Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Right out of the shute, you're wrong. It wasn't H.W. Bush, it was G. W. Bush's administration who followed through on the first 1999 lawsuit brought against tobacco companies by the US government.
It's spelled "Chute", not "shute". Just thought you'd wanna split hairs more finely. I wrote the wrong Bush, my bad. Doesn't change the fact that the Tobacco Industry did do wrong, AND the left is anti-smoking because they are anti-consumption. They want a say over what you put in your body, just like the Nazis did.
When I say "we," I don't mean the teacher's union. Duh... You and your ilk continually interpret what interest groups do or say as being all-inclusive for how ALL of us believe.
Would this be coming from the same group of people who accuse all conservatives as being mind numbed robots doing whatever Fox News says? Again, I refer you to the case of Pot V. Kettle.
Secondly, The teachers unions continually support and endorse leftists for office and anti-choice/homeschool legislation. There's no getting around that.
I'm sure the store owners standing on the roofs of their businesses with shotguns, protecting them from looters during the oh so tolerant Rodney King race riots, because the police told them they are on their own are happy they have the right to bear arms. The only ones who want a disarmed populace are totalitarians bent on enslaving their neighbor.
Planned Parenthood doesn't engage in baby killing as its priority, asshole, no matter how you spin it.
So you're denying they run abortion clinics now and push young women into getting abortions as a preferred method of dealing with an unwanted pregnancy?
And need I remind you that it wasn't the Democrats who made mockeries out of town hall meetings last summer by shouting down and cutting off debate over the health care issue. Nope, that would be members of YOUR crowd who acted like ignorant 12-year olds.
Right. Nancy Pelosi calling concerned citizens Nazis for disagreeing with her isn't trying to shut down debate. I'm sure using SEIU thugs to prevent legitimate residents into open town halls and attack those who get insistent is not any attempt whatsoever in preventing accountability from our elected officials. I'm sure a crowd of 1.3+ million people on 9/12 is just a heavy tourist day. I'm sure calling health care protesters who politely ask for facts from our congressmen in their offices as 'radicals who threatened to harm him', is not trying to scare people away from their privileged ruling class position.
So fulla shit. These are just a few examples of what the left has pulled off the top of my head. I'm sure anyone with the inclination can find hundreds more.
Hugo Chavez is a great leader and a true humanitarian.
Last winter when some people in America didn't have money to afford to heat their homes.
President Chavez stepped up to the plate and helped them out with their energy needs.
I totally agree with you JillianAs for Nazi...you know that I am always going on about the fact that the word should not be used for lesser things...that it diminishes what the nazi's did in order to try to make whatever current situation they're talking about worse.![]()
Fascism comprises a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology and a corporatist economic ideology.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism
Facism is extremist right wing. Communism is extremist left wing.
They are both equal in the totalitarian aspects.
strange things happen at wiki
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkiGORmirRU[/ame]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism
Facism is extremist right wing. Communism is extremist left wing.
They are both equal in the totalitarian aspects.
strange things happen at wiki
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkiGORmirRU[/ame]
And just moments later:
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFGpMm9kHXg[/ame]
Fascism is largely left wing. Communism is effectively ALL left wing.
The contention that fascism is "right wing" is mere baseless propaganda. Well, maybe not ALL baseless. But mostly baseless.
They are indeed both totalitarian.
would be nice if you applied actual definitions instead of the fantasy in your head.![]()
It would be nice if YOU'd stop citing wiki-fucking-pedia as though whatever they vomit constitutes something legitmate.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism
Facism is extremist right wing. Communism is extremist left wing.
They are both equal in the totalitarian aspects.
strange things happen at wiki
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkiGORmirRU[/ame]
And just moments later:
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFGpMm9kHXg[/ame]
would be nice if you applied actual definitions instead of the fantasy in your head.![]()
It would be nice if YOU'd stop citing wiki-fucking-pedia as though whatever they vomit constitutes something legitmate.
It's disconcerting that people continue to allege that Wikipedia is an unreliable source based on a few incidents of edits to certain pages that happened back in 2003. The online encyclopedia has since then made it difficult to just drop in and change words willy-nilly, and whenever information has NOT been fully sourced, there is a disclaimer to that effect directly next to the entry.
Wikipedia remains the most comprehensive go-to place on the Internet when searching for something specific. If you don't like its entries, then I suggest you scroll down to the sources at the bottom of pages that are cited and use those as your verification.
Reliability of Wikipedia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It would be nice if YOU'd stop citing wiki-fucking-pedia as though whatever they vomit constitutes something legitmate.
Be nice. She is.
I was nice. And she is usually nice. But what she calls the "fantasies in my head" is not a "nice" way to couch her criticism. And my rebuke of her less than nice rejoinder is not ad hominem, either. Wiki, as a source, blows. I was addressing her source, not her.
Seriously, wiki properly serves solely as a sometimes useful point of departure to begin looking into a question. To cite it as a source for ANY actual contention, however, is silly.
Hugo Chavez is a great leader and a true humanitarian.
Last winter when some people in America didn't have money to afford to heat their homes.
President Chavez stepped up to the plate and helped them out with their energy needs.
And just moments later:
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFGpMm9kHXg[/ame]
and just secs later Palin joins Fox - checkmate
Hugo Chavez is a great leader and a true humanitarian.
Last winter when some people in America didn't have money to afford to heat their homes.
President Chavez stepped up to the plate and helped them out with their energy needs.
It would be nice if YOU'd stop citing wiki-fucking-pedia as though whatever they vomit constitutes something legitmate.
It's disconcerting that people continue to allege that Wikipedia is an unreliable source based on a few incidents of edits to certain pages that happened back in 2003. The online encyclopedia has since then made it difficult to just drop in and change words willy-nilly, and whenever information has NOT been fully sourced, there is a disclaimer to that effect directly next to the entry.
Wikipedia remains the most comprehensive go-to place on the Internet when searching for something specific. If you don't like its entries, then I suggest you scroll down to the sources at the bottom of pages that are cited and use those as your verification.
Reliability of Wikipedia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Lol.
You used a wiki site to support your claims that wiki is a source of reliable information?
Wiki provides decent information for anything that is not debatable.
Anything that is debatable is crap from wiki. Fucking Obama's wiki site read like a fucking campaign ad.
and just secs later Palin joins Fox - checkmate
Even funnier!
His goal will be blur the distinction between America today and Nazi Germany .
His goal will be blur the distinction between America today and Nazi Germany .
I thought that's what Cons were trying to do these days.
Oh noes, Gunny! Soda's gonna neg rep you too for daring to disagree with him!You simply don't know what you are talking about.I know what you mean, but in this case there really is no question at all that Nazism is inherently right wing.
The Nazis made an allaince with the right wing of germans in 1933, they were NOT however 'inherently right wing.'
In fact, hitler views on labor and private ownership show he was not 'right wing' at all.
The only part of Nazism that could be considered 'right wing' was nationalism, this is in fact where so many make the mistake of claiming Nazism is 'right wing', they take this one similarity and try to fit it into what the Nazis were.
This common mistake has existed for many years and does indeed have its roots as someone mentioned with Communist accusations against the Nazis in the 1930s, as another goal of Nazism was the destruction of communism.
You mean the National Socialist German Workers Party?
Say it isn't so.
Don't you mean out of your ass? Really, with all the truly SERIOUS issues to debate, you come up with a half-dozen which mean squat in the bigger picture of things. So typical. Sure you don't want to make a big deal out of Obama's comment about 57 states? His verbal gaffs always grab the attention of some of the more shallow-minded too.