Strategist: Democrat Party in Decline

[Wry Catcher]

Democrats have lost the trust of the people.

You're a liar or ignorant - likely both.

 

[FJO]

Gee, wonder if the Republican party is declining as quickly as Rush's or Fox's audiences? How fortunate for the lefty lib scum, huh? Well, we've got nothing left now other than to ratchet up the production of all that dirty air and water for our scorched earth finale.

FNC is getting twice the viewership of their closest competitor during primetime. In what way is that declining?

Tes people like comedy! How about that landslide win for Romney?

And all you sloped skulled tards ate it up!!

She is so mad she looks like she could eat a dog!!

Isn't it President Obama who regularly dines on dog meat? Or, at least, used to?

 

[Mac1958]

It's my impression that both parties are packed with elitist pig authortarians and sociopaths.

Freakin' BINGO.

And to make it worse, they're supported by apologists and sychophants.

.

 

[rightwinger]

Hillary 2016

Nuff said

 

[t_polkow]

FNC is getting twice the viewership of their closest competitor during primetime. In what way is that declining?

Tes people like comedy! How about that landslide win for Romney?

And all you sloped skulled tards ate it up!!

She is so mad she looks like she could eat a dog!!

Isn't it President Obama who regularly dines on dog meat? Or, at least, used to?

Michelle Malkin is a vile far-right US political pundit. She's a proponent of torture, and demonizes liberals at almost every opportunity, often for no particular reason. Being a woman, she's usually the go-to alternative to Ann Coulter. Being Asian, (i.e., not white), she's often used to shield American conservative punditry from accusations of racism (regardless of the fact that Malkin's a flaming racist herself). Her rhetoric is so bad that Andrew Sullivan made up the "Michelle Malkin" award for the most intemperate, hateful remarks of the year. (Both she and Coulter are ineligible for the award, to give others a chance at winning.


Michelle follows the typical nationalist views on immigration; lock 'em up or kick 'em out. She is associated with the nativist website VDARE, who must be thrilled to have an actual minority on hand. She has a particular obsession with "anchor babies," children born to immigrants in the United States. She is adamant that the laws that allow foreign parents of American-born children to gain citizenship should be changed immediately. Interestingly enough, Malkin's own parents were immigrants (On Student visas) from the Philippines. In other words, Michelle Malkin is an anchor baby. Irony meter full.
This user finds it odd that she hasn't put herself immediately at the front of the deportation line, but this user isn't really surprised at her hypocrisy.

Michelle Malkin - RationalWiki

 

[Dot Com]

The last I looked, the Democratic party gained two seats in the Senate and 10 seats in the House in the last election, and Obama was re-elected.

Up is Down....Good is Bad...And Gains are loses

exactly!!1 Its like saying "we won, we won!!!" as you retreat from ANOTHER lost battle

 

[Dot Com]

Gee, wonder if the Republican party is declining as quickly as Rush's or Fox's audiences? How fortunate for the lefty lib scum, huh? Well, we've got nothing left now other than to ratchet up the production of all that dirty air and water for our scorched earth finale.

FNC is getting twice the viewership of their closest competitor during primetime. In what way is that declining?

Yes people like comedy! How about that landslide win for Romney?

And all you sloped skulled tards ate it up!!

She is so mad she looks like she could eat a dog!!







Anchor baby Malkin

The rightists love that Oriental woman

 

[Mac1958]

.

I guess racism is "okay" when "my" side does it.

.

 

[ClosedCaption]

It's my impression that both parties are packed with elitist pig authortarians and sociopaths. The democrook party of course is completely lost, it was the first down the drain. The repukes have been swirling in the bowl, and only kept near the top thanks to rhetoric that appeals to those of us who value individual freedom. Of course we hold our political hacks to account, and when they fail to do what they're supposed to we withdraw support.

Democrooks of course support their masters with dog like devotion. They're so dedicated they ignore every transgression, except maybe jumping party lines on gun grabbing. Other than that a democrook can be quilty of any crime, including manslaughter, and still manage to stay in the senate.

If the elitist pig element of the repuke party, that is the McLames and other RINO's are pounded out there's no way the democrook party will come back. The puppet masters of the left are aware of this I believe, and that's why their minions are programmed to vicerally attack populist repubs whenever they come up. The Tea Party is the biggest threat to the statists. That is why it is so maligned.

Notice Romney was the only repuke that wasn't viciously attacked until he was the last one standing. Next time the bed wetters attack a candidate, we know they're doing something right. Hopefully we'll have the sense to stand by them if it's worth doing so.

 

[Pete7469]

Yeah, that's exactly what I said bed wetter. Weren't you giving me shit for not reading your moonbat drivel recently?

Take your own advice, and a lethal dose of heroin.

 

[rightwinger]

The numbers just don't add up for Republicans

Red States/Blue State loyalties provide an automatic advantage for the Democratic candidate. Even before the first vote is cast, the Democrats lead. States that were once consistently toss up states are now leaning decidedly blue. Ohio and Florida may go blue permanantly in the next election. If they do, no Republican may be elected president for a generation

 

[ClosedCaption]

Yeah, that's exactly what I said bed wetter. Weren't you giving me shit for not reading your moonbat drivel recently?

Take your own advice, and a lethal dose of heroin.

no

 

[t_polkow]

FNC is getting twice the viewership of their closest competitor during primetime. In what way is that declining?

Yes people like comedy! How about that landslide win for Romney?

And all you sloped skulled tards ate it up!!

She is so mad she looks like she could eat a dog!!







Anchor baby Malkin

The rightists love that Oriental woman

Yep they got their token cover

 

[Dot Com]

The numbers just don't add up for Republicans

Red States/Blue State loyalties provide an automatic advantage for the Democratic candidate. Even before the first vote is cast, the Democrats lead. States that were once consistently toss up states are now leaning decidedly blue. Ohio and Florida may go blue permanantly in the next election. If they do, no Republican may be elected president for a generation

that doesn't even acct for the ones that are leaning blue from red (AKA- purple) states.

 

[FJO]

Tes people like comedy! How about that landslide win for Romney?

And all you sloped skulled tards ate it up!!

She is so mad she looks like she could eat a dog!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2nP4Azjr14

Isn't it President Obama who regularly dines on dog meat? Or, at least, used to?

Michelle Malkin is a vile far-right US political pundit. She's a proponent of torture, and demonizes liberals at almost every opportunity, often for no particular reason. Being a woman, she's usually the go-to alternative to Ann Coulter. Being Asian, (i.e., not white), she's often used to shield American conservative punditry from accusations of racism (regardless of the fact that Malkin's a flaming racist herself). Her rhetoric is so bad that Andrew Sullivan made up the "Michelle Malkin" award for the most intemperate, hateful remarks of the year. (Both she and Coulter are ineligible for the award, to give others a chance at winning.


Michelle follows the typical nationalist views on immigration; lock 'em up or kick 'em out. She is associated with the nativist website VDARE, who must be thrilled to have an actual minority on hand. She has a particular obsession with "anchor babies," children born to immigrants in the United States. She is adamant that the laws that allow foreign parents of American-born children to gain citizenship should be changed immediately. Interestingly enough, Malkin's own parents were immigrants (On Student visas) from the Philippines. In other words, Michelle Malkin is an anchor baby. Irony meter full.
This user finds it odd that she hasn't put herself immediately at the front of the deportation line, but this user isn't really surprised at her hypocrisy.

Michelle Malkin - RationalWiki

Anchor baby? If she is an "anchor baby", so is Barack Insane Obama, with the difference that Malkin loves America and does not want it ruined, by "fundamentally changing" it.

She was born in Philadephia, so she is a genuine American, unlike the dog eating usurper in the White House.

Here is an account of Michelle Malkin, that was not written and quoted by idiots who are filled with psychotic irrational hatred of those with whom they disagree, politically.

Michelle Malkin - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[rightwinger]

Isn't it President Obama who regularly dines on dog meat? Or, at least, used to?

Michelle Malkin is a vile far-right US political pundit. She's a proponent of torture, and demonizes liberals at almost every opportunity, often for no particular reason. Being a woman, she's usually the go-to alternative to Ann Coulter. Being Asian, (i.e., not white), she's often used to shield American conservative punditry from accusations of racism (regardless of the fact that Malkin's a flaming racist herself). Her rhetoric is so bad that Andrew Sullivan made up the "Michelle Malkin" award for the most intemperate, hateful remarks of the year. (Both she and Coulter are ineligible for the award, to give others a chance at winning.


Michelle follows the typical nationalist views on immigration; lock 'em up or kick 'em out. She is associated with the nativist website VDARE, who must be thrilled to have an actual minority on hand. She has a particular obsession with "anchor babies," children born to immigrants in the United States. She is adamant that the laws that allow foreign parents of American-born children to gain citizenship should be changed immediately. Interestingly enough, Malkin's own parents were immigrants (On Student visas) from the Philippines. In other words, Michelle Malkin is an anchor baby. Irony meter full.
This user finds it odd that she hasn't put herself immediately at the front of the deportation line, but this user isn't really surprised at her hypocrisy.

Michelle Malkin - RationalWiki

Anchor baby? She was born in Philadephia, so she is a genuine American.

Here is an account of Michelle Malkin, that was not written and quoted by idiots who are filled with psychotic irrational hatred of those with whom they disagree, politically.

Michelle Malkin - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thats what an anchor baby is

Malkin was born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to Philippine citizens Rafaela (née Perez) – a homemaker and teacher – and Apolo DeCastro Maglalang, who was then a physician-in-training.[1] Several months prior to Malkin's birth, her parents had immigrated to the United States on an employer-sponsored visa

 

[PMZ]

There is only one big unanswered political question for us. Who, what, when will replace the GOP as they continued down the path to extinction. They have decided to stay on that path, so their demise is certain, their replacement is a given, while the details remain unclear.

To me it's a question of leadership. Who will emerge from the ashes?

I don't see anybody fighting for first place yet. They all seem content to believe that Rush and Rupert, the NRA and the church can be influential enough to bring enough votes to the table to make a difference despite the evidence to the contrary.

IMO 2016 will be the evidence needed to make a new party imperative and the GOP's demise unarguable. That's not much time for new, effective leadership to emerge.

 

[rightwinger]

There is only one big unanswered political question for us. Who, what, when will replace the GOP as they continued down the path to extinction. They have decided to stay on that path, so their demise is certain, their replacement is a given, while the details remain unclear.

To me it's a question of leadership. Who will emerge from the ashes?

I don't see anybody fighting for first place yet. They all seem content to believe that Rush and Rupert, the NRA and the church can be influential enough to bring enough votes to the table to make a difference despite the evidence to the contrary.

IMO 2016 will be the evidence needed to make a new party imperative and the GOP's demise unarguable. That's not much time for new, effective leadership to emerge.

Touches on a major problem for Republicans. There are no moderate Republicans. Rush and the rightwing media have either driven them to the right or out of the party

This leaves moderate Americans with only one choice. Do they accept a moderate left candidate or a hard right candidate?

Republicans have ceded the middle and they will lose

 

[Dot Com]

I hate anchor babies HATE!!! Especially ones like Michelle Malkin.

Michelle Malkin is a vile far-right US political pundit. She's a proponent of torture, and demonizes liberals at almost every opportunity, often for no particular reason. Being a woman, she's usually the go-to alternative to Ann Coulter. Being Asian, (i.e., not white), she's often used to shield American conservative punditry from accusations of racism (regardless of the fact that Malkin's a flaming racist herself). Her rhetoric is so bad that Andrew Sullivan made up the "Michelle Malkin" award for the most intemperate, hateful remarks of the year. (Both she and Coulter are ineligible for the award, to give others a chance at winning.


Michelle follows the typical nationalist views on immigration; lock 'em up or kick 'em out. She is associated with the nativist website VDARE, who must be thrilled to have an actual minority on hand. She has a particular obsession with "anchor babies," children born to immigrants in the United States. She is adamant that the laws that allow foreign parents of American-born children to gain citizenship should be changed immediately. Interestingly enough, Malkin's own parents were immigrants (On Student visas) from the Philippines. In other words, Michelle Malkin is an anchor baby. Irony meter full.
This user finds it odd that she hasn't put herself immediately at the front of the deportation line, but this user isn't really surprised at her hypocrisy.

Michelle Malkin - RationalWiki

Anchor baby? She was born in Philadephia, so she is a genuine American.

Here is an account of Michelle Malkin, that was not written and quoted by idiots who are filled with psychotic irrational hatred of those with whom they disagree, politically.

Michelle Malkin - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thats what an anchor baby is

Malkin was born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to Philippine citizens Rafaela (née Perez) – a homemaker and teacher – and Apolo DeCastro Maglalang, who was then a physician-in-training.[1] Several months prior to Malkin's birth, her parents had immigrated to the United States on an employer-sponsored visa

 

[buckeye45_73]

Sometimes events occur, as they say, 'when you least expect it....."
That is the truth that Democrat analyst Doug Sosnik speaks to his party....

Democratic strategist: Party 'in decline'

1. “Since Obama was elected President, the Democrats have lost nine governorships, 56 members of the House and two Senate seats,” Doug Sosnik, the political director in Bill Clinton’s White House, writes in a new memo..... , the Democratic Party’s favorability rating has declined by 15 points since Obama took power. A Pew Research Center survey this January showed that the Democratic Party was viewed favorably by 47 percent of Americans, down from 62 percent in Jan. 2009.


2. Obama neither directly campaigned nor raised money for down-ticket Democrats last year. The post-election creation of Organizing for Action to push his own agenda has upset party regulars because it makes the Democratic National Committee less relevant than ever, squeezes fundraising for other Democratic groups and emphasizes issues that put moderates in a bind.

3. “Obama not only got elected by running against the party establishment, but he has governed as a President who does not emphasize his party label,” writes Sosnik.






4. Sosnik outlines several challenges facing his own party:

• Obama’s personal popularity does not easily translate for other candidates. The president is not building the Democratic Party’s institutional apparatus in a way that it will thrive when he’s gone.

• The losses in the 2010 midterms gave Republicans control of the redistricting process, which will be in effect until after the 2020 census. This gives the GOP a structural advantage in keeping the House.

• Millennials, born 1981 to 1994, and Generation X’ers, born 1965 to 1980, are voting Democratic, but a plurality identify themselves as independents — which makes them less reliable.

• Democrats cannot count on the same level of African-American turnout without Obama at the top of the ticket. Sosnik cites new analysis showing that in 2012 for the first time ever eligible black voters turned out a higher rate than whites.





5. While Republicans have a serious Hispanic problem, Sosnik explains, “younger Hispanics feel less of an allegiance to the Democratic Party than their elders.” Only 50 percent of Hispanic voters aged 18-34 identify themselves as Democrats, according to Gallup, compared to 59 percent of Hispanic voters 55 or older.

6. If Hillary Clinton does not run, Sosnik fears that Democrats will be left with a thin bench of top-flight presidential contenders in 2016.

7. Looking to 2014, Democratic base groups also tend to turn out at lower rates for midterms than presidential elections.

8. In terms of actual policy making, Sosnik believes that it will be “almost impossible” for Obama to effectively engage Congress.

9. ... the fact that he didn’t set out a clear policy agenda for a second term left him without a clear mandate to govern over a politically divided Congress....

10. “Furthermore,” he writes, “there’s not a single member of either party who fears paying a political price for not falling in line with the President, making it even more difficult to get members to cast difficult votes.”
Read more: Democratic strategist: Party 'in decline' - POLITICO.com






First, the socialist/communists took over the Democrat Party..

11. Creation of the Progressive Caucus is credited to Bernie Sanders. The groups in the radical network include a) the Congressional Progressive Caucus, b) the Congressional Black Caucus, c) the Populist Caucus, and the d) Progressive Democrats of America.

a. Allied with the above is ACORN, SEIU, and the Institute for Policy Studies

b. And, indirectly, the Center for American Progress and the Apollo Alliance.
Aaron Klein, "Red Army"

.....but even that wasn't extreme enough for them....



Interesting....the folks talking about a third party didn't recognize that we have one now.....
the Obama Fanatics Party.

The Republican't Party is in decline and I'll explain why. Unless one signs on and never questions the long held and never proven platitudes of the new and extreme conservative wing, they are immediately thrown under the bus and considered to be a RINO.

Anyone who denies this fact is a liar or stupid.

Hence, to question the 'authority', i.e. the dogma, is forbidden; true leaders don't follow, they lead - many times in the face of criticism and doubt.

HAve you seen liberals? Unless you're a faglover and a socialist, you're not welcome