Stormy's amended lawsuit: Bad news for Cohen and, you know who...

means absolutely nothing...if Bill can perjure himself--a very serious crime--and get away with it, so can Trump over this stupid crap
Stupid crap is right. How many years ago was this? And how many men would turn down a free thrill with a whore? C'mon...let's get out of the Democrat's gutter and think about what he is accomplishing!
It’s not the sex, it’s the crime. And that happened in October, 2016, when trump failed to report a $130,000 campaign contribution.
it doesn't matter...Bill stayed in office....we want fairness and equality--yes?
 
means absolutely nothing...if Bill can perjure himself--a very serious crime--and get away with it, so can Trump over this stupid crap
Clinton didn’t get away with it. He was fined and his license to practice law was suspended. Part of a plea deal he agreed to to avoid charges being filed against him.
you just said--no charges ..and he stayed in office ---so what's the problem?? you want Trump treated differently because he's Republican??
 
means absolutely nothing...if Bill can perjure himself--a very serious crime--and get away with it, so can Trump over this stupid crap
Stupid crap is right. How many years ago was this? And how many men would turn down a free thrill with a whore? C'mon...let's get out of the Democrat's gutter and think about what he is accomplishing!
It’s not the sex, it’s the crime. And that happened in October, 2016, when trump failed to report a $130,000 campaign contribution.
it doesn't matter...Bill stayed in office....we want fairness and equality--yes?
So what? He still didn’t get away with his crime. There was a penalty to pay. Too fucking bad for you if it wasn’t harsh enough for you. :itsok:
 
means absolutely nothing...if Bill can perjure himself--a very serious crime--and get away with it, so can Trump over this stupid crap
Stupid crap is right. How many years ago was this? And how many men would turn down a free thrill with a whore? C'mon...let's get out of the Democrat's gutter and think about what he is accomplishing!
It’s not the sex, it’s the crime. And that happened in October, 2016, when trump failed to report a $130,000 campaign contribution.
it doesn't matter...Bill stayed in office....we want fairness and equality--yes?
So what? He still didn’t get away with his crime. There was a penalty to pay. Too fucking bad for you if it wasn’t harsh enough for you. :itsok:
hahahhah--stop trying to deflect--answer the question:
you want it differently for Trump because he's Republican??
 
means absolutely nothing...if Bill can perjure himself--a very serious crime--and get away with it, so can Trump over this stupid crap
Clinton didn’t get away with it. He was fined and his license to practice law was suspended. Part of a plea deal he agreed to to avoid charges being filed against him.
you just said--no charges ..and he stayed in office ---so what's the problem?? you want Trump treated differently because he's Republican??
Trump has not been impeached or formally charged with anything. I’m not calling for him to be impeached or charged with anything. I am waiting for the investigation to conclude before rendering any such judgements. At which time, I myself will accept whatever conclusions are reached. So how am I treating Trump any differently?
 
means absolutely nothing...if Bill can perjure himself--a very serious crime--and get away with it, so can Trump over this stupid crap
Stupid crap is right. How many years ago was this? And how many men would turn down a free thrill with a whore? C'mon...let's get out of the Democrat's gutter and think about what he is accomplishing!
It’s not the sex, it’s the crime. And that happened in October, 2016, when trump failed to report a $130,000 campaign contribution.
it doesn't matter...Bill stayed in office....we want fairness and equality--yes?
So what? He still didn’t get away with his crime. There was a penalty to pay. Too fucking bad for you if it wasn’t harsh enough for you. :itsok:
hahahhah--stop trying to deflect--answer the question:
you want it differently for Trump because he's Republican??
:itsok:
 
means absolutely nothing...if Bill can perjure himself--a very serious crime--and get away with it, so can Trump over this stupid crap
Clinton didn’t get away with it. He was fined and his license to practice law was suspended. Part of a plea deal he agreed to to avoid charges being filed against him.
you just said--no charges ..and he stayed in office ---so what's the problem?? you want Trump treated differently because he's Republican??
Trump has not been impeached or formally charged with anything. I’m not calling for him to be impeached or charged with anything. I am waiting for the investigation to conclude before rendering any such judgements. At which time, I myself will accept whatever conclusions are reached. So how am I treating Trump any differently?
that's fine---the OP wants Trump treated unfairly
 
Saying nothing is consistent. Stop drinking your own piss, tard.
Trump has no choice but to be silent.

To tell the truth would give Melania everything she needs to tear up the pre-nup. To lie would open him up to impeachment.

And even Trump's fake Christian supporters would find themselves having to defend the creep or abandon him if he tells the truth.

So, yeah. Silence is the adulterer's only option right now. He is letting his lickspittles lie for him.

Sorry Gtard, this is yet another nothing burger.

Nobody cares what a coke snorting, cum guzzling, porn whore says....especially when the porn whore has voluntarily signed not one, not two, but THREE statements to the contrary. :rofl:

Go back to screaming RUSSIA!!!
The 60 minutes interview with Stormy Daniels had its best ratings in ten years. Your desperate wishful thinking that no one cares is amusing. :lol:

And you obviously care, too. That's why you have chained yourself to Trump in the gutter.

Reality check.

The reason 60 minutes had the high ratings is because the cum guzzling, coke snorting, porn whore's sleaze bag attorney promised PROOF. He failed to deliver any.

I don't care what he did 12 years ago. Even if he did screw her it was consensual.

enjoy your dinner....

2217d38bd99b83dfe01529f04b7cee0e_39288e03917_t.png
This is why Trump has his wife and kids locked away from microphones and reporters. So tards like you have time to convince yourselves adultery is harmless.

I have to ask, is your outage at adultery universal, ie, are you upset that JFK is lionized by the left despite being a known horndog, and are you on record anywhere condemning Bubba's high approval ratings when he left office, despite not only being a horndog, but with a reputation for, shall we say, not taking "NO" for an answer?
 
So now that "Russia collusion" failed, "Stormy bareback" failed, what is next on The Swamp's agenda to attack our President?

I heard he once wore white after Labor Day. That might get some traction on certain circles.
 
means absolutely nothing...if Bill can perjure himself--a very serious crime--and get away with it, so can Trump over this stupid crap
Clinton didn’t get away with it. He was fined and his license to practice law was suspended. Part of a plea deal he agreed to to avoid charges being filed against him.
you just said--no charges ..and he stayed in office ---so what's the problem?? you want Trump treated differently because he's Republican??
Trump has not been impeached or formally charged with anything. I’m not calling for him to be impeached or charged with anything. I am waiting for the investigation to conclude before rendering any such judgements. At which time, I myself will accept whatever conclusions are reached. So how am I treating Trump any differently?
that's fine---the OP wants Trump treated unfairly
He does? The OP is claiming Cohen may have violated campaign finance laws and that may extend to Trump as well, depended upon his involvement. How the fuck is that treating trump unfairly?
 
means absolutely nothing...if Bill can perjure himself--a very serious crime--and get away with it, so can Trump over this stupid crap
Clinton didn’t get away with it. He was fined and his license to practice law was suspended. Part of a plea deal he agreed to to avoid charges being filed against him.
you just said--no charges ..and he stayed in office ---so what's the problem?? you want Trump treated differently because he's Republican??
Trump has not been impeached or formally charged with anything. I’m not calling for him to be impeached or charged with anything. I am waiting for the investigation to conclude before rendering any such judgements. At which time, I myself will accept whatever conclusions are reached. So how am I treating Trump any differently?
that's fine---the OP wants Trump treated unfairly
He does? The OP is claiming Cohen may have violated campaign finance laws and that may extend to Trump as well, depended upon his involvement. How the fuck is that treating trump unfairly?
hahahha
please--you are real good at acting stupid
please read the OP's posts on USMB --that will give you the answer
 
Clinton didn’t get away with it. He was fined and his license to practice law was suspended. Part of a plea deal he agreed to to avoid charges being filed against him.
you just said--no charges ..and he stayed in office ---so what's the problem?? you want Trump treated differently because he's Republican??
Trump has not been impeached or formally charged with anything. I’m not calling for him to be impeached or charged with anything. I am waiting for the investigation to conclude before rendering any such judgements. At which time, I myself will accept whatever conclusions are reached. So how am I treating Trump any differently?
that's fine---the OP wants Trump treated unfairly
He does? The OP is claiming Cohen may have violated campaign finance laws and that may extend to Trump as well, depended upon his involvement. How the fuck is that treating trump unfairly?
hahahha
please--you are real good at acting stupid
please read the OP's posts on USMB --that will give you the answer
Nah, I’m not interested in following everyone’s words on here. If you have a case to make, make it. If you want to discuss this thread’s topic, discuss it. Otherwise, stop gumming at my ankles.
 
Is it possible to defame a porn star?

I’m curious what the case law says
The credibility of the porn star is greater than that of the President of the United States.

Pretty fucking sad.

Sad when folks take sides with a Porn Star that didn't report a threat to her minor child to the Police.

But that's just how the brain dead role I guess.
Sad when tards take the side of a man who threatened a mother and child.

Impossible. Only one person, or two or it's true, even knows if the incident occurred at all, and only one would know who did it. To take her statement as fact and project it on Trump is rather weak and foolish, don't you think?
 
Stormy Daniels has amended her lawsuit against Donald Trump to include two key new points: a defamation claim against Trump’s longtime personal lawyer Michael Cohen, and an argument that the non-disclosure agreement Daniels signed isn’t valid because the $130,00 hush money payment from Cohen to Daniels was in violation of federal election law.

Cohen defamed Daniels, the lawsuit now says, by implying on February 13 that she was lying about her 2006 affair with Trump, even as he paid her six figures to not talk about it.

Washington Post

Ya know the fun part? There are at least half a dozen more NDA's out there. Drip Drip :)
 
Ya know the fun part? There are at least half a dozen more NDA's out there. Drip Drip :)


Soon, Trump cultists will "explain" the above as Trump generous, charity giving......
 
Oh my, how very specific of you.

Not.

That fails to answer the question. How can a personal payoff from an attorney be classified as a campaign contribution? Cohen didn't contribute to the campaign, he paid someone off with his own money.

Apples and oranges.

If you don't have any factual evidence, just say so. No harm in admitting defeat, Nat.

this has been explained multiple times. trumptards seem to enjoy trolling by repeating the same question over and over. but feel free to read:

Payment To Stormy Daniels May Have Broken Campaign Finance Law
How can paying someone from your own personal funds violate campaign finance law?

Clearly a question you can't answer.

And NPR? Ha. You'll need to do better than that.

you were given information. learn to read, nutter butter

now you want to pretend NPR is lying because it tells the truth and not what insane trumptards want.

:cuckoo:
Because if I cited fox news, you would call the same accusation a lie.

Who is the "eternal nitwit" now?

don't worry

your lead is safe :thup:
 
Stormy Daniels has amended her lawsuit against Donald Trump to include two key new points: a defamation claim against Trump’s longtime personal lawyer Michael Cohen, and an argument that the non-disclosure agreement Daniels signed isn’t valid because the $130,00 hush money payment from Cohen to Daniels was in violation of federal election law.

Cohen defamed Daniels, the lawsuit now says, by implying on February 13 that she was lying about her 2006 affair with Trump, even as he paid her six figures to not talk about it.

Washington Post

Ya know the fun part? There are at least half a dozen more NDA's out there. Drip Drip :)

A couple shots will take care of that nasty drip you got.

But ain’t no medication on the face of the earth that can cure what actually ails ya.............


False hope.
 
Clinton POTUS
Trump POTUS
Bill accused of a crime/having sex when married/etc
Trump accused of a crime/having sex when married/etc
WTF is the matter with you?? you can't see the comparison??


Idiot.....so Monica was

a. a porn star?
b. was paid to hush her blow job up right before an election?
c. was asked to sign a NDA?

Surely there's a grown up walking around your basement....ask for help

No, she was a 20 something intern who was taken advantage of by a powerful white man. Classic case of Sexual Harassment perpetrated by a classic sexual predator. But then you don't care about any of that.

It once was a contention that a truly consensual relationship between a boss and female employee was impossible because of the power unbalance. In Bubba's case, the imbalance was about as big as it can get.

Of course, those making that claim shut up when Bubba's case came to light.
 
you just said--no charges ..and he stayed in office ---so what's the problem?? you want Trump treated differently because he's Republican??
Trump has not been impeached or formally charged with anything. I’m not calling for him to be impeached or charged with anything. I am waiting for the investigation to conclude before rendering any such judgements. At which time, I myself will accept whatever conclusions are reached. So how am I treating Trump any differently?
that's fine---the OP wants Trump treated unfairly
He does? The OP is claiming Cohen may have violated campaign finance laws and that may extend to Trump as well, depended upon his involvement. How the fuck is that treating trump unfairly?
hahahha
please--you are real good at acting stupid
please read the OP's posts on USMB --that will give you the answer
Nah, I’m not interested in following everyone’s words on here. If you have a case to make, make it. If you want to discuss this thread’s topic, discuss it. Otherwise, stop gumming at my ankles.
I made the case---what's good for the goose is good for the gander
 

Forum List

Back
Top