Lewdog
Gold Member
That's right, mass genocide in the Congo, actual people being killed, but Obama chose to bomb Libya. People actually being killed in the Congo vs people might be killed in Libya. Why Libya and not the Congo? Libya is Europe's oil supply, the Congo meh nothing to be gained.
Really? Because as of 2015 the U.S. had active troops in the Congo.
MAP: The U.S. military currently has troops in these African countries
Lib please this was widely reported in the news at the time. Obama chose to rush into Libya and take out their leader, Obama's justification was that he was planning to kill some of his own people. Meanwhile hundreds of thousands were being killed in the Congo and some in the press asked why Obama wasn't dealing with the Congo if that was the reason.
Hillary Clinton was asked, she said look Europe stood by us in Afghanistan and we owe them a favor, Libya is an important oil source for Europe, so we have to go into Libya to pay Europe back the favor.
I'm not a fucking Lib douche bag, and I proved you wrong about U.S. troops being in the Congo. Got anymore lies you want to talk about?