Supreme Court Strikes Down Louisiana Abortion Restrictions

[Rambunctious]

And the USMB libs celebrate the expanded killing of babies.....sickening selfish pigs......

 

[SaxxyBlues]

Thank you Chief Justice Roberts. You do a woman's heart good.

 

[OldLady]

On Monday, the Supreme Court blocked Louisiana from enforcing a law restricting abortion in June Medical Services v. Russo.

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/06/su...is.restrictions-in-victory-for-womens-rights/

Roberts obviously knows what un-constitutional is and means.

He also knows what stare decisis means.

So plessey should never been overturned?

No, Plessy should never have been written.

But it was, and if Stare decisis is as in voidable as some people claim, it should have never been overturned.

Of course it's not inviolable. However, you need a good reason to revisit a ruling. What would precipitate changing that Texas ruling?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

This places the issue of privacy rights at the center of the November election.

I don't think it does.

The Louisiana law was clearly a roundabout for a total ban. The SCOTUS has already shot that down multiple times.

Most voters don't really care about this issue anymore. Only a few loud people on both sides are making it seem that way.

 

[Anathema]

The last week makes me believe the “Conservative” members of this court need to be taken out behind the woodshed and “reminded” who butters their bread.

 

[martybegan]

On Monday, the Supreme Court blocked Louisiana from enforcing a law restricting abortion in June Medical Services v. Russo.

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/06/su...is.restrictions-in-victory-for-womens-rights/

Roberts obviously knows what un-constitutional is and means.

He also knows what stare decisis means.

So plessey should never been overturned?

No, Plessy should never have been written.

But it was, and if Stare decisis is as in voidable as some people claim, it should have never been overturned.

Of course it's not inviolable. However, you need a good reason to revisit a ruling. What would precipitate changing that Texas ruling?

In this case LA made the mistake of having the wording exactly the same. The should have increased the distance to 50 miles, and made hospitals able to admit doctors with some paperwork.

I can see it here, but again, I am responding to a post where SD is presented as the end all be all.

And I would LOVE this type of reasoning to be turned around and used in 2nd amendment cases. when it comes to Abortion, anything that seems to be purely designed to make getting one harder "just because" is evidently unconstitutional.

Why shouldn't the same standard by applied to gun rights?

 

[Astrostar]

And the USMB libs celebrate the expanded killing of babies.....sickening selfish pigs......

Nope! Not babies, FETUSES!! The utter ignorance of the far right wing trumpanzees is staggering! Bigly!!!

 

[airplanemechanic]

And the USMB libs celebrate the expanded killing of babies.....sickening selfish pigs......

Nope! Not babies, FETUSES!! The utter ignorance of the far right wing trumpanzees is staggering! Bigly!!!

I guess they're fetuses to some people.

 

[airplanemechanic]

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

On Monday, the Supreme Court blocked Louisiana from enforcing a law restricting abortion in June Medical Services v. Russo.

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/06/su...is.restrictions-in-victory-for-womens-rights/

Roberts obviously knows what un-constitutional is and means.

He also knows what stare decisis means.

So plessey should never been overturned?

Wrong.

Red herring fallacy, false comparison fallacy.

This sort of rightwing sophistry attempts to compare cases one having nothing to do with the other.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

On Monday, the Supreme Court blocked Louisiana from enforcing a law restricting abortion in June Medical Services v. Russo.

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/06/su...is.restrictions-in-victory-for-womens-rights/

Roberts obviously knows what un-constitutional is and means.

He also knows what stare decisis means.

Precedent for sure coupled with an open mind.

True.

And the bizarre irony is that this is a ruling that conservatives should applaud – the Court has checked unwarranted government regulation, government excess and overreach.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Regardless of what people think of Roe, it is not getting overturned. Justices appointed by GOP Presidents do not always march in lockstep.

Which goes to this now being a political issue.

Conservatives will want Trump reelected in the hope of appointing another ‘conservative’ justice hostile to the right to privacy.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

On Monday, the Supreme Court blocked Louisiana from enforcing a law restricting abortion in June Medical Services v. Russo.

Supreme Court strikes down Louisiana abortion restrictions in victory for women's rights

On Monday, the Supreme Court blocked Louisiana from enforcing a law restricting abortion in June Medical Services v. Russo.The law, which would have required abortion providers to obtain admitting privileges from local hospitals, could have left only one doctor legally able to provide abortions...

www.rawstory.com

congrats, bad News for babies

 

[martybegan]

On Monday, the Supreme Court blocked Louisiana from enforcing a law restricting abortion in June Medical Services v. Russo.

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/06/su...is.restrictions-in-victory-for-womens-rights/

Roberts obviously knows what un-constitutional is and means.

He also knows what stare decisis means.

So plessey should never been overturned?

Wrong.

Red herring fallacy, false comparison fallacy.

This sort of rightwing sophistry attempts to compare cases one having nothing to do with the other.

You made a blanket statement, got called on it, and then started whining about it.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Thank you Chief Justice Roberts. You do a woman's heart good.

well unless the baby is female

 

[jwoodie]

And the bizarre irony is that this is a ruling that conservatives should applaud

And the bizarre irony is that this is a ruling that liberals (not progressives) should oppose.

 

[okfine]

And the USMB libs celebrate the expanded killing of babies.....sickening selfish pigs......

The right to privacy is such a horrible thing.

 

[Rambunctious]

And the USMB libs celebrate the expanded killing of babies.....sickening selfish pigs......

Nope! Not babies, FETUSES!! The utter ignorance of the far right wing trumpanzees is staggering! Bigly!!!

So what are you?....a big fetus?....

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

sad

 

[Rambunctious]

And the USMB libs celebrate the expanded killing of babies.....sickening selfish pigs......

The right to privacy is such a horrible thing.

Yep Manson and his family feel the same way as your stupid remark indicates........