Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And if you were not legally married, what recourse would you have if your wife kicked you out?
And the wife had no LEGAL recourse. She would have if gay marriage had been legal then. So spending a load of time and money on Lawyers really isn't the answer/replacement for legalized marriage, is it?
We don't have a problem. Civil marriage isn't a problem except to some bigots that don't like sharing the goodies they've given themselves.
That's not a dodge, it is an answer to your question. When interracial marriage was "forced down our throats" by the Supreme Court, a majority of Americans were opposed to blacks marrying whites. (Which was not the case with the gay marriage decision) Few churches were willing to do it. NONE were forced by the government to perform interracial marriages.Dodge of question noted.
None will be forced to perform a ceremony for a gay couple.
Oh please. If they cared about the "sacred and honorable traditions" of civil marriage, they would be more concerned about Las Vegas drive thru, get married by Elvis weddings than committed gay couples. Try again...You mean people who want to preserve a sacred and honorable tradition?
Hey dumbass .....
This is not a thread about Mooslim cab drivers.
Try commenting on the actual OP or stick your whataboutism up your ass.
No, he doesn't. I was married in a church, by a priest, without having to present a marriage license. You can get religiously married without having to get a license.Why not? Again, a priest has to obtain a government license to marry people just like a magistrate. So why would this court ruling exclude them?
Oh please. If they cared about the "sacred and honorable traditions" of civil marriage, they would be more concerned about Las Vegas drive thru, get married by Elvis weddings than committed gay couples. Try again...
No, he doesn't. I was married in a church, by a priest, without having to present a marriage license. You can get religiously married without having to get a license.
That's a different case entirely. The drivers asked for a religious accommodation that could have easily been granted the drivers since the trucking company rarely hauled alcohol and had plenty of other drivers. It's different than the taxi driver case since a large number, a majority I believe, of the cab drivers were Muslim.If she wants to talk about Muslim drivers, talk about the Muslim truck drivers that were fired for not taking a trailer of alcohol to a warehouse. They sued the trucking company right out of business.
Wow drama queen. Marriage is destroyed now?The kind of ceremony is not tradition, marriage being the union of one man and one woman is tradition until the commies Fd it up like they do everything in this country. You can't be a true liberal unless you are destroying things for other people.
So, isn't that what you want?Yes you can, but it's not accepted or recognized by the state.
Instead of making up dozens of bullshit reasons, why don't you just be honest if you can? The reason gays invaded our normal institution is that some can't accept rejection. It drives them crazy that they are looked upon as outcasts in society. You talk legal this and benefits that, yet when I say okay, let's give everybody those benefits and legalities but keep marriage as a religious union, you still feel rejected and continue your rant about being married. So it has nothing to do with legalities or benefits at all.
Very well put.
They want to normalize what is not normal.
That is the core issue.
So, isn't that what you want?
Churches were never compelled to perform interracial marriages. They will never be compelled to perform same sex marriages. To think so is ridiculous.
Beyond that, they want to force abnormality and immorality on society as a whole, compel everyone to treat abnormal as normal, immoral as moral, and to punish any who refuse to do so.
No, they can't. They couldn't force churches to perform interracial marriages and they can't force a church to perform gay marriages.The state cannot interfere with religious rituals. They can interfere if that priest is licensed by the state and conducting a legal marriage also sponsored by government.
That's a different case entirely. The drivers asked for a religious accommodation that could have easily been granted the drivers since the trucking company rarely hauled alcohol and had plenty of other drivers. It's different than the taxi driver case since a large number, a majority I believe, of the cab drivers were Muslim.
It is a fact. Not an opinion and I keep repeating it because it is not sinking in. The first amendment claim is bullshit. Thomas and Alito are cranks.I saw your opinion the first time you posted them.
Don't be like dumbass gene and keep posting them over and over.
It does not make them any more factual then the first time you posted them.
I am simply posting what the SCOTUS Justices are saying.
It may not come up again .....
You may be right ....
But, the fact that it will continue to deny Americans their 1st Amendment Rights tells me it's only a matter of time before it is once again challenged and rightfully so.
You simply cannot provide Freedom and Liberty to one group by taking it from another.
That is EXACTLY what Obergefell does.
They will get it figured out.
Bullshit! You still have not answered the question that I asked several times. How has same sex marriage harmed you personally, or society in general?I don't know what it is with you leftists, but you ask questions, we answer, and you keep asking the same questions over and over again as if you didn't read a word. If your memory is that bad, I suggest speed read the previous replies to get your answer AGAIN!
