BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 56,638
- 16,608
You obviously share the less than elementary reading comprehension skills, it seems to be a trait among moonbats.
We have a winner.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You obviously share the less than elementary reading comprehension skills, it seems to be a trait among moonbats.
but he IS identified as Jewish.PETE7469 SAID:
“Another intolerant libtard sues school over Jesus.”
This is a lie, which comes as no surprise given the OP is a liar.
Nowhere in the cited article is anyone identified as a 'liberal.'
The phrase "separation of church and state" is found NO WHERE in the COTUS,
So what if that phase isn't in the Constitution? He said: "This country was founded on the idea of separation of church and state", and it was.
“[T]he First Amendment's language, properly interpreted,"
PROPERLY INTERPRETED?
BWAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Another ignorant, ridiculous lie from the right.The Progressive Jihad on Religion, they won't rest until Atheism is the National Religion of the USA
Wrong.So there IS no separation of church and state?FLORENCE, Colo. (CBS4) – A Colorado teacher is suing a school district, claiming a school is not keeping church and state separate.
In the lawsuit former Florence High School teacher Robert Basevitz says he experienced religious discrimination at his school. When he formally complained about it, he says he was transferred to another school in the district, and that’s when things elevated to the lawsuit.
Why is it that just one sniveling troll can upset the daily routines of an entire school just because he's buthurt about religion? Furthermore, why does no one ever sue districts for promoting the cult of male chauvinism, slavery and death?
“This country was founded on the idea of separation of church and state — that’s the very first sentence in the Bill or Rights before any other freedom is discussed,” Maxon said.
Ok... This assclown is supposed to be a lawyer? He's not even literate apparently:
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
The phrase "separation of church and state" is found NO WHERE in the COTUS, and nothing in the COTUS can be taken out of context enough to imply such. The First Amendment clearly places the restrictions solely on the CONGRESS, not some school district or even a state. How these imbeciles can graduate high school with such pitiful english comprehension skills baffles me, but the fact that they passed a bar exam give me cause to think I should go after some easy money, get a law degree, and sue fascist pig liberals for offending me.
Cool. Then the government can tell you what to do with your religion.
Nope, only mentioned in a letter to the Danbury Baptists, by a later president.
" Then the government can tell you what to do with your religion"
Sure, well, other than this SLIGHT problem,
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"
The first clearly states that the Government can NOT restrict religious freedom. That means schools can not restrict prayer or religious freedom either. If as a student someone wants to pray or quote scripture they are free to do it. But not according to you liberal dumb asses.
And yet another lie from the right.The first clearly states that the Government can NOT restrict religious freedom. That means schools can not restrict prayer or religious freedom either. If as a student someone wants to pray or quote scripture they are free to do it. But not according to you liberal dumb asses.
'Personalized Bibles distributed to students, morning prayer circles on campus, and a church pastor regularly on the Florence High School campus ministering with the principal nearby, are a few examples that attorney Paul Maxon says is unconstitutional.
“Government and public schools need to remain neutral on questions of religion so that you and I are not forced to (be exposed to) someone else’s personal religious beliefs,” Maxon said.”
Correct.
Having a member of the clergy on campus 'ministering' to students is a clear Establishment Clause violation. See Lee v. Weisman (1992)
Another ignorant, ridiculous lie from the right.The Progressive Jihad on Religion, they won't rest until Atheism is the National Religion of the USA
The first clearly states that the Government can NOT restrict religious freedom. That means schools can not restrict prayer or religious freedom either. If as a student someone wants to pray or quote scripture they are free to do it. But not according to you liberal dumb asses.
So you would be okay with Muslims being given time to pray towards Mecca during the school day, at school?
Good. Keep your bible thumping at home and at church.
FLORENCE, Colo. (CBS4) – A Colorado teacher is suing a school district, claiming a school is not keeping church and state separate.
In the lawsuit former Florence High School teacher Robert Basevitz says he experienced religious discrimination at his school. When he formally complained about it, he says he was transferred to another school in the district, and that’s when things elevated to the lawsuit.
Why is it that just one sniveling troll can upset the daily routines of an entire school just because he's buthurt about religion? Furthermore, why does no one ever sue districts for promoting the cult of male chauvinism, slavery and death?
“This country was founded on the idea of separation of church and state — that’s the very first sentence in the Bill or Rights before any other freedom is discussed,” Maxon said.
Ok... This assclown is supposed to be a lawyer? He's not even literate apparently:
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
The phrase "separation of church and state" is found NO WHERE in the COTUS, and nothing in the COTUS can be taken out of context enough to imply such. The First Amendment clearly places the restrictions solely on the CONGRESS, not some school district or even a state. How these imbeciles can graduate high school with such pitiful english comprehension skills baffles me, but the fact that they passed a bar exam give me cause to think I should go after some easy money, get a law degree, and sue fascist pig liberals for offending me.
Unfortunately you are correct but they do NOT have the right to bring it to school. Which is what happened.Good. Keep your bible thumping at home and at church.
They have a right to bring their religion into the public square, to the same extent as others who wish to publicize their opinions and beliefs... A street preacher has the same right to give his speil at a public park as do them Occupy protestors. The Methodists have the same right to march in Skokie as do the Nazi's
No one's arguing otherwise.Good. Keep your bible thumping at home and at church.
They have a right to bring their religion into the public square, to the same extent as others who wish to publicize their opinions and beliefs... A street preacher has the same right to give his speil at a public park as do them Occupy protestors. The Methodists have the same right to march in Skokie as do the Nazi's
No, it really was not.The phrase "separation of church and state" is found NO WHERE in the COTUS,
So what if that phase isn't in the Constitution? He said: "This country was founded on the idea of separation of church and state", and it was.