Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you had read the thread you would have discovered that the DA is meeting with Perry's attorney today to discuss when he will turn himself in. You would also know that the charges are serious enough to convince the Grand Jury, but, you'll just ignore reality, as usual.I'm sure that he will appreciate your support, while getting his mugshot this week. Even in Texas someone facing felony charges has to be booked in at the county jail. There's gonna be some wicked footage of that little drama.
Its not going to happen, if it was going to happen, it would have already.
Anyone involved in putting this before the grand jury should be brought before the Texas Bar and punished.
Guess that would make faggot and dick jokes number 8.Why is it that most republican replies fall between 5 and 7, the lowest forms of debate?
Grades of Debate
Top: More intelligent and productive on the top - 1
To
Bottom: Less intelligent and productive on the bottom - 7
1. Refuting the central point explicitly refutes the central point
2. Refutation finds the mistake and explains why its mistaken
3. Counter Argument Contradicts and then backs up contradiction with reasoning or supportive evidence.
4. Contradiction states the opposing case with little or no evidence.
5. Responding to Tone criticizes to the tone of the writing without attacking the substance of the argument
6. Ad Hominem attacks the characteristics or authority of the writer without addressing the substance of the argument.
7. Name calling You are a Dumbass
And why, because the know how to dogma not debate...
Why is it that most republican replies fall between 5 and 7, the lowest forms of debate?
Grades of Debate
Top: More intelligent and productive on the top - 1
To
Bottom: Less intelligent and productive on the bottom - 7
1. Refuting the central point explicitly refutes the central point
2. Refutation finds the mistake and explains why its mistaken
3. Counter Argument Contradicts and then backs up contradiction with reasoning or supportive evidence.
4. Contradiction states the opposing case with little or no evidence.
5. Responding to Tone criticizes to the tone of the writing without attacking the substance of the argument
6. Ad Hominem attacks the characteristics or authority of the writer without addressing the substance of the argument.
7. Name calling You are a Dumbass
Nice projection my little cat toy...Guess that would make faggot and dick jokes number 8.Why is it that most republican replies fall between 5 and 7, the lowest forms of debate?
Grades of Debate
Top: More intelligent and productive on the top - 1
To
Bottom: Less intelligent and productive on the bottom - 7
1. Refuting the central point explicitly refutes the central point
2. Refutation finds the mistake and explains why its mistaken
3. Counter Argument Contradicts and then backs up contradiction with reasoning or supportive evidence.
4. Contradiction states the opposing case with little or no evidence.
5. Responding to Tone criticizes to the tone of the writing without attacking the substance of the argument
6. Ad Hominem attacks the characteristics or authority of the writer without addressing the substance of the argument.
7. Name calling You are a Dumbass
And why, because the know how to dogma not debate...
I debate with people worthy of it. You are a useless troll fucktard, fit only for ridicule.
You make no points, you take no viable position, and you are probably a basement dwelling retard. So I use you as a cat uses a mouse on a string, as a play-thing to amuse me.
Don't actually remember seeing much of that from you. Lots of partisan nah nah nah you fucking faggot though.Why is it that most republican replies fall between 5 and 7, the lowest forms of debate?
Grades of Debate
Top: More intelligent and productive on the top - 1
To
Bottom: Less intelligent and productive on the bottom - 7
1. Refuting the central point explicitly refutes the central point
2. Refutation finds the mistake and explains why its mistaken
3. Counter Argument Contradicts and then backs up contradiction with reasoning or supportive evidence.
4. Contradiction states the opposing case with little or no evidence.
5. Responding to Tone criticizes to the tone of the writing without attacking the substance of the argument
6. Ad Hominem attacks the characteristics or authority of the writer without addressing the substance of the argument.
7. Name calling You are a Dumbass
My debate style is a form of GIGO, garbage in, garbage out. When assholes like you start with shit-posts, I reply in kind. If you were to present something even close to a rational argument, something rational would be returned.
Don't actually remember seeing much of that from you. Lots of partisan nah nah nah you fucking faggot though.Why is it that most republican replies fall between 5 and 7, the lowest forms of debate?
Grades of Debate
Top: More intelligent and productive on the top - 1
To
Bottom: Less intelligent and productive on the bottom - 7
1. Refuting the central point explicitly refutes the central point
2. Refutation finds the mistake and explains why its mistaken
3. Counter Argument Contradicts and then backs up contradiction with reasoning or supportive evidence.
4. Contradiction states the opposing case with little or no evidence.
5. Responding to Tone criticizes to the tone of the writing without attacking the substance of the argument
6. Ad Hominem attacks the characteristics or authority of the writer without addressing the substance of the argument.
7. Name calling You are a Dumbass
My debate style is a form of GIGO, garbage in, garbage out. When assholes like you start with shit-posts, I reply in kind. If you were to present something even close to a rational argument, something rational would be returned.
Nice projection my little cat toy...Guess that would make faggot and dick jokes number 8.
And why, because the know how to dogma not debate...
I debate with people worthy of it. You are a useless troll fucktard, fit only for ridicule.
You make no points, you take no viable position, and you are probably a basement dwelling retard. So I use you as a cat uses a mouse on a string, as a play-thing to amuse me.
If you had read the thread you would have discovered that the DA is meeting with Perry's attorney today to discuss when he will turn himself in. You would also know that the charges are serious enough to convince the Grand Jury, but, you'll just ignore reality, as usual.Its not going to happen, if it was going to happen, it would have already.
Anyone involved in putting this before the grand jury should be brought before the Texas Bar and punished.
If he does have to surrender, he should go in with a smile on his face. Once this crap is thrown out, anyone involved in it should be sued for malicious prosecution, and never able to practice law again.
He did nothing wrong, and once that is shown, there should be repercussions for those people who wasted time and money on a political witch hunt.
He does have to surrender, and there's no witch-hunt as there's no reason for one. The Grand Jury heard the evidence and the testimony of his staff. Sorry, but they believe, as do I, that he broke the law. Time will tell...
I'll be honest I hope he is fucked! Just the fact that he vacationed at a place called N&#&rhead. And you can just look at that fucking retard and know he's corrupt. He is the perfect example of how we have greedy/ignorant politicians because we have a greedy/ignorant society. He is the best we have folks. Garbage in, garbage out.
Texas really is a shitty state.
Tell the grand jury that indicted him.
"oops"
But I disagree that it would have any bearing on the right's being willing to vote for him.
Hell, he's a blithering idiot but that didn't even slow them down.
If a right wing candidate got out of jail the day before the polls opened, some RWs would vote for him.
Hey, retardo boy, check out Texass' statistics.
Getting indicted by a grand jury always enhances a politicians standing.
