Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I got five hundred thousand myself.Zuckerberg financed a coup and paid off politicians and judges.
A small sample of how Facebook Boy spread his millions around to buy the presidency for senile loser, Joe Biden.![]()
Report: Zuckerberg Money Used in Violation of Federal Election Law
A new report by a national public interest law firm alleged, that half a billion dollars donated by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg was used to violate election laws...www.newsmax.com
Who was it who told you that robbing and cheating people required high intelligence? Doing it without getting caught, perhaps; THIS clumsy, obvious mess? Not so much.
The Hell they did not discover it. The proof never saw the inside of a courtroom.Who was it who told you that robbing and cheating people required high intelligence? Doing it without getting caught, perhaps; THIS clumsy, obvious mess? Not so much.
Well, if there was fraud enough to swing the Presidential election.....no one discovered it.
In many states. In thousands of precincts. That seems to argue they WERE really smart.
On the other hand, another argument is offered they didn't NEED to be smart.
I mean by that, Republicans had frequently been warned by Don Trump for at least 10-months that there would be cheating. Yet, some Republicans now say Trump lost to that very cheating---AFTER they had repeatedly been warned.
WTF?
Does that mean that those accused Dems really were as dumb as some here imply?
But the other side was even dumber? No?
Everybody knows the demonRats stole this election! EVERYBODY!
Maybe. Maybe not. Some were. Most of the affidavits don’t actually allege fraud, just things that the people thought could be fraud but didn’t know one way or the other.Affidavits signed under oath are not "hearsay."
The proof never saw the inside of a courtroom.
How many times have I told you courts will not hear it. Dumbass.And, so? Why?The proof never saw the inside of a courtroom.
The question to those Elite Strike Force lawyers by the guy who writes their checks (and, those duped & snookered who sent in their hard earned cash) should have been: WHY aren't you finding and presenting compelling enough evidence to get us to a trial? Get us to one trial in over 60 courtrooms?
Jesus H! team!......you've gone before close to 100 judges, some of which I personally appointed myself.....and you still can't get us to the trial stage?
WTF?
I'm going to give the libturds a lot of credit for stopping the counting in 6 states way behind, only to win 7 days later all 6 of them. AFUKINMAZIN I tell ya. Like winning the Super Lotto 6 weeks in a rowNo it is not. The courts refused to hear it. Stop lying.If no evidence was heard how would you know that? You lose.No. It is the truth against the real big lie. Absolutely everything points to fraud. The withholding of ballots and machines. The censorship so fraud was not discussed and people like insisting there was not. If there was no fraud this would be over because cases with evidence would have been heard and machines would audited.Massive fraud is the retelling of the Big Lie.That does not change the fact there was massive fraud. Even it if were true.Oh we can process it. You idiots look like MF fools out there. The world is laughing at that Vegetable and the dumb shit stains like yourself hereThe anti-American Rubepublicans who hate the sovereign will of the people continue to believe The Big Lie because they’re emotional snowflakes who can’t process that their Orange God lost.
lol
The world is laughing at Qult45. You dumb mouth breathers are comedy.
Then no fraud would be proven. That Democrats did nothing but yell traitor is obvious guilt. No scrutiny has been allowed, let alone transparency. They did nothing to prove election integrity.
No fraud was proven. The cases weren't heard because there was no evidence to prove the claims. FaceBook posts, and videos with conspiracy theory voice overs do no constitute "evidence" in a court of law.
Because the Qult45 'evidence' is hearsay and butthurt? Yeah, that's definitely the case.
Hey Faun. Long time no see whaz up?And, so? Why?The proof never saw the inside of a courtroom.
The question to those Elite Strike Force lawyers by the guy who writes their checks (and, those duped & snookered who sent in their hard earned cash) should have been: WHY aren't you finding and presenting compelling enough evidence to get us to a trial? Get us to one trial in over 60 courtrooms?
Jesus H! team!......you've gone before close to 100 judges, some of which I personally appointed myself.....and you still can't get us to the trial stage?
WTF?
It appears that the propaganda on the election from the Democrat Reich isn't working:
The latest evidence from Rasmussen Reports:By a margin of 51%-44%, voters said it is “likely” that cheating affected the outcome. That included 74% of Republicans and 30% of Democrats. Some 47% said it is likely Democrats stole or destroyed ballots for former President Donald Trump. That included 75% of Republicans and 30% of Democrats. An even 50% said that it is unlikely ballots were destroyed. It is the latest survey to show that much of the nation is stuck in neutral when it comes to moving past the 2020 election, especially Republicans.Trump has done little to help them move forward, as recently as last weekend claiming anew that Democrats and President Joe Biden robbed his reelection.That issue has been fed by continued controversies over balloting and election reform and the partisan fight over the impact of the Georgia voting changes. Liberals, most recently actor Will Smith, have fallen in line to decry the changes.However, a nonpartisan state-by-state review of election laws reported on by Secrets yesterday said that Georgia is in the group of states with the easiest election rules. Delaware, home to Biden, was not.The survey also looked at election laws and found that voters want cheating eliminated from the system far more than making it easier to vote. And they demand voter identification.Rasmussen said: “Asked which is more important, making it easier for everybody to vote, or making sure there is no cheating in elections, 60% of Likely Voters say it’s more important to prevent cheating, while 37% said it’s more important to make it easier to vote.“Only 22% of voters say it is currently too hard to vote, while 34% said it’s too easy to vote, and 41% say the level of difficulty in voting is about right.”
Well the forensics are coming out soon there buddyabout the same amount that believes in invisible deities.
Zuckerberg financed a coup and paid off politicians and judges.
A small sample of how Facebook Boy spread his millions around to buy the presidency for senile loser, Joe Biden.![]()
Report: Zuckerberg Money Used in Violation of Federal Election Law
A new report by a national public interest law firm alleged, that half a billion dollars donated by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg was used to violate election laws...www.newsmax.com
The Hell they did not discover it. The proof never saw the inside of a courtroom.Who was it who told you that robbing and cheating people required high intelligence? Doing it without getting caught, perhaps; THIS clumsy, obvious mess? Not so much.
Well, if there was fraud enough to swing the Presidential election.....no one discovered it.
In many states. In thousands of precincts. That seems to argue they WERE really smart.
On the other hand, another argument is offered they didn't NEED to be smart.
I mean by that, Republicans had frequently been warned by Don Trump for at least 10-months that there would be cheating. Yet, some Republicans now say Trump lost to that very cheating---AFTER they had repeatedly been warned.
WTF?
Does that mean that those accused Dems really were as dumb as some here imply?
But the other side was even dumber? No?
Yeah conservs got it STUCK up the rear on that election.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------You idiots look like MF fools out there.
So, poster 'Hang on', it seems you are whining about being robbed and outsmarted in 2020 by people you label as dumb? Isn't there a performative contradiction there?
Or, alternatively, some may say those folks ain't as dumb as you have asserted.
Or, alternatively, some may say you ain't as smart as you have asserted.
Seems like there's work to do on your argument. No?
Who was it who told you that robbing and cheating people required high intelligence? Doing it without getting caught, perhaps; THIS clumsy, obvious mess? Not so much.
Besides, I remember the left spending four years telling us how Donald Trump was simultaneously a knuckle-dragging moron AND a fiendishly clever foreign agent/super-villain.
Oh okay. I'll believe you because your aren't a fucking lunatic.That is so much bullshit. Zuckerburg helped local municipalities and voters. Just because they oppose your choice does not make it illegal.
They snuck up on him and hit him on the blind side(s)Yeah conservs got it STUCK up the rear on that election.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------You idiots look like MF fools out there.
So, poster 'Hang on', it seems you are whining about being robbed and outsmarted in 2020 by people you label as dumb? Isn't there a performative contradiction there?
Or, alternatively, some may say those folks ain't as dumb as you have asserted.
Or, alternatively, some may say you ain't as smart as you have asserted.
Seems like there's work to do on your argument. No?
Said by an attorney.I read somewhere that any reasonable person wouldn't believe it.
No, by her attorney, you uninformed cretin.Said by an attorney.I read somewhere that any reasonable person wouldn't believe it.
Yup, tRump's former attorney.
MAGA