Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #181
You'd think someone as allegedly intelligent as you are could tell the difference between the Navy and the Air Force.I do all the time. I even apologize for them.
That never occurred to you, though, did it?
So...you fucked up, and it's MY fault.
You really are not very bright, are you?
Then why do you pretend your opinion matters?
And once again, you speak of matter of which you know nothing.
E-6s are supervisors. As an E-4, I worked unsupervised because I knew what I was doing. As an E-5, I led maintenance crews and wrote performance reports and decorations. As an E-6, I managed a billion dollars' worth of equipment. I told (respectfully) O-6s that they couldn't have the equipment they wanted. When I retired, my Director, another O-6, said he'd heard nothing but compliments for my work from those same O-6s whose requests I turned down. Generals and command chief master sergeants have given me coins for my work.
Now, do you really want to continue bloviating about construction and the military as if you know something about it? I really don't mind making you look stupid.
Or, if you'd rather, before you post, you could ask yourself, "Have I ever done this?" If the answer is no, then you could just STFU and not look like such an arrogant prick.
But that never occurred to you, either.
Really, in my experience the division officer (in my case, the Lt. Cmdr. gave the orders and the Chief supervised the division. First Class and Second Class PO's implemented the division operations under direction and worked within their rate.
Other than boot camp and a few temp assignments I was at sea.
Guess not.
The Air Force expects initiative and self-reliance from our Airmen. Does the Navy need their widdle hands held all the time?
It was. I spent about half my career in a cublicle. That's when I managed the billion-dollar fleet of equipment. The other stuff I did in the field.
But, hey, nice try at minimizing my service. Too bad reality doesn't agree with your arrogant prickery.
Of course you don't, now that I've shown your idiotic assertions to be stupid.
I have, and it is. Your problem with it is not that it's bad for the country, but that it's bad for the Democratic Party.Maybe you ought to ask yourself if the ideology you hold is good for the country.
Did you know that the stereotypes and talking points you just spewed exist only in the minds of idiot leftists incapable of independent thought?As a patriot you might consider how the avarice and bigotry and the callous disregard for other Americans which today's Republican Party advocates fits with the principles upon our nation was founded.
I hate to break it to you, but you're really a dumb person. No, really, you are. And every time you try to sound smart, it just totally fails. And there are few things more funny that a dumb person insisting he's smart.![]()
As a know it all will you please explain to me how a policy which allowes for too little wealth to the many and too much to the few will work out? A flat tax in a decade will redistribute the wealth, simple math even someone who managed only millions should understand.
Explain the consequences of Citzens United v. FEC, does it really expand liberty and freedom? Explain why you think so, if you do? (if you do, why is the GOP pushing for tax cuts to corportions? If they have the rights of a person, shouldn't they pay the same rate?)
Just two of many questons which occur to me. And I'm a dumb leftist as you pointed out. I'm sure you can offer answers for my education.