Switzerland votes to criminalize homophobia and hate speech

[Silhouette]

What is a "Constitutional Supreme Court"?

One that doesn’t add language or meaning to the Constitution without permission of the governed (Legislature).

Stay tuned. You will soon see them mopping up the mess left by the last Court.

 

[Correll]

(CBN News) Switzerland has voted to make it illegal to be homophobic or discriminate against anyone in the LGBTQ community. The National Council, which is the lower house in Switzerland’s legislature, voted 118 – 60 in favor of a law that says anyone guilty of homophobia will face heavy fines or up to three years in prison. “I tabled the motion after speaking to friends of mine who have personally been victims of verbal and physical homophobic violence,” Mathias Reynard, a member of the Swiss Socialist Party told ShortList.
Switzerland Votes to Criminalize Homophobia and 'Hate Speech'


And hate speech OMFG, they can make hate speech out of anything look as the ass clowns here... Hate speech can be I don't like your hair cut ........ gawd snowfales panzies pathetic.

THis is what happens when you want a communist Country which is once again what hte gays are pushing for ( the leftist tards ), this is what you get when you have ANTIFA's, BLM the mentality doesn't know that's what they are doing though because dumb meets dumber ........

This won't make ppl down and kiss their asses it will just generate HATRED all the more.

"THis is what happens when you want a communist Country which is once again what hte gays are pushing for ( the leftist tards ), this is what you get when you have ANTIFA's, BLM the mentality doesn't know that's what they are doing though because dumb meets dumber ........"

unfortunately you live in a free country (if you live in the USA) and there is nothing you can do about any of those groups.....

since you don't advocate violence....

and you accept their right to free speech.....

right?

Antifa, BLM, leftists tards, aren't just talking. So there is a lot, on many fronts to be done.


THe OP, is about a law being passed to criminalize thoughts and speech.


That is the type of shit we seated Kavanaugh to stop.


Seems we can to something about it.

 

[Lysistrata]

What's wrong with this? How are heterosexuals not free to go their way and be heterosexuals? Better that heterosexuals turn their attention on the things going wrong within the heterosexual community. Domestic violence? Patriarchy, otherwise known as the worship of the sacred penis?

Patriarchy is religious myth of fourth wave feminists.

Tell that to the penis-worshipers. Southern Baptists? Roman Catholics? Yes, patriarchy exists. They tell everyone that you have to have a dick to get in. Then you deny it? What the hell is going on? This is something out of Orwell or Fahrenheit 451. Do these organizations exist that do not allow people with vaginas into their leadership circles or not? You tell me how patriarchy does not actually exist. These organizations either have these rules or they don't. Which is it? Face facts.

No it does not exist in the sense that feminists and you claim.

Isolated examples prove nothing and domestic violence is as much on women as men

Private clubs do not reflect society.

"Isolated examples"??? are you still denying that male supremacy exists in the Roman Catholic Church? The Southern Baptist cult? Do you still deny that our institutions elevate the penis over the vagina? Only the penis is allowed? These are very stark terms, harsh but true, and, unfortunately, in 2018, we have to make them much more clear than we would wish. Why can't you explain this situation instead of running away from it?

Those are private organizations and isolated examples.

Much like female only colleges are isolated examples as opposed to proof of matriarchy.

According to your logic your argument is defeated because we have more matriarchy as those colleges prove.

Yes our institutions ele atw no such thing.

I am explaining it clearly
You have failed to prove the patriarchy myth because it is a myth

Then explain the Roman catholic church. The southern baptist cult. The histories of educational institutions not allowing female students in. The denial of the vote for so long to female Americans. The disrespect of female Americans. The disrespect of female Americans of color. Explain why there were laws that allowed husbands to take over the ownership of the assets of the women the married. Explain why female people could not get into our institutions of higher learning, could not rise in their careers. You have a lot of explaining to do.

 

[Mac1958]

I say, good for Switzerland. Abominable speech should be squelched.

Why?

And who gets to decide what is and is not "abominable"? The "majority"? That's good enough for you?
.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Patriarchy is religious myth of fourth wave feminists.

Tell that to the penis-worshipers. Southern Baptists? Roman Catholics? Yes, patriarchy exists. They tell everyone that you have to have a dick to get in. Then you deny it? What the hell is going on? This is something out of Orwell or Fahrenheit 451. Do these organizations exist that do not allow people with vaginas into their leadership circles or not? You tell me how patriarchy does not actually exist. These organizations either have these rules or they don't. Which is it? Face facts.

No it does not exist in the sense that feminists and you claim.

Isolated examples prove nothing and domestic violence is as much on women as men

Private clubs do not reflect society.

"Isolated examples"??? are you still denying that male supremacy exists in the Roman Catholic Church? The Southern Baptist cult? Do you still deny that our institutions elevate the penis over the vagina? Only the penis is allowed? These are very stark terms, harsh but true, and, unfortunately, in 2018, we have to make them much more clear than we would wish. Why can't you explain this situation instead of running away from it?

Those are private organizations and isolated examples.

Much like female only colleges are isolated examples as opposed to proof of matriarchy.

According to your logic your argument is defeated because we have more matriarchy as those colleges prove.

Yes our institutions ele atw no such thing.

I am explaining it clearly
You have failed to prove the patriarchy myth because it is a myth

Then explain the Roman catholic church. The southern baptist cult. The histories of educational institutions not allowing female students in. The denial of the vote for so long to female Americans. The disrespect of female Americans. The disrespect of female Americans of color. Explain why there were laws that allowed husbands to take over the ownership of the assets of the women the married. Explain why female people could not get into our institutions of higher learning, could not rise in their careers. You have a lot of explaining to do.

No I do not as we we're discussing the present not the past.

Oppression in history does not prove it today

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Since the so-called OP doesn't like something they did. You know..."If I don't like you, you're a 'commie'." Regardless of reality.

So, you support jailing people for disagreeing with you.


Good to know.

 

[Correll]

Since the so-called OP doesn't like something they did. You know..."If I don't like you, you're a 'commie'." Regardless of reality.

So, you support jailing people for disagreeing with you.


Good to know.

This issue is a Western Nation criminalizing having the wrong ideas.


BODECEA responded to someone attacking the idea, and attacked the WAY he attacked the idea, yet said nothing about the idea itself.


Concluding that she supports the idea of criminalizing having the wrong ideas, is valid.

 

[Claudette]

Well since Switzerland has always been neutral I doubt these new legal decisions will make a difference in anything.

 

[deanrd]

Now Swiss men have to take it up the butt to prove they're not homophobic.

Republicans want to kill gay people. They have for decades. One of their dreams. After gay people they want to kill blacks. Oh wait, there are really doing that.

 

[deanrd]

Republicans dream of killing so many people. And yet they are so soft and squishy.

 

[Lysistrata]

Tell that to the penis-worshipers. Southern Baptists? Roman Catholics? Yes, patriarchy exists. They tell everyone that you have to have a dick to get in. Then you deny it? What the hell is going on? This is something out of Orwell or Fahrenheit 451. Do these organizations exist that do not allow people with vaginas into their leadership circles or not? You tell me how patriarchy does not actually exist. These organizations either have these rules or they don't. Which is it? Face facts.

No it does not exist in the sense that feminists and you claim.

Isolated examples prove nothing and domestic violence is as much on women as men

Private clubs do not reflect society.

"Isolated examples"??? are you still denying that male supremacy exists in the Roman Catholic Church? The Southern Baptist cult? Do you still deny that our institutions elevate the penis over the vagina? Only the penis is allowed? These are very stark terms, harsh but true, and, unfortunately, in 2018, we have to make them much more clear than we would wish. Why can't you explain this situation instead of running away from it?

Those are private organizations and isolated examples.

Much like female only colleges are isolated examples as opposed to proof of matriarchy.

According to your logic your argument is defeated because we have more matriarchy as those colleges prove.

Yes our institutions ele atw no such thing.

I am explaining it clearly
You have failed to prove the patriarchy myth because it is a myth

Then explain the Roman catholic church. The southern baptist cult. The histories of educational institutions not allowing female students in. The denial of the vote for so long to female Americans. The disrespect of female Americans. The disrespect of female Americans of color. Explain why there were laws that allowed husbands to take over the ownership of the assets of the women the married. Explain why female people could not get into our institutions of higher learning, could not rise in their careers. You have a lot of explaining to do.

No I do not as we we're discussing the present not the past.

Oppression in history does not prove it today

But we are discussing what is happening today. The Roman Catholic, Southern Baptist, the other "Christian" cults, all of the "Christian" penis-worshipers, and the penis-worshipers from the other religions, including all the way to Hindus and Muslims, are still at worshiping the beef until the present day. This is ongoing.

 

[Correll]

Republicans dream of killing so many people. And yet they are so soft and squishy.

Says the tough guy posting anonymously online.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No it does not exist in the sense that feminists and you claim.

Isolated examples prove nothing and domestic violence is as much on women as men

Private clubs do not reflect society.

"Isolated examples"??? are you still denying that male supremacy exists in the Roman Catholic Church? The Southern Baptist cult? Do you still deny that our institutions elevate the penis over the vagina? Only the penis is allowed? These are very stark terms, harsh but true, and, unfortunately, in 2018, we have to make them much more clear than we would wish. Why can't you explain this situation instead of running away from it?

Those are private organizations and isolated examples.

Much like female only colleges are isolated examples as opposed to proof of matriarchy.

According to your logic your argument is defeated because we have more matriarchy as those colleges prove.

Yes our institutions ele atw no such thing.

I am explaining it clearly
You have failed to prove the patriarchy myth because it is a myth

Then explain the Roman catholic church. The southern baptist cult. The histories of educational institutions not allowing female students in. The denial of the vote for so long to female Americans. The disrespect of female Americans. The disrespect of female Americans of color. Explain why there were laws that allowed husbands to take over the ownership of the assets of the women the married. Explain why female people could not get into our institutions of higher learning, could not rise in their careers. You have a lot of explaining to do.

No I do not as we we're discussing the present not the past.

Oppression in history does not prove it today

But we are discussing what is happening today. The Roman Catholic, Southern Baptist, the other "Christian" cults, all of the "Christian" penis-worshipers, and the penis-worshipers from the other religions, including all the way to Hindus and Muslims, are still at worshiping the beef until the present day. This is ongoing.

And female only colleges worship the pussy


Yes private organizations have membership rules you do not approve of but they do not prove or support the idiotic feminist myth of patriarchy.

 

[Lysistrata]

"Isolated examples"??? are you still denying that male supremacy exists in the Roman Catholic Church? The Southern Baptist cult? Do you still deny that our institutions elevate the penis over the vagina? Only the penis is allowed? These are very stark terms, harsh but true, and, unfortunately, in 2018, we have to make them much more clear than we would wish. Why can't you explain this situation instead of running away from it?

Those are private organizations and isolated examples.

Much like female only colleges are isolated examples as opposed to proof of matriarchy.

According to your logic your argument is defeated because we have more matriarchy as those colleges prove.

Yes our institutions ele atw no such thing.

I am explaining it clearly
You have failed to prove the patriarchy myth because it is a myth

Then explain the Roman catholic church. The southern baptist cult. The histories of educational institutions not allowing female students in. The denial of the vote for so long to female Americans. The disrespect of female Americans. The disrespect of female Americans of color. Explain why there were laws that allowed husbands to take over the ownership of the assets of the women the married. Explain why female people could not get into our institutions of higher learning, could not rise in their careers. You have a lot of explaining to do.

No I do not as we we're discussing the present not the past.

Oppression in history does not prove it today

But we are discussing what is happening today. The Roman Catholic, Southern Baptist, the other "Christian" cults, all of the "Christian" penis-worshipers, and the penis-worshipers from the other religions, including all the way to Hindus and Muslims, are still at worshiping the beef until the present day. This is ongoing.

And female only colleges worship the pussy


Yes private organizations have membership rules you do not approve of but they do not prove or support the idiotic feminist myth of patriarchy.

Well it's good have some of the western countries that still have monarchies change the rule that a person born to a certain ranking in the line of succession to the throne has to be a male, it still exists. With your "private organizations," how come I was drafted into the Roman Catholic organization as an infant and I was indoctrinated into it when I was under ten years of age? I was indoctrinated into penis worship.

At the bottom of the whole thing: explain penis worship.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Those are private organizations and isolated examples.

Much like female only colleges are isolated examples as opposed to proof of matriarchy.

According to your logic your argument is defeated because we have more matriarchy as those colleges prove.

Yes our institutions ele atw no such thing.

I am explaining it clearly
You have failed to prove the patriarchy myth because it is a myth

Then explain the Roman catholic church. The southern baptist cult. The histories of educational institutions not allowing female students in. The denial of the vote for so long to female Americans. The disrespect of female Americans. The disrespect of female Americans of color. Explain why there were laws that allowed husbands to take over the ownership of the assets of the women the married. Explain why female people could not get into our institutions of higher learning, could not rise in their careers. You have a lot of explaining to do.

No I do not as we we're discussing the present not the past.

Oppression in history does not prove it today

But we are discussing what is happening today. The Roman Catholic, Southern Baptist, the other "Christian" cults, all of the "Christian" penis-worshipers, and the penis-worshipers from the other religions, including all the way to Hindus and Muslims, are still at worshiping the beef until the present day. This is ongoing.

And female only colleges worship the pussy


Yes private organizations have membership rules you do not approve of but they do not prove or support the idiotic feminist myth of patriarchy.

Well it's good have some of the western countries that still have monarchies change the rule that a person born to a certain ranking in the line of succession to the throne has to be a male, it still exists. With your "private organizations," how come I was drafted into the Roman Catholic organization as an infant and I was indoctrinated into it when I was under ten years of age? I was indoctrinated into penis worship.

At the bottom of the whole thing: explain penis worship.

Most Women ( and some gay men ) love dick. And there is nothing wrong with that.

If you or anyone else is Catholic it is by free choice

Once again none of your examples proves or supports the feminist myth of patriarchy.

 

[Lysistrata]

Then explain the Roman catholic church. The southern baptist cult. The histories of educational institutions not allowing female students in. The denial of the vote for so long to female Americans. The disrespect of female Americans. The disrespect of female Americans of color. Explain why there were laws that allowed husbands to take over the ownership of the assets of the women the married. Explain why female people could not get into our institutions of higher learning, could not rise in their careers. You have a lot of explaining to do.

No I do not as we we're discussing the present not the past.

Oppression in history does not prove it today

But we are discussing what is happening today. The Roman Catholic, Southern Baptist, the other "Christian" cults, all of the "Christian" penis-worshipers, and the penis-worshipers from the other religions, including all the way to Hindus and Muslims, are still at worshiping the beef until the present day. This is ongoing.

And female only colleges worship the pussy


Yes private organizations have membership rules you do not approve of but they do not prove or support the idiotic feminist myth of patriarchy.

Well it's good have some of the western countries that still have monarchies change the rule that a person born to a certain ranking in the line of succession to the throne has to be a male, it still exists. With your "private organizations," how come I was drafted into the Roman Catholic organization as an infant and I was indoctrinated into it when I was under ten years of age? I was indoctrinated into penis worship.

At the bottom of the whole thing: explain penis worship.

Most Women ( and some gay men ) love dick. And there is nothing wrong with that.

If you or anyone else is Catholic it is by free choice

Once again none of your examples proves or supports the feminist myth of patriarchy.

You can continue to deny that patriarchy exists and is enforced in various religions, but this is just denial of reality. Dick-worship goes on around the world, accompanied by superstitions about female biological functioning.

I said, moron, that I was introduced to the RC church when I was an infant, a few weeks old. Shit no. I rejected RC as soon as I was old enough to think. i think the evangelical/southern baptist cults do the same thing; try to enlist girls for sex and penis worship while they are children. I'm a heterosexual. I am attracked to males sexually. But the sex training in spreading and dick-licking and obeying the penis comes from the practices and teachings of these cults, which are patriarchal. They teach worshiping the penis in their churches.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No I do not as we we're discussing the present not the past.

Oppression in history does not prove it today

But we are discussing what is happening today. The Roman Catholic, Southern Baptist, the other "Christian" cults, all of the "Christian" penis-worshipers, and the penis-worshipers from the other religions, including all the way to Hindus and Muslims, are still at worshiping the beef until the present day. This is ongoing.

And female only colleges worship the pussy


Yes private organizations have membership rules you do not approve of but they do not prove or support the idiotic feminist myth of patriarchy.

Well it's good have some of the western countries that still have monarchies change the rule that a person born to a certain ranking in the line of succession to the throne has to be a male, it still exists. With your "private organizations," how come I was drafted into the Roman Catholic organization as an infant and I was indoctrinated into it when I was under ten years of age? I was indoctrinated into penis worship.

At the bottom of the whole thing: explain penis worship.

Most Women ( and some gay men ) love dick. And there is nothing wrong with that.

If you or anyone else is Catholic it is by free choice

Once again none of your examples proves or supports the feminist myth of patriarchy.

You can continue to deny that patriarchy exists and is enforced in various religions, but this is just denial of reality. Dick-worship goes on around the world, accompanied by superstitions about female biological functioning.

I said, moron, that I was introduced to the RC church when I was an infant, a few weeks old. Shit no. I rejected RC as soon as I was old enough to think. i think the evangelical/southern baptist cults do the same thing; try to enlist girls for sex and penis worship while they are children. I'm a heterosexual. I am attracked to males sexually. But the sex training in spreading and dick-licking and obeying the penis comes from the practices and teachings of these cults, which are patriarchal. They teach worshiping the penis in their churches.

Well there you go proving me correct.

Feminism defines patrarchy as systemic throughout all of society


A cult within a society does not prove anything about all of society.

There is no patrarchy as feminism defines it and you have helped to prove that fact.


It is you in denial of reality embracing a myth.

FACT you are wrong and cannot prove the existence of what you claim

 

[Asclepias]

Since the so-called OP doesn't like something they did. You know..."If I don't like you, you're a 'commie'." Regardless of reality.

`
This is 2018. The only people that use the word commie or communist (outside of historical context) are your anachronistic old people and, well, people who don't know any better.

There are still plenty of people who believe in that shit. And are willing to fight for it.


This article is about a western nation, who just criminalized having the wrong thoughts.

Your dismissal of this, is not reasonable.

No ass clown. its about a country that criminalized discrimination and violent hate speech. Cant you read idiot?

"Switzerland has voted to make it illegal to be homophobic or discriminate against anyone in the LGBTQ community. "

 

[Soupnazi630]

Since the so-called OP doesn't like something they did. You know..."If I don't like you, you're a 'commie'." Regardless of reality.

`
This is 2018. The only people that use the word commie or communist (outside of historical context) are your anachronistic old people and, well, people who don't know any better.

There are still plenty of people who believe in that shit. And are willing to fight for it.


This article is about a western nation, who just criminalized having the wrong thoughts.

Your dismissal of this, is not reasonable.

No ass clown. its about a country that criminalized discrimination and violent hate speech. Cant you read idiot?

"Switzerland has voted to make it illegal to be homophobic or discriminate against anyone in the LGBTQ community. "

Wrong.

No where does it state anything about violence.

It is in fact about ideological suppression of free expression and nothing more.

 

[Asclepias]

Since the so-called OP doesn't like something they did. You know..."If I don't like you, you're a 'commie'." Regardless of reality.

`
This is 2018. The only people that use the word commie or communist (outside of historical context) are your anachronistic old people and, well, people who don't know any better.

There are still plenty of people who believe in that shit. And are willing to fight for it.


This article is about a western nation, who just criminalized having the wrong thoughts.

Your dismissal of this, is not reasonable.

No ass clown. its about a country that criminalized discrimination and violent hate speech. Cant you read idiot?

"Switzerland has voted to make it illegal to be homophobic or discriminate against anyone in the LGBTQ community. "

Wrong.

No where does it state anything about violence.

It is in fact about ideological suppression of free expression and nothing more.

Sure it does dummy. Learn how to read.

"The law criminalizes "physical violence" and "verbal violence" against LGBT people. "
-Mathias Reynard