strollingbones
Diamond Member
has there been any discussion of the warm water temps in the gulf and the strengthening of hurricanes?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The OP is a conservative. He was not bothered by this thread : President Trump: The Hero Of Hurricane HarveyIf you're not interested in the political implications of a natural disaster, don't post in 'politics'.
It isnt unprecedented. People tend to blow events like thisway out of proportion. Dont get me wrong... Its bad. Its really bad. However it is not unprecedented.That area has had flooding before. It has had hurricanes before. But it has never had this magnitude of disaster before. And how the hell could you have prepared for this?
Hurricane Harvey went from a dangerous tropical storm to a cat 4 hurricane in less than 48 hours. It was reached cat 1 strength at 1 pm Thursday, and struck the coast at cat 4 at 10 pm on Friday. Now how the hell are you going to evacuate millions of people from the coast to past Houston in that length of time? Assuming that you started evacuating at the time that Harvey reached hurricane status? And where would you put the people? Had you even issued such an order, the people there would have laughed at you. After all, they have ridden out many hurricanes up to cat 3 without any real problems. Had the order to evacuate the whole of that area been given, millions of people would have been on the roads that are now under water, and the catastrophe would have had a far higher death toll than it does now.
And there is a second matter to consider. For the people giving the early warning concerning Harvey being a precipitation event were scientists. You know, those people that all the "Conservatives" on this board will tell you, at length, that don't know their ass from a hole in the ground. Warmer waters and a warmer atmosphere means there will be more evaporation, and more precipitation.
You were doing pretty good until the third paragraph. Hurricanes don't usually stall for 5-6 days in one geographical area. 30 inches of water over thousands of square miles is, as you said, is unprecedented. Some areas here will see more than 50 inches. I live 40 miles NW of Houston and have had 28 inches and it will rain for the next two days according to the forecast. Things aren't engineered to handle an 800 year flood.
.
Rare film shows great flood of 1935
People seem to get myopic towards events like these. They tend to transpose "the worst in my lifetime"; into "the worst ever". And seldom are the two in agreement. A lot has changed in Houston since the 1930s. There is a lot more asphalt and concrete laid down than there was back then; and that certainly isnt helping matters. But for the media, and local governance to just throw up their hands, and claim "this is unprecedented"! Is not only historically inaccurate; its also quite dangerous. For in fact a precedent had been set in the 30's. And then, just as now; the leadership took the stance that it was "unprecedented". And it wasnt true then either. These leaders should put more effort into knowing the history of the geography over which they govern. Such knowledge would aid these locales when it comes to designing future growth of large cities such as Houston. Had the leadership taken to heart the example set in the 30's; the devastation we see unfolding in 2017 might have been far less.
Hopefully the leaders of today, will do what the leaders of the 30's, and 40's did not... Learn from the past.
The flood of 35 wouldnt have happened if the Barker and Addicks reservoir been there at the time.
And the 35 storm didnt drop nearly as much rain.
You get all these people who say they aren't doing enough to prepare or fight the effects of hurricanes,yet Houston and Galveston have been working on just that for almost one hundred years in the form of seawalls and reservoirs and now mandatory water retention ponds with new construction.
I have not seen that thread. I made my opinion known of a Trump visit in the thread I did see.The OP is a conservative. He was not bothered by this thread : President Trump: The Hero Of Hurricane HarveyIf you're not interested in the political implications of a natural disaster, don't post in 'politics'.
It was predictable that this thing was going to be politicized the moment it became a hurricane.It is an unpredictable natural disaster. Mistakes will be made & acts a heroism will occur. Politics has nothing to do with it so put your partisan bs away for awhile. And ultimately unless you are disabled and didn't leave you have no one to blame but yourself.
You see all the threads I start, but somehow you didn't see that other one. Interesting.I have not seen that thread. I made my opinion known of a Trump visit in the thread I did see.The OP is a conservative. He was not bothered by this thread : President Trump: The Hero Of Hurricane HarveyIf you're not interested in the political implications of a natural disaster, don't post in 'politics'.
Try to be less of an uninformed dick why dontcha
You're beyond help. And just to clue you in, this thread isn't about Trump. There are politicians from BOTH parties involved in the decisions for Houston.You see all the threads I start, but somehow you didn't see that other one. Interesting.I have not seen that thread. I made my opinion known of a Trump visit in the thread I did see.The OP is a conservative. He was not bothered by this thread : President Trump: The Hero Of Hurricane HarveyIf you're not interested in the political implications of a natural disaster, don't post in 'politics'.
Try to be less of an uninformed dick why dontcha
It isnt unprecedented. People tend to blow events like thisway out of proportion. Dont get me wrong... Its bad. Its really bad. However it is not unprecedented.That area has had flooding before. It has had hurricanes before. But it has never had this magnitude of disaster before. And how the hell could you have prepared for this?
Hurricane Harvey went from a dangerous tropical storm to a cat 4 hurricane in less than 48 hours. It was reached cat 1 strength at 1 pm Thursday, and struck the coast at cat 4 at 10 pm on Friday. Now how the hell are you going to evacuate millions of people from the coast to past Houston in that length of time? Assuming that you started evacuating at the time that Harvey reached hurricane status? And where would you put the people? Had you even issued such an order, the people there would have laughed at you. After all, they have ridden out many hurricanes up to cat 3 without any real problems. Had the order to evacuate the whole of that area been given, millions of people would have been on the roads that are now under water, and the catastrophe would have had a far higher death toll than it does now.
And there is a second matter to consider. For the people giving the early warning concerning Harvey being a precipitation event were scientists. You know, those people that all the "Conservatives" on this board will tell you, at length, that don't know their ass from a hole in the ground. Warmer waters and a warmer atmosphere means there will be more evaporation, and more precipitation.
You were doing pretty good until the third paragraph. Hurricanes don't usually stall for 5-6 days in one geographical area. 30 inches of water over thousands of square miles is, as you said, is unprecedented. Some areas here will see more than 50 inches. I live 40 miles NW of Houston and have had 28 inches and it will rain for the next two days according to the forecast. Things aren't engineered to handle an 800 year flood.
.
Rare film shows great flood of 1935
People seem to get myopic towards events like these. They tend to transpose "the worst in my lifetime"; into "the worst ever". And seldom are the two in agreement. A lot has changed in Houston since the 1930s. There is a lot more asphalt and concrete laid down than there was back then; and that certainly isnt helping matters. But for the media, and local governance to just throw up their hands, and claim "this is unprecedented"! Is not only historically inaccurate; its also quite dangerous. For in fact a precedent had been set in the 30's. And then, just as now; the leadership took the stance that it was "unprecedented". And it wasnt true then either. These leaders should put more effort into knowing the history of the geography over which they govern. Such knowledge would aid these locales when it comes to designing future growth of large cities such as Houston. Had the leadership taken to heart the example set in the 30's; the devastation we see unfolding in 2017 might have been far less.
Hopefully the leaders of today, will do what the leaders of the 30's, and 40's did not... Learn from the past.
has there been any discussion of the warm water temps in the gulf and the strengthening of hurricanes?
If we had a president who was actually an American, this never would have happened. (-:It is an unpredictable natural disaster. Mistakes will be made & acts a heroism will occur. Politics has nothing to do with it so put your partisan bs away for awhile.
And ultimately unless you are disabled and didn't leave you have no one to blame but yourself.
It was your cousin's fault, as are the dams holding back the Hou waters. (-:I'm proud to lay claim to not politicizing the record rains and Oroville Dam either.
View attachment 146526
What kind of city doesn't have emergency plans for different disaster sceneries?
Especially one situated along a coast where hurricanes occur?
*****SMILE*****
View attachment 146526
What kind of city doesn't have emergency plans for different disaster sceneries?
Especially one situated along a coast where hurricanes occur?
*****SMILE*****
One ran by a mayor that was elected because he was black rather than because he is a true leader.
View attachment 146526
What kind of city doesn't have emergency plans for different disaster sceneries?
Especially one situated along a coast where hurricanes occur?
*****SMILE*****
One ran by a mayor that was elected because he was black rather than because he is a true leader.
So, blacks get elected because they are black? Is that what you are claiming Mr Racist Fuck?
View attachment 146526
What kind of city doesn't have emergency plans for different disaster sceneries?
Especially one situated along a coast where hurricanes occur?
*****SMILE*****
One ran by a mayor that was elected because he was black rather than because he is a true leader.
So, blacks get elected because they are black? Is that what you are claiming Mr Racist Fuck?
I really don't care about twats calling me racist; my statement stands.
It isnt unprecedented. People tend to blow events like thisway out of proportion. Dont get me wrong... Its bad. Its really bad. However it is not unprecedented.That area has had flooding before. It has had hurricanes before. But it has never had this magnitude of disaster before. And how the hell could you have prepared for this?
Hurricane Harvey went from a dangerous tropical storm to a cat 4 hurricane in less than 48 hours. It was reached cat 1 strength at 1 pm Thursday, and struck the coast at cat 4 at 10 pm on Friday. Now how the hell are you going to evacuate millions of people from the coast to past Houston in that length of time? Assuming that you started evacuating at the time that Harvey reached hurricane status? And where would you put the people? Had you even issued such an order, the people there would have laughed at you. After all, they have ridden out many hurricanes up to cat 3 without any real problems. Had the order to evacuate the whole of that area been given, millions of people would have been on the roads that are now under water, and the catastrophe would have had a far higher death toll than it does now.
And there is a second matter to consider. For the people giving the early warning concerning Harvey being a precipitation event were scientists. You know, those people that all the "Conservatives" on this board will tell you, at length, that don't know their ass from a hole in the ground. Warmer waters and a warmer atmosphere means there will be more evaporation, and more precipitation.
You were doing pretty good until the third paragraph. Hurricanes don't usually stall for 5-6 days in one geographical area. 30 inches of water over thousands of square miles is, as you said, is unprecedented. Some areas here will see more than 50 inches. I live 40 miles NW of Houston and have had 28 inches and it will rain for the next two days according to the forecast. Things aren't engineered to handle an 800 year flood.
.
Rare film shows great flood of 1935
People seem to get myopic towards events like these. They tend to transpose "the worst in my lifetime"; into "the worst ever". And seldom are the two in agreement. A lot has changed in Houston since the 1930s. There is a lot more asphalt and concrete laid down than there was back then; and that certainly isnt helping matters. But for the media, and local governance to just throw up their hands, and claim "this is unprecedented"! Is not only historically inaccurate; its also quite dangerous. For in fact a precedent had been set in the 30's. And then, just as now; the leadership took the stance that it was "unprecedented". And it wasnt true then either. These leaders should put more effort into knowing the history of the geography over which they govern. Such knowledge would aid these locales when it comes to designing future growth of large cities such as Houston. Had the leadership taken to heart the example set in the 30's; the devastation we see unfolding in 2017 might have been far less.
Hopefully the leaders of today, will do what the leaders of the 30's, and 40's did not... Learn from the past.
It's unprecedented because no other tropical system has dumped this much water over such a wide area. There's more people over a wider area today. Also there's a lot of infrastructure put in place since the 30s to deal with massive rains and this storm is overwhelming all of it.
.
View attachment 146526
What kind of city doesn't have emergency plans for different disaster sceneries?
Especially one situated along a coast where hurricanes occur?
*****SMILE*****
One ran by a mayor that was elected because he was black rather than because he is a true leader.
So, blacks get elected because they are black? Is that what you are claiming Mr Racist Fuck?
I really don't care about twats calling me racist; my statement stands.
Most inbred racists are proud of themselves & don't are about being called out for it.
The man had more experience in government than his opponent. He was better educated.