actually gender is a protected class…sexuality is notSarah Huckabee is not a protected group
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
actually gender is a protected class…sexuality is notSarah Huckabee is not a protected group
.A business is not a person.
The owner is free to hate gays.
But if his business is open to the public, it must accommodate the whole public
”We don’t serve Negroes” is no longer allowed
That's all most of the bed wetter's do. You can't be a cognizant adult, observe the reality of our world and the conditions of our country then conclude democrook policy has a positive impact on anything.oh you give him too much credit…i think he just parrots demafasict propaganda
The SC did kick out Trump's election suit.Why not? It’s OK to refuse to serve Republicans, but not gays?
Who appointed them? Oh yeah; the guy you worship. Gonna vote for him again? Sure you are.Roberts, Kavanaugh and Barret absolutely the worst!
Supreme Court rejects ‘independent state legislature’ theory.
"The Supreme Court on Tuesday rebuffed a legal theory that argued that state legislatures have the authority to set election rules with little oversight from state courts, a major decision that turns away a conservative push to empower state legislatures.
By a 6-3 vote, the court rejected the “independent state legislature” theory in a case about North Carolina’s congressional map. The once-fringe legal theory broadly argued that state courts have little — or no — authority to question state legislatures on election laws for federal contests.
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the court’s opinion, joined by the three liberal justices, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, along with two conservatives, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented."
Why didn't Trump appoint Alito and Thomas clerks to SCOTUS?
Roberts is a compromised Epstein Island guest, but Kavanaugh and Barrett and huge disappointments on key cases
We almost need to set up another court just to deal with the malfeasance of the Trump administration.The SC did kick out Trump's election suit.
Who appointed them? Oh yeah; the guy you worship. Gonna vote for him again? Sure you are.
And you wonder why about every 3-4 months you have to make a post like the one you made before where you have to admit some puzzlement as to your idol's failures.
I'm sure ACB and Kat will pay some dividends for you late this week (if not today) but really....how many more of these will you have to make before you realize you've been had?
Ever since J6 the boy is jaded.We almost need to set up another court just to deal with the malfeasance of the Trump administration.
Kavanaugh and Barrett were appointed to repeal Row v WadeWho appointed them? Oh yeah; the guy you worship. Gonna vote for him again? Sure you are.
And you wonder why about every 3-4 months you have to make a post like the one you made before where you have to admit some puzzlement as to your idol's failures.
I'm sure ACB and Kat will pay some dividends for you later this week (if not today) but really....how many more of these will you have to make before you realize you've been had by the blob?
that was absolutely ruled correctly. of course courts have judicial oversight of state lawsRoberts, Kavanaugh and Barret absolutely the worst!
Supreme Court rejects ‘independent state legislature’ theory.
"The Supreme Court on Tuesday rebuffed a legal theory that argued that state legislatures have the authority to set election rules with little oversight from state courts, a major decision that turns away a conservative push to empower state legislatures.
By a 6-3 vote, the court rejected the “independent state legislature” theory in a case about North Carolina’s congressional map. The once-fringe legal theory broadly argued that state courts have little — or no — authority to question state legislatures on election laws for federal contests.
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the court’s opinion, joined by the three liberal justices, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, along with two conservatives, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented."
Why didn't Trump appoint Alito and Thomas clerks to SCOTUS?
Roberts is a compromised Epstein Island guest, but Kavanaugh and Barrett and huge disappointments on key cases
Sure you do.I don't worship him, Ricky Retardo.
You think Id be safe walking the streets of NY with my MAGA hat?
Sure you do.
that was absolutely ruled correctly. of course courts have judicial oversight of state laws
Dimtards will be really upset after these.Rumblings are that the SCOTUS may announce rulings on major cases today. Among them are the student loan forgiveness program (which is an overreach of Biden’s executive power) and the Affirmative Action cases (which currently allow for admission goals to be set according to race). Also closely watched is the LBGQ case in which a private business owner does not want to provide his/her service to gays.
I suggest that each of these cases are so important in their own right that we have separate threads for them, but for now, this serves as notice that the decisions may be imminent.
![]()
Supreme Court expected to rule on several major cases
The Supreme Court is expected to hand down several major rulings that could impact millions of Americans, including cases that focus on student loans, LGBTQ rights and the future of affirmative action. NBC News legal analyst Danny Cevallos joins News NOW to explain what cases are being...www.nbcnews.com
Kavanaugh and Barrett were appointed to repeal Row v Wade
Mission accomplished
You said you did. But like your idol...you are physically unable to tell the truth.I don't have a MAGA hat! LOL You're such a tool!
Tissue?The Supreme Court will continue its campaign to strip individual rights