Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
teapartysamurai defends Beck, Becks' material is rooted in the John Birch Society, thus . . .
She is fail. Post something pertinent, tps.
Robert Welch was crazy paranoid. Mostly the Tea Party is crazy, full-blown schizophrenic. It is self-destrucive. It doesn't even know if the federal government, and so including them, should even exist.
The Constitution they pretend to believe in, sets up Judicial Review. Everything still funded through the federal government, since the adoption of the U. S. Constitution, has already gone through Judicial Review, and is subject to continuing, Judicial Review.
The Tea Party intends to by-pass the Constitution, with some Blue Ribbon Commission, likely of billionaires, to pass on all of U. S. federal history.
That is insane.
The reference is to Item 5 in their Contract from America!
Communists didn't even think up that. They came up with nuclear weapons instead! Even General Eisenhower, knew this.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(There were in fact a lot of policies which Eisenhower took for granted!)
Hey moron!
Marbury v. Madison, NOT the Constitution set up judicial review. <snip>
No. Not the same rhetoric. Repeating that dishonest mantra is still dishonest.
And we all already know that you leftwingers are opposed to fidelity to our Constitutional Republic founding principle of a limited government.
Show me where the Constitution says limited government
The tenth and ninth imply it.
Show me where the Constitution says limited government
The whole damn DOCUMENT is based on limiting government you idiot!
What do you think checks and balances are about?
You sound like Sarah Palin when she doesn't know the answer...."All of it"
Nowhere in the Constitution does it call out limited government. Checks and balances keep one branch of government from being too powerful.
Come on....what you got next?
No. Not the same rhetoric. Repeating that dishonest mantra is still dishonest.
And we all already know that you leftwingers are opposed to fidelity to our Constitutional Republic founding principle of a limited government.
Show me where the Constitution says limited government
The whole damn DOCUMENT is based on limiting government you idiot!
What do you think checks and balances are about?
That is but one interpretation of it. The quotes in my signature come from some of the people who wrote the constitution and passed it. At least those 3, clearly did not think that the government should have expansive powers in the name of General Welfare and regulation of commerce.you are also fully aware that government has expansive power to act in furtherance of the general welfare and regulate commerce.
.
The fact remains the question was asked "show me where the constitution says limited government" Which is a silly question. Considering the fact that our constitution was written to spell out what the Government can and cant do. It is a document that by it's very nature seeks to limit the power given to the government it created.
Charles, we are guided by the Constitution, not by their intentions before or after. The document has to work for us in this generation and time of history. Now the corporations try to take over government, thus We the People have to use the Constitution to protect us from the corporations. Are you for or against the welfare of Americans?
Wow. Your level of ignorance is kinda scary.
Are you actually going to sit there and pretend that our constitution does not set up the three branches of our Federal Government with ENUMERATED powers?
Do you not grasp the meaning of, among other notions, the 10th Amendment?
In your paltry rhetorical efforts are you going to claim that if the Constitution doesn't use the PHRASE "limited government" that it didn't set up a limited government?
Some lib rhetoric is more rancid and useless than others. Yours is pathetic.
wow... for a lawyer, that's pretty selective.
you are also fully aware that government has expansive power to act in furtherance of the general welfare and regulate commerce.
so why pretend that government is only allowed to do specifically limited things.
the constitution is not some fundie version of the bible.
Wow...You were able to comprehend a mascale post?Robert Welch was crazy paranoid. Mostly the Tea Party is crazy, full-blown schizophrenic. It is self-destrucive. It doesn't even know if the federal government, and so including them, should even exist.
The Constitution they pretend to believe in, sets up Judicial Review. Everything still funded through the federal government, since the adoption of the U. S. Constitution, has already gone through Judicial Review, and is subject to continuing, Judicial Review.
The Tea Party intends to by-pass the Constitution, with some Blue Ribbon Commission, likely of billionaires, to pass on all of U. S. federal history.
That is insane.
The reference is to Item 5 in their Contract from America!
Communists didn't even think up that. They came up with nuclear weapons instead! Even General Eisenhower, knew this.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(There were in fact a lot of policies which Eisenhower took for granted!)
Hey moron!
Marbury v. Madison, NOT the Constitution set up judicial review.
And when it comes to Blue Ribbon Commissions you better look at Obama's Czars.
I mean, SERIOUSLY liberals. Do YOU EVEN COMPREHEND THE CONCEPT HYPOCRISY BEFORE YOU OPEN YOUR IGNORANT MOUTHS?????
Shzam!
The whole damn DOCUMENT is based on limiting government you idiot!
What do you think checks and balances are about?
You sound like Sarah Palin when she doesn't know the answer...."All of it"
Nowhere in the Constitution does it call out limited government. Checks and balances keep one branch of government from being too powerful.
Come on....what you got next?
No where in the constitution does it call for the democrat and republican parties.
Robert Welch was crazy paranoid. Mostly the Tea Party is crazy, full-blown schizophrenic. It is self-destrucive. It doesn't even know if the federal government, and so including them, should even exist.
The Constitution they pretend to believe in, sets up Judicial Review. Everything still funded through the federal government, since the adoption of the U. S. Constitution, has already gone through Judicial Review, and is subject to continuing, Judicial Review.
The Tea Party intends to by-pass the Constitution, with some Blue Ribbon Commission, likely of billionaires, to pass on all of U. S. federal history.
That is insane.
The reference is to Item 5 in their Contract from America!
Communists didn't even think up that. They came up with nuclear weapons instead! Even General Eisenhower, knew this.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(There were in fact a lot of policies which Eisenhower took for granted!)
Hey moron!
Marbury v. Madison, NOT the Constitution set up judicial review. <snip>
7 of 9 Founders on record about JD defended it. 9 0f 13 state constitutions recognized the principle. Who else can judge the constitutionality of legislation: the legislature? the president?
Stop the moronic nonsense. You don't like it? Isn't going to change anytime soon.
If the founders of the USA were for big government, why didn't they institute national health care, Social Security, Medicare, etc.?
Anyone who thinks America was founded on the principle of big government is a fucking moron.
Show me where the Constitution says limited government
The tenth and ninth imply it.
To Tea Baggers it might
To a hundred years of legal decisions their are no restrictions limiting government
Hey moron!
Marbury v. Madison, NOT the Constitution set up judicial review. <snip>
7 of 9 Founders on record about JD defended it. 9 0f 13 state constitutions recognized the principle. Who else can judge the constitutionality of legislation: the legislature? the president?
Stop the moronic nonsense. You don't like it? Isn't going to change anytime soon.
Well REAL FUNNY that liberals are all for the USSC being the last word on the Constitution UNTIL they make a decision liberals don't like, LIKE Bush v. Gore or Citizens United.
Hypocrites!
Show me where the Constitution says limited government
The whole damn DOCUMENT is based on limiting government you idiot!
What do you think checks and balances are about?
sorry, i don't discuss my area of education with loons.
If the founders of the USA were for big government, why didn't they institute national health care, Social Security, Medicare, etc.?
Anyone who thinks America was founded on the principle of big government is a fucking moron.
