Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not allowed to be there because he refused to play make believe.
He did what he was supposed to do; TEACH!!!And if he had done what he was supposed to do he might have been able to show they were wrong.
But instead he choose instead to trespass where he was not allowed to be
So he got arrested for violating a court order not for refusing to use pronouns.
Christian teacher imprisoned in Ireland after refusing to use transgender student's preferred pronouns | Blaze Media
A Christian teacher in Ireland who refused to use the preferred pronouns of a transgender student has been suspended and is now in jail for contempt of court. Enoch Burke was arrested on Monday for violating a court order to neither teach nor be physically present at Wilson's Hospital School in...www.theblaze.com
Fascism, not semi-fascism.
It's what they all voted for in Ireland and around the woke world, like Germans who voted for Nazis back in the day.
Make no mistake, democracy is how the National Socialists came to power.
You basically defend punishing ThoughtCrime, figures as much.
He violated a court order. That's why he got arrested.He did what he was supposed to do; TEACH!!!
The Board are in the wrong. BIG TIME!!
Greg
He did what he was supposed to do; TEACH!!!
The Board are in the wrong. BIG TIME!!
Greg
I am defending the right of the school to make such a choice. Just like I defend the baker to choose if they wanted to bake a cake or not, or the photographer not to shoot a wedding they did not wish.
He violated a court order. That's why he got arrested.
He did not IGNORE the school; he rightly told the school that the charge of "Gross Misconduct" was inappropriate and slanderous (my words; not sure exactly what he said) and frankly probably illegal and the consequent direction invalid. I figure he will sue for that.and there is a good debate to be had over if that was right or not.
But there is no debate that he ignored the school and came on their property after being told not to, and he ignored a court order not to do so. Those are not up for discussion, they are facts.
There is a difference between this and that, you just don't see it.
One involves reality, the other involves kids being gaslighted into thinking they can change genders/sexes.
This guy ain't Rosa Parks.What did Rosa Parks violate, or Plessey?
What did many of the people protesting Segregation violate?
So any employer can remove a person for "gross misconduct" when it does NOT meet the requirements of the Labour Laws??? My God man you are a Union's worst nightmare!!!!!I am defending the right of the school to make such a choice. Just like I defend the baker to choose if they wanted to bake a cake or not, or the photographer not to shoot a wedding they did not wish.
It was an employment dispute where the School does not meet the standard of burden of proof for "Gross Misconduct". It was a bullying tactic and a gross calumny directed at the teacher in question. It is that simple, Gator.And that does not take away the school's right to do so.
Again, this is the difference between you and I. You will only fight for rights and actions you agree with, I will fight for rights even if I do not personally agree with them.
And that does not take away the school's right to do so.
Again, this is the difference between you and I. You will only fight for rights and actions you agree with, I will fight for rights even if I do not personally agree with them.
It's the issues at stake; NOT just the fact that it's in one of the most beautiful parts of the world.It's Ireland why do you care?
He did not IGNORE the school; he rightly told the school that the charge of "Gross Misconduct" was inappropriate and slanderous (my words; not sure exactly what he said) and frankly probably illegal and the consequent direction invalid. I figure he will sue for that.
This guy ain't Rosa Parks.
His employer , the school, told him to stay off their property he refused he was arrested for that.
His employer could have also fired him for not following school policy regarding preferred pronouns.
You don't have to agree with the pronoun bullshit, I don't, but he was not unjustly arrested.
pssst; yes, that was Democrats of course.The South had the "right" to blast protesters with water hoses during the Civil Rights movement.
Lawful Neutral usually ends up being Lawful Evil.
So any employer cane remove a person for "gross misconduct" when it does NOT meet the requirements of the Labour Laws??? My God man you are a Union's worst nightmare!!!!!
Greg
