blackhawk
Diamond Member
As things stand now it seems unlikely the U.S. will attack Syria but if we should what are the goals you would want the attack to accomplish?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
However? HE has surrogates...namely IRAN. IRAN should be OUR TARGET. They have been a PAIN IN OUR ASS since Carter.Considering the fact that Israel has bombed the hell out of Assad multiple times and he did not retaliate should reinforce the fact that he has no intention of going after Israel. He's had 40 years to do that.
However? HE has surrogates...namely IRAN. IRAN should be OUR TARGET. They have been a PAIN IN OUR ASS since Carter.Considering the fact that Israel has bombed the hell out of Assad multiple times and he did not retaliate should reinforce the fact that he has no intention of going after Israel. He's had 40 years to do that.
Considering the fact that Israel has bombed the hell out of Assad multiple times and he did not retaliate should reinforce the fact that he has no intention of going after Israel. He's had 40 years to do that.
However? HE has surrogates...namely IRAN. IRAN should be OUR TARGET. They have been a PAIN IN OUR ASS since Carter.Considering the fact that Israel has bombed the hell out of Assad multiple times and he did not retaliate should reinforce the fact that he has no intention of going after Israel. He's had 40 years to do that.
Yeah Romney would be doing the same, and why I didn't vote for him or Obama...I voted for CAIN even though he withdrew.However? HE has surrogates...namely IRAN. IRAN should be OUR TARGET. They have been a PAIN IN OUR ASS since Carter.Considering the fact that Israel has bombed the hell out of Assad multiple times and he did not retaliate should reinforce the fact that he has no intention of going after Israel. He's had 40 years to do that.
I hope I don't offend you because I respect you but the entire point of taking Syria is to weaken Iran. Iran and Saudi are both battling for influence in that region and they hate one another. Take Syria, and Iran is seriously weakened. Syria is all about Iran, but the problem some of you are having is that you can't get passed the partisan stuff. If Romney was the president he'd be doing the same things. Furthermore, the United States created the mess in Iran with a little help. I've gone off on a tangent a little here so I hope you don't mind.
As things stand now it seems unlikely the U.S. will attack Syria but if we should what are the goals you would want the attack to accomplish?
However? HE has surrogates...namely IRAN. IRAN should be OUR TARGET. They have been a PAIN IN OUR ASS since Carter.Considering the fact that Israel has bombed the hell out of Assad multiple times and he did not retaliate should reinforce the fact that he has no intention of going after Israel. He's had 40 years to do that.
What are you babbling about velveetacheesedick? YOU are an IDIOT.However? HE has surrogates...namely IRAN. IRAN should be OUR TARGET. They have been a PAIN IN OUR ASS since Carter.Considering the fact that Israel has bombed the hell out of Assad multiple times and he did not retaliate should reinforce the fact that he has no intention of going after Israel. He's had 40 years to do that.
Pffft.
We invade their neighbors, saddle our navy right up next to them, destroy their economy with sanctions...and they are the aggressor????
As things stand now it seems unlikely the U.S. will attack Syria but if we should what are the goals you would want the attack to accomplish?
Not attacking Syria IS the goal.
.
And the only REAL case is Money/Politics...saving Obama's ass from severe embarrassment...while making the people look like assholes for voting for this inept Piece of shit human that thinks he's POTUS.As things stand now it seems unlikely the U.S. will attack Syria but if we should what are the goals you would want the attack to accomplish?
Not attacking Syria IS the goal.
.
That does not seem to be the goal of the Obama administration despite the poor job their doing in making a case for it.
As things stand now it seems unlikely the U.S. will attack Syria but if we should what are the goals you would want the attack to accomplish?
Not attacking Syria IS the goal.
.
That does not seem to be the goal of the Obama administration despite the poor job their doing in making a case for it.
And the only REAL case is Money/Politics...saving Obama's ass from severe embarrassment...while making the people look like assholes for voting for this inept Piece of shit human that thinks he's POTUS.Not attacking Syria IS the goal.
.
That does not seem to be the goal of the Obama administration despite the poor job their doing in making a case for it.
As things stand now it seems unlikely the U.S. will attack Syria but if we should what are the goals you would want the attack to accomplish?
Not attacking Syria IS the goal.
.
That does not seem to be the goal of the Obama administration despite the poor job their doing in making a case for it.
Not attacking Syria IS the goal.
.
That does not seem to be the goal of the Obama administration despite the poor job their doing in making a case for it.
The goal of the Obama administration is to please the Zionists. Therefore he wants to attack Syria thereby provoking Iran into retaliating. When they do Obama will have a pretext to invade Iran.
By destroying Syria and Iran the Zionuts will vote democrat in the next elections.
And so it goes.
.
That does not seem to be the goal of the Obama administration despite the poor job their doing in making a case for it.
The goal of the Obama administration is to please the Zionists. Therefore he wants to attack Syria thereby provoking Iran into retaliating. When they do Obama will have a pretext to invade Iran.
By destroying Syria and Iran the Zionuts will vote democrat in the next elections.
And so it goes.
.
Wow.