Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ya know the fun part? There are at least half a dozen more NDA's out there. Drip Drip
Soon, Trump cultists will "explain" the above as Trump generous, charity giving......
It once was a contention that a truly consensual relationship between a boss and female employee was impossible because of the power unbalance. In Bubba's case, the imbalance was about as big as it can get.
Of course, those making that claim shut up when Bubba's case came to light.
I made the case---what's good for the goose is good for the ganderNah, I’m not interested in following everyone’s words on here. If you have a case to make, make it. If you want to discuss this thread’s topic, discuss it. Otherwise, stop gumming at my ankles.hahahhaHe does? The OP is claiming Cohen may have violated campaign finance laws and that may extend to Trump as well, depended upon his involvement. How the fuck is that treating trump unfairly?that's fine---the OP wants Trump treated unfairlyTrump has not been impeached or formally charged with anything. I’m not calling for him to be impeached or charged with anything. I am waiting for the investigation to conclude before rendering any such judgements. At which time, I myself will accept whatever conclusions are reached. So how am I treating Trump any differently?
please--you are real good at acting stupid
please read the OP's posts on USMB --that will give you the answer
Ya know the fun part? There are at least half a dozen more NDA's out there. Drip Drip
Soon, Trump cultists will "explain" the above as Trump generous, charity giving......
I'm giving his marriage another 6 months - Tops
Stormy's pimp er I mean lawyer keeps claiming there is "evidence" on the CD that will "prove Trump banged Stormy. ONCE.
That's right. The 25 year old porn star claimed she was asked up to Trump's hotel room. Did she say: "OK but first I need to go to my car and get the secret video camera and set it up when you aren't looking so I can later blackmail you".
What Stormy's pimp actually has on video is Stormy taking a lie detector test. Of course the pimp hired a lie detector expert who would claim Stormy was telling the truth. There is literally no court in the US that will accept any lie detector test as settled fact.
Stormy Daniels has amended her lawsuit against Donald Trump to include two key new points: a defamation claim against Trump’s longtime personal lawyer Michael Cohen, and an argument that the non-disclosure agreement Daniels signed isn’t valid because the $130,00 hush money payment from Cohen to Daniels was in violation of federal election law.
Cohen defamed Daniels, the lawsuit now says, by implying on February 13 that she was lying about her 2006 affair with Trump, even as he paid her six figures to not talk about it.
Washington Post
One could have asked the same question of Bill Clinton.
Too much moral preening and hypocrisy in this thread.
Trump cultists have REFUSED to address the more salient point that Trump and Cohen my have broken campaign finance laws...........
I GUESS ITS EASIER TO LOOK AT THE SEX PART SO THAT CLINTON CAN ALSO BE BLAMED?
one more Fn time-- please provide a link to that lawStormy's pimp er I mean lawyer keeps claiming there is "evidence" on the CD that will "prove Trump banged Stormy. ONCE.
That's right. The 25 year old porn star claimed she was asked up to Trump's hotel room. Did she say: "OK but first I need to go to my car and get the secret video camera and set it up when you aren't looking so I can later blackmail you".
What Stormy's pimp actually has on video is Stormy taking a lie detector test. Of course the pimp hired a lie detector expert who would claim Stormy was telling the truth. There is literally no court in the US that will accept any lie detector test as settled fact.
One more fucking time for the above idiot and his fellow cultists...It is NOT about the sex....It is about...
"........that the non-disclosure agreement Daniels signed isn’t valid because the $130,00 hush money payment from Cohen to Daniels was in violation of federal election law...."
It once was a contention that a truly consensual relationship between a boss and female employee was impossible because of the power unbalance. In Bubba's case, the imbalance was about as big as it can get.
Of course, those making that claim shut up when Bubba's case came to light.
Why is it so fucking 'difficult" for morons like you to realize that it is NOT the sex part but this from the O/P?
"..........that the non-disclosure agreement Daniels signed isn’t valid because the $130,00 hush money payment from Cohen to Daniels was in violation of federal election law......"
Go back to sleep.
You made no case. You falsely ascribed a position to me I did not take about treating Trump unfairly; and when I pointed that out to you, you switched to — oh yeah? Well what about the OP?I made the case---what's good for the goose is good for the ganderNah, I’m not interested in following everyone’s words on here. If you have a case to make, make it. If you want to discuss this thread’s topic, discuss it. Otherwise, stop gumming at my ankles.hahahhaHe does? The OP is claiming Cohen may have violated campaign finance laws and that may extend to Trump as well, depended upon his involvement. How the fuck is that treating trump unfairly?that's fine---the OP wants Trump treated unfairlyTrump has not been impeached or formally charged with anything. I’m not calling for him to be impeached or charged with anything. I am waiting for the investigation to conclude before rendering any such judgements. At which time, I myself will accept whatever conclusions are reached. So how am I treating Trump any differently?
please--you are real good at acting stupid
please read the OP's posts on USMB --that will give you the answer
The simple fact is Trump is saying "I didn't do it" through other people, never personally and his lawyer is basically saying to her "you can't talk about that sex".
So, if the sex didn't happen, the lawyer doesn't need to say she can't talk about it. Right?
hahahahYou made no case. You falsely ascribed a position to me I did not take about treating Trump unfairly; and when I pointed that out to you, you switched to — oh yeah? Well what about the OP?I made the case---what's good for the goose is good for the ganderNah, I’m not interested in following everyone’s words on here. If you have a case to make, make it. If you want to discuss this thread’s topic, discuss it. Otherwise, stop gumming at my ankles.hahahhaHe does? The OP is claiming Cohen may have violated campaign finance laws and that may extend to Trump as well, depended upon his involvement. How the fuck is that treating trump unfairly?that's fine---the OP wants Trump treated unfairly
please--you are real good at acting stupid
please read the OP's posts on USMB --that will give you the answer
That’s not an argument. That’s crying.
once again---like Stormy--you provide no evidence = your OP is crapone more Fn time-- please provide a link to that law
you don't know what that law is --do you?
actually I do.....but it's not fair to share it with trump cultists.....it would shatter their half brains.....lol
How many times need I request you stop fantasizing about me? You’re creeping me out.I made the case---what's good for the goose is good for the ganderNah, I’m not interested in following everyone’s words on here. If you have a case to make, make it. If you want to discuss this thread’s topic, discuss it. Otherwise, stop gumming at my ankles.hahahhaHe does? The OP is claiming Cohen may have violated campaign finance laws and that may extend to Trump as well, depended upon his involvement. How the fuck is that treating trump unfairly?that's fine---the OP wants Trump treated unfairly
please--you are real good at acting stupid
please read the OP's posts on USMB --that will give you the answer
Correct, if it’s ok in case 1, then why not in case 2.
Faun, wants you to quit “gumming at his ankles” he’d prefer you aim higher. By about 3 feet.
the OP wants Trump out of the white house for an ALLEGED crime he can't even link
but it was ok for Bill to commit a crime
case closed..
lol)
It’s being investigated.One could have asked the same question of Bill Clinton.
Too much moral preening and hypocrisy in this thread.
Trump cultists have REFUSED to address the more salient point that Trump and Cohen my have broken campaign finance laws...........
I GUESS ITS EASIER TO LOOK AT THE SEX PART SO THAT CLINTON CAN ALSO BE BLAMED?
So let's get a ruling on that. An actual ruling, not a lawyer's opinion, not a keyboard hockey who's mindlessly repeating something he liked hearing.
how many times are you people going to argue with insults/etc and 0 evidence? which means your argument is crap-worthlessHow many times need I request you stop fantasizing about me? You’re creeping me out.I made the case---what's good for the goose is good for the ganderNah, I’m not interested in following everyone’s words on here. If you have a case to make, make it. If you want to discuss this thread’s topic, discuss it. Otherwise, stop gumming at my ankles.hahahhaHe does? The OP is claiming Cohen may have violated campaign finance laws and that may extend to Trump as well, depended upon his involvement. How the fuck is that treating trump unfairly?
please--you are real good at acting stupid
please read the OP's posts on USMB --that will give you the answer
Correct, if it’s ok in case 1, then why not in case 2.
Faun, wants you to quit “gumming at his ankles” he’d prefer you aim higher. By about 3 feet.
