Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Right------that's why the word "sexual preference" gets thrown about. Who are you kidding ? Marriage has everything to do with sex.Katzndogz thinks marriage is about sexuality rather than the love of two people that bind them together.
It is not the sex, it is the love, katzndogz.
Are you being obtuse or are you that dense?So, telling you that you do not get to mandate who a gay person does, and does not marry is "forcing government into homos' lives"?A look at history and the whole "traditional marriage" argument falls apart.
Not to mention that government has no place in our private lives.
Then why are you advocating for the government to force people into homos' private lives?
Geez, democrats are so stupid. They should not be allowed to vote.
So, I guess, if were able to get a ban on "dinner table prayer", then you would be against any court trying to overturn that, because you wouldn't want to "force government" into the private lives of Christians, right?
Do you see how stupid your logic sounds?
Another disjointed, dense response. I said nothing about my marriage. Where did you get that?Why does this offend you so much? What effect does this have on your marriage?Any homos who are legally married in the name of their homosexuality. Legal marriage forces recognition, subsidization and concessions in the name of homo buttfucking/muffdiving. Why must we all be forced into that activity?A look at history and the whole "traditional marriage" argument falls apart.
Not to mention that government has no place in our private lives.
Then why are you advocating for the government to force people into homos' private lives?
Geez, democrats are so stupid. They should not be allowed to vote.
Whose homosexual life into which you are being forced, Rosh?
Okay...before I can hope to respond to this, you're gonna need to clarify your meaning of this statement, preferably without the sophomoric characterizations.I don't want the government forcing me to acknowledge a homo doing a homo.So, telling you that you do not get to mandate who a gay person does, and does not marry is "forcing government into homos' lives"?A look at history and the whole "traditional marriage" argument falls apart.
Not to mention that government has no place in our private lives.
Then why are you advocating for the government to force people into homos' private lives?
Geez, democrats are so stupid. They should not be allowed to vote.
So, I guess, if were able to get a ban on "dinner table prayer", then you would be against any court trying to overturn that, because you wouldn't want to "force government" into the private lives of Christians, right?
Do you see how stupid your logic sounds?
See? It's the highlighted part that doesn't make any sense. How, exactly, are they being "forced' on you? They want to marry each other. How, precisely, is that "forcing" them on you?Another disjointed, dense response. I said nothing about my marriage. Where did you get that?Why does this offend you so much? What effect does this have on your marriage?Any homos who are legally married in the name of their homosexuality. Legal marriage forces recognition, subsidization and concessions in the name of homo buttfucking/muffdiving. Why must we all be forced into that activity?A look at history and the whole "traditional marriage" argument falls apart.
Not to mention that government has no place in our private lives.
Then why are you advocating for the government to force people into homos' private lives?
Geez, democrats are so stupid. They should not be allowed to vote.
Whose homosexual life into which you are being forced, Rosh?
Anytime anyone is forced upon you by the government in the name of an absolutely personal and irrelevant behavior everyone should be offended. That is fascism. OK? Get it?
And yet state legislators cannot make laws that take away rights without a compelling reason.There is no written intent in the Constitution that restricts marriage to that of opposite sex. Show me where it does if I have missed it, Marty.
Doesn't have to be in there, if its not referred as a federal power, or left to the people, it is the realm of the State Legislatures, pure and simple.
Right------that's why the word "sexual preference" gets thrown about. Who are you kidding ? Marriage has everything to do with sex.Katzndogz thinks marriage is about sexuality rather than the love of two people that bind them together.
It is not the sex, it is the love, katzndogz.
It may have something to do with sex, that's up to the married couple. It has nothing to do with procreation.
I guess you never heard that a couple can put a penny in a jar for every time they have sex before marriage and take one out every time they have sex after marriage. The jar lasts the entire marriage.
Insistent media messages claim surging and overwhelming public support for redefinition of marriage but recent numbers from major surveys and the Census Bureau tell a very different story.
In late September, a Pew Center poll found less than half of respondents – 49% to be exact – saying that they “favor allowing gays and lesbians to marry legally” – a sharp five point drop since February. Without the biased wording of the question, gay marriage might have received even weaker public backing: if a survey asks you if you want to “allow” other people to do something they say they ardently desire, you’d have to be deeply committed to traditional matrimony to say no. Had Pew asked “Do you want your government to redefine marriage so that male-male and female-female couples are treated identically to traditional marriages?” the response to sweeping change could have been still less favorable.
That’s particularly obvious in light of another surprising result in the poll: a full 50% of respondents agreed with the statement that “homosexual behavior is a sin,” including 77% of black Protestants and a crushing 82% of white Evangelicals. Moreover, the overall percentage of those viewing homosexuality as “sinful” has been soaring, not declining: it’s up from 45% in May of 2013.
Considering the demographics in the 31 states that have so far resisted the nationwide push for gay marriage, it’s tough to imagine that these electorates, with their heavy concentration of Evangelicals and blacks, will endorse government sponsorship of same sex couples at any time in the near future.
New Figures Show Gay Marriage Tidal Wave Is Only a Trickle Truth Revolt
Right------that's why the word "sexual preference" gets thrown about. Who are you kidding ? Marriage has everything to do with sex.Katzndogz thinks marriage is about sexuality rather than the love of two people that bind them together.
It is not the sex, it is the love, katzndogz.
It may have something to do with sex, that's up to the married couple. It has nothing to do with procreation.
I guess you never heard that a couple can put a penny in a jar for every time they have sex before marriage and take one out every time they have sex after marriage. The jar lasts the entire marriage.
Well that was just cute as hell-------it MAY have something to do with sex ? Thanks for the confirmation
Surely your response is not to suggest that sex is about procreation? You don't really believe that is the only reason that people have sex, do you?Right------that's why the word "sexual preference" gets thrown about. Who are you kidding ? Marriage has everything to do with sex.Katzndogz thinks marriage is about sexuality rather than the love of two people that bind them together.
It is not the sex, it is the love, katzndogz.
It may have something to do with sex, that's up to the married couple. It has nothing to do with procreation.
I guess you never heard that a couple can put a penny in a jar for every time they have sex before marriage and take one out every time they have sex after marriage. The jar lasts the entire marriage.
Well that was just cute as hell-------it MAY have something to do with sex ? Thanks for the confirmation
Sexuality and procreative ability and intention are not requirements for marriage.
Real marriage can exist without sex, you silly goof.
No one...well..few of us, are denying that sex has anything to do with marriage - only procreation. I'm still waiting to hear you acknowledge that there is a difference between the two.Sexuality and procreative ability and intention are not requirements for marriage.
I didn't claim that sex was a requirement. I said sex had something to do with real marriages. You can stop the strawman stuff anytime.
According to whom, you goof?Real marriage can exist without sex, you silly goof.
rare as hens teeth----just the kind of cause you liberals go gaga over. The rare exceptions.
