toxicmedia
Gold Member
Why would it die?Like I said, the law will still die:
![]()
You have to get 2/3rds of the house and senate to do that.
And they won't.
Plus Hillary will veto any attempts
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why would it die?Like I said, the law will still die:
![]()
You! Smarter than the collective Supreme court justices.
Man, why you are you wasting your time on the internet.
You have to get 2/3rds of the house and senate to do that.
And they won't.
Wow, you really need to read what you post.Same reason Oregon did, they couldn't make it work from an IT standpoint.I'm sorry, are you high?Of the 3 dozen states that go through the fed... It is because if they didn't...They couldn't afford the low premiums offered to the public and would have to hike prices to compensate. Plus ...the millions to set up their own exchanges.
The red states that don't offer exchanges are the states that have Republican Governors.
That's the only reason the red states don't do it
So why did Hawaii decide to get rid of the exchange?
That's all on the computer geeks, not the concept of an exchange
Uhm....no
After Multiple Enrollment Failures, Hawaii Dumps State Obamacare Exchange
While Hawaii enrolled zero individuals and is the worst performing state, it is not alone. Vermont signed up only 97 households, while Rhode Island enrolled just 25 households.
Hawaii’s dismal performance should not be surprising. The website cost taxpayers $205 million but could only enroll 8,592 individuals in year one. Cost to taxpayers per enroll: $23,899.
After Multiple Enrollment Failures Hawaii Dumps State Obamacare Exchange - Katie Pavlich
Hawaii and Oregon had trouble with their web sites, and it got too expensive to fix.
An IT PROBLEM.
Last time I checked we had something called National Security, or did you miss that part of reality, like most of the rest? Public Health is a national issue, period.Good, they aren't necessary. Health Care is a national issue. You know, One Nation Under God right?It must be Armageddon! There is much wailing, rending of garments, and gnashing of teeth!
Any bets that the existing State exchanges will disappear within two years?
When is your delusional mind going to accept the fact that there are no national issues, only State issues and federal issues. The Constitution was supposed to draw very distinct lines between the two. Welcome to post-constitutional America.
Wheres that high speed rail tax we so desperately need ! Lol
Reality tends toward the left, so sad for you...Last time I checked we had something called National Security, or did you miss that part of reality, like most of the rest? Public Health is a national issue, period.Good, they aren't necessary. Health Care is a national issue. You know, One Nation Under God right?It must be Armageddon! There is much wailing, rending of garments, and gnashing of teeth!
Any bets that the existing State exchanges will disappear within two years?
When is your delusional mind going to accept the fact that there are no national issues, only State issues and federal issues. The Constitution was supposed to draw very distinct lines between the two. Welcome to post-constitutional America.
Commie concepts, we know, you love'em.
The Prog victory dance is a temporary thang.
There is a big silver lining for conservatives: they don't have to hold their noses and bail out Obama for entrapping 6M people in ScobamaCare. Those 6M people may be grateful; but many time more than that are incredibly unhappy with ScobamaCare.
Last time I checked we had something called National Security, or did you miss that part of reality, like most of the rest? Public Health is a national issue, period.Good, they aren't necessary. Health Care is a national issue. You know, One Nation Under God right?It must be Armageddon! There is much wailing, rending of garments, and gnashing of teeth!
Any bets that the existing State exchanges will disappear within two years?
When is your delusional mind going to accept the fact that there are no national issues, only State issues and federal issues. The Constitution was supposed to draw very distinct lines between the two. Welcome to post-constitutional America.
Infants think only of themselves, hence you. The grownups can see that other people matter too...Last time I checked we had something called National Security, or did you miss that part of reality, like most of the rest? Public Health is a national issue, period.Good, they aren't necessary. Health Care is a national issue. You know, One Nation Under God right?It must be Armageddon! There is much wailing, rending of garments, and gnashing of teeth!
Any bets that the existing State exchanges will disappear within two years?
When is your delusional mind going to accept the fact that there are no national issues, only State issues and federal issues. The Constitution was supposed to draw very distinct lines between the two. Welcome to post-constitutional America.
WHY IS IT MY RESPONSIBILITY TO KEEP YOU AND YOURS HEALTHY?
WHY IS THE PARASITIC MANIFESTO PROTECTED BY "NATIONAL SECURITY"??
OH , I TOTALLY FORGOT, THE PARASITES ARE NOW THE MAJORITY SO THEY GET TO DEFINE NATIONAL SECURITY.
.
Reality tends toward the left, so sad for you...Last time I checked we had something called National Security, or did you miss that part of reality, like most of the rest? Public Health is a national issue, period.Good, they aren't necessary. Health Care is a national issue. You know, One Nation Under God right?Any bets that the existing State exchanges will disappear within two years?
When is your delusional mind going to accept the fact that there are no national issues, only State issues and federal issues. The Constitution was supposed to draw very distinct lines between the two. Welcome to post-constitutional America.
Commie concepts, we know, you love'em.
You! Smarter than the collective Supreme court justices.
Man, why you are you wasting your time on the internet.
Actually, I have a litany of attorneys who agree with me. The "collective" to you consists only of the six Justices who ruled in favor. What, are the other three just as stupid as me? Are you smarter than the three justices who ruled against?
Please, display to us your unparalleled legal prowess. Or shut yer trap.
Not at all. If would would stop banging your head against the walls of reality it wouldn't hurt so much. The world doesn't spin backwards, only forwards...Reality tends toward the left, so sad for you...Last time I checked we had something called National Security, or did you miss that part of reality, like most of the rest? Public Health is a national issue, period.Good, they aren't necessary. Health Care is a national issue. You know, One Nation Under God right?
When is your delusional mind going to accept the fact that there are no national issues, only State issues and federal issues. The Constitution was supposed to draw very distinct lines between the two. Welcome to post-constitutional America.
Commie concepts, we know, you love'em.
So sad for all of us.
The Prog victory dance is a temporary thang.
There is a big silver lining for conservatives: they don't have to hold their noses and bail out Obama for entrapping 6M people in ScobamaCare. Those 6M people may be grateful; but many time more than that are incredibly unhappy with ScobamaCare.
Yeah, keep those Obamacare doom-and-gloom predictions coming. They've panned out so well so far....
Sure you do! And they seem to have had their asses handed to them once again.
To be fair, in the past, the SCOTUS has never been willing to overturn an "entrenched law." So there is precedent.
It's when Gruber says, oops I made something up that didn't happenThis is not the first time, nor will it be the last that SCOTUS considers the intent of the law and not just the letter of law. It should be clear to everyone that Congress did not intent for people to be denied health insurance because they applied through a state exchange operating under federal guidance instead of a federal exchange as specified in the law. The intent of law was to provide additional healthcare coverage, not less.When the court ignores black letter law, we're all in trouble.
Had SCOTUS ruled against subsidies for those on state exchanges, it would have created chaos in healthcare insurance as the federal exchange attempted add 26 states.
First you need to get your facts straight, subsidies were provided for State exchanges, one of the architects of the law (Gruber) admitted the federal exchange was intentionally left out of the subsidy scheme in order to force States to establish exchanges. The supremes ignored black letter law and one of the authors of the law verifying there was no oversight, to allow subsidies for the federal exchange. It was on its face, a bad political decision and a horrendous legal decision.
Yep. Exactly.
Gruber recanted his brain fart. He's a gadfly. You've got nothing.
How the hell do you "recant" something that actually happened?