Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
- Sep 4, 2014
- 30,837
- 20,609
They left out critical facts.. They created a narrative...Not what the story reported
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They left out critical facts.. They created a narrative...Not what the story reported
As long as the coach doesn't require the prayer, then it is fine and if another religion would want to have a prayer, so be it. I believe prayer is private and personal, so I would not participate with the coach but those that want to have a right. It is not a violation of church and state.Bad decision by the Court.
The Coach is a paid employee, by choosing to pray to his chosen god he is endorsing that god as part of his official duties as head coach. Endorsing one religion over all others is the first step to establishing it.
I cannot wait till the Satanist get ahold of this and start to hold their version of "prayers" after a football game.
So, you aren't sensitive about someone kneeling during the national anthem? Forced coercion.
You mean like they did with Roe? You people have no ability to be introspect.
Now this is interesting.....can you think of any other situation where this could also apply to?
So let's speculate on the unknown and throw that on there to cast shade on a discussion when what you are suggesting can't be proven eitherI did not claim that he did, I asked a question.
Yeah, little children, and having teachers introduce them to alternative gendersDo you have a point you are trying to make?
As long as the coach doesn't require the prayer, then it is fine and if another religion would want to have a prayer, so be it.
Yeah, little children, and having teachers introduce them to alternative genders
In violation of the parents deeply held religious beliefs... What could go wrong...Yeah, little children, and having teachers introduce them to alternative genders
So let's speculate on the unknown and throw that on there to cast shade on a discussion when what you are suggesting can't be proven either
OK.
Shortly after the Supreme Court ruled against school prayer, Schools responded that these prayers were “voluntary”
The Court rejected that claim and ruled that such prayer was coercion and that it unreasonably influences students to participate
Today the Court reversed itself and says these public prayers do not coerce participation
He never coerced anyone to join in, they did it on their volition
It is all about coercion and intrusion of speech onto others which can't happen at the 50 years line.
It still doesn't help his team to win.As the TRUMPCourt continues to erode Constitutional protections long understood.
The coach has a right to personally pray but not to coerce players to participate in public prayer
The coach was fired for ignoring instructions not to hold public prayers not for the act of praying
Private prayers after a game on the 50-yard line
It is all about coercion and intrusion of speech onto others which can't happen at the 50 years line.
Bad decision by the Court.
The Coach is a paid employee, by choosing to pray to his chosen god he is endorsing that god as part of his official duties as head coach. Endorsing one religion over all others is the first step to establishing it.
I cannot wait till the Satanist get ahold of this and start to hold their version of "prayers" after a football game.
That is literally, their job.No, it is their interpretation of what the Constitution says
But, that wasn't the intent of the Constitution.The Court ruled on this in the past when schools claimed that such prayers were “voluntary”
Due to the positions of power that a teacher or coach had over students, it was ruled coerced prayer