gallantwarrior
Gold Member
No, guy, you see, the difference is that rights were given up.
When my Dad was my age, he got cancer. But because he belonged to a union, he had good medical benefits, he got top notch treatment, and even though he died, anyway, after he died, they still gave my mom good benefits for the remainder of the time she lived.
On the other hand, seven years ago, I had some medical issues, and despite having six years of glowing reviews and sometimes working 60 hours a week, after my bills hit a certain level, they were pretty keen to get me off the payroll. My bosses response when I protested was "Well, good thing I don't have to deal with a union."
Incidently, by the time this "genius" was done, we lost 60% of our business and 50% of our employees. Not a union in sight.
We need unions because people like that become managers.
The simple solution is to have the unions start their own businesses.
But they won't do that because then all those union slobs might actually have to work
When unions actually do hire people themselves, do they use union folks?
Nope.
How convenient. "Giving back to the community". Hiring the unemployed for minimum wage instead of Davis-Bacon wages? The hypocrisy stinks to hell and back.