Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You could have a court that overturns Roe one day, and then reaffirms Casey the next day.
It hasn't happened because the court has in general supported precedent, even their own, so they wouldn't do that.When has that happened? That is pure speculation of what could happen and ignorance of the way SCOTUS decisions are made.
Dred Scott was never overturned./——-/ You mean legal precedent like Dread Scott and others 13 Overturned Supreme Court Cases. You mean like that?
Actually the senate gets to make the determination of confirming a judicial candidate on any basis they see fit.You are half right.
They get to determine if they are qualified...NOT if their philosophy jibes with the the flavor of the month in Congress.
Or skin color or ethnicity or sexual orientation or support for the institution of slavery, or bias toward the repealing of criminality of pedophilia...Actually the senate gets to make the determination of confirming a judicial candidate on any basis they see fit.
They could vote strictly by gender, or hair color, or whether or not the candidate could rub their stomach and pat their head simultaneously.
The constitution gives them advice and consent, without in any way restricting the criteria they use.
American liberals aren't leftists, they're in a category all by themselves. They're the "synthetic left":Is it better that the SC overturned RvW and ruled favorably to the right on recent gun cases , giving you ammunition and better prospects for the midterms?
Or, would you have rather had RvW stay in place and won the gun cases, and yet take more of a drubbing at the midterms?
Which way is better for your overall prospects?
They all also said they wouldn’t comment on possible rulings. Even RBG said Roe was bad law.The context was testifying to the US Senate under oath.
When asked if they would overturn Roe, they all say that it was settled law, and they believe in Stare Decisis.
I would rather have a court that respects the Constitution.
No. She said there was a better argument to be made.They all also said they wouldn’t comment on possible rulings. Even RBG said Roe was bad law.
Thanks for your opinion, but, I didn't ask for it.It is an interpretation of a right.
And when the 2A is found to only pertain to the militia as it states… you will whine
But hey… precedent no longer matters
most demafacist like you do…they miss Plessy and Jim CrowI would rather have a court that respects legal precedent
correct. that it was bad law and poorly doneNo. She said there was a better argument to be made.
We need to institute something in the House akin to the filibuster where the House can't have limitless powers to do whatever the hell they want with a simple vote of 218-217.Exactly.
Democrats WOULD have had significantly more leverage if they hadn't nuked the filibuster.
That is exactly why it exists.
It protects the minority from the majority.
If I were a Democrat...I'd be working to shore up the filibuster ... not weaken it.
The total failure of Biden and the Democrats has nearly ensured that they will be the minority party in 2023.
She also said that the Court should not be expanded.They all also said they wouldn’t comment on possible rulings. Even RBG said Roe was bad law.
They are going to lose in the mid-term elections, so it matter not…Is it better that the SC overturned RvW and ruled favorably to the right on recent gun cases , giving you ammunition and better prospects for the midterms?
Or, would you have rather had RvW stay in place and won the gun cases, and yet take more of a drubbing at the midterms?
Which way is better for your overall prospects?
We need to institute something in the House akin to the filibuster where the House can't have limitless powers to do whatever the hell they want with a simple vote of 218-217.
They are going to lose in the mid-term elections, so it matter not…
Could but maybe not this time around…Republicans should win the mid terms
But their MAGA candidates in the Senate will once again cost them the Senate
We shall seeCould but maybe not this time around…
Nor should he seeing it will limit his power or chance of returning as the Senate Majority Leader…We shall see
Mitch McConnell is not happy with the Republican candidates for Senate
Nor should he seeing it will limit his power or chance of returning as the Senate Majority Leader…
