State teen birthrate dropped to lowest level in 20 years

ClosedCaption

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2010
53,233
6,719
State teen birthrate dropped to lowest level in 20 years - latimes.com

In 2011, the birthrate for teenage girls in California dropped to its lowest level since 1991, a state report released Wednesday announced.

Twenty-eight children were born in the state for every 1,000 teenage girls, a sharp decline from 1991 when the rate peaked at 70.9 births for every 1,000 teenage girls.

Public health experts say state laws are responsible for the decline because they require public schools that offer sex education classes to provide scientifically reliable instructions on how contraceptives work along with information about abstinence.

Reproductive health planning projects like the California Personal Responsibility Education Program are also credited with the lower numbers.

Sex Ed works...whoda thunk it? Rational folks that's who
 
It also helps when half the boys in the age-group are busy buggering each other instead of chasing girls
 
From your own link Katz:

"What I see are teenagers who are poorly informed about the risk and also who don't know where to go for services," Khemet said.

It's unclear if testing could partly account for the STD spike. Screening methods have improved in recent years, becoming less invasive and therefore more appealing to youths, Moscicki said. More testing can translate into higher reported infection rates.

On the other hand, when youths have poor access to medical care, they aren't tested for long stretches of time and can continue to spread their infection. Sacramento County has closed four of its five public health clinics – which provided STD screening and treatment – due to budget cuts in the past three years.

Poor access to health care partly explains why STD rates are higher among young minorities, Moscicki said. In Sacramento County, infection rates have jumped across all races, but the increases have been highest among blacks and Asian Americans.

Read more here: STDs rise for young women - Grace Rubenstein - The Sacramento Bee

Thanks
 
Poor teens who don't get std's have the same access to health care as those who get std's. They just don't have the same belief in a right to fuck the world.
 
From your own link Katz:

"What I see are teenagers who are poorly informed about the risk and also who don't know where to go for services," Khemet said.

It's unclear if testing could partly account for the STD spike. Screening methods have improved in recent years, becoming less invasive and therefore more appealing to youths, Moscicki said. More testing can translate into higher reported infection rates.

On the other hand, when youths have poor access to medical care, they aren't tested for long stretches of time and can continue to spread their infection. Sacramento County has closed four of its five public health clinics – which provided STD screening and treatment – due to budget cuts in the past three years.

Poor access to health care partly explains why STD rates are higher among young minorities, Moscicki said. In Sacramento County, infection rates have jumped across all races, but the increases have been highest among blacks and Asian Americans.

Read more here: STDs rise for young women - Grace Rubenstein - The Sacramento Bee

Thanks

Good points.
You know, I can't imagine why anyone would not receive this trend as good news?!?!?

Is there a segment of our society that is just so invested in the "this-world-sucks-and-just-gets-suckier-everyday" mentality that they refuse to accept any encouraging news?

Too bad. Life is too short to choose to spend it being that unhappy.
 
From your own link Katz:

"What I see are teenagers who are poorly informed about the risk and also who don't know where to go for services," Khemet said.

It's unclear if testing could partly account for the STD spike. Screening methods have improved in recent years, becoming less invasive and therefore more appealing to youths, Moscicki said. More testing can translate into higher reported infection rates.

]On the other hand, when youths have poor access to medical care, they aren't tested for long stretches of time and can continue to spread their infection. Sacramento County has closed four of its five public health clinics – which provided STD screening and treatment – due to budget cuts in the past three years.

Poor access to health care partly explains why STD rates are higher among young minorities, Moscicki said. In Sacramento County, infection rates have jumped across all races, but the increases have been highest among blacks and Asian Americans.

Thanks

Just to inform you and others - there is NO SCREENING FOR STD. Meaning - nobody ever provides blanket SCREENING for STDs .
Tests are done upon request ONLY.

The only screening for STDs are done by some private companies upon job application and for insurance purposes. That includes HIV testing.
Oh, and for immigration purposes they do syphilis testing along with TB testing - HIV not included for PC reasons :D
 
stop spreading BS, please - STD testing upon request is available FOR FREE for the poor populace in the majority of states across the country.
 
Maybe they can climb higher in the rankings if they follow Texas's lead on this issue. "Come to Texas, no state tax and teen pregnancies for all."

"Texas was ranked 4 out of 51 (50 states + the District of Columbia) on 2010 final teen births rates among females aged 15-19 (with 1 representing the highest rate and 51 representing the lowest rate).RH1 On a similar scale – where 1 is the highest teen pregnancy rate and 51 is the lowest – Texas was ranked 5 out of 51 (50 states + the District of Columbia) in pregnancies to females aged 15- 19 in 2005.RH2"

Texas Adolescent Reproductive Health Facts - The Office of Adolescent Health
 
State teen birthrate dropped to lowest level in 20 years - latimes.com

In 2011, the birthrate for teenage girls in California dropped to its lowest level since 1991, a state report released Wednesday announced.

Twenty-eight children were born in the state for every 1,000 teenage girls, a sharp decline from 1991 when the rate peaked at 70.9 births for every 1,000 teenage girls.

Public health experts say state laws are responsible for the decline because they require public schools that offer sex education classes to provide scientifically reliable instructions on how contraceptives work along with information about abstinence.

Reproductive health planning projects like the California Personal Responsibility Education Program are also credited with the lower numbers.

Sex Ed works...whoda thunk it? Rational folks that's who

Or it could be because of the abortion rate. Just sayin'. It's just as easy to make the correlation that abortion has reduced the birth rate as sex education.

State Facts About Abortion: California

• In 2008, 1.2 million American women obtained abortions, producing a rate of 19.6 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age. The rate is virtually unchanged from 2005, when the abortion rate was 19.4 abortions per 1,000 women 15-44.

• In 2008, 214,190 women obtained abortions in California, producing a rate of 27.6 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age. Some of these women were from other states, and some California residents had abortions in other states, so this rate may not reflect the abortion rate of state residents. The rate increased 2% since 2005, when it was 27.1 abortions per 1,000 women 15-44. Abortions in California represent 17.7% of all abortions in the United States.
 
State teen birthrate dropped to lowest level in 20 years - latimes.com

In 2011, the birthrate for teenage girls in California dropped to its lowest level since 1991, a state report released Wednesday announced.

Twenty-eight children were born in the state for every 1,000 teenage girls, a sharp decline from 1991 when the rate peaked at 70.9 births for every 1,000 teenage girls.

Public health experts say state laws are responsible for the decline because they require public schools that offer sex education classes to provide scientifically reliable instructions on how contraceptives work along with information about abstinence.

Reproductive health planning projects like the California Personal Responsibility Education Program are also credited with the lower numbers.

Sex Ed works...whoda thunk it? Rational folks that's who

Or it could be because of the abortion rate. Just sayin'. It's just as easy to make the correlation that abortion has reduced the birth rate as sex education.

State Facts About Abortion: California

• In 2008, 1.2 million American women obtained abortions, producing a rate of 19.6 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age. The rate is virtually unchanged from 2005, when the abortion rate was 19.4 abortions per 1,000 women 15-44.

• In 2008, 214,190 women obtained abortions in California, producing a rate of 27.6 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age. Some of these women were from other states, and some California residents had abortions in other states, so this rate may not reflect the abortion rate of state residents. The rate increased 2% since 2005, when it was 27.1 abortions per 1,000 women 15-44. Abortions in California represent 17.7% of all abortions in the United States.

That is a legitimate point. The latest statistics I could find had California at 26 abortions per 1,000. That's teenagers - not the entire reproductive age population.

So it appears that with that factored in - the number has dropped at least 16.9 per 1,000. Assuming that teens are getting abortions at the same ratio as they were in 2008 in relation to all within the entire reproductive age population - the decrease is much higher.

So that's good, right?

I don't get why some seem so determined to create a dark cloud for this silver lining.

It's good news, right?
 
Last edited:
State teen birthrate dropped to lowest level in 20 years - latimes.com



Sex Ed works...whoda thunk it? Rational folks that's who

Or it could be because of the abortion rate. Just sayin'. It's just as easy to make the correlation that abortion has reduced the birth rate as sex education.

State Facts About Abortion: California

• In 2008, 1.2 million American women obtained abortions, producing a rate of 19.6 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age. The rate is virtually unchanged from 2005, when the abortion rate was 19.4 abortions per 1,000 women 15-44.

• In 2008, 214,190 women obtained abortions in California, producing a rate of 27.6 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age. Some of these women were from other states, and some California residents had abortions in other states, so this rate may not reflect the abortion rate of state residents. The rate increased 2% since 2005, when it was 27.1 abortions per 1,000 women 15-44. Abortions in California represent 17.7% of all abortions in the United States.

That is a legitimate point. The latest statistics I could find had California at 26 abortions per 1,000. That's teenagers - not the entire reproductive age population.

So it appears that with that factored in - the number has dropped at least 16.9 per 1,000. Assuming that teens are getting abortions at the same ratio as they were in 2008 in relation to all within the entire reproductive age population - the decrease is much higher.

So that's good, right?

I don't get why some seem so determined to create a dark cloud for this silver lining.

It's good news, right?

My point is that correlation does not imply causation. It's just as easy to say that birth rates of teen gilrs in California are due to increased abortions as it is to say it is due to sex education and contraception. How do you prove either? Why did they come to the one conclusion and not the other? And yes, it is good news.....unless the reason is because innocent babies are being aborted.
 
Or it could be because of the abortion rate. Just sayin'. It's just as easy to make the correlation that abortion has reduced the birth rate as sex education.

State Facts About Abortion: California

• In 2008, 1.2 million American women obtained abortions, producing a rate of 19.6 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age. The rate is virtually unchanged from 2005, when the abortion rate was 19.4 abortions per 1,000 women 15-44.

• In 2008, 214,190 women obtained abortions in California, producing a rate of 27.6 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age. Some of these women were from other states, and some California residents had abortions in other states, so this rate may not reflect the abortion rate of state residents. The rate increased 2% since 2005, when it was 27.1 abortions per 1,000 women 15-44. Abortions in California represent 17.7% of all abortions in the United States.

That is a legitimate point. The latest statistics I could find had California at 26 abortions per 1,000. That's teenagers - not the entire reproductive age population.

So it appears that with that factored in - the number has dropped at least 16.9 per 1,000. Assuming that teens are getting abortions at the same ratio as they were in 2008 in relation to all within the entire reproductive age population - the decrease is much higher.

So that's good, right?

I don't get why some seem so determined to create a dark cloud for this silver lining.

It's good news, right?

My point is that correlation does not imply causation.
What a silly comment. Go back and read the evidence.
 
Or it could be because of the abortion rate. Just sayin'. It's just as easy to make the correlation that abortion has reduced the birth rate as sex education.

State Facts About Abortion: California

• In 2008, 1.2 million American women obtained abortions, producing a rate of 19.6 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age. The rate is virtually unchanged from 2005, when the abortion rate was 19.4 abortions per 1,000 women 15-44.

• In 2008, 214,190 women obtained abortions in California, producing a rate of 27.6 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age. Some of these women were from other states, and some California residents had abortions in other states, so this rate may not reflect the abortion rate of state residents. The rate increased 2% since 2005, when it was 27.1 abortions per 1,000 women 15-44. Abortions in California represent 17.7% of all abortions in the United States.

That is a legitimate point. The latest statistics I could find had California at 26 abortions per 1,000. That's teenagers - not the entire reproductive age population.

So it appears that with that factored in - the number has dropped at least 16.9 per 1,000. Assuming that teens are getting abortions at the same ratio as they were in 2008 in relation to all within the entire reproductive age population - the decrease is much higher.

So that's good, right?

I don't get why some seem so determined to create a dark cloud for this silver lining.

It's good news, right?

My point is that correlation does not imply causation. It's just as easy to say that birth rates of teen gilrs in California are due to increased abortions as it is to say it is due to sex education and contraception. How do you prove either? Why did they come to the one conclusion and not the other? And yes, it is good news.....unless the reason is because innocent babies are being aborted.

The numbers indicate that the reduction in the teen birthrate goes well beyond what could be explained by abortion.
 
State teen birthrate dropped to lowest level in 20 years - latimes.com

In 2011, the birthrate for teenage girls in California dropped to its lowest level since 1991, a state report released Wednesday announced.

Twenty-eight children were born in the state for every 1,000 teenage girls, a sharp decline from 1991 when the rate peaked at 70.9 births for every 1,000 teenage girls.

Public health experts say state laws are responsible for the decline because they require public schools that offer sex education classes to provide scientifically reliable instructions on how contraceptives work along with information about abstinence.

Reproductive health planning projects like the California Personal Responsibility Education Program are also credited with the lower numbers.

Sex Ed works...whoda thunk it? Rational folks that's who

It's really because I retired my penis.
 
State teen birthrate dropped to lowest level in 20 years - latimes.com

In 2011, the birthrate for teenage girls in California dropped to its lowest level since 1991, a state report released Wednesday announced.

Twenty-eight children were born in the state for every 1,000 teenage girls, a sharp decline from 1991 when the rate peaked at 70.9 births for every 1,000 teenage girls.

Public health experts say state laws are responsible for the decline because they require public schools that offer sex education classes to provide scientifically reliable instructions on how contraceptives work along with information about abstinence.

Reproductive health planning projects like the California Personal Responsibility Education Program are also credited with the lower numbers.

Sex Ed works...whoda thunk it? Rational folks that's who

It's really because I retired my penis.

And yet here it is - on display for all of us - protruding from your shirt collar.
 
That is a legitimate point. The latest statistics I could find had California at 26 abortions per 1,000. That's teenagers - not the entire reproductive age population.

So it appears that with that factored in - the number has dropped at least 16.9 per 1,000. Assuming that teens are getting abortions at the same ratio as they were in 2008 in relation to all within the entire reproductive age population - the decrease is much higher.

So that's good, right?

I don't get why some seem so determined to create a dark cloud for this silver lining.

It's good news, right?

My point is that correlation does not imply causation.
What a silly comment. Go back and read the evidence.

This evidence?

Public health experts say state laws are responsible for the decline because they require public schools that offer sex education classes to provide scientifically reliable instructions on how contraceptives work along with information about abstinence.

“We do believe that our programs are behind these numbers,” said Karen Ramstrom, the chief of the program standards branch at the California Department of Public Health’s maternal child and adolescent health division.

With strong "empirical" evidence like "say" and "believe", I trust you believe in the tooth fairy too.
 

Forum List

Back
Top