martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 83,434
- 34,518
- 2,300
- Thread starter
- #141
It is when the state seeks to deny same-sex couples access to marriage law for no other reason than some are frightened and offended by gay Americans.Defining the marriage contract is not a "nanny state type law."
Fining a baker for not baking a cake? THAT'S a nanny state type law.
And bakers aren't fined because they refuse to bake a cake, they're appropriately fined because they violated public accommodations law for refusing to serve a patron for no other reason than being frightened and offended by gay Americans.
Yes, they are fined for not baking a cake, and you know it.
Stop hiding your religious bigotry with semantics.
For crying out loud....Who gives a fuck about a cake?
We can't proceed on gay marriage until we have resolved this cake issue?
Gay marriage? But what about the cakes?
It's not about cake, its about forcing morality on others under the guise of public accommodation laws. It's about progressives not being satisfied with winning when it comes to the law and government, but having to force people to either break their moral code or go out of business.
Cry me a river
We can't discuss anything about gay marriage because it may lead to...........cakes
How is this stopping the conversation? Its a related topic. Are you also unable to walk and chew gum at the same time?