from standing behind it.

because people on both sides are going to vent and want "justice" for how they feel.

WTF? How does that excuse all these conspiracy theorists mouthing off without being able to commit to a testable prediction?

If you are going to assert how all these indictments are coming over Trump campaign surveillance, then you should have the balls to commit to a timeline when these claims expire and if nothing happens learn your lesson and admit being wrong.

It's been YEARS since Trump first claimed that Obama wiretapped him Nixon style and there is still exactly nothing to back that claim up. If I was a Trump supporter who has respect for his word I'd be fucking pissed he was making a dupe out of me.

We don't need to predict a "timeline", we just need to predict that it will happen before the 2020 election. Please recall all of the Trump-Putin "collusion" that Mueller was going to find so that Trump (that Russian asset) could be impeached. That investigation was total bullshit, the dem's "insurance policy" against a Trump win in 2016. There was no collusion.

Barr knows that there was "illegal spying" on the Trump campaign in 2016.
Using the "2-hop rule" they could spy on anyone in the Trump campaign, including Trump.
William Barr says 'spying did occur' on Trump campaign during Obama era
We know that Barr, Huber, Durham, and Horowitz will all have findings that will prove the biggest political scandal in US history, stay tuned....

Get ready for quite the rowdy NUH UNH! denial and then calling you stupid.

Seen this act far too many times.

The sad fact is that you may be exactly right. Hillary was nailed, and got off. Some people are obviously more equal than others.
If the deep state "establishment" covers their tracks and no one illegally spied on the Trump campaign, that could be Barr's finding.

Popadopulous, the Trump Tower meeting, Barr's spying claim, the Moscow Trump Tower, FISA abuses, illegal unmasking, the 25th Amendment try, all the ongoing Trump investigations, emoluments, tax returns, obstruction of justice, Stormy Daniels, guilt by association, etc. all go away if/when Trump wins in 2020.

So all we can say is we'll see what happens. Lindsay Graham, Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan, and the rest are going to have their shot at the conspiracy theory, we'll see if Barr, Huber, Durham, and Horowitz can come up with any evidence worthy of indictment. I put the odds at 2:1 that some of the Obama deep state conspirators will be indicted.

If Hillary "was nailed" how come Trump's AG Horrowitz in 2018 found the decision to not bring charges a reasonable conclusion completely consistent with DOJ's prior handling of such cases?

Your cool stories just don't add up, do they?

 

[Terri4Trump]

Time will tell if this means Russian Bots or FBI Agents who broke the laws of the United States of America.

(1) Who wrote the "Steel Dossier"?
(2) Who paid for what and when? Was political revenge really a source of this?
(3) Why did Comey depart from internal controls that should prevent this from happening?
(4)Why did Mueller act confused when asked about his poorly written 2nd report?
(5) Credibility issues: Rachel Maddow, CNN News dropping viewers
(6) Why did the media call questioners "Tin foil hatters"
(7) Why were investigations predicated and why weren't they legal?
(8) Does process need to be reviewed, and does system need to be cleansed?
(9) Why did Brennan, Clapper, Rice, Strzok and a handful of others others leak to the media on government equipment?
(10) Was this charge against President trump an attempted coup?
(11) Will free and democratic Hong Kong become a vassal of Communist China?

​

They should all get LIFE in prison at hard labor: Obama, Crooked Hillary, Lying Comey, Struck Stroke, and the rest. And then, the FCC licenses should be pulled from CNN, NBC, and all the others who assisted in the Coup

 

[AntonToo]

Time will tell if this means Russian Bots or FBI Agents who broke the laws of the United States of America.

(1) Who wrote the "Steel Dossier"?
(2) Who paid for what and when? Was political revenge really a source of this?
(3) Why did Comey depart from internal controls that should prevent this from happening?
(4)Why did Mueller act confused when asked about his poorly written 2nd report?
(5) Credibility issues: Rachel Maddow, CNN News dropping viewers
(6) Why did the media call questioners "Tin foil hatters"
(7) Why were investigations predicated and why weren't they legal?
(8) Does process need to be reviewed, and does system need to be cleansed?
(9) Why did Brennan, Clapper, Rice, Strzok and a handful of others others leak to the media on government equipment?
(10) Was this charge against President trump an attempted coup?
(11) Will free and democratic Hong Kong become a vassal of Communist China?

​

All of this stuff could be 100% true, but no one will be held accountable, sadly.

.

It also could be 100% false and THAT is why no one will be held accountable, not sadly.

If you think there is no truth to this, I have a bridge to sell you. It may not be as diabolical as it is being presented, but it is far from false. Way too much smoke.

.

There has so far been ZERO evidence presented for any of the illegalities routinely claimed by Trump and his rightwinger dupes.

Legitamate surveilance, with reasonable suspicion and warrants in hand IS NOT some sort of not-as-diabolical version of what Trumpsters are peddling. It is our Justice system doing it's damn job, protecting this country.

 

[iceberg]

because people on both sides are going to vent and want "justice" for how they feel.

WTF? How does that excuse all these conspiracy theorists mouthing off without being able to commit to a testable prediction?

If you are going to assert how all these indictments are coming over Trump campaign surveillance, then you should have the balls to commit to a timeline when these claims expire and if nothing happens learn your lesson and admit being wrong.

It's been YEARS since Trump first claimed that Obama wiretapped him Nixon style and there is still exactly nothing to back that claim up. If I was a Trump supporter who has respect for his word I'd be fucking pissed he was making a dupe out of me.

We don't need to predict a "timeline", we just need to predict that it will happen before the 2020 election. Please recall all of the Trump-Putin "collusion" that Mueller was going to find so that Trump (that Russian asset) could be impeached. That investigation was total bullshit, the dem's "insurance policy" against a Trump win in 2016. There was no collusion.

Barr knows that there was "illegal spying" on the Trump campaign in 2016.
Using the "2-hop rule" they could spy on anyone in the Trump campaign, including Trump.
William Barr says 'spying did occur' on Trump campaign during Obama era
We know that Barr, Huber, Durham, and Horowitz will all have findings that will prove the biggest political scandal in US history, stay tuned....

Get ready for quite the rowdy NUH UNH! denial and then calling you stupid.

Seen this act far too many times.

The sad fact is that you may be exactly right. Hillary was nailed, and got off. Some people are obviously more equal than others.
If the deep state "establishment" covers their tracks and no one illegally spied on the Trump campaign, that could be Barr's finding.

Popadopulous, the Trump Tower meeting, Barr's spying claim, the Moscow Trump Tower, FISA abuses, illegal unmasking, the 25th Amendment try, all the ongoing Trump investigations, emoluments, tax returns, obstruction of justice, Stormy Daniels, guilt by association, etc. all go away if/when Trump wins in 2020.

So all we can say is we'll see what happens. Lindsay Graham, Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan, and the rest are going to have their shot at the conspiracy theory, we'll see if Barr, Huber, Durham, and Horowitz can come up with any evidence worthy of indictment. I put the odds at 2:1 that some of the Obama deep state conspirators will be indicted.

If Hillary "was nailed" how come Trump's AG Horrowitz in 2018 found the decision to not bring charges a reasonable conclusion completely consistent with DOJ's prior handling of such cases?

Your cool stories just don't add up, do they?

RUSSIA!!!

 

[AntonToo]

WTF? How does that excuse all these conspiracy theorists mouthing off without being able to commit to a testable prediction?

If you are going to assert how all these indictments are coming over Trump campaign surveillance, then you should have the balls to commit to a timeline when these claims expire and if nothing happens learn your lesson and admit being wrong.

It's been YEARS since Trump first claimed that Obama wiretapped him Nixon style and there is still exactly nothing to back that claim up. If I was a Trump supporter who has respect for his word I'd be fucking pissed he was making a dupe out of me.

We don't need to predict a "timeline", we just need to predict that it will happen before the 2020 election. Please recall all of the Trump-Putin "collusion" that Mueller was going to find so that Trump (that Russian asset) could be impeached. That investigation was total bullshit, the dem's "insurance policy" against a Trump win in 2016. There was no collusion.

Barr knows that there was "illegal spying" on the Trump campaign in 2016.
Using the "2-hop rule" they could spy on anyone in the Trump campaign, including Trump.
William Barr says 'spying did occur' on Trump campaign during Obama era
We know that Barr, Huber, Durham, and Horowitz will all have findings that will prove the biggest political scandal in US history, stay tuned....

Get ready for quite the rowdy NUH UNH! denial and then calling you stupid.

Seen this act far too many times.

The sad fact is that you may be exactly right. Hillary was nailed, and got off. Some people are obviously more equal than others.
If the deep state "establishment" covers their tracks and no one illegally spied on the Trump campaign, that could be Barr's finding.

Popadopulous, the Trump Tower meeting, Barr's spying claim, the Moscow Trump Tower, FISA abuses, illegal unmasking, the 25th Amendment try, all the ongoing Trump investigations, emoluments, tax returns, obstruction of justice, Stormy Daniels, guilt by association, etc. all go away if/when Trump wins in 2020.

So all we can say is we'll see what happens. Lindsay Graham, Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan, and the rest are going to have their shot at the conspiracy theory, we'll see if Barr, Huber, Durham, and Horowitz can come up with any evidence worthy of indictment. I put the odds at 2:1 that some of the Obama deep state conspirators will be indicted.

If Hillary "was nailed" how come Trump's AG Horrowitz in 2018 found the decision to not bring charges a reasonable conclusion completely consistent with DOJ's prior handling of such cases?

Your cool stories just don't add up, do they?

RUSSIA!!!

Someone call an ambulance for this retard, he is having a stroke.

 

[The Original Tree]

The Department of Justice and The Attorney General of the United States of America stated that The Trump Campaign was spied upon.

No, all they stated was that the campaign, not Trump, were SURVEILED and perhaps LEGALLY SO.

Of course thats a banal statement since it was well known for a while now that there was a counter-intelligence case going on since June of 2016, so Barr is just blowing smoke up your ass.

What was the name of The Campaign?

The Trump Campaign.

End of story.

Cheaters Never Prosper.

And Hillary Clinton Will Never Be President.

 

[AntonToo]

The Department of Justice and The Attorney General of the United States of America stated that The Trump Campaign was spied upon.

No, all they stated was that the campaign, not Trump, were SURVEILED and perhaps LEGALLY SO.

Of course thats a banal statement since it was well known for a while now that there was a counter-intelligence case going on since June of 2016, so Barr is just blowing smoke up your ass.

What was the name of The Campaign?

The Trump Campaign.

End of story.

Cheaters Never Prosper.

And Hillary Clinton Will Never Be President.

...and you completely dodged the primary point that Barr never actually said anything illegal, or even improper was done.

 

[iceberg]

We don't need to predict a "timeline", we just need to predict that it will happen before the 2020 election. Please recall all of the Trump-Putin "collusion" that Mueller was going to find so that Trump (that Russian asset) could be impeached. That investigation was total bullshit, the dem's "insurance policy" against a Trump win in 2016. There was no collusion.

Barr knows that there was "illegal spying" on the Trump campaign in 2016.
Using the "2-hop rule" they could spy on anyone in the Trump campaign, including Trump.
William Barr says 'spying did occur' on Trump campaign during Obama era
We know that Barr, Huber, Durham, and Horowitz will all have findings that will prove the biggest political scandal in US history, stay tuned....

Get ready for quite the rowdy NUH UNH! denial and then calling you stupid.

Seen this act far too many times.

The sad fact is that you may be exactly right. Hillary was nailed, and got off. Some people are obviously more equal than others.
If the deep state "establishment" covers their tracks and no one illegally spied on the Trump campaign, that could be Barr's finding.

Popadopulous, the Trump Tower meeting, Barr's spying claim, the Moscow Trump Tower, FISA abuses, illegal unmasking, the 25th Amendment try, all the ongoing Trump investigations, emoluments, tax returns, obstruction of justice, Stormy Daniels, guilt by association, etc. all go away if/when Trump wins in 2020.

So all we can say is we'll see what happens. Lindsay Graham, Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan, and the rest are going to have their shot at the conspiracy theory, we'll see if Barr, Huber, Durham, and Horowitz can come up with any evidence worthy of indictment. I put the odds at 2:1 that some of the Obama deep state conspirators will be indicted.

If Hillary "was nailed" how come Trump's AG Horrowitz in 2018 found the decision to not bring charges a reasonable conclusion completely consistent with DOJ's prior handling of such cases?

Your cool stories just don't add up, do they?

RUSSIA!!!

Someone call an ambulance for this retard, he is having a stroke.

You keep yelling at one side for stupid conspiracy theories while you back your own.

And we wonder why there is a divide.

 

[The Original Tree]

The Department of Justice and The Attorney General of the United States of America stated that The Trump Campaign was spied upon.

No, all they stated was that the campaign, not Trump, were SURVEILED and perhaps LEGALLY SO.

Of course thats a banal statement since it was well known for a while now that there was a counter-intelligence case going on since June of 2016, so Barr is just blowing smoke up your ass.

What was the name of The Campaign?

The Trump Campaign.

End of story.

Cheaters Never Prosper.

And Hillary Clinton Will Never Be President.

...and you completely dodged the primary point that Barr never actually said anything illegal, or even improper was done.

Spying is improper and unethical.
Spying on an American Citizen with a fraudulent FISA Warrant based on False Affidavits is illegal, but also is a violation of FISA itself, which was never intended to be abused to create a Surveillance State against American Citizens.

Cheaters Never Prosper, and Liars cannot enter in to The Kingdom of Heaven.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Time will tell if this means Russian Bots or FBI Agents who broke the laws of the United States of America.

(1) Who wrote the "Steel Dossier"?
(2) Who paid for what and when? Was political revenge really a source of this?
(3) Why did Comey depart from internal controls that should prevent this from happening?
(4)Why did Mueller act confused when asked about his poorly written 2nd report?
(5) Credibility issues: Rachel Maddow, CNN News dropping viewers
(6) Why did the media call questioners "Tin foil hatters"
(7) Why were investigations predicated and why weren't they legal?
(8) Does process need to be reviewed, and does system need to be cleansed?
(9) Why did Brennan, Clapper, Rice, Strzok and a handful of others others leak to the media on government equipment?
(10) Was this charge against President trump an attempted coup?
(11) Will free and democratic Hong Kong become a vassal of Communist China?

​

All of this stuff could be 100% true, but no one will be held accountable, sadly.

.

It also could be 100% false and THAT is why no one will be held accountable, not sadly.

If you think there is no truth to this, I have a bridge to sell you. It may not be as diabolical as it is being presented, but it is far from false. Way too much smoke.

.

There has so far been ZERO evidence presented for any of the illegalities routinely claimed by Trump and his rightwinger dupes.

Legitamate surveilance, with reasonable suspicion and warrants in hand IS NOT some sort of not-as-diabolical version of what Trumpsters are peddling. It is our Justice system doing it's damn job, protecting this country.

But, surely you agree that it seems highly suspicious, when a Democrat administration puts a mole in the campaign of the presidential candidate in the Republican party, right? You can certainly understand the concern, can you not?

.

 

[AntonToo]

Get ready for quite the rowdy NUH UNH! denial and then calling you stupid.

Seen this act far too many times.

The sad fact is that you may be exactly right. Hillary was nailed, and got off. Some people are obviously more equal than others.
If the deep state "establishment" covers their tracks and no one illegally spied on the Trump campaign, that could be Barr's finding.

Popadopulous, the Trump Tower meeting, Barr's spying claim, the Moscow Trump Tower, FISA abuses, illegal unmasking, the 25th Amendment try, all the ongoing Trump investigations, emoluments, tax returns, obstruction of justice, Stormy Daniels, guilt by association, etc. all go away if/when Trump wins in 2020.

So all we can say is we'll see what happens. Lindsay Graham, Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan, and the rest are going to have their shot at the conspiracy theory, we'll see if Barr, Huber, Durham, and Horowitz can come up with any evidence worthy of indictment. I put the odds at 2:1 that some of the Obama deep state conspirators will be indicted.

If Hillary "was nailed" how come Trump's AG Horrowitz in 2018 found the decision to not bring charges a reasonable conclusion completely consistent with DOJ's prior handling of such cases?

Your cool stories just don't add up, do they?

RUSSIA!!!

Someone call an ambulance for this retard, he is having a stroke.

You keep yelling at one side for stupid conspiracy theories while you back your own.

And we wonder why there is a divide.

I see your brain farts are not settling.

What stupid conspiracy theories do I back?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The sad fact is that you may be exactly right. Hillary was nailed, and got off. Some people are obviously more equal than others.
If the deep state "establishment" covers their tracks and no one illegally spied on the Trump campaign, that could be Barr's finding.

Popadopulous, the Trump Tower meeting, Barr's spying claim, the Moscow Trump Tower, FISA abuses, illegal unmasking, the 25th Amendment try, all the ongoing Trump investigations, emoluments, tax returns, obstruction of justice, Stormy Daniels, guilt by association, etc. all go away if/when Trump wins in 2020.

So all we can say is we'll see what happens. Lindsay Graham, Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan, and the rest are going to have their shot at the conspiracy theory, we'll see if Barr, Huber, Durham, and Horowitz can come up with any evidence worthy of indictment. I put the odds at 2:1 that some of the Obama deep state conspirators will be indicted.

If Hillary "was nailed" how come Trump's AG Horrowitz in 2018 found the decision to not bring charges a reasonable conclusion completely consistent with DOJ's prior handling of such cases?

Your cool stories just don't add up, do they?

RUSSIA!!!

Someone call an ambulance for this retard, he is having a stroke.

You keep yelling at one side for stupid conspiracy theories while you back your own.

And we wonder why there is a divide.

I see your brain farts are not settling.

What stupid conspiracy theories do I back?

But, it's not far fetched to believe something is amiss when a Democratic Administration orders a mole to be placed in the presidential campaign of the Republican nominee, right?

.

 

[AntonToo]

Time will tell if this means Russian Bots or FBI Agents who broke the laws of the United States of America.

(1) Who wrote the "Steel Dossier"?
(2) Who paid for what and when? Was political revenge really a source of this?
(3) Why did Comey depart from internal controls that should prevent this from happening?
(4)Why did Mueller act confused when asked about his poorly written 2nd report?
(5) Credibility issues: Rachel Maddow, CNN News dropping viewers
(6) Why did the media call questioners "Tin foil hatters"
(7) Why were investigations predicated and why weren't they legal?
(8) Does process need to be reviewed, and does system need to be cleansed?
(9) Why did Brennan, Clapper, Rice, Strzok and a handful of others others leak to the media on government equipment?
(10) Was this charge against President trump an attempted coup?
(11) Will free and democratic Hong Kong become a vassal of Communist China?

​

All of this stuff could be 100% true, but no one will be held accountable, sadly.

.

It also could be 100% false and THAT is why no one will be held accountable, not sadly.

If you think there is no truth to this, I have a bridge to sell you. It may not be as diabolical as it is being presented, but it is far from false. Way too much smoke.

.

There has so far been ZERO evidence presented for any of the illegalities routinely claimed by Trump and his rightwinger dupes.

Legitamate surveilance, with reasonable suspicion and warrants in hand IS NOT some sort of not-as-diabolical version of what Trumpsters are peddling. It is our Justice system doing it's damn job, protecting this country.

But, surely you agree that it seems highly suspicious, when a Democrat administration puts a mole in the campaign of the presidential candidate in the Republican party, right? You can certainly understand the concern, can you not?
.

Russia hacks DNC.
Trump members know about Russia having Clinton emails, when no one else does.
Trump campaign solicits compromat on Hillary from Russian government.
Trump campaign is being run by an undeclared foreign agents named Manafort and Gates. Manafort specifically owns millions to Deripaska and offers to continiously provide campaign info in return.
Trump, who has had Russian bussiness entaglements for a while now, is trying to secure a Tower project in Moscow, right in the middle of campaign.
Trump publicly opposes sanctions on Russia, goes on TV to flatter and defend Putin, also asks Russia to go hack Hillary emails.

And you seriously propose that there is not enough here for reasonable suspicions? Not enough to surveil Manafort and known Russian spy-ring co-operator named Carter AFTER they left the campaign?

 

[iceberg]

All of this stuff could be 100% true, but no one will be held accountable, sadly.

.

It also could be 100% false and THAT is why no one will be held accountable, not sadly.

If you think there is no truth to this, I have a bridge to sell you. It may not be as diabolical as it is being presented, but it is far from false. Way too much smoke.

.

There has so far been ZERO evidence presented for any of the illegalities routinely claimed by Trump and his rightwinger dupes.

Legitamate surveilance, with reasonable suspicion and warrants in hand IS NOT some sort of not-as-diabolical version of what Trumpsters are peddling. It is our Justice system doing it's damn job, protecting this country.

But, surely you agree that it seems highly suspicious, when a Democrat administration puts a mole in the campaign of the presidential candidate in the Republican party, right? You can certainly understand the concern, can you not?
.

Russia hacks DNC.
Trump members know about Russia having Clinton emails.
Trump campaign solicits compromat on Hillary from Russian government.
Trump campaign is being a run by an undeclared foreign agents named Manafort and gates.
Trump, who has had Russian bussiness entaglements for a while now, is trying to build a Tower in Moscow.
Trump publicly opposes sanctions on Russia, goes on TV to flatter and defend Putin, also asks Russia to go hack to get Hillary emails.

And you seriously propose that there is not enough here for reasonable suspicions?

But deleting 33k mails
Lying about classified material
Bill n Loretta private meetings
Verious FISA wrongs
DNC server was never analyzed so prove your "hack, " hack

All this isn't enough.

Got it.

 

[AntonToo]

It also could be 100% false and THAT is why no one will be held accountable, not sadly.

If you think there is no truth to this, I have a bridge to sell you. It may not be as diabolical as it is being presented, but it is far from false. Way too much smoke.

.

There has so far been ZERO evidence presented for any of the illegalities routinely claimed by Trump and his rightwinger dupes.

Legitamate surveilance, with reasonable suspicion and warrants in hand IS NOT some sort of not-as-diabolical version of what Trumpsters are peddling. It is our Justice system doing it's damn job, protecting this country.

But, surely you agree that it seems highly suspicious, when a Democrat administration puts a mole in the campaign of the presidential candidate in the Republican party, right? You can certainly understand the concern, can you not?
.

Russia hacks DNC.
Trump members know about Russia having Clinton emails.
Trump campaign solicits compromat on Hillary from Russian government.
Trump campaign is being a run by an undeclared foreign agents named Manafort and gates.
Trump, who has had Russian bussiness entaglements for a while now, is trying to build a Tower in Moscow.
Trump publicly opposes sanctions on Russia, goes on TV to flatter and defend Putin, also asks Russia to go hack to get Hillary emails.

And you seriously propose that there is not enough here for reasonable suspicions?

But

Take your butts and go fuck yourself. Nothing to do with what you quoted.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

All of this stuff could be 100% true, but no one will be held accountable, sadly.

.

It also could be 100% false and THAT is why no one will be held accountable, not sadly.

If you think there is no truth to this, I have a bridge to sell you. It may not be as diabolical as it is being presented, but it is far from false. Way too much smoke.

.

There has so far been ZERO evidence presented for any of the illegalities routinely claimed by Trump and his rightwinger dupes.

Legitamate surveilance, with reasonable suspicion and warrants in hand IS NOT some sort of not-as-diabolical version of what Trumpsters are peddling. It is our Justice system doing it's damn job, protecting this country.

But, surely you agree that it seems highly suspicious, when a Democrat administration puts a mole in the campaign of the presidential candidate in the Republican party, right? You can certainly understand the concern, can you not?
.

Russia hacks DNC.
Trump members know about Russia having Clinton emails, when no one else does.
Trump campaign solicits compromat on Hillary from Russian government.
Trump campaign is being run by an undeclared foreign agents named Manafort and Gates. Manafort specifically owns millions to Deripaska and offers to continiously provide campaign info in return.
Trump, who has had Russian bussiness entaglements for a while now, is trying to secure a Tower project in Moscow, right in the middle of campaign.
Trump publicly opposes sanctions on Russia, goes on TV to flatter and defend Putin, also asks Russia to go hack Hillary emails.

And you seriously propose that there is not enough here for reasonable suspicions? Not enough to surveil Manafort and known Russian spy-ring co-operator named Carter AFTER they left the campaign?

Do you not see the one-sided nature of all this stuff you just posted?

.

 

[AntonToo]

It also could be 100% false and THAT is why no one will be held accountable, not sadly.

If you think there is no truth to this, I have a bridge to sell you. It may not be as diabolical as it is being presented, but it is far from false. Way too much smoke.

.

There has so far been ZERO evidence presented for any of the illegalities routinely claimed by Trump and his rightwinger dupes.

Legitamate surveilance, with reasonable suspicion and warrants in hand IS NOT some sort of not-as-diabolical version of what Trumpsters are peddling. It is our Justice system doing it's damn job, protecting this country.

But, surely you agree that it seems highly suspicious, when a Democrat administration puts a mole in the campaign of the presidential candidate in the Republican party, right? You can certainly understand the concern, can you not?
.

Russia hacks DNC.
Trump members know about Russia having Clinton emails, when no one else does.
Trump campaign solicits compromat on Hillary from Russian government.
Trump campaign is being run by an undeclared foreign agents named Manafort and Gates. Manafort specifically owns millions to Deripaska and offers to continiously provide campaign info in return.
Trump, who has had Russian bussiness entaglements for a while now, is trying to secure a Tower project in Moscow, right in the middle of campaign.
Trump publicly opposes sanctions on Russia, goes on TV to flatter and defend Putin, also asks Russia to go hack Hillary emails.

And you seriously propose that there is not enough here for reasonable suspicions? Not enough to surveil Manafort and known Russian spy-ring co-operator named Carter AFTER they left the campaign?

Do you not see the one-sided nature of all this stuff you just posted?

.

Facts don't have a side.

If you think I posted something less than factual go ahead and refute it, but I see them adding up to PLENTY of reasonable suspicion warranting investigating.

As a Republican named Comey said to the righties - take out Trump and Russians in this story, substitute Obama and Iranian mulluahs and you'll easily understand why there needed to be an investigation.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

If you think there is no truth to this, I have a bridge to sell you. It may not be as diabolical as it is being presented, but it is far from false. Way too much smoke.

.

There has so far been ZERO evidence presented for any of the illegalities routinely claimed by Trump and his rightwinger dupes.

Legitamate surveilance, with reasonable suspicion and warrants in hand IS NOT some sort of not-as-diabolical version of what Trumpsters are peddling. It is our Justice system doing it's damn job, protecting this country.

But, surely you agree that it seems highly suspicious, when a Democrat administration puts a mole in the campaign of the presidential candidate in the Republican party, right? You can certainly understand the concern, can you not?
.

Russia hacks DNC.
Trump members know about Russia having Clinton emails, when no one else does.
Trump campaign solicits compromat on Hillary from Russian government.
Trump campaign is being run by an undeclared foreign agents named Manafort and Gates. Manafort specifically owns millions to Deripaska and offers to continiously provide campaign info in return.
Trump, who has had Russian bussiness entaglements for a while now, is trying to secure a Tower project in Moscow, right in the middle of campaign.
Trump publicly opposes sanctions on Russia, goes on TV to flatter and defend Putin, also asks Russia to go hack Hillary emails.

And you seriously propose that there is not enough here for reasonable suspicions? Not enough to surveil Manafort and known Russian spy-ring co-operator named Carter AFTER they left the campaign?

Do you not see the one-sided nature of all this stuff you just posted?

.

Facts don't have a side.

If you think I posted something less than factual go ahead and refute it, but I see them adding up to PLENTY of reasonable suspicion warranting investigating.

Likewise, there is plenty of reason to at least look into the evidence presented to the FISA court, right? I mean, they put a damn mole in the opposition party's presidential nominee's campaign. That gave the Obama administration ears into the campaign itself.

You would have no problem with Trump doing the same to, say, a Biden campaign?

.