Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Funny to watch Republicans pretend as though they are all about fundamental fairness and not at all interested in disenfranchising people they disagree with. Fucking hilarious.
Riddle me this.
I'm a law abiding gun owner who served over 20 years in the military, what is fair about making ME provide ID and waiting 7 days to buy a gun just because some OTHER people commit crimes with guns?
Now watch Republicans scream about a politicized Supreme Court.
Democratic Effort Boosted as Courts Block Voter ID Laws - Bloomberg
So "fair" means the law benefits the Democrat party?
Fair means the law benefits the voters.
Not based on how liberals define it. The only voters it benefits are illegal voters.
Absentee ballot voter fraud. Voter ID wouldn't have touch it.
Which is exactly my point.
Apparently you think blacks are too stupid to apply for a voter ID!
Absentee ballot voter fraud. Voter ID wouldn't have touch it.
Which is exactly my point.
Apparently you think blacks are too stupid to apply for a voter ID!
Apparently I think in person voter fraud is virtually non-existent. Making voter ID a solution in search of a problem.
Absentee ballot voter fraud. Voter ID wouldn't have touch it.
Which is exactly my point.
Apparently you think blacks are too stupid to apply for a voter ID!
Apparently I think in person voter fraud is virtually non-existent. Making voter ID a solution in search of a problem.
The above Ms. Richards voted in person 6 times for obuma at different voting locations.
Updated Ohio Poll Worker Voted For Obama...6 Times - Katie Pavlich
I remember when Obama was about to address a predominantly black elementary school in Florida during his first term, when Fox investigated the Secret Service protocols for our White House braveheart before he'd talk to all the seven year-old children, that the average kid, and the kid's parents or guardians, and the kid's teachers, had to have screened in all, 21 pieces of documentation for Secret Service clearance before Obama would set his cowardly ass into their classroom. And this is the same hypocrite who doesn't think voter ID cards are a good idea. If they couldn't steal elections, there wouldn't be a democratic party.
I remember when Obama was about to address a predominantly black elementary school in Florida during his first term, when Fox investigated the Secret Service protocols for our White House braveheart before he'd talk to all the seven year-old children, that the average kid, and the kid's parents or guardians, and the kid's teachers, had to have screened in all, 21 pieces of documentation for Secret Service clearance before Obama would set his cowardly ass into their classroom. And this is the same hypocrite who doesn't think voter ID cards are a good idea. If they couldn't steal elections, there wouldn't be a democratic party.
I don't think hypocrisy means what you think it means.
Now watch Republicans scream about a politicized Supreme Court.
Democratic Effort Boosted as Courts Block Voter ID Laws - Bloomberg
So "fair" means the law benefits the Democrat party?
Fair means the law benefits the voters.
Not based on how liberals define it. The only voters it benefits are illegal voters.
Its not a coincidence that more people voting means more Democratic victories. While republicans do better when fewer people vote. Or are allowed to.
Think on that one.
Explain how in the hell does having to show an ID to vote prevent anyone from voting that legally can vote?Now watch Republicans scream about a politicized Supreme Court.
Democratic Effort Boosted as Courts Block Voter ID Laws - Bloomberg
And if it was your intention to vote that election cycle you should have already registered
If you don't have a suitable ID, or if the government specifically targets your ID so that it can't be used for voting, then you can't vote. Take....Texas. They no longer accept Student ID as valid identification for voting, despite the identification being issued by the State of Texas. But they now accept a gun license for voting. Why? They don't want students voting. And they do want gun owners voting.
There is virtually no in person voter fraud, the only kind of fraud that voter ID could possibly prevent. In the last 10 years Texas could find 2, that's right 2 cases of in person voter fraud that their voter ID laws could prevent. And please note that this is a state that has no problem with roughly 4% innocence rate in executions.
To get a student ID one must show a valid government issued photo identification. In other words, your point doesn't make any sense.
If you have to have a valid government ID to get a student ID, why deny Student ID as valid for voting?
Especially, and this is kinda important......there is virtually no in person voter fraud for voter ID laws to prevent. What's next for Texas...unicorn leash laws?
Conservatives are as usual missing the point with regard to this issue, or intentionally attempting to avoid the point because they know it completely destroys their 'argument' in support of 'voter ID' laws.
The burden rests solely with the state in its desire to restrict, curtail, or otherwise limit a fundamental right such as voting; and absent objective, documented evidence in support of the state's desire to restrict a fundamental right, any measure seeking to limit that right is invalid.
In the case of 'voter ID' laws there is no objective, documented evidence that 'voter fraud' as a consequence of identity has changed the outcome of any election, or exists to such a degree as to undermine the integrity of the election process to justify such laws.
Indeed, voters have already verified their identity when they first registered to vote. As long as their names remain active and valid in the voter registration logs, there is no reason for a voter to further establish his identity absent evidence that a particular voter is attempting to commit fraud.
The state may not presume that every voter is guilty of committing voter fraud, where such a presumption is in fact un-Constitutional.
Explain how in the hell does having to show an ID to vote prevent anyone from voting that legally can vote?Now watch Republicans scream about a politicized Supreme Court.
Democratic Effort Boosted as Courts Block Voter ID Laws - Bloomberg
And if it was your intention to vote that election cycle you should have already registered
If you don't have a suitable ID, or if the government specifically targets your ID so that it can't be used for voting, then you can't vote. Take....Texas. They no longer accept Student ID as valid identification for voting, despite the identification being issued by the State of Texas. But they now accept a gun license for voting. Why? They don't want students voting. And they do want gun owners voting.
There is virtually no in person voter fraud, the only kind of fraud that voter ID could possibly prevent. In the last 10 years Texas could find 2, that's right 2 cases of in person voter fraud that their voter ID laws could prevent. And please note that this is a state that has no problem with roughly 4% innocence rate in executions.
Sure we're missing the liberal point because it's absolutely bull shit. But you should support voter ID it prevents republicans from voting more than once.Conservatives are as usual missing the point with regard to this issue, or intentionally attempting to avoid the point because they know it completely destroys their 'argument' in support of 'voter ID' laws.
The burden rests solely with the state in its desire to restrict, curtail, or otherwise limit a fundamental right such as voting; and absent objective, documented evidence in support of the state's desire to restrict a fundamental right, any measure seeking to limit that right is invalid.
In the case of 'voter ID' laws there is no objective, documented evidence that 'voter fraud' as a consequence of identity has changed the outcome of any election, or exists to such a degree as to undermine the integrity of the election process to justify such laws.
Indeed, voters have already verified their identity when they first registered to vote. As long as their names remain active and valid in the voter registration logs, there is no reason for a voter to further establish his identity absent evidence that a particular voter is attempting to commit fraud.
The state may not presume that every voter is guilty of committing voter fraud, where such a presumption is in fact un-Constitutional.
I'm old school conservative. Back when a real conservative was the smartest person in the room. Do you know what we used to call people who advocated spending taxpayer dollars on a a completely ineffective government program to solve problems they blew way out of proportion, and which only managed to place more obstacles in our lives?
Liberals.
Explain how in the hell does having to show an ID to vote prevent anyone from voting that legally can vote?Now watch Republicans scream about a politicized Supreme Court.
Democratic Effort Boosted as Courts Block Voter ID Laws - Bloomberg
And if it was your intention to vote that election cycle you should have already registered
If you don't have a suitable ID, or if the government specifically targets your ID so that it can't be used for voting, then you can't vote. Take....Texas. They no longer accept Student ID as valid identification for voting, despite the identification being issued by the State of Texas. But they now accept a gun license for voting. Why? They don't want students voting. And they do want gun owners voting.
There is virtually no in person voter fraud, the only kind of fraud that voter ID could possibly prevent. In the last 10 years Texas could find 2, that's right 2 cases of in person voter fraud that their voter ID laws could prevent. And please note that this is a state that has no problem with roughly 4% innocence rate in executions.
To get a student ID one must show a valid government issued photo identification. In other words, your point doesn't make any sense.
If you have to have a valid government ID to get a student ID, why deny Student ID as valid for voting?
Especially, and this is kinda important......there is virtually no in person voter fraud for voter ID laws to prevent. What's next for Texas...unicorn leash laws?
I don't know why one would deny student ID as valid for voting but it's hard to say that students are dissuaded to vote since they must have a government ID to get a student ID. Unicorn leash laws would be required if there were "virtually" no unicorns. "Virtually" means that there ARE unicorns. One can not wonder if you are referring to undocumented unicorns, unicorns with felony records or other kinds of unicorns that tend to vote democrat.